Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / TheNewTens

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
Revolutionary_Jack Since: Sep, 2018
Mar 23rd 2019 at 6:21:02 PM •••

So folks, given that we are in the last months of this decade. What do we call the next one?

My pitch — The Double Twenties!

Eagal This is a title. Since: Apr, 2012
This is a title.
Nov 16th 2018 at 5:08:40 PM •••

  • Gayngst: Discrimination against LGBT individuals on basis of "religious freedom" has been a big issue in the United States, particularly the Supreme Court ruling of the Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission case where the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Christian baker who refused to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple on the basis of freedom of religion.

I pulled this for reasons of misinformation. The Supreme Court ruled against the Commission due to their failure to act neutrally. It very pointedly did not comment on the broader implications of the baker's religious rights versus the gay couple's rights, so it's not really significant to the example. Without the Cakeshop ruling, the example is general and a Zero Context Example.

Edited by Eagal You fell victim to one of the classic blunders!
alnair20aug93 🍊orange fursona🧡 (Long Runner)
🍊orange fursona🧡
Jul 14th 2018 at 3:07:25 AM •••

How would we call this decade retrospectively? I feel like we can't call this "The New Tens" forever come 2020 and beyond.

ᜇᜎᜈ᜔ᜇᜈ᜔|I DO COMMISSIONS|ᜇᜎᜈ᜔ᜇᜈ᜔ Hide / Show Replies
ArtemisStyle Since: Jul, 2018
Aug 1st 2018 at 11:40:00 PM •••

I think we could call it "the Twenty-tens" or "the Two-tens". On another subject, is there a thread to clean up this page? There are several contentious sentences and edits here and I think this needs a clean up.

alnair20aug93 (Long Runner)
Aug 3rd 2018 at 12:23:35 AM •••

The cleanup thread is HERE.

ᜇᜎᜈ᜔ᜇᜈ᜔|I DO COMMISSIONS|ᜇᜎᜈ᜔ᜇᜈ᜔
naturalironist Since: Jul, 2016
Aug 20th 2018 at 4:14:56 PM •••

2nd try: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=15332790380A68015400&page=1

"It's just a show; I should really just relax"
Freiberg Since: Jan, 2001
Sep 7th 2011 at 10:55:01 PM •••

Does a TV show count as being made in the New Tens if it started before (2009 or earlier) but continues to be made?

Hide / Show Replies
DarkPaladinX Since: Sep, 2009
Mar 21st 2018 at 2:36:49 AM •••

After looking through this trope page and reinsert/redeleting the Oppressive States of America trope, I've noticed there are many No Real Life Examples Please tropes in this trope. Should we remove those tropes as well?

lavendermintrose Since: Nov, 2012
Jul 17th 2017 at 12:35:59 PM •••

Why is there even a description of this, though? Everyone knows what it is because everyone lives in it. Maybe in, like, 2030, it will be necessary to put a description there, but now it's just sort of ridiculous.

Also... listing works? Really? Even though the page acknowledges that there's just more stuff than ever being made now? Do you realize there are over 100 anime made a year, just using the example I know best?

Also, not every place is the same. Someone else said it's just too focused on America, but not even every group in America is the same. I can even think of, off the top of my head, at least five different groups just in New York City who would all find half of this inaccurate, but for different reasons. And that's just people I know - I'm sure if you go to any of the dozens of other major cities in the world, you'd find the same. Double that to count rural areas. Not that everyone knows what they're talking about, not that every last concern deserves space here - my point is actually the opposite. You can't make a "retrospective" two-thirds through the thing you're talking about.

.... but then again, this is sort of typical troper behavior, isn't it?

I made this Idolized Julius Kingsley icon back when Akito first came out, and now that the crossover is actually happening, I don't care. Hide / Show Replies
JulianLapostat Since: Feb, 2014
Jul 17th 2017 at 12:39:22 PM •••

We had description pages for every decade, including The Oughties...so I don't think having it is against precedent or policy.

If you want you can maybe debate it in the Forums and ask to cut it out...

We also have a Real Life trope page too...

