Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* {{Moe}}: The female nudists themselves are surprisingly adorable in how sensitive and yet shameless they act while naked around others. Their movements, reactions, and general elegance, as well as their extreme caution over being so revealing around others, plus the occasional moment where they accidentally risk losing their HandOrObjectUnderwear, make them seem much more endearing than if they were truly confident to be naked.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* FetishRetardant: Most viewers are ''not'' a fan of the HandOrObjectUnderwear use on the actresses and would prefer their frontal bodies be entirely uncovered.
to:
* FetishRetardant: Most viewers are ''not'' a fan of the HandOrObjectUnderwear use used on the actresses and would prefer their frontal bodies be entirely uncovered.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* BestKnownForTheFanservice: [[TriviallyObvious Of course]], because it's an early 1960s FauxDocumentary nudist film. With the film lacking in a well-written plot, the film instead resorts to using more nude scenes of the model actresses and actors, though the women get more attention from the camera. There are also barely any [[PlotDevice plot devices]] to drag the film away from compiling compelling undressed actors in the nude camp itself... On the plus of this, despite [[MsFanservice all of the girls that are born with indescribably beauty and attributes who are 100 percent nude having their nudity being focused on and emphasized the most as opposed to the boys]], the writer of the film (Doris Wishman) isn't a male writer, and is actually an elderly woman wanted to promote the serenity and appeal of the nudist lifestyle itself more than the occurrences in the background, unlike most other nudist fims. The girls of which are given more attention than the boys are always hidden by a very strategic HandOrObjectUnderwear, ModestyTowel, [[SexyDiscretionShot having their whole lower half out of the camera's shot]], or simply turning around to create MaleGaze despite how much more of the film the {{Fanservice}} itself dominates due to censorship laws not allowing the lower half to be shown, but the upper half to be fine to show. This makes the fanservice better at times.
to:
* BestKnownForTheFanservice: [[TriviallyObvious Of course]], because it's an early 1960s FauxDocumentary nudist film. With the film lacking in a well-written plot, the film instead resorts to using more nude scenes of the model actresses and actors, though the women get more attention from the camera. There are also barely any [[PlotDevice plot devices]] to drag the film away from compiling compelling undressed actors in the nude camp itself... On the plus of this, despite [[MsFanservice all of the girls that are born with indescribably beauty and attributes who are 100 percent nude having their nudity being focused on and emphasized the most as opposed to the boys]], the writer of the film (Doris Wishman) isn't a male writer, and is actually an elderly woman wanted to promote the serenity and appeal of the nudist lifestyle itself more than the occurrences in the background, unlike most other nudist fims. The girls of which are given more attention than the boys are always hidden by a very strategic HandOrObjectUnderwear, ModestyTowel, [[SexyDiscretionShot having their whole lower half out of the camera's shot]], or simply turning around to create MaleGaze despite how much more of the film the {{Fanservice}} itself dominates due to censorship laws not allowing the lower half to be shown, but the upper half to be fine to show. This makes the fanservice better at times.times.
* FetishRetardant: Most viewers are ''not'' a fan of the HandOrObjectUnderwear use on the actresses and would prefer their frontal bodies be entirely uncovered.
* SignatureScene: The montage of the female nudists leaving the cottage after getting naked.
----
* FetishRetardant: Most viewers are ''not'' a fan of the HandOrObjectUnderwear use on the actresses and would prefer their frontal bodies be entirely uncovered.
* SignatureScene: The montage of the female nudists leaving the cottage after getting naked.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
* BestKnownForTheFanservice: [[TriviallyObvious Of course]], because it's an early 1960s FauxDocumentary nudist film. With the film lacking in a well-written plot, the film instead resorts to using more nude scenes of the model actresses and actors, though the women get more attention from the camera. There are also barely any [[PlotDevice plot devices]] to drag the film away from compiling compelling undressed actors in the nude camp itself...
