Soooo... why are there tropes for Obama?
We don't trope real-life people. As far as I know, a Useful Notes page can have tropes that apply to fictional portrayals of a real person in works, but not troping his life like he's a work.
They've been here since the page was locked which implicitly tells me that the mods didn't think anything was wrong with them.
Edited by Larkmarn Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them. Hide / Show RepliesWe do trope real life people, just most of them are creators.
doin' a thingThe Biographical film was a joke for the white house correspondents dinner. It is irresponsible having it in the article.
Hide / Show RepliesHuh? Why is it a bad thing to have it here?
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanWasn't the Spielberg's Obama clearly a joke? That info on the page shouldn't be there considering it's never been followed up and it was clear in the video it was a joke
Power of Thor!Removed this example, because it's not a trope. Is there a better place?
- Grammy Award: Two. Best Spoken Word Album, for the audiobooks of Dreams from My Father (2006) and The Audacity of Hope (2008).
I think we should add a few items to Self-Deprecation and a couple of others to reflect his appearance as guest co-host of the Colbert Report, especially during The Decree.
Qui odoratus est qui fecit. Hide / Show RepliesMight want to propose it here.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanCan we create a Quotes page for President Obama again since the 2014 election is behind us now?
Hide / Show RepliesNo, because these elections haven't resolved any of the political animosities.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanObama's election to the U.S. Senate
It's mentioned in a couple of the tropes, so some detail might be useful.
Jack Ryan was Obama's first Republican opponent. Ryan, then Illinois Attorney General, had a problem with his name. The Governor was George Ryan — no relation to Jack — who was tied up in a nasty corruption scandal at that time (and recently got out of the Federal Pen at Terre Haute). Incidentally, it's a long story, but Ryan's corruption can be directly tied to the deaths of six children. Anyway, there were undoubtedly people who confused the two Ryans.
However, Ryan's real problem stemmed from his messy divorce from actress Jeri Ryan (who is best remembered for playing Seven of Nine in Star Trek: Voyager. The couple asked to have the divorce records sealed, but during the Senate campaign, the <I>Chicago Tribune</I> and the ABC television affiliate in Chicago petitioned the court to have the records unsealed. While this was going on, the heads of the Illinois Republican Party asked Ryan if there was anything damaging in the records. Ryan said that there wasn't.
Well, the records were unsealed, and there were allegations from Jeri accusing her ex-husband of taking her to sex clubs and trying to pressure her into having sex in front of others. Ryan's lie about the records infuriated the Republican leadership, especially Judy Barr Topinka (the head of the party in Illinois) and then-US House of Representatives Speaker Dennis Hastert. If they had known what was in the records, they could have easily spun it as the wild accusations of an aggrieved ex-wife; but Ryan's lie was unforgivable.
Ryan dropped out of the race under pressure from the party, and then the party scrambled to find a replacement. They had a number of problems:
• The Illinois Republican Party is split fairly evenly into two factions. There are the extreme conservatives, led (more-or-less) by Jim Oberweis; and the moderately conservative, led at that time by Topinka. Oberweis, who had finished second in the Republican primary to Ryan, wanted the job, but Topinka, who loathes Oberweis, vetoed it. The party leadership agreed that Oberweis had not a prayer of winning. Oberweis had also been fined by the Federal Election Commission for appearing in commercials for his company, Oberweis Dairies, during the primary campaign. (Topinka had some interest in running herself, but Oberweis, who loves Topinka as much as she loves him, killed that.)
• Two men who would be obvious candidates, former Governors Jim Thompson and Jim Edgar, each of whom was reasonably popular (especially Thompson), both said they would not run. Various others were approached, including former Chicago Bears coach Mike Ditka, but either they turned it down or they were not seen as viable candidates. One leading possibility, Orion Samuelson, turned it down because (1) he was recovering from recent major surgery, (2) his wife was not keen on the idea and (3) he had no money.
Ryan quit the race at the end of June 2004, and the Republicans went all through July without a candidate, leaving Obama to campaign unopposed for over a month.
Finally, at the beginning of August, Alan Keyes became the candidate for reasons that are unclear. (See http://www.gibbsmagazine.com/Alan%20Keyes%20to%20run.htm for a typical reaction to Keyes' entrance into the race.)
