Follow TV Tropes

Following

History UsefulNotes / KievanRus

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The most common, or, better to say, best known by the lay people, theory (usually called "Normanist") says that Kievan Rus was founded by the Scandinavian prince (Actually ,in that times, Russians used one title 'Князь' or 'Knyaz`', and 'Великий' (The great) 'князь' meant ruler of Kiev. The titles were in active use to the end of Russian nobility in early XXth century) Rurik and his Viking followers, who migrated south and conquered the backward, almost-tribal Eastern Slavs (ancestors of Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians). The fact is really unknown, and is actually the ground for the very [[MisplacedNationalism hot and politicized debate]]. ''Scientific'' consensus is generally that the Vikings were basically just as tribal (or developed, take whatever you wish) as Slavs, and that their cultures were sufficiently similar for people and nobility to freely mix together. Also, one of the Old Norse words for Ruthenia was "Gardariki" (Realm of [many] towns), which means pre-Kievan Rus was already an urbanizing culture.

An official myth dating back to the Imperial era says the Slavs themselves invited the Norse to rule them. Needless to say, it is subject to the very same debate, which is generally more about politics than history. Some say that knowing the attitudes and customs of TheDungAges, this is highly unlikely, other insist that it was actually pretty routine. Just don't try to [[FlameBait bring it up]] in a non-scientific circles. The first capital of Rurik's principality was the ancient Northern city of Ladoga (now called ''Old'' Ladoga), but soon moved to Novgorod (another Northern city, founded by the settlers from Ladoga; now called ''Veliky'' ("Great") ''Novgorod'' despite it's smaller than [[OtherRussianTownsAndCities the other Novgorod]]; the Norse called it Holmgard). His sons, however, took it over south, to Kiev.

The original Kievan Rus was pagan, with the Viking-descended nobility worshiping the Norse gods and the common Slavs their own pantheon, which was somewhat similar, but distinct. There were also significant and influential Christian minority, as well as Jewish and Muslim ones. Christians, however, were much better placed, as they generally were Christianized Vikings who served at Byzantine court as mercenaries, and were often relatives of Russian nobility. In 988, Prince Vladimir I, who was dissatisfied with paganism, and wished to establish a state religion, converted Rus into OrthodoxChristianity.

to:

The most common, or, better to say, theory best known by the lay people, theory people (usually called "Normanist") says that Kievan Rus was founded by the Scandinavian prince (Actually ,in [[note]](At that times, time, Russians used one title 'Князь' or 'Knyaz`', and 'Великий' (The great) 'князь' meant ruler of Kiev. The titles were in active use to the end of Russian nobility in early XXth century) century[[/note]] Rurik and his Viking followers, who migrated south and conquered the backward, almost-tribal Eastern Slavs (ancestors of Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians). The fact truth is really unknown, and is actually the ground grounds for the very [[MisplacedNationalism hot and politicized debate]]. ''Scientific'' Scientific consensus is generally that the Vikings were basically just as tribal (or developed, take whatever you wish) as at a similar level of development to the Slavs, and that their cultures were sufficiently similar for people and nobility to freely mix together. Also, one One of the Old Norse words for Ruthenia was "Gardariki" (Realm of [many] towns), which means suggests pre-Kievan Rus was already an urbanizing culture.

An official myth dating back to the Imperial era says the Slavs themselves invited the Norse to rule them. Needless to say, it is subject to the very same debate, which is generally more about politics than history. Some say that knowing the attitudes and customs of TheDungAges, this is highly unlikely, other others insist that it was actually pretty routine. Just don't try to [[FlameBait bring it up]] in a non-scientific circles. The first capital of Rurik's principality was the ancient Northern city of Ladoga (now called ''Old'' Ladoga), but soon moved to Novgorod (another Northern city, founded by the settlers from Ladoga; now called ''Veliky'' ("Great") ''Novgorod'' despite it's being smaller than [[OtherRussianTownsAndCities the other Novgorod]]; the Norse called it Holmgard). His sons, however, took it over south, south to Kiev.

