Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / TurnOn

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ValuesResonance: Reputation aside, one thing in the show's favor is that, especially by 1969 standards, it had a very diverse cast, split evenly between men and women, and multiracial, with two African-Americans (Creator/TeresaGraves and Mel Stewart), a Latino (Carlos Manteca) and an Asian-American (Cecile Ozorio) alongside the white majority cast (Bonnie Boland, Creator/HamiltonCamp, Maxine Greene, Ken Greenwald, Debbie Macomber,[[note]]Not the romance novelist[[/note]] Maura [=McGiveney=] and Bob Staats).

to:

* ValuesResonance: Reputation aside, one thing in the show's favor is that, especially by 1969 standards, it had a very diverse cast, split evenly between men and women, and multiracial, with two African-Americans (Creator/TeresaGraves and Mel Stewart), a Latino (Carlos Manteca) and an Asian-American (Cecile Ozorio) alongside the white majority cast (Bonnie Boland, Creator/HamiltonCamp, Maxine Greene, Ken Greenwald, Debbie Macomber,[[note]]Not the romance novelist[[/note]] Maura [=McGiveney=] and Bob Staats).Staats).

----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ValuesResonance: Reputation aside, one thing in the show's favor is that, especially by 1969 standards, it had a very diverse cast, split evenly between men and women, and multiracial, with two African-Americans (Teresa Graves and Mel Stewart), a Latino (Carlos Manteca) and an Asian-American (Cecile Ozorio) alongside the white majority cast (Bonnie Boland, Creator/HamiltonCamp, Maxine Greene, Ken Greenwald, Debbie Macomber,[[note]]Not the romance novelist[[/note]] Maura [=McGiveney=] and Bob Staats).

to:

* ValuesResonance: Reputation aside, one thing in the show's favor is that, especially by 1969 standards, it had a very diverse cast, split evenly between men and women, and multiracial, with two African-Americans (Teresa Graves (Creator/TeresaGraves and Mel Stewart), a Latino (Carlos Manteca) and an Asian-American (Cecile Ozorio) alongside the white majority cast (Bonnie Boland, Creator/HamiltonCamp, Maxine Greene, Ken Greenwald, Debbie Macomber,[[note]]Not the romance novelist[[/note]] Maura [=McGiveney=] and Bob Staats).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenBase: Reactions to the leaked episodes are extremely divisive; no surprise considering this show's history. One side finds the material unfunny at worst and bewildering at best, and think it was deservedly cancelled. On the other hand, it's developed some admiration from people who appreciate how ''Turn-On'' pushed the limits of television, and insist the show's SurrealHumor and subversive presentation was decades ahead of its time.

to:

* BrokenBase: Reactions to the leaked episodes are extremely divisive; no surprise considering this show's history. One side finds the material unfunny at worst and bewildering at best, and think it was deservedly cancelled. On the other hand, it's developed some admiration from people who appreciate how ''Turn-On'' pushed the limits of television, and insist the show's SurrealHumor and subversive presentation was decades ahead of its time. Still others consider it a case of TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot: the presentation was innovative, but the material just wasn't very good and relied way too much on shock value.

Added: 444

Changed: 4

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenBase: Reactions to the leaked episodes are extremely divisive; no surprise considering this show's history. One side finds the material unfunny at worst and bewildering at best, and think it was deservedly cancelled. On the other hand, it's developed some admiration from people who appreciate how ''Turn-On'' pushed the limits of television, and insist the show's SurrealHumor and subversive presentation was decades ahead of its time.



* QuirkyWork: It says a lot that even after almost six decades and MindScrew becoming a common mode in American pop culture, the two finished episodes still come across as a relentless attack on the senses built around quick joke-like fragments, rather than a SketchComedy show, making the whole thing feel like a fever dream experienced under the influence of the entire inventory of a CVS pharmacy. You can only imagine how alien and disorienting it must've been for people channel-surfing on a winter night in 1969.

to:

* QuirkyWork: It says a lot that even after almost six decades and MindScrew becoming a common mode in American pop culture, the two finished episodes still come across as a relentless attack on the senses built around quick joke-like fragments, rather than a SketchComedy show, making the whole thing feel like a fever dream experienced under the influence of the entire inventory of a CVS pharmacy. You can only imagine how alien and disorienting it must've been for people channel-surfing on a winter night in 1969.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** One modern commentator has noted that watching the show's short self-contained skits gives it a similar sensation to watching a half-hour of Platform/TikTok comedy videos.

to:

** One Several modern commentator has commentators have noted that watching the show's short self-contained skits gives it give you a similar sensation to watching a half-hour of random Platform/TikTok comedy videos.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* QuirkyWork: It says a lot that even after almost six decades and MindScrew becoming a common mode in American pop culture, the two finished episodes still come across as a relentless attack on the senses built around quick joke-like fragments, rather than a SketchComedy show, making the whole thing an absolute ordeal to sit through even today. You can only imagine how alien and disorienting it must've been for people channel-surfing on a winter night in 1969.

to:

