Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Myth / NorseMythology

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
WaterBlap Blapper of Water Since: May, 2014
Blapper of Water
Mar 31st 2017 at 10:38:46 AM •••

I heavily edited some examples and the edit reason is pretty long, so I'm putting the reason here:

The information about chthonic beings is not correct. The Jotuns fight in Ragnorok, but those are giants – not The Undead. None of the Norse gods are omniscient, so Not So Omniscient After All is being misused. Odin isn’t quote-unquote all-powerful, and the eye example probably fits better under Equivalent Exchange or Power at a Price. The information about the Aesir being unable to create their own technology doesn’t seem correct. Loki – a member of the Aesir (like it or not) – is able to create technology (e.g. fishing nets). The resurrection of Baldr may be something that is Hijacked by Jesus, but the information that these three creatures are the last of their kind isn't quite true? The Lore isn't clear about exactly how many people survive, just that there are survivors.

    The cut or revised examples 
  • God Is Flawed: Compared to Greek, Roman and Hindu myths where the Gods are inherently powerful and possess unfathomable powers, the Norse deities derive their abilities by means of specific actions, devices and tools, without which they are Not So Omniscient After All, vulnerable and weak.
    • Odin is wise and all-powerful not because he was born that way, but because he submitted himself to a particular ritual at Yggdrasil, traded his eye for wisdom to give himself an advantage. This makes him potentially omniscient and all-knowing but he's still limited by his subjectivity, by what he's able to see and foresee and is unable to escape the trap of Self-Fulfilling Prophecy.
    • Thor is incredibly powerful but his abilities primarily come from Mjolnir the Hammer, which was made by the Svartalfheim. Indeed the great treasures of the Gods were built entirely by other beings in the Nine Realms, with the Gods themselves not able to build or replicate any real technology by themselves.
    • Likewise, the immortality of the Gods comes from them consuming Idunn's Apples and if they don't ingest it regularly and in the right dosage, they age very fast and go grey and weak without it.
    • And of course, where the Greek Gods triumphed over the chthonic deities and beings (For instance Zeus and Typhon), the Norse Gods will ultimately meet their end at the hands of the chthonic beings at Ragnarok, where Odin will be swallowed by Fenris, the Midgard Serpent will kill Thor, and the other Gods will die at the hands of Loki's army, while Surtr the Fire Giant who kills Frey and Nidhogg the Dragon will survive Ragnarok and endure forever after.
  • Mutual Kill: What will happen on Ragnarok to Thor and the Midgard Serpent as well as Loki and Heimdall.
  • Last of His Kind: Vali and Ve, and a resurrected Balder will be all that remains of the Aesir after Ragnarok
  • Zombie Apocalypse: Loki's army at Ragnarok will feature the undead corpses of Hel fighting the warriors of Valhalla alongside the Aesir.

Look at all that shiny stuff ain't they pretty Hide / Show Replies
JulianLapostat Since: Feb, 2014
Mar 31st 2017 at 11:06:01 AM •••

I think those edits make sense and are well reasoned and I thank you for your corrections.

WaterBlap Since: May, 2014
Mar 31st 2017 at 3:08:39 PM •••

I'm sure the example section needs more work, but these were just the most recent examples, so those were the ones I went for.

Look at all that shiny stuff ain't they pretty
JulianLapostat Since: Feb, 2014
Mar 31st 2017 at 4:48:20 PM •••

I added on to them because it felt a little dry and unrepresentative and inaccessible. It was inspired by Gaiman's 2017 anthology which retold the main tales and intended for new readers.

WaterBlap Since: May, 2014
Mar 31st 2017 at 6:04:41 PM •••

I don't think Gaiman's anthology should be troped on here. IIRC, he admitted that he made various changes to the stories that he was adapting. It just seems that it should go on Norse Mythology (Gaiman)

Edit: Actually, I'm gonna ask over at ATT. This seems like a wiki-wide question, not just this one page.

Edited by WaterBlap Look at all that shiny stuff ain't they pretty
JulianLapostat Since: Feb, 2014
Mar 31st 2017 at 6:10:54 PM •••

No he didn't make changes. He says clearly in his introduction that he merely retold the same stories in a modern fashion but didn't change the narrative or characterization. I.e. the stories are the same and the characters do the same thing in the stories as they did in the Sturlusson versions.

I checked and it was correct.

Digamma Since: Feb, 2010
Apr 14th 2010 at 1:41:55 PM •••

Cut the following bit, since it was being questioned and, according to my general understanding of Norse Mythology, Loki doesn't seem to fit that trope for Heimdallr — please correct me if I'm wrong.

  • Evil Counterpart: Loki to Heimdallr.  ?