Keyes lives in Maryland, and had no actual connections to Illinois. It did not help that in 2000, Keyes attacked Hillary Clinton for running for US Senator from New York even though she had never lived there, calling her a carpetbagger. So, of course, he was asked how his running for the Senate in Illinois differed from Clinton's running for the Senate. He did not have an answer.
Keyes did not run a good race. He egregiously misstated Obama's stand on abortion, saying that Obama's support of abortion extended to support of infanticide. Almost no one believed it, and the Democrats legitimately said that he was lying about it, which people did believe.
In a debate with Obama that covered gay marriage and gay adoption, Keyes said that because of sperm donor anonymity, a hypothetical lesbian couple could adopt a child who would be unable to determine who his or her father is and therefore would be put at risk of marrying a sister or brother. Of course, this argument could be made about all pregnancies with anonymous sperm donors.
Keyes came off as a homophobe, defining homosexuality as centered in "selfish hedonism". When asked if Mary Cheney, Dick Cheney's lesbian daughter, fit the description and was therefore a "selfish hedonist", Keyes replied, "Of course she is. That goes by definition." He said "granting homosexuals the right to marry is like granting plantation owners the right to own slaves".
Keyes also got little support for his remark that "Jesus Christ would not vote for Obama", especially since it gave Obama to make an excellent speech about the place of freedom of religion in American politics.
The bottom line was that Obama got 70% of the vote and Keyes went home to Maryland.
Hide / Show RepliesShould it be mentioned that Obama is a member of the United Church of Christ, to dispel the rumours about him being a Communist/Muslim?
I just pulled this entry from the page:
It's ZCE and I think we ought to keep the page about media appearances and the like, not necessarily day-to-day politics.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanThe "Obama Curse" seems more fitting as an example of Madden Curse instead of Touch of Death as it's currently listed: something being mentioned by someone famous, and then suffers misfortune.
Someone should add how Bush and Obama are present in My Name Is Khan, going so far as "Obama" adressing directly main character.
Okay, so I see Barack has his fair share of fangirls (and possibly fanboys as well), since this page seems to praise him to the point where you can almost here the Squee in the editor's tone. I understand that politics is prime Flame Bait, but it seems very unreasonable to just shoot down every negative comment (no matter how legitimate) there is to make about him. Not even a YMMV tab to admit he's a Base Breaker or walking Flame Bait in his own right. No need to call him The Scrappy though (as noted in the aforementioned fanbase, he clearly isn't), but still; judging by the comments above me, it seems we could do well to unlock this page and really do some work on it.
Hide / Show RepliesBecause all politicians are Base Breakers and Flame Bait depending on your point of view, so why does that even need to be said? Just to tell other people you don't like him? I don't like many politicans with their own pages here, but I don't bother pointing out that they're base breakers or flame bait for me because that's apparent and redundant. Besides, I've noticed that people sneak those tropes in pretending to be "just pointing it out," then sneak in an explanation about why, then someone sneaks in natter about how one may have a point (all while pretending to still be neutral).
Yeah, that avatar's a 'Shop of my real face.This page is utter gushing over him. That's not a good idea considering how Flame Bait the target is.
He who has a why to live can bear almost any how -Neitzsche (I know)For all his unpopularity, George W Bush's page remains pretty positive overall. I like it that way. If we want to talk about Obama being flame bait and a base breaker, we'll have to do likewise for Bush (and plenty of other popular/unpopular politicians). Tvtropes is just about the last page I can go to that can talk about political leaders without descending into yet another partisan bitchslapfest. I hope we all want to keep it that way.
I don't know if 'bitchslapfest' is a real word. But it is from now on, because I'm using it. I think I'll start tonight. Thanks, iwishihad2000feet!
George W Bush's page doesn't portray him very positively, it has him listed as Butt Monkey, has a bunch of references to his torture policies (Enhanced Interrogation techniques, Insistent Terminology, Kill It With Water) and then there's Nice Job Breaking It Hero and some of the stuff in his description. Don't get me wrong I dislike both but while on Bush's page you get reminders of his torture policies and his perceived incompetence the worst you see on Obama's page has to do with him being too compromising, I think it should have some more sanely critical tropes listed, especially with knowledge of things like his war on whistleblowers and the details of his drone strike policy comes to more light, I understand not wanting to make it into a political debate but that doesn't mean hardly put a critical thing about him, we should strive for more honesty and balance don't you think?