* QuirkyWork: It says a lot that even after almost six decades and MindScrew becoming a common mode in American pop culture, the two finished episodes still come across as a relentless attack on the senses built around quick joke-like fragments, rather than a SketchComedy show, making the whole thing an absolute ordeal to sit through even today.feel like a fever dream experienced under the influence of the entire inventory of a CVS pharmacy. You can only imagine how alien and disorienting it must've been for people channel-surfing on a winter night in 1969.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* QuirkyWork: It says a lot that even after almost six decades and MindScrew becoming a common mode in American pop culture, the two finished episodes still come across as a relentless sensory assault built around quick joke-like fragments, rather than a SketchComedy show, making the whole thing an absolute ordeal to sit through even today. You can only imagine how alien and disorienting it must've been for people channel-surfing on a winter night in 1969.

to:

* QuirkyWork: It says a lot that even after almost six decades and MindScrew becoming a common mode in American pop culture, the two finished episodes still come across as a relentless sensory assault attack on the senses built around quick joke-like fragments, rather than a SketchComedy show, making the whole thing an absolute ordeal to sit through even today. You can only imagine how alien and disorienting it must've been for people channel-surfing on a winter night in 1969.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* QuirkyWork: It says a lot that even after almost six decades and MindScrew becoming a common mode in American pop culture, the two finished episodes still come across as a relentless sensory assault built around quick joke-like fragments, rather than a SketchComedy show, making the whole thing an absolute ordeal to sit through even today. You can only imagine how alien and disorienting it must've been for people channel-surfing on a winter night in 1969.
-->'''Creator/NathanRabin''': (''In a 2023 review of the show'') I love drugs but ''Turn-On'' was way too druggy for me.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ValuesResonance: Reputation aside, one thing in the show's favor is that, especially by 1969 standards, it had a very diverse cast, split evenly between men and women, and multiracial, with two African-Americans (Theresa Graves and Mel Stewart), a Latino (Carlos Manteca) and an Asian-American (Cecile Ozorio) alongside the white majority cast (Bonnie Boland, Creator/HamiltonCamp, Maxine Greene, Ken Greenwald, Debbie Macomber,[[note]]Not the romance novelist[[/note]] Maura [=McGiveney=] and Bob Staats).

to:

* ValuesResonance: Reputation aside, one thing in the show's favor is that, especially by 1969 standards, it had a very diverse cast, split evenly between men and women, and multiracial, with two African-Americans (Theresa (Teresa Graves and Mel Stewart), a Latino (Carlos Manteca) and an Asian-American (Cecile Ozorio) alongside the white majority cast (Bonnie Boland, Creator/HamiltonCamp, Maxine Greene, Ken Greenwald, Debbie Macomber,[[note]]Not the romance novelist[[/note]] Maura [=McGiveney=] and Bob Staats).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ValuesResonance: Reputation aside, one thing in the show's favor is that, especially by 1969 standards, it had a very diverse cast, multiracial and evenly split between men and women.

to:

* ValuesResonance: Reputation aside, one thing in the show's favor is that, especially by 1969 standards, it had a very diverse cast, multiracial and split evenly split between men and women.women, and multiracial, with two African-Americans (Theresa Graves and Mel Stewart), a Latino (Carlos Manteca) and an Asian-American (Cecile Ozorio) alongside the white majority cast (Bonnie Boland, Creator/HamiltonCamp, Maxine Greene, Ken Greenwald, Debbie Macomber,[[note]]Not the romance novelist[[/note]] Maura [=McGiveney=] and Bob Staats).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** One modern commentator has noted that watching the show's short self-contained skits gives it a similar feeling to watching a half-hour of Platform/TikTok comedy videos.

to:

** One modern commentator has noted that watching the show's short self-contained skits gives it a similar feeling sensation to watching a half-hour of Platform/TikTok comedy videos.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** One modern commentator has noted that watching the show's short self-contained skits gives it a similar feeling to watching a half-hour's worth of Platform/TikTok comedy videos.

to:

** One modern commentator has noted that watching the show's short self-contained skits gives it a similar feeling to watching a half-hour's worth half-hour of Platform/TikTok comedy videos.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HilariousInHindsight:
** The concept of the show is that it's comedy entirely generated by computer. Advances in ArtificialIntelligence have led to lots of current experiments with exactly that same idea. And since modern AI comedy (like ''WebAnimation/NothingForever'') has exhibited the same tendencies toward NonSequitur gags, SurrealHumor and SoUnfunnyItsFunny jokes that ''Turn-On'' did, it looks downright prophetic.
** One modern commentator has noted that watching the show's short self-contained skits gives it a similar feeling to watching a half-hour's worth of Platform/TikTok comedy videos.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* UnintentionalPeriodPiece: Besides all the hot button issues from TheSixties that were used as the basis for gags (birth control, drugs), there are some very specific topical references from early 1969, like [[UsefulNotes/TheVietnamWar South Vietnamese prime minister Nguyễn Cao Kỳ]] and his professed admiration for UsefulNotes/AdolfHitler (suggesting that Kỳ requested a swastika-shaped table for the Paris peace talks), and the war of words at San Francisco State University between striking students and university president S.I. Hayakawa (with Tim Conway portraying Hayakawa as a {{Samurai}}).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ValuesResonance: Reputation aside, one thing in the show's favor is that, especially by 1969 standards, it had a very diverse cast, multiracial and evenly split between men and women.

Top