Hide / Show Replies
EinarOsidur Since: Dec, 1969
Apr 14th 2010 at 1:57:43 PM •••

Loki is a very old god, and he has his etymological if not functional counterparts in other Indo-European pantheons. Lyon in France still bears his name. But Loki has so many roles that he can't conveniently been assigned any one particular function. Snorri mentions various tales of him where he is wise, a bungler, good, a trickster or downright evil.

Heimdallr, on the other hand was mostly a listener and guardian of the rainbow.

I hope this explained things somewhat, but I do recommend reading Snorra-Edda. It's really worth it.

All the best

Einar ósiður

Edited by EinarOsidur
WaterBlap Since: May, 2014
Mar 31st 2017 at 10:38:20 AM •••

[blanked]

Edited by WaterBlap Look at all that shiny stuff ain't they pretty
DunDun Wandering... Since: Apr, 2012
Wandering...
Apr 2nd 2013 at 5:45:10 PM •••

The list of "main characters in Norse Mythology" is much longer than one would expect. There are even listings of the sun and moon, who really can't be considered "main characters," what with them being the sun and the moon.

I put the list into a folder for now, but I think we need to talk about what characters to take off that list. A more in-depth list would go into Characters.Norse Mythology, and I guess we probably will need to write that on the main page (since someone decided the sun and moon would count as "main characters").

Just putting this in the discussion before actually doing anything...

Cider The Final ECW Champion Since: May, 2009
The Final ECW Champion
Nov 20th 2012 at 7:18:08 PM •••

I wanted to add that the Jotun were not all enemies to the Aesir and that many of them who were hostile were described as "dog-wise". I do not know what that term actually means though and if it is not a mistranslation or coincidence. Anybody know?

Modified Ura-nage, Torture Rack
LordGro Since: May, 2010
Mar 31st 2012 at 11:45:13 AM •••

About Sigurd/Siegfried's alleged Blood Bath and why I deleted that example from the page:

Read this chapter of Völsunga saga. Odin only advises Sigurd to dig trenches for the blood. The reason seems to be that the blood is venomous and that Sigurd runs risk of being poisoned or drowned by the blood if he digs only one pit. Odin doesn’t advise him to bathe in the blood, Sigurd doesn’t do it, and Sigurd doesn’t get invulnerable. Instead, he suddenly understands the language of the birds when he tastes the dragon’s blood while roasting its heart; a power he doesn’t get in the German Siegfried legend.

Nibelungenlied is dated to c. 1200; all the written versions of the Norse Sigurd legend are somewhat younger. The Ramsund carving (Sweden) is indeed some 170 years older, but it definitely doesn’t show a Blood Bath either. — Also, the German legend is not derivative from the Norse legend; both traditions existed alongside each other for centuries (in fact, the legend had wandered from the South to the North at some unknown point in time before 1000 CE).

I also checked both the Prose Edda and the Poetic Edda, and they have no Blood Bath of Sigurd either.

As apparent by reading Völsunga saga, the other wiki’s page on Sigurd is erroneous. (Note that the page on Völsunga saga itself doesn’t mention a blood bath.) It’s not uncommon for people to confuse/conflate Nibelungenlied with the Norse Sigurd legend, and that's exactly what happened here.

Edited by LordGro Let's just say and leave it at that.
Redthir Since: Aug, 2012
Mar 7th 2012 at 2:47:04 PM •••

Red Oni, Blue Oni - Honir and Mimir fit this trope very well. They were very close companions, Honir was very brave and a great warrior and Mimir very wise. However, Honir was not particularly clever and without Mimir he was completely lost. Honir to me is a Red Oni, and Mimir is a Blue Oni.

Tahaneira Since: Oct, 2009
Oct 5th 2011 at 8:55:10 PM •••

I feel like Odin's raven informants, Hugin and Munin, should be added in, but I can't find a decent place to insert them. Any suggestions?

Hide / Show Replies
Laota Since: Jan, 2001
85.210.112.119 Since: Dec, 1969
Feb 24th 2011 at 3:40:55 AM •••

It says on this page that Loki wagering his head was an expression for his heads weight in gold. I know TV Tropes doesn't need references but I have never seen that theory before. I don't want to delete it in case I'm missing something, but I'd like to know where they're getting it from.

Hide / Show Replies
Laota Since: Jan, 2001
Mar 26th 2011 at 7:39:53 AM •••

I've never heard that either. It seemed like Loki was pulling an, "I'll eat my hat" and Brokk took him at this word. Either that, or Loki meant it literally but was positive he could fix the contest. I've never read anywhere that Loki meant his head's weight in gold, or any kind of expression like that anyplace else.

Top