I know it's locked because of bias potential and all that, but maybe we want to mention his re election in 2012?
Hide / Show RepliesSomeone needs to add that Obama is now being played by fully-black Jay Pharoah on SNL.
Hey, I just saw an article in Washington Post about Obama's road to victory this year. Here's the link of you want to check: Basically, Obama just steamrolled Romney (their word, not mine) until Romney beat him majorly in the first debate. That evened the whole game until the election. Now, here's the catch: Obama's aides had been urging him to practice his debate, knowing that Romney would put all his remaining cards in the first debate. However, Obama was so (in hindsight, over-) confident that debate wouldn't have mattered with his lead, so he didn't take the lesson seriously. And then we know what happened afterward.
Here's the thing: is this Cassandra Truth or Break the Haughty?
Can someone please add to either the Black and Nerdy or One Of Us pages that he's apparently a fan of Mean Girls if this is any indication:
Dinner tables are for eating, not conversation. Hide / Show RepliesAhh, I only posted a link to the image. How about now?◊
Dinner tables are for eating, not conversation.Go to this thread for edit requests. I've made this one for you.
That was the amazing part. Things just keep going.can i please add "he's also a lefty" under the southpaw entry?
Hide / Show RepliesYes, but you need to ask in the forums, dude. There is a thread in FAQ. Linked from Locked Pages.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanIs there really a compelling reason to have examples on a page like this? I'm hardly the guy's biggest fan (or biggest enemy - more like ambivalent), but even I can see the problems this leads to. And judging by the edit history and state of the page as it is now, it looks like they're more than active.
...in fact, taking one look at the page for George W Bush, there's no precedent for having examples of tropes. Despite Bush being just as polarizing as Obama, there is no list of tropes he inspired, merely works of fiction. In light of that, I find no reason for the page to have any trope examples at all. Obama's not that special.
Edited by Rebochan Hide / Show RepliesBut some of them are really interesting...
I suppose we could move towards sending the examples to the tropes he's an example of, rather than listing them on the actual Barack Obama page. But we've got to keep the stuff about geeky Obama somewhere. We've just got to.
What really bugs me is that we have trope examples for Clinton, and Obama, but none for George W Bush, with a Cautious Editing tag on him. It just strikes me as REALLY unfair.
Modified that "tag" on the Bush article. The article has trope examples.
Edited by FastEddie Goal: Clear, Concise and WittyI think this is a good idea. Clearly the moderators can't handle the edits to the real life section for Barack Obama. Why not just take the real life sections down for each President, tell tropers to go someplace else for real life examples, and only include examples in fiction?
If you really must, wouldn't it be more appropriate to stuff them in a YMMV page instead?
It's less a case of being unable to handle it and more a case of the possibility such comments offending people. You would think him announcing the death of Osama Bin Laden would be up there, but oh nos, someone from Al Qaeda might read it and suicide bomb the TV Tropes servers.
We tend to be rather careful about adding tropes for real life people.
Meh, I thought it was funny going from the Bush page to the Obama page just now... Bush's reflects that he had low approval ratings by the end (but throws in some YMMV about how some people still liked him/didn't HATE him). Obama's reflects the perception of Obama right after getting elected. It doesn't reflect that his approval ratings are also now down below 50, that many of his original fans (myself included, and for the record, I'm basically a weird mix of libertarian and liberal... I know, its confusing.... but I'm not really devoted to one party or the other in an inherent way) have become disillusioned by his actions (never closing gitmo, health care wasn't the socialist system we wanted, it ended up corporatist instead, no end to bush tax cuts, gave in on the debt ceilling thing, and so on... basically he hasn't done anything we thought he promised), and/or that he might be seen as a 'broken idealist' in that now HE is, in response to complaints, telling people to 'stop whining' because you can't always get what you want... which is at least pragmatic, not idealist.