Eagal This is a title. Since: Apr, 2012
This is a title.
Jun 18th 2017 at 3:30:54 PM •••

Page is fairly large. Should it be divided? And if so, how? Perhaps 2010-2015 and 2015-2020?

You fell victim to one of the classic blunders! Hide / Show Replies
JulianLapostat Since: Feb, 2014
Jun 18th 2017 at 3:51:29 PM •••

I think 2016-Present is a better cut off...

alnair20aug93 (Long Runner)
Jul 7th 2017 at 3:51:53 AM •••

Trim down the political and Millennial woes tropes.

Edited by alnair20aug93 ᜇᜎᜈ᜔ᜇᜈ᜔|I DO COMMISSIONS|ᜇᜎᜈ᜔ᜇᜈ᜔
JulianLapostat Since: Feb, 2014
Jul 7th 2017 at 7:56:20 AM •••

Any reason? All the other decade pages discusses politics.

patoezequiel Pato Since: Nov, 2014
Pato
May 15th 2017 at 1:36:55 PM •••

Uh, after reading the page, I think it suffers from a severe case of We All Live In America.

- Tell me, ser: Are you friend or foe? - I am a human being, no different from you. Hide / Show Replies
JulianLapostat Since: Feb, 2014
May 15th 2017 at 1:43:49 PM •••

I did try and amend it by adding a global touch to right-wing movements around the world.

It is true that it's Americo-centric but the decade pages for the other pages are the same, and I would say on balance that this is one of better pages. like in the celebrity deaths of 2016 I mentioned some famous international film-makers that copped it and one of them is Iranian (Abbas Kiarostami).

flblbl Since: Jun, 2017
Jun 6th 2017 at 5:33:01 AM •••

Nah, if anything it suffers from a severe case of TV Tropes-don't-have-a-varied-community mixed with some hints of it's-way-too-early-to-tell.

Mullon Since: Jan, 2001
Apr 8th 2017 at 4:15:09 PM •••

This page is horribly depressing. And accurate.

Never trust anyone who uses "degenerate" as an insult. Hide / Show Replies
JulianLapostat Since: Feb, 2014
Apr 8th 2017 at 4:48:03 PM •••

It's constantly being updated, so who knows what the future will bring...if one thing is certain, then that life is unpredictable, for better and for worse.

TokoWH Professional Lurker Since: Jan, 2011
Professional Lurker
Feb 16th 2015 at 5:01:31 PM •••

So, at the risk of getting flamed... I actually like The New '10s so far. Disregarding any major things like internet censorship attempts and politics, of course. Those things always end up being major headaches no matter how you look at them.

May just be because I don't have as many personal problems as I once did during the Turn of the Millennium, but there have been a lot more recent things made in this era that I like more than dislike.

Stealthy Since: Oct, 2011
Jul 14th 2013 at 4:38:04 AM •••

Could somebody please work on this page to actually reflect the culture of the 2010s? As a particularly glaring example, it currently says that, essentially, rock no longer exists as a mainstream genre and isn't listened to by teenagers. Literally everyone I know would like to dispute you on that, as would the releases of, to name two albums off the top of my head (there are certainly more), Sempiternal and Save Rock And Roll, and all of the mainstream rock and metal bands in this decade and the people who listen to them.

Take this article at face value and you'll think the only subculture to exist this decade are hipsters.

(Not to mention the main page claiming that the 2010s is simply a continuation of the 2000s, which is the most hilarious thing I have read in my life.)

Hide / Show Replies
harryhenry Since: Jan, 2012
Jun 17th 2014 at 7:53:32 AM •••

Except rock isn't as popular as it once was. Dosen't mean that teenagers don't listen to rock anymore, or that rock bands don't exist anymore, just that rock isn't exactly on the popular zeitgist.

Forrestal Since: Aug, 2013
Aug 27th 2013 at 3:04:48 AM •••

I can't attest for this on a more global scale, but in certain parts of Australia, namely areas where Hipster culture is predominant (Inner city melbourne, sydney ect) the Double Breasted coat (not trench coats so much, they usually end at upper thigh/lower waist and are as such usually considered too short) is becoming more and more prevalent with both guys and girls and all age groups beneath about 40.