The original Kievan Rus was pagan, with the Viking-descended nobility worshiping [[NorseMythology the Norse gods gods]] and the common Slavs [[SlavicMythology their own pantheon, pantheon]], which was somewhat similar, but distinct. There were was also a significant and influential Christian minority, as well as Jewish and Muslim ones. Christians, however, were much better placed, as they generally were Christianized Vikings who served at the Byzantine court as mercenaries, and were often relatives of Russian nobility. In 988, Prince Vladimir I, who was dissatisfied with paganism, and wished to establish a state religion, converted Rus into OrthodoxChristianity.



Early Kievan Rus was a united monarchy, though with big family feuds, exacerbated by the Slavic succession laws, where the brother held precedence over the son. This had quickly led to the bloody free-for-all, and in the 12th century the feudal patchwork kicked in. That made the blanket term "Kievan Rus" obsolete: There were also the Vladimir Rus, the Novgorod Rus, later the Moscow Rus and many smaller principalities, although initially the Kievan throne was notionally their suzerain, and the ruler of Kiev held the title of Grand Prince. This made Rus very vulnerable to outside threats, and in the mid-13th century it was overrun by the Mongol Horde.

The Mongols left most of the political system intact, but now the Grand Prince had to be formally recognized as such by his Mongol lieges, who chose the most obedient ones. The Novgorod Rus was spared of the Mongol invasion by being too far north, and its princes and council being too much of {{Magnificent Bastard}}s (Novgorod was a republic, its prince being only the hired military leader, who could be deposed by the parliament and the city council), but had to deal with other enemies, such as Swedes and TheTeutonicKnights.

Eventually, Grand Duchy of Vladimir-Suzdal, later known as "of Moscow", ended up as the most important principality. The Muscovite princes cast off the Mongol-Tatar yoke, annexed the Novgorod Republic and united the northern principalities. The principalities under the Grand Duchy of Moscow later formed the [[TsaristRussia Muscovite Tsardom]]. Kiev, the original capital of Ruthenia, and the southern principalities were united by the Galician-Volhynian Principality (later renamed the Kingdom of Rus) for a time, until its lands were divided between Kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania (which had little connection to the ''modern'' Lithuania, and corresponding mostly to the modern Belorussia[[hottip:*:Current Lithuania was more of an AxCrazy cousin kept out of sight, but cared because its pagan population were {{Proud Warrior Race Guy}}s and its princes made fantastic commanders. It was vassal to the then Lithuania and was called Zhemaitia.]]), another pretender to be the "true heir" of Ruthenia.

The question of who are the "true heirs" of the Kievan Rus is often a matter of disagreement between Eastern Slavs, with Russians saying that Moscow's reunification of the northern principalities and Kiev's depopulation by the Tatars and later subjugation by Lithuania (and Novgorod, a distinctly Russian city, being the first capital of Rurik's princedom) make it clear which city inherited the title of the capital of the Rus, while Ukrainians see the Galicia-Lodomeria as the heir to original Rus, and are saying that Kiev and the southern principalities stayed as the core of Ruthenian culture, unlike the colonial northern principalities, the people of which were intermingled with Ugro-Finns and Tatars. Belarusian principalities mostly stayed autonomously of Rus and, being united with Aukštaitija, formed the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, which will later unite most of Ruthenian territories, except for Novgorod and North-Eastern colonies that will become a basis for future Russia. But since Russians pack the greatest punch of the three most of the time, the Russian-Ruthenian connection is the most well known. This question is even more complicated by the fact that a people called Ruthenians (or Rusyns, or Ruthens) do exist now; they are relatives of Ukrainians living in Transcarpathia.

to:

Early Kievan Rus was a united monarchy, though with big family feuds, exacerbated by the Slavic succession laws, where the brother held precedence over the son. This had quickly led to the a bloody free-for-all, and in the 12th century the a feudal patchwork kicked in. That made the blanket term "Kievan Rus" obsolete: There were also the Vladimir Rus, the Novgorod Rus, later the Moscow Rus and many smaller principalities, although initially the Kievan throne was notionally their suzerain, and the ruler of Kiev held the title of Grand Prince. This made Rus very vulnerable to outside threats, and in the mid-13th century it was overrun by the Mongol Horde.

