Follow TV Tropes

Following

History YMMV / AThousandWords

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not enough context (ZCE)


* AluminumChristmasTrees: Jack's habit of reading the first five pages and the last five pages of a book to see if it is worthwhile is portrayed as if it were negligent on his part, but it is actually fair by industry standards.

to:

* AluminumChristmasTrees: Jack's habit of reading the first five pages and the last five pages of a book to see if it is worthwhile is portrayed as if it were negligent on his part, but it is actually fair by industry standards. [[note]]Reading the first five pages of a book is a book trick that helps you predetermine the rest of the book up to the last five pages, and vice verse with the last five pages.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:

Added DiffLines:

* AluminumChristmasTrees: Jack's habit of reading the first five pages and the last five pages of a book to see if it is worthwhile is portrayed as if it were negligent on his part, but it is actually fair by industry standards.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CriticalDissonance: This film was ''universally'' reviled by critics, receiving a score of 0% fresh from 54 critics on Rotten Tomatoes in 2012, by which time it had become highly unusual for any film on the site to receive a 0%. 47% of audience scorers, however, stated that they liked it, and elsewhere it's generally considered SoOkayItsAverage. Given the starting point, there was pretty much nowhere but up.

to:

* CriticalDissonance: This film was ''universally'' reviled by critics, receiving a score of 0% '''[[MedalOfDishonor 0%]]''' fresh from 54 critics on Rotten Tomatoes in 2012, by which time it had become highly unusual for any film on the site to receive a 0%. 47% of audience scorers, however, stated that they liked it, and elsewhere it's generally considered SoOkayItsAverage. Given the starting point, there was pretty much nowhere but up.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* EnsembleDarkhorse: The chipper, music-loving barista played by Creator/JackMcBrayer who has to guess a lot of funny pantomiming actions is a fairly well-liked character in the poorly received film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AluminumChristmasTrees: Jack's habit of reading the first five pages and the last five pages of a book to see if it is worthwhile is portrayed as if it were negligent on his part, but it is actually fair by industry standards.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Watching the movie now. Jack reads ten pages in total, not ten pages of the beginning and the end.


* AluminumChristmasTrees: Jack's habit of reading the first ten pages and the last ten pages of a book to see if it is worthwhile is portrayed as if it were negligent on his part, but it is actually fair by industry standards.

to:

* AluminumChristmasTrees: Jack's habit of reading the first ten five pages and the last ten five pages of a book to see if it is worthwhile is portrayed as if it were negligent on his part, but it is actually fair by industry standards.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SugarWiki/HeReallyCanAct: Never thought loudmouth Eddie Murphy could do such silent pantomiming didn't you?

to:

* SugarWiki/HeReallyCanAct: Never thought loudmouth Eddie Murphy could do such silent pantomiming didn't pantomiming, did you?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HeReallyCanAct: Never thought loudmouth Eddie Murphy could do such silent pantomiming didn't you?

to:

* HeReallyCanAct: SugarWiki/HeReallyCanAct: Never thought loudmouth Eddie Murphy could do such silent pantomiming didn't you?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HeReallyCanAct: Never thought Loudmouth Eddie Murphy could do such silent pantomiming didn't you?

to:

* HeReallyCanAct: Never thought Loudmouth loudmouth Eddie Murphy could do such silent pantomiming didn't you?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AluminumChristmasTrees: Jack's habit of reading the first ten pages and the last ten pages of a book to see if it is worthwhile is portrayed as if it were negligent on his part, but it is actually fair by industry standards.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CriticalDissonance: This film was ''universally'' reviled by critics, receiving a score of 0% fresh from 54 critics on Rotten Tomatoes in 2012, by which time it had become highly unusual for any film on the site to receive a 0%. 47% of audience scorers, however, stated that they liked it. Given the starting point, there was pretty much nowhere but up.

to:

* CriticalDissonance: This film was ''universally'' reviled by critics, receiving a score of 0% fresh from 54 critics on Rotten Tomatoes in 2012, by which time it had become highly unusual for any film on the site to receive a 0%. 47% of audience scorers, however, stated that they liked it.it, and elsewhere it's generally considered SoOkayItsAverage. Given the starting point, there was pretty much nowhere but up.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
TRS Wick cleaning. Do not re-add.


* HeReallyCanAct: Never thought Loudmouth Eddie Murphy could do such silent pantomiming didn't you?
* NeedsMoreLove: Many fans think the film deserved better praise than what it got and the negative reviews were ridiculous and unfair.

to:

* HeReallyCanAct: Never thought Loudmouth Eddie Murphy could do such silent pantomiming didn't you?
* NeedsMoreLove: Many fans think the film deserved better praise than what it got and the negative reviews were ridiculous and unfair.
you?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HeCanReallyAct: Never thought Loudmouth Eddie Murphy could do such silent pantomiming didn't you?

to:

* HeCanReallyAct: HeReallyCanAct: Never thought Loudmouth Eddie Murphy could do such silent pantomiming didn't you?

Added: 231

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CriticalDissonance: This film was ''universally'' reviled by critics, receiving a score of 0% fresh from 54 critics on Rotten Tomatoes in 2012, by which time it had become highly unusual for any film on the site to receive a 0%. 47% of audience scorers, however, stated that they liked it. Given the starting point, there was pretty much nowhere but up.

to:

* CriticalDissonance: This film was ''universally'' reviled by critics, receiving a score of 0% fresh from 54 critics on Rotten Tomatoes in 2012, by which time it had become highly unusual for any film on the site to receive a 0%. 47% of audience scorers, however, stated that they liked it. Given the starting point, there was pretty much nowhere but up.
*HeCanReallyAct: Never thought Loudmouth Eddie Murphy could do such silent pantomiming didn't you?
*NeedsMoreLove: Many fans think the film deserved better praise than what it got and the negative reviews were ridiculous and unfair.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*CriticalDissonance: This film was ''universally'' reviled by critics, receiving a score of 0% fresh from 54 critics on Rotten Tomatoes in 2012, by which time it had become highly unusual for any film on the site to receive a 0%. 47% of audience scorers, however, stated that they liked it. Given the starting point, there was pretty much nowhere but up.

Top