Any thoughts on adding it?

Gunhead Data Smuggler Since: Apr, 2011
Data Smuggler
Apr 15th 2013 at 9:02:13 PM •••

Since the New Tens seem to be compared to both the Gilded Age and Cyberpunk, how about The Chromed Age?

Surenity Since: Aug, 2009
Sep 18th 2012 at 11:50:37 PM •••

There should probably be some kind of rule about what's important enough to be mentioned in the description, or else by 2019 this page will be like ten miles long. Though we won't really know what's important until a few years down the road, I guess. Kind of reminds me of when VH 1 tried to do "I Love The New Millenium" in 2007 and now everything's out of date.

My tropes launched: https://surenity2.blogspot.com/2021/02/my-tropes-on-tv-tropes.html
manhandled &)$;@9?@4$/8&;’ Since: Feb, 2012
&)$;@9?@4$/8&;’
Aug 8th 2012 at 12:48:54 PM •••

wow. noone outside of tropes acknowledges the term "new tens". am i the only one who cares?

I got my political views from reddit and that's bad
203.206.56.241 Since: Dec, 1969
Apr 20th 2011 at 12:18:32 AM •••

Should'nt the New 10s begin with 2011 and not 2010.

Hide / Show Replies
Taifun Since: Jan, 2001
Apr 22nd 2011 at 6:41:41 PM •••

No. Decades are a ten-year period, counted from xxx0 to xxx9, inclusive. 1960-1969 is a decade. 2000-2010 is not, being 11 years.

illegalcheese Since: Apr, 2010
Jun 4th 2012 at 4:57:22 PM •••

There is a subjective aspect; depending on who you ask, the new tens started as early as 2009 and as late as 2012. Those opinions are based on perceived significant shifts in culture; 2009 since Obama was just elected marking a shift in perception in the US, 2012 for a whole lot of other things.

Ckuckoo Since: Nov, 2010
Jun 4th 2012 at 8:20:25 PM •••

illegalcheese, I think you're confusing eras with decades. Decades are just ten year periods, eras are more abstract, like "the Obama era", "the War on Terror", etc.

aladdin99 Since: Oct, 2011
Jan 10th 2012 at 1:02:50 PM •••

...and so this page has been turned into yet another overblown whine-fest about how "the 90's were best" that blatantly accentuates the negative (well someone had to say it).

Hide / Show Replies
msq Since: Oct, 2010
Jan 24th 2012 at 2:36:45 AM •••

Couldn't help but agree. I even had to extend the disclaimer (along with some edits in the Japanese culture parts) in an attempt to kept things in context.

Soupdragon Since: Aug, 2010
May 24th 2011 at 8:36:03 AM •••

Should horizontal Lens Flare 's, Vocaloid and Autotune be 2010s tropes already?

Perhaps there should also be trope codifying section and highpoint section for every decade, so one can see where a trope kicked off and in which decade/year it started to become discredited.

Edited by Soupdragon Hide / Show Replies
Soupdragon Since: Aug, 2010
Dec 5th 2011 at 6:47:14 PM •••

I would like to add Mind Blowing Text or Kinectic Typography

Edited by Soupdragon
DonaldthePotholer Since: Dec, 2009
Sep 30th 2011 at 11:46:22 AM •••

So... when do we add the notes about the Incandescent Light Bulb Phase Out and the end of Analog TV?

Ketchum's corollary to Clarke's Third Law: Any sufficiently advanced tactic is indistinguishable from blind luck. Hide / Show Replies
Soupdragon Since: Aug, 2010
Dec 5th 2011 at 6:28:15 PM •••

What effect did it have on tropes?

gibberingtroper Since: May, 2009
Feb 12th 2011 at 8:38:03 AM •••

Removed the "half hearted" part from "half hearted rebuff of the Democrats." Given that it was the biggest legislative swing since the Thirties and was born from the rise of an independent political movement, I'd be more inclined to call it the "severe rebuff." But we can keep it neutral and call it simply a rebuff.

Top