The Mongols left most of the political system intact, but now the Grand Prince had to be formally recognized as such by his Mongol lieges, who chose the most obedient ones. The Novgorod Rus was spared of the Mongol invasion by being too far north, and its princes and council being too much of such {{Magnificent Bastard}}s (Novgorod was a republic, its prince being only the hired military leader, who could be deposed by the parliament and the city council), but had to deal with other enemies, such as Swedes and TheTeutonicKnights.

Eventually, the Grand Duchy of Vladimir-Suzdal, later known as "of Moscow", ended up as the most important principality. The Muscovite princes cast off the Mongol-Tatar yoke, annexed the Novgorod Republic and united the northern principalities. The principalities under the Grand Duchy of Moscow later formed the [[TsaristRussia Muscovite Tsardom]]. Kiev, the original capital of Ruthenia, and the southern principalities were united by the Galician-Volhynian Principality (later renamed the Kingdom of Rus) for a time, until its lands were divided between the Kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania (which had little connection to the ''modern'' Lithuania, and corresponding corresponded mostly to the modern Belorussia[[hottip:*:Current Belorussia[[note]]Current Lithuania was more of an AxCrazy cousin kept out of sight, but cared because its pagan population were {{Proud Warrior Race Guy}}s and its princes made fantastic commanders. It was vassal to the then Lithuania and was called Zhemaitia.]]), [[/note]]), another pretender to be the "true heir" of Ruthenia.

The question of who are now the "true heirs" of the Kievan Rus is often a matter of disagreement between Eastern Slavs, with Russians saying that Moscow's reunification of the northern principalities and Kiev's depopulation by the Tatars and later subjugation by Lithuania (and Novgorod, a distinctly Russian city, being the first capital of Rurik's princedom) make it clear which city inherited the title of the capital of the Rus, while Ukrainians see the Galicia-Lodomeria as the heir to original Rus, and are saying claim that Kiev and the southern principalities stayed as the core of Ruthenian culture, unlike the colonial northern principalities, the people of which were intermingled with Ugro-Finns and Tatars. Belarusian principalities mostly stayed autonomously of autonomous from Rus and, being united with Aukštaitija, formed the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, which will would later unite most of the Ruthenian territories, except for Novgorod and North-Eastern colonies that will would become a basis for the future Russia. But since Russians pack the greatest punch of the three most of the time, the Russian-Ruthenian connection is the most well known. This question is even more complicated even more by the fact that a people called Ruthenians (or Rusyns, or Ruthens) do exist now; they are relatives of Ukrainians living in Transcarpathia.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The most common, or, better to say, best known by the lay people, theory (usually called "Normanist") says that Kievan Rus was founded by the Scandinavian prince Rurik and his Viking followers, who migrated south and conquered the backward, almost-tribal Eastern Slavs (ancestors of Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians). The fact is really unknown, and is actually the ground for the very [[MisplacedNationalism hot and politicized debate]]. ''Scientific'' consensus is generally that the Vikings were basically just as tribal (or developed, take whatever you wish) as Slavs, and that their cultures were sufficiently similar for people and nobility to freely mix together. Also, one of the Old Norse words for Ruthenia was "Gardariki" (Realm of [many] towns), which means pre-Kievan Rus was already an urbanizing culture.

to:

The most common, or, better to say, best known by the lay people, theory (usually called "Normanist") says that Kievan Rus was founded by the Scandinavian prince (Actually ,in that times, Russians used one title 'Князь' or 'Knyaz`', and 'Великий' (The great) 'князь' meant ruler of Kiev. The titles were in active use to the end of Russian nobility in early XXth century) Rurik and his Viking followers, who migrated south and conquered the backward, almost-tribal Eastern Slavs (ancestors of Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians). The fact is really unknown, and is actually the ground for the very [[MisplacedNationalism hot and politicized debate]]. ''Scientific'' consensus is generally that the Vikings were basically just as tribal (or developed, take whatever you wish) as Slavs, and that their cultures were sufficiently similar for people and nobility to freely mix together. Also, one of the Old Norse words for Ruthenia was "Gardariki" (Realm of [many] towns), which means pre-Kievan Rus was already an urbanizing culture.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