** On the plus of this, despite [[MsFanservice all of the girls that are born with indescribably beauty and attributes who are 100 percent nude having their nudity being focused on and emphasized the most as opposed to the boys]], the writer of the film (Doris Wishman) isn't a male writer, and is actually an elderly woman wanted to promote the serenity and appeal of the nudist lifestyle itself more than the occurrences in the background, unlike most other nudist fims. The girls of which are given more attention than the boys are always hidden by a very strategic HandOrObjectUnderwear, ModestyTowel, [[SexyDiscretionShot having their whole lower half out of the camera's shot]], or simply turning around to create MaleGaze despite how much more of the film the {{Fanservice}} itself dominates due to censorship laws not allowing the lower half to be shown, but the upper half to be fine to show. This makes the fanservice better at times.
** On the plus of this, despite [[MsFanservice all of the girls that are born with indescribably beauty and attributes who are 100 percent nude having their nudity being focused on and emphasized the most as opposed to the boys]], the writer of the film (Doris Wishman) isn't a male writer, and is actually an elderly woman wanted to promote the serenity and appeal of the nudist lifestyle itself more than the occurrences in the background, unlike most other nudist fims. The girls of which are given more attention than the boys are always hidden by a very strategic HandOrObjectUnderwear, ModestyTowel, [[SexyDiscretionShot having their whole lower half out of the camera's shot]], or simply turning around to create MaleGaze despite how much more of the film the {{Fanservice}} itself dominates due to censorship laws not allowing the lower half to be shown, but the upper half to be fine to show. This makes the fanservice better at times.
to:
* BestKnownForTheFanservice: [[TriviallyObvious Of course]], because it's an early 1960s FauxDocumentary nudist film. With the film lacking in a well-written plot, the film instead resorts to using more nude scenes of the model actresses and actors, though the women get more attention from the camera. There are also barely any [[PlotDevice plot devices]] to drag the film away from compiling compelling undressed actors in the nude camp itself... \n** On the plus of this, despite [[MsFanservice all of the girls that are born with indescribably beauty and attributes who are 100 percent nude having their nudity being focused on and emphasized the most as opposed to the boys]], the writer of the film (Doris Wishman) isn't a male writer, and is actually an elderly woman wanted to promote the serenity and appeal of the nudist lifestyle itself more than the occurrences in the background, unlike most other nudist fims. The girls of which are given more attention than the boys are always hidden by a very strategic HandOrObjectUnderwear, ModestyTowel, [[SexyDiscretionShot having their whole lower half out of the camera's shot]], or simply turning around to create MaleGaze despite how much more of the film the {{Fanservice}} itself dominates due to censorship laws not allowing the lower half to be shown, but the upper half to be fine to show. This makes the fanservice better at times.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Up To Eleven is a defunct trope
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
** On the plus of this, despite [[MsFanservice all of the girls that are born with indescribably beauty and attributes who are 100 percent nude having their nudity being focused on and emphasized the most as opposed to the boys]], the writer of the film (Doris Wishman) isn't a male writer, and is actually an elderly woman wanted to promote the serenity and appeal of the nudist lifestyle itself more than the occurrences in the background, unlike most other nudist fims. The girls of which are given more attention than the boys are always hidden by a very strategic HandOrObjectUnderwear, ModestyTowel, [[SexyDiscretionShot having their whole lower half out of the camera's shot]], or simply turning around to create MaleGaze despite how much more of the film the {{Fanservice}} itself dominates due to censorship laws not allowing the lower half to be shown, but the upper half to be fine to show. [[UpToEleven This makes the fanservice better at times]].
to:
** On the plus of this, despite [[MsFanservice all of the girls that are born with indescribably beauty and attributes who are 100 percent nude having their nudity being focused on and emphasized the most as opposed to the boys]], the writer of the film (Doris Wishman) isn't a male writer, and is actually an elderly woman wanted to promote the serenity and appeal of the nudist lifestyle itself more than the occurrences in the background, unlike most other nudist fims. The girls of which are given more attention than the boys are always hidden by a very strategic HandOrObjectUnderwear, ModestyTowel, [[SexyDiscretionShot having their whole lower half out of the camera's shot]], or simply turning around to create MaleGaze despite how much more of the film the {{Fanservice}} itself dominates due to censorship laws not allowing the lower half to be shown, but the upper half to be fine to show. [[UpToEleven This makes the fanservice better at times]].times.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 1 (click to see context) :
* AmateurCast: The film is pointed out the most for its hiring of cast members who seemingly feel a minor discomfort playing the role of nudity. This flaw happens in the plot of the film more than it does the moments where general actors play around in the nude. In the segments that show the nudists being nudists in the film, however, the cast plays off the idea of taking their clothes off rather casually. In spite of this, the one noticeably the most uncomfortable during the general action is the lead actress herself due to being the main focus; she makes rigid movements with her mouth and occasionally swallows saliva down, the biggest amount close up being an hour into the film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* AmateurCast: The film is pointed out the most for its hiring of cast members who seemingly feel a minor discomfort playing the role of nudity. This flaw happens in the plot of the film more than it does the moments where general actors play around in the nude. In the segments that show the nudists being nudists in the film, however, the cast plays off the idea of taking their clothes off rather casually. In spite of this, the one noticeably the most uncomfortable during the general action is the lead actress herself due to being the main focus; she makes rigid movements with her mouth and occasionally swallows saliva down, the biggest amount close up being an hour into the film.
