Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Minor re-write. Bane did show up in the original White Knight but it was also a pretty small role as well.
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: The sequel introduced the ''White Knight''-verse version of [[spoiler: Bane. He spends a few short pages establishing himself by manhandling Azrael... Only for one of Azrael's minions to cut his venom tube from behind, after which Azrael cuts Bane's head off like a floundering fish. After that, one can only wonder ''why'' they even bothered introducing Bane if they were just going to kill him off so abruptly.]]
to:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: The sequel introduced the ''White Knight''-verse version of [[spoiler: Bane.Bane shows up again, hinting at a more important role in the sequel. He spends a few short pages establishing himself by manhandling Azrael... Only for one of Azrael's minions to cut his venom tube from behind, after which Azrael cuts Bane's head off like a floundering fish. After that, one can only wonder ''why'' they even bothered introducing bringing Bane back if they were just only going to kill him off so abruptly.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Based on reviews from both critics and users on the Comicbook Roundup website; as well as user reviews from various book sites, it just sounds like personal complaining rather than a general consensus. And the claim that they can’t create new stories now that Batman’s identity is exposed also sounds way too personal.
Deleted line(s) 4 (click to see context) :
* {{Sequelitis}}: While the first ''ComicBook/BatmanWhiteKnight'' received praise for its art and its concept (though the [[BrokenBase execution of it was up for debate]]), reception towards the sequels and spin-offs have been considerably worse, with the story spinning out of control and the premise wearing thin. It also doesn't help that they [[spoiler: pretty much killed off a vast majority of iconic Batman characters and elements, ending with Batman being exposed and facing trial, making it unclear just ''how'' they can continue the story in the future unless they choose to bring in Ra's al-Ghul or an obscure Batman villain from the 40s or 50s that everyone's forgotten about]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added line(s) 4 (click to see context) :
----
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: The sequel introduced the ''White Knight''-verse version of [[spoiler: Bane. He spends a few short pages establishing himself by manhandling Azrael... only for one of Azrael's minions to cut his venom tube from behind, after which Azrael cuts Bane's head off like a floundering fish. After that, one can only wonder ''why'' they even bothered introducing Bane if they were just going to kill him off so abruptly.]]
to:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: The sequel introduced the ''White Knight''-verse version of [[spoiler: Bane. He spends a few short pages establishing himself by manhandling Azrael... only Only for one of Azrael's minions to cut his venom tube from behind, after which Azrael cuts Bane's head off like a floundering fish. After that, one can only wonder ''why'' they even bothered introducing Bane if they were just going to kill him off so abruptly.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* {{Sequelitis}}: While the first ''ComicBook/BatmanWhiteKnight'' received praise for its art and its concept (though the [[BrokenBase execution of it was up for debate]]), reception towards the sequels and spin-offs have been considerably worse, with the story spinning out of control and the premise wearing thin.
to:
* {{Sequelitis}}: While the first ''ComicBook/BatmanWhiteKnight'' received praise for its art and its concept (though the [[BrokenBase execution of it was up for debate]]), reception towards the sequels and spin-offs have been considerably worse, with the story spinning out of control and the premise wearing thin. It also doesn't help that they [[spoiler: pretty much killed off a vast majority of iconic Batman characters and elements, ending with Batman being exposed and facing trial, making it unclear just ''how'' they can continue the story in the future unless they choose to bring in Ra's al-Ghul or an obscure Batman villain from the 40s or 50s that everyone's forgotten about]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* {{Sequilitis}}: While the first ''ComicBook/BatmanWhiteKnight'' received praise for its art and its concept (though the [[BrokenBase execution of it was up for debate]], reception towards the sequels and spin-offs have been considerably worse, with the story spinning out of control and the premise wearing thin.