Basically, regardless of whether you personally like him (just like Bush), things are not going very well, even if its not really his fault in your mind. The current rule that its not okay to post anything bad about Obama's presidency (percieved or otherwise) without saying only 'nuts' think that basically breaks the rules of cautious editing, as
"Let's be bad guys." -Serenity (Jayne) I'd rather be free than safe.Basically: Its equally 'offensive' to be totally one sided in our coverage of any person, arguably more so.
Due to actual facts that can be proven (Obama got so and so approval rating for this thing amongst his original supporters in this poll), it is NOT flame bait to mention that Obama isn't the glorious leader portrayed in the current page... its actually flame bait to instead constantly be deleting those legitimate posts and replace them with more "And he's so smart! And funny! People love him!" posts. I think he's smart too, but what are the polls saying? Thats what shapes his tropes, as a 'performer.' If a performer has a broken base, put it on the page. Obama has a broken base. You do the math.
"Let's be bad guys." -Serenity (Jayne) I'd rather be free than safe.If you are referring to the What the Hell, Hero? trope that kept being added and deleted then I believe this is a legitimate trope that if only for the sake of fairness should be added, or adopt a completely neutral stance and delete praising tropes.
If this is not the example you are referring to then please point out what you are talking about.
Thats the one. Broken Base could also be appropriate. The actual tropes attached to the situation don't matter that much, just that the situation is represented.
However, I actually think going entirely neutral might be best... but it also goes against the whole point of T Vtropes, in some ways, so perhaps moving all pro/anti obama tropes (a good number of them) into a YMMV section that is essentially unregulated while leaving the main page free of bias would be best.... it could keep stuff that are more about his presidency (perhaps like Both Sides Have A Point, regarding his statements in his books) and universal perceptions (that is, republicans, democrats, and everyone else agree that during the election there was worry that he was Not Too Black... so that trope could stay in that context) , while all praise and complaints could go into YMMV....
"Let's be bad guys." -Serenity (Jayne) I'd rather be free than safe.Seriously, why the hell is there no YMMV page for this guy? I think it can be safely admitted that he's definitely a Base Breaker in some cases, so it's far worse to just allow a page only for gushing about how smart/funny/sexy/whatever he is and cut any instance that risks to imply something bad about him.
Again, because the last time there were people who kept using it as a way to sneak in comments about how they hate him or how some conspiracy theories of how evil he is "may have a point" while pretending to be just saying. Personally, I think all politician pages should be example-wiped now if all they're going to inspire is that and complaining about how you're not allowed to complain.
Edited by Malchus Yeah, that avatar's a 'Shop of my real face.Honestly, Five-Man Band?
This trope is much abused on too many pages; is there really a good justification for it to be here?
Hide / Show RepliesI agree, it doesn't fit. Seven isn't five. It should either be taken out or had the extra lancers removed.
Edited by TheoGrenThe second entry in Embarrassing Middle Name seems to belong to a different trope.
Edited by Eagal You fell victim to one of the classic blunders! Hide / Show RepliesAlso, I don't think having a name that could be rendered Irishesque by the addition of an apostrophe counts as Names The Same.
You fell victim to one of the classic blunders!I'm going to make another call to unlock this to new edits. What we've got right now is a fossil page from January 2008 which is increasingly inaccurate for how Obama is perceived and depicted.
Hide / Show RepliesI agree with this. I don't see another politician page that's edit locked, even likely targets such as Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin or George W Bush (who is not yet under the politicians index). The assumption that it will descend into Flame War due to being for a political figure does not appear to be supported. Inertia isn't a good reason.
I rarely visit the forums to avoid the cynicism ooze.I agree with this. I don't see another politician page that's edit locked, even likely targets such as Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin or George W Bush (who is not yet under the politicians index). The assumption that it will descend into Flame War due to being for a political figure does not appear to be supported. Inertia isn't a good reason.
I rarely visit the forums to avoid the cynicism ooze.The spoiler in the Cold Case entry should be nixed, as it's irrelevant to the entry.
I rarely visit the forums to avoid the cynicism ooze.Black and Nerdy: Add recent photo op with Nichelle Nichols. Catch Phrase: Add "Fire It Up". Conspiracy Theory: Add that Cleveland was not only elected President while holding dual citizenship, but he even did it twice. Curb-Stomp Battle: Change "suggested why" to "suggested this is why". Deadpan Snarker: Add "Brush that dirt off my shoulder" visual snark from 2008. Also add his mortgage relief press conference on Super Tuesday 2012, stealing fire from the hotly contested Republican primaries/caucuses. Five-Man Band: Biden doubles as a lancer, too; pre-office, he had a reputation for snark that makes Obama's look like a Sesame Street bit. (And wouldn't Hillary be The Chick?) Is This Thing Still On: Add recent overheard Israel/Iran strategy gaffe.
Hide / Show Repliesfor the "wrong sylLAble" trope, change the correct pronunciation to "ba-ROCK" and note that on Top Gear, Jeremy Clarkson mispronounced his first name as rhyming with Mac (and said the surname first).
Hide / Show Replies- AcCENT Upon The Wrong SylLAble: Jon Stewart will occasionally pronounce the President's name flatly as "Barreck Obbamuh" instead of "Ba-RACK O-Bama", usually if he's done (or not done) something particularly galling. British media sometimes mangles the pronunciation by accident ("Barreck Obamurr"), with Doctor Who being the obvious example on this wiki.
This is always going to be tricky, given that we're talking about different accents and can't really break out the IPA. I'll let an American edit the American pronunciations, but for the British it's either "BA-ruck" (like the word 'barrack') or "buh-RACK uh-BAH-muh".
Edited by johnnyeOn the subject of American pronunciations, I'm positive his last name is pronounced "oh-BAH-muh" by most Americans, with the "oh" sound sounding like the "oh" sound in "toaster." I've never heard anyone pronounce the first syllable as "uh."
Edited by GastonRabbit Patiently awaiting the release of Paper Luigi and the Marvelous Compass.How come...
- 1.) The last 20 edits on this History page are all done by a mod?
- 2.) It's locked?
Need to change the Royal Canadian Air Farce wick. It is not filed here under the Series/ tag.
These entries have to be expanded according to How To Write An Example:
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanAnother example for Black and Nerdy: He follows Aperture Science on Twitter.
I want to add a little correction. The article says Barack also means "blessed" in Hebrew. While that's certainly a beautiful meaning, it's not a Hebrew one in this case. Barack is actually an Arabic name, باراك Bārāk, meaning "blessed". It does have a Hebrew cognate name, but that's ברוך "Baruch". In Hebrew, ברק "Barak" means something different entirely — "lightning".
I wanted to add:
- Sham Ceremony: Averted. His swearing in was slightly off due to the Chief Justice screwing it up, so they redid it later to prevent nuts from claiming he wasn't president.
But this is locked. Any chance this can be added?
Hide / Show RepliesOver a year late, but there is this thread for that. I will ask.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanCould we get an explanation for this being deleted please?
Hide / Show RepliesA note from admin about examples: Barack Obama as a modern politician is noteworthy to this site as a performer. He uses rhetorical techniques to obtain a specific outcome. That's storytelling. The examples here are of the guy's techniques, and how he is used in media, not about your political opinions. No subjective tropes or "audience reaction" tropes are wanted here. Recall the Rule of Cautious Editing Judgment. [italicized bolding mine]
Edited by Malchus Yeah, that avatar's a 'Shop of my real face.I edited the quote back without the subjective tags, as I believe we should not bow down to terrorists and lie by omitting it.
Crowning Moment Of Awesome would explicitly give him the credit for this, which would be high-grade Flame Bait as far as I can guess.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman"Won the Nobel Peace Prize on October 9, 2009" Should be "Was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize". This isn't the Stanley Cup. You don't "win" it.
"that lead many to feel he was not taking the idea seriously" Should be "that led".
"Somewhat softened, in that he has now ordered federal prosecutors not to go after" Should be "has now ordered federal prosecutors to not go after".
Hide / Show RepliesThis is a wiki. You can edit it yourself, so go right ahead.
D'oh, nevermind. Forgot this was locked. My bad.
Edited by MrDeathAny word on when this page may be unlocked? Are we waiting for specific tropers to go away or are we waiting for Barack Obama to stop being a divisive political figure?
See you in the discussion pages.Really, there's a lot more work to be done, if only because none of the last 9 months of events, whether it's the oil spill or health care or financial reform, are mentioned in the intro. Someone suggested nixing the trope examples above: I could support that, with the more useful stuff (eg. One Of Us) being integrated into the intro. Is it possible to unlock it just for known tropers so this could be done?