An official myth dating back to the Imperial era says the Slavs themselves invited the Norse to rule them. Needless to say, it is subject to the very same debate, which is generally more about politics than history. Some say that knowing the attitudes and customs of TheDungAges, this is highly unlikely, other insist that it was actually pretty routine. Just don't try to [[FlameBait bring it up]] in a non-scientific circles. The first capital of Rurik's principality was the ancient Northern city of Ladoga (now called ''Old'' Ladoga), but soon moved to Novgorod (another Northern city, founded by the settlers from Ladoga; now called ''Veliky'' ("Great") ''Novgorod'' despite it's smaller than [[OtherRussianTownsAndCities the other Novgorod]]). His sons, however, took it over south, to Kiev.

to:

An official myth dating back to the Imperial era says the Slavs themselves invited the Norse to rule them. Needless to say, it is subject to the very same debate, which is generally more about politics than history. Some say that knowing the attitudes and customs of TheDungAges, this is highly unlikely, other insist that it was actually pretty routine. Just don't try to [[FlameBait bring it up]] in a non-scientific circles. The first capital of Rurik's principality was the ancient Northern city of Ladoga (now called ''Old'' Ladoga), but soon moved to Novgorod (another Northern city, founded by the settlers from Ladoga; now called ''Veliky'' ("Great") ''Novgorod'' despite it's smaller than [[OtherRussianTownsAndCities the other Novgorod]]).Novgorod]]; the Norse called it Holmgard). His sons, however, took it over south, to Kiev.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Danylo (Daniel) I of Galicia. The prince of Galicia-Volhynia, he created a wide alliance against the Mongol-Tatars in Eastern Europe, as well as reasoned with the Pope to start the Crusade against the Mongol-Tatars, but ultimately failed and had to stay as the vassal of the Khan. He is known as the founder of Lviv and the first ruler to be crowned as "the King of Rus".

to:

* Danylo (Daniel) I of Galicia. The prince of Galicia-Volhynia, he created a wide alliance against the Mongol-Tatars in Eastern Europe, as well as reasoned with the Pope to start the Crusade against the Mongol-Tatars, but ultimately failed and had to stay as the vassal of the Khan. He is known as the founder of Lviv and the first ruler to be crowned as "the King of Rus". This title didn't stick for long, though.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The question of who are the "true heirs" of the Kievan Rus is often a matter of disagreement between Eastern Slavs, with Russians saying that Moscow's reunification of the northern principalities and Kiev's depopulation by the Tatars and later subjugation by Lithuania make it clear which city inherited the title of the capital of the Rus (and Novgorod, a distinctly Russian city, being the first capital of Rurik's princedom), while Ukrainians see the Galicia-Lodomeria as the heir to original Rus, and are saying that Kiev and the southern principalities stayed as the core of Ruthenian culture, unlike the colonial northern principalities, the people of which were intermingled with Ugro-Finns and Tatars. Belarusian principalities mostly stayed autonomously of Rus and, being united with Aukštaitija, formed the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, which will later unite most of Ruthenian territories, except for Novgorod and North-Eastern colonies that will become a basis for future Russia. But since Russians pack the greatest punch of the three most of the time, the Russian-Ruthenian connection is the most well known. This question is even more complicated by the fact that a people called Ruthenians (or Rusyns, or Ruthens) do exist now; they are relatives of Ukrainians living in Transcarpathia.

to:

The question of who are the "true heirs" of the Kievan Rus is often a matter of disagreement between Eastern Slavs, with Russians saying that Moscow's reunification of the northern principalities and Kiev's depopulation by the Tatars and later subjugation by Lithuania make it clear which city inherited the title of the capital of the Rus (and Novgorod, a distinctly Russian city, being the first capital of Rurik's princedom), princedom) make it clear which city inherited the title of the capital of the Rus, while Ukrainians see the Galicia-Lodomeria as the heir to original Rus, and are saying that Kiev and the southern principalities stayed as the core of Ruthenian culture, unlike the colonial northern principalities, the people of which were intermingled with Ugro-Finns and Tatars. Belