Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion WesternAnimation / Futurama

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
Mukora Uniocular Since: Jan, 2010
Uniocular
Jun 7th 2010 at 2:06:35 PM •••

Why does the page say the new season is airing on June tenth? Every preview I've seen says it's on the twenty-fourth.

"It's so hard to be humble, knowing how great I am." Hide / Show Replies
SpaceCaptainX Since: Apr, 2015
Jun 24th 2015 at 1:52:54 PM •••

Doesn't matter, it's gone now.

What time is it? Adventure- Oh wait 5:30.
Nithael Since: Jan, 2001
Jun 24th 2015 at 3:24:50 PM •••

Thank you, I'm sure Mukora was still waiting for an answer to that question five years later.

Fangusu Since: Jan, 2015
Jan 18th 2015 at 10:58:16 AM •••

Do you any of you guys think there are any Complete Monster candidates from Futurama?

Edited by Fangusu
EchoingSilence Since: Jun, 2013
Sep 18th 2013 at 9:36:29 AM •••

Is it wrong of me to think that "A taste of freedom" Has a Accidental Aesop in it of, "Just because you are a minority does not give you the moral high ground to turn around and start treating other people like shit" or alternatively "Revenge continues a cycle of hate" or something like that. Any thoughts?

Gatchaman432 Warper of Minds Since: Jul, 2011
Warper of Minds
Sep 25th 2011 at 9:43:08 AM •••

Would the episodes Anthology of Interest Parts I and II, Reincarnation, and Holiday Spectacular be examples of episodes that have an Alternate Universe take on the Futurama continuity?

Okay, who's been messing around with my brain? Hide / Show Replies
Camacan MOD Since: Jan, 2001
Jul 6th 2011 at 11:51:46 PM •••

Under Chekhov's Armoury: this one will need more details when it is moved back to main: how do the ashes get spilt or otherwise inappropriately disposed of? Do ashes get spilt? If not, not an example.

  • Ashes to Crashes: All of Fry's friends and relatives from the twenty-first century are dead. That still doesn't stop them being important in certain episodes and plot arcs. Prime example? His dog.

Edited by Camacan
SirChazbot Mr. Since: Oct, 2010
Mr.
Jun 26th 2011 at 10:18:16 PM •••

Anvilicious? I think the case can be made that, especially the new series, has had enough Green Aesops to qualify. It should absolutely be justified with a 'Some Anvils Need to be Dropped' note, but I still think it should be on there. Agree? Disagree? Ferret?

divinecloudburst Since: Dec, 1969
Mar 17th 2011 at 11:12:23 PM •••

The "funny" use of "Good news, everyone!" at every possible point in the article really doesn't add anything. It's close to being an in-site verbal tic, actually.

Hide / Show Replies
MrDeath Since: Aug, 2009
Mar 18th 2011 at 7:17:47 AM •••

Two instances is "every possible point in the article"?

divinecloudburst Since: Dec, 1969
Mar 22nd 2011 at 4:59:11 AM •••

The point stands. Verbal tics don't belong in articles.

MrDeath Since: Aug, 2009
Mar 22nd 2011 at 10:11:52 AM •••

It's not a Verbal Tic, it's a running gag that's repeatedly used on the show. If there's anywhere at all that a "Good News Everyone!" meme oughta go, it's on the show that it comes from.

divinecloudburst Since: Dec, 1969
MrDeath Since: Aug, 2009
Mar 23rd 2011 at 8:02:00 AM •••

"Need" has nothing to do with this. It doesn't "need" to go anywhere. For that matter, nobody really "needs" to know what tropes are used in Futurama at all, so should we just blank the page because it's not "needed"?

Likewise, there's no "need" to take it off the page, just that you, and you alone, don't seem to want it there.