Edited by Westrim I rarely visit the forums to avoid the cynicism ooze.Really, there's a lot more work to be done, if only because none of the last 9 months of events, whether it's the oil spill or health care or financial reform, are mentioned in the intro. Someone suggested nixing the trope examples above: I could support that, with the more useful stuff (eg. One Of Us) being integrated into the intro. Is it possible to unlock it just for known tropers so this could be done?
Edited by Westrim I rarely visit the forums to avoid the cynicism ooze.@Some Guy: The page will probably be unlocked when the 2012 elections are over. It was locked due to getting political heat, after all, and the GW Bush page isn't locked. @Westrim: That sounds very Flame Bait-y to me. Never mind that Known tropers might start the same trouble as unknown ones could.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanIs Obama a case of "But not too White"? I mean the fact that he is mixed race rather than blacks seems to get ignored quite a lot, especially on the lead up to the election.
Example of Crowd Chant: During Barack Obama's U.S. presidential campaign, his supporters would often chant, "Yes We Can!"
I'm guessing...no. It seems like the issue is considered too much of a Flame Bait.
But the article's constant gushing over him and attacking anyone who may have a problem with him as 'nuts' isn't Flame Bait?
The page is locked? And yet it still has all these tropes painting him as this saintly figure. Not really NPOV, you know. And a bunch of Take That, Critics! on the page, too. It's Flame Bait for sure, but almost nobody can do anything about it.
Hide / Show RepliesThe page is locked, but is it possible that we could add that Obama has a doppelganger in the form of comedian Reggie Brown?
May I suggest an edit?
When the page was unlocked, I added under "Fan Disillusionment" that Progressives were unhappy with the healthcare reforms and considered them Corporatism. I'd like to add that libertarians (ideologically speaking, not just members of the Libertarian Party) were also unhappy with the outcome of the healthcare reforms for exactly the same reason (i.e. that the bill was Corporatist).
I am a libertarian but this isn't a biased edit. There is nothing "wrong" or "good" with the fact that at times, libertarians and progressives agree on some issues. Also, some libertarians voted for Obama simply to avoid the possibility of President Palin (cue shuddering), which would technically make them count as "fans" for the purposes of this trope.
All I ask is for the final text under "Fan Disillusionment" where it reads:
- The outcome of the healthcare reform bill (see "Golden Mean Fallacy" below) caused a significant level of this amongst the more hardcore progressives; they expected a much more government-oriented bill and considered the final outcome (and specifically the mandate that each individual purchase health insurance) to be absolute Corporatism.
to read:
- The outcome of the healthcare reform bill (see "Golden Mean Fallacy" below) caused a significant level of this amongst the more hardcore progressives; they expected a much more government-oriented bill and considered the final outcome (and specifically the mandate that each individual purchase health insurance) to be absolute Corporatism (a criticism that many libertarians concurred with).
I don't know — I wouldn't think most libertarians were ever big fans, so it doesn't seem like it'd match the trope.
Considering how low he's currently dropped in popularity points among registered democratic voters, and the sheer number of articles discussing the disillusionment of his former enthusiasts, I'd argue that this would be a clue that perhaps some former/current fans believe the President's public policies didn't quite live up to their expectations. Poor guy…
Edited out the reference to his being the first son of a non-native-born citizen to be President, because Chester Arthur's father was Irish.
Hide / Show RepliesAlso, most of the foundingi fathers were sons of non-native-born citizens. Hell, most of them weren't born in the US either since it didn't exist until they were old men.
Edited out the reference to his being the first son of a non-native-born citizen to be President, because Chester Arthur's father was Irish.
-Barack means "blessed" in his father's native language (Kiswahili, aka Swahili). It sounds the same as the Hebrew word for lightning, but that's just a coincidence.
- Barack means "blessed" in his father's native language (Kiswahili, aka Swahili). This is akin to the Hebrew name Baruch, also meaning "blessed". It sounds the same as the Hebrew word for lightning, but that's just a coincidence.
actually, BRK, which is Ancient Hebrew (and pronounced "Barak." There are no vowels, hurray for fun translating) has a slightly different meaning. It means both "Bless" and "Curse." An example of it used both ways is in the book of Job. A translator would have to guess which was the intent of the writer based on context.