to:
* AmateurCast: The film is pointed out the most for its hiring of cast members who seemingly feel a minor discomfort playing the role of nudity. This flaw happens in the plot of the film more than it does the moments where general actors play around in the nude. In the segments that show the nudists being nudists in the film, however, the cast plays off the idea of taking their clothes off rather casually. In spite of this, the one noticeably the most uncomfortable during the general action is the lead actress herself due to being the main focus; she makes rigid movements with her mouth and occasionally swallows saliva down, the biggest amount close up being an hour into the film.film.
* BestKnownForTheFanservice: [[TriviallyObvious Of course]], because it's an early 1960s FauxDocumentary nudist film. With the film lacking in a well-written plot, the film instead resorts to using more nude scenes of the model actresses and actors, though the women get more attention from the camera. There are also barely any [[PlotDevice plot devices]] to drag the film away from compiling compelling undressed actors in the nude camp itself...
** On the plus of this, despite [[MsFanservice all of the girls that are born with indescribably beauty and attributes who are 100 percent nude having their nudity being focused on and emphasized the most as opposed to the boys]], the writer of the film (Doris Wishman) isn't a male writer, and is actually an elderly woman wanted to promote the serenity and appeal of the nudist lifestyle itself more than the occurrences in the background, unlike most other nudist fims. The girls of which are given more attention than the boys are always hidden by a very strategic HandOrObjectUnderwear, ModestyTowel, [[SexyDiscretionShot having their whole lower half out of the camera's shot]], or simply turning around to create MaleGaze despite how much more of the film the {{Fanservice}} itself dominates due to censorship laws not allowing the lower half to be shown, but the upper half to be fine to show. [[UpToEleven This makes the fanservice better at times]].
* BestKnownForTheFanservice: [[TriviallyObvious Of course]], because it's an early 1960s FauxDocumentary nudist film. With the film lacking in a well-written plot, the film instead resorts to using more nude scenes of the model actresses and actors, though the women get more attention from the camera. There are also barely any [[PlotDevice plot devices]] to drag the film away from compiling compelling undressed actors in the nude camp itself...
** On the plus of this, despite [[MsFanservice all of the girls that are born with indescribably beauty and attributes who are 100 percent nude having their nudity being focused on and emphasized the most as opposed to the boys]], the writer of the film (Doris Wishman) isn't a male writer, and is actually an elderly woman wanted to promote the serenity and appeal of the nudist lifestyle itself more than the occurrences in the background, unlike most other nudist fims. The girls of which are given more attention than the boys are always hidden by a very strategic HandOrObjectUnderwear, ModestyTowel, [[SexyDiscretionShot having their whole lower half out of the camera's shot]], or simply turning around to create MaleGaze despite how much more of the film the {{Fanservice}} itself dominates due to censorship laws not allowing the lower half to be shown, but the upper half to be fine to show. [[UpToEleven This makes the fanservice better at times]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* AmateurCast: The film is pointed out the most for its hiring of cast members who seemingly feel a minor discomfort playing the role of nudity. This flaw happens in the plot of the film more than it does the moments where general actors play around in the nude. In the segments that show the nudists being nudists in the film, however, the cast plays off the idea of taking their clothes off rather casually. In spite of this, the one noticeably the most uncomfortable during the general action is the lead actress herself due to being the main focus; she makes rigid movements with her mouth and occasionally swallows saliva down, the biggest amount close up being an hour into the film.