Edited by MrDeath
divinecloudburst Since: Dec, 1969
Mar 25th 2011 at 1:38:19 AM •••

If you really want to argue semantics, we don't "need" tvtropes at all :)

btw according to the edit history, you yourself conceded they were "verbal tics", just as you alone seem to want them there :)

MrDeath Since: Aug, 2009
Mar 25th 2011 at 8:24:30 AM •••

Yes, that's the point I was trying to make. Saying "we don't need it" on its own has zero value in this discussion.

As for the second point, I was simply mirroring your own edit reason.

And "you alone seem to want them there" is patently false based on one simple fact: I didn't put them there in the first place. Ergo, at least one other troper (the one(s) who put them there) wanted them there.

Furthermore, everyone else who came by the page to edit it, including the half-dozen or so since I put them back, left them right where they were, so it seems you're the only one who actively wants them off the page.

divinecloudburst Since: Dec, 1969
Mar 25th 2011 at 3:25:13 PM •••

If your words are no more than smoke and mirrors, then I see little point in discussing this further.


(On the other hand, you *are* alone in "actively" (to use your phrasing) trying to replace the tics now, especially if we assume, using your reasoning, that the editors between my edit and your yours agree with and support its removal.)

cathstuart Since: Aug, 2009
Mar 25th 2011 at 10:49:12 PM •••

Good news everyone! Everyone wants it to stay there!

divinecloudburst Since: Dec, 1969
Mar 26th 2011 at 5:37:00 AM •••

Haha, stay cool. I was only trying to improve the page. In my personal opinion, the proliferation of in-jokey memes makes us increasingly like 4chan or encyclopedia dramatica. But if people 'round here want to keep the jokes, I have no problem with that. No hard feelings all, and happy troping everyone!

Edited by divinecloudburst
MrDeath Since: Aug, 2009
Mar 28th 2011 at 11:09:17 AM •••

Smoke and mirrors? I think you've mistaken my meaning. By "mirroring" your edit reason I meant I was just reusing your words in a clever (if, admittedly, passive aggressive) way.

As for me being "alone" in actively replacing them, there was only two days between your edits and mine, while the Good News Everyone!'s had been there for several months or longer, and it's been over two weeks since I put them back on.

Or, to put it another way, it took four editors before someone (me) put them back, while well over a dozen editors later they're still on there, and probably hundreds left them there before you edited the page.

Heck, the other editors may not have even noticed they were gone—not everyone checks the full page history before they edit. I've seen times where tropers are apparently unaware the page history even exists. Many just pop on the page, head right to the trope they want to edit, save, and move on, whereas I'm a little obsessive about checking the page histories on shows/tropes I follow, so I tend to notice changes like this more readily.

divinecloudburst Since: Dec, 1969
Apr 1st 2011 at 10:58:12 PM •••

Actually you mistook mine. The phrasing was deliberate.

Thank you for admitting to being passive aggressive. It wasn't the best way to engage in a discussion, but that's water under the bridge.

Peteman Since: Jan, 2001
Jun 26th 2010 at 7:52:36 AM •••

Is Fry and Leela an Interspecies Romance? Leela is human, albeit a mutated one.

Hide / Show Replies
ArcVaranus Since: Dec, 2009
Jul 10th 2010 at 2:05:07 PM •••

Nah. There's people born with extra fingers and toes, or without limbs. It's a strange mutation, but doesn't make them different species or anything. After all, everyone has a little mutation that makes them distinct from one another- it's what makes one person look different from the next. Leela's eye is a rather big deviance, but it's just a mutation in the end.

NothingButJeans Since: Mar, 2011
Mar 13th 2011 at 12:38:39 AM •••

However, the show does cross over into Interspecies Romance territory quite often. My question is, when Fry was in Zoidberg's body and Leela in Farnsworth's, was THAT Interspecies Romance?

Don't you know?
94.9.133.108 Since: Dec, 1969
Jul 21st 2010 at 5:43:22 PM •••

Could someone go into more detail as to why the movies are considered Seasonal Rot?

Top