Actually, wrong. Barak is lightning. BRKH (pronounced Barekh) is the imperative 'bless'. The reason for BRKH used as 'curse' in the book of Job is because of the Tiqqun soferim - Chazal deemed that it is blasphemous (or something similar) to put God's name near the word 'curse' so it was changed to 'bless'.
The voice of thy brother's blood crieth unto me from the groundPurely out of curiousity and not wanting to unwittingly start an edit war - why is there an entry for The Chamberlain?
Hide / Show RepliesBecause someone chose to ignore the Rule Of Cautious Editing Judgment, thinking he/she was being clever. It managed to avoid notice by being nestled between the more noticeable entries for Catchphrase and Conspiracy Theorist.
But now, REDACTED.
Edited by Malchus Yeah, that avatar's a 'Shop of my real face.Just in case it wasn't obvious, I just went on an editing spree to remove a few lingering subjective tropes as per the standard conventions. The admin note dealy-jigger may have had something to do with it as well. :P
Although I do wonder if a YMMV page is in order...
Edited by Anaheyla This is still a signature. Hide / Show RepliesP.S. Elaboration is needed for the status of Hot Consort. To what does this refer?
This is still a signature.Moving a disputed example here and notifying moderator to keep an eye on it.
Barack Obama: Although Obama is often depicted as a departure from the WASP as president norm, one can also characterize him as an extension of the trope. Obama is half-White, half Anglo-Saxon, and a Protestant. Hence, one could argue that he is two thirds WASP.
Hide / Show RepliesThe open Repair Shop topic is all over these edits. EVERYBODY is in agreement that Barack Obama is not a WASP.
Note from edit history: "...since you feel so strongly about this, why don't you simply edit in a rejoinder to my entry? That way, we both have our say, and we can stop this pointless edit war..."
That is not how it works. A "rejoinder" is natter. No conversations in the main page. This is how it works: bring the dispute to the discussion page.
Also note that the person that said that is banned (for other actions).
Edited by rodneyAnonymous Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.Follow Sean Murray I's link.
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.EDIT: Never mind, I'm letting blackcat's post deal with this.
Edited by KillerClowns- "Yes We Can" backwards is "Hail Satan!" Ignoring the fact that the number of syllables are different...
This needs to be corrected. By putting something so glaring wrong, whoever wrote that discredits any further points they make. And their point is, in fact, legitimate.
(I hope).
Hide / Show RepliesCitation needed. I'm not going to say no-one does, but it seems unlikely. HAY-yul?
You might be thinking that it's a diphthong - the two vowel sound run together - but it's only one syllable.
As I've made overtures as to how this description could be improved, I've taken a shot at putting it more in line with the "politician as performer" idea mentioned in the admin note and I think well-demonstrated in the Sarah Palin article.
Edit it as you like if you feel this was an unhelpful change. And, um, apologies to Fast Eddie if it turns out modifying the admin message was an unforgivable crime. If that's the case I'd prefer my lumps with sugar, if possible.
Edited by SomeGuy See you in the discussion pages. Hide / Show RepliesWhat was so wrong with the paragraph about the Nobel Peace Prize that it had to be removed entirely?
In fact, a lot general, impartial information about Obama's political background and election has been removed, too (including the fact that he's the first black president, which many would say is a BIG FUCKING DEAL). What gives?
Edited by SeanMurrayIAll right, I think a more detailed explanation is warranted.
We are not The Other Wiki. This isn't true just in terms of There Is No Such Thing As Notability, but also of general form. Stuff like Obama winning the Nobel Prize, the specifics of the elections he was involved in and his political background, this is all stuff we can get on Wikipedia, and probably with better citations to boot. By contrast, someone on the TV Tropes wiki goes to pages expecting analysis of tropes in media, which I've tried to outline to the best of my ability by emphasizing the image Obama conveys to the country, and keeping the page from getting too long by consequently cutting off the more dry, encyclopedic information.