to:
* {{Sequilitis}}: {{Sequelitis}}: While the first ''ComicBook/BatmanWhiteKnight'' received praise for its art and its concept (though the [[BrokenBase execution of it was up for debate]], debate]]), reception towards the sequels and spin-offs have been considerably worse, with the story spinning out of control and the premise wearing thin.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* Sequilitis: While the first ''ComicBook/BatmanWhiteKnight'' received praise for its art and its concept (though the [[BrokenBase execution of it was up for debate]], reception towards the sequels and spin-offs have been considerably worse, with the story spinning out of control and the premise wearing thin.
to:
* Sequilitis: {{Sequilitis}}: While the first ''ComicBook/BatmanWhiteKnight'' received praise for its art and its concept (though the [[BrokenBase execution of it was up for debate]], reception towards the sequels and spin-offs have been considerably worse, with the story spinning out of control and the premise wearing thin.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* Sequilitis: While the first ''ComicBook/BatmanWhiteKnight'' received praise for its art and its concept (though the [[BrokenBase execution of it was up for debate]], reception towards the sequels and spin-offs have been considerably worse, with the story spinning out of control and the premise wearing thin.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: The sequel introduced the ''White Knight''-verse version of [[spoiler: Bane. He spends a few short pages establishing himself by manhandling Azrael... only for one of Azrael's minions to cut his venom tube from behind, after which Azrael cuts Bane's head off like a floundering fish. After that, one can only wonder ''why'' they even bothered introduced Bane if they were just going to kill him off so abruptly.]]
to:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: The sequel introduced the ''White Knight''-verse version of [[spoiler: Bane. He spends a few short pages establishing himself by manhandling Azrael... only for one of Azrael's minions to cut his venom tube from behind, after which Azrael cuts Bane's head off like a floundering fish. After that, one can only wonder ''why'' they even bothered introduced introducing Bane if they were just going to kill him off so abruptly.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodCharacter: The sequel introduced the ''White Knight''-verse version of [[spoiler: Bane. He spends a few short pages establishing himself by manhandling Azrael... only for one of Azrael's minions to cut his venom tube from behind, after which Azrael cuts Bane's head off like a floundering fish. After that, one can only wonder ''why'' they even bothered introduced Bane if they were just going to kill him off so abruptly.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* HilariousInHindsight: Mainstream comics Barbara Gordon is now featured wearing just a DominoMask instead of the cowl, but it still fools even James Gordon.
to:
* HilariousInHindsight: Mainstream comics Barbara Gordon is now featured wearing just a DominoMask instead of the cowl, but it still fools even James Gordon.Gordon.
----
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* CharacterRerailment: In ''ComicBook/BatmanWhiteKnight'', the Joker was presented as a mischievous prankster fanboy who wasn’t as bad as the main universe counterpart, and that the Gotham police had little evidence of him involved with serious crimes. Here, his plots are more dangerous, he plans to undo the work that his alter ego Jack had done combating exposing corruption in Gotham and he brings in Jean-Paul Valley, helping him become the murderous Azrael.
to:
* CharacterRerailment: In ''ComicBook/BatmanWhiteKnight'', the Joker was presented as a mischievous prankster fanboy who wasn’t as bad as the main universe counterpart, and that the Gotham police had little evidence of him involved with serious crimes. Here, his plots are more dangerous, he plans to undo the work that his alter ego Jack had done combating exposing corruption in Gotham and he brings in Jean-Paul Valley, helping him become the murderous Azrael.Azrael.
* HilariousInHindsight: Mainstream comics Barbara Gordon is now featured wearing just a DominoMask instead of the cowl, but it still fools even James Gordon.
* HilariousInHindsight: Mainstream comics Barbara Gordon is now featured wearing just a DominoMask instead of the cowl, but it still fools even James Gordon.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* CharacterRerailment: In ''ComicBook/BatmanWhiteKnight'', the Joker was presented as a mischievous prankster fanboy who wasn’t as bad as the main universe counterpart, and that the Gotham police had little evidence of him involved with serious crimes. Here, his plots are more dangerous, he plans to undo the work that his alter ego Jack had done combating exposing corruption in Gotham and he brings in Jean-Paul Valley, helping him become the murderous Azrael.
