Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / MeaningfulName

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
Larkmarn Since: Nov, 2010
Mar 7th 2024 at 8:02:35 AM •••

I think it's just kinda assumed that a title inherently has some meaning, or else it wouldn't be the title (or would be a Non-Indicative Name). But if it has extra levels of meaning, it could be a Double-Meaning Title.

Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 20th 2021 at 8:43:03 AM •••

Previous Trope Repair Shop thread: Misused, started by shokoshu on Aug 18th 2019 at 1:05:13 PM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
ElodieHiras Since: Sep, 2010
Jan 25th 2020 at 1:53:26 PM •••

Alright, so I'm writing something for myself, and I'm wondering what would this count as.

So an organization makes bots to protect humanity, the Bulwark series of robots, for a variety of purpose.

The Bulwark model 13 is human looking to be able to get the trust of civvies so that in times of crisis they can lead them to safety (humans tend to trust things shaped like humans more easily than a pure combat bot).

Bulwark model 13, unit 37 unexpectedly became sentient. As a later breakthrough in terms of sentient non-living entities demonstrated, the more people building an item get attached to it, the more likely it is to develop sentience. And the engineers crafting the Bulwark series got attached to it for no other reason than this bot was Bulswark 13-37, or Bulwark Leet. So the sentient bot was designed leet, which given that it is the one that became sentient, is appropriate, but it being model leet was the reason it became sentient...

Hide / Show Replies
Maclemz Since: May, 2020
May 27th 2020 at 5:18:39 PM •••

<a href="https://www.latestjobvacancies.com/"> What do you suggest is a meaningful name actually?</a>

draph91 Since: Mar, 2013
May 9th 2017 at 1:44:42 AM •••

Can this trope apply to objects as well?

Slayermaster Since: Jun, 2013
Jun 30th 2013 at 11:52:23 AM •••

Would this trope apply to a work wherein the meaningful name is never even revealed or noted to be meaningful? You only realize it because of outside information or background knowledge, for example, a character who is a dark wizard, and their name is Latin for dark wizard (or something). Would this still be a meaningful name? Or something else?

sugarplumfairy Media Addict Since: Oct, 2012
Media Addict
Mar 3rd 2013 at 9:57:42 PM •••

More of a personal curiosity question, but is it generally considered a good thing or a bad thing if the Meaningful Name only becomes clear in hindsight?

Hide / Show Replies
Larkmarn Since: Nov, 2010
Mar 4th 2013 at 6:24:51 AM •••

Personally: Hindsight. Makes the Fridge Logic a bit easier to swallow as it's a little more subtle. Harry Potter's meaningful names, for example, were just way over the top.

Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
sugarplumfairy Since: Oct, 2012
Mar 4th 2013 at 11:06:37 PM •••

Well, to be specific, I suppose, what if a character's last name was McGuffin, and it's only until a lot later in the story that you realize that they are, in fact, a McGuffin? (In this particular case it's supposed to be more of an inside thing.)

Edited by sugarplumfairy
SamMax Since: Sep, 2011
Feb 1st 2012 at 5:24:41 AM •••

Should Real Life examples be in the trivia tab of individual works? It doesn't say...

75.199.111.166 Since: Dec, 1969
Feb 6th 2011 at 11:52:41 AM •••

This goes under the Real Life section, but the former actor John Dye, should count just look at his most famous role, we'll wait.

Marie Since: Nov, 2012
Apr 3rd 2010 at 6:20:22 AM •••

@ The One Who Tropes, re: Mick Xenophon. I removed the bit about changing his name, because he hardly changed it at all, only to an older form of the same name, nothing to do with scientology. See this news story.

Top