In other words facts, impartial though they may be, are irrelevant to us if they don't impact Obama's public image, and they should be related to his image as such if they're going to be in the description. At least, that's my opinion- if you strongly and reasonably disagree, by all means revert the parts of the description you wish. I acknowledge that my rewrite was a bit of a departure and may have been a bit much given the page was only recently unlocked.
Edited by SomeGuy See you in the discussion pages.Even those don't matter much. The entirety of the description could be "Forty-fourth President of the United States. Provides examples of:..."
People looking for encyclopedia entries about the guy have other resources.
Edited by FastEddie Goal: Clear, Concise and WittyStill, I think it warrants mention that Obama's the first black president. No matter what the history books might say about him, that bit is always going to be a very prominent and identifiable fact about the guy.
Edited by SeanMurrayIAnd, for better or for worse, reactions to that fact are the basis in some form of a lot of what is said about him in less political issue driven media.
Just to stick my nose into the current edit war, yes, a threat sent to the president should be taken seriously. It should certainly be investigated and looked into.
But if it's found that it was made by a drunken teenager who, you know, was drunk and not really a threat, banning him from the country for life is a bit harsh. He's a teenager who did something stupid when he was drunk, not a terrorist/communist/ninja operative plotting to kill/kidnap the president.
Hide / Show RepliesBe that as it may, we should emphasize Rule Of Cautious Editing Judgment. An event like this has little to do with Obama and everything to do with the President of the United States, and including it reeks of politicization.
See you in the discussion pages.I edited details about Obama's name. I only know a bit of Hebrew, but if Barack means blessing in Swahili, then Swahili must share some words with Hebrew (or perhaps Hebrew and Arabic share the word and and Swahili got it from Arabic- I'm really curious). Baruch means blessed in Hebrew, and I can tell that it's the same root for Obama's first name.
I think that I explained accurately why his name wouldn't mean lightening.
Edit- I answered my own question- found info here. It is from Arabic, and the example they give is like the Egyptian leader Mubaarak. Kind of interestingly that Barack and his father spell their names more like a Hebrew transliteration than an Arabic one.
Edited by Jordan HodorTo whosoever it may concern, the Repair Shop discussion is about the possibility of unlocking this page. I'd suggest making your opinion known if you ever want to edit in within the next few years.
See you in the discussion pages. Hide / Show RepliesGood news- you may have noticed that the lock has been lifted. Let's all keep a careful eye on this page so the admins have no cause to re-instate it.
See you in the discussion pages.Very minor, but his daughter's name is spelled "Malia," not "Milia." (In "Overprotective Dad.")
That portal part of the "Black and Nerdy, One of Us" trope is fake, if one would read the comments on the page of the picture.
I think werdnak noticed that. The question is why?
Edited by Westrim I rarely visit the forums to avoid the cynicism ooze.I think werdnak noticed that. The question is why?
Edited by Westrim I rarely visit the forums to avoid the cynicism ooze.I'm sorry, but I'm going to ask again in this thread: the "hottip," [birthers are] called that by people who "conservatives" see as "liberal," seems to be very blatantly saying the US right is delusional, a reasonable interpretation of the statement saying they're all birthers. Does it need to be fixed there?
(Also, there's a grammatical error.)
Edited by TwinBird My posts make considerably more sense read in the voice of John Ratzenberger.It sounds like it's calling attention to the term being a Detractor Nickname, but expressing it in a circuitous way.
HodorIn the Saturday Night Live entry under Live Action TV, one left out word makes loses the whole joke. It would read better as, "Dwayne Johnson took the role for a skit where "Barack Obama" transformed into "The Rock Obama" and proceeded to throw disagreeable advisers out a window.."
- called that by people who "conservatives" see as "liberal"
...this seems like an unnecessary dig at the right. I can't take it out because the page seems to have been recently locked, but um... Rule Of Cautious Editing Judgment?
My posts make considerably more sense read in the voice of John Ratzenberger.
Is there a particular reason why the "succeeding George W. Bush and followed by Donald Trump line" was removed? (The guy who did it - prgiordano - left no edit reason, and it happens to have been his first ever site edit, so I'm a little leery of the motives for doing so.)
Edited by TotemicHero Expergiscēre cras, medior quam hodie. (Awaken tomorrow, better than today.) Hide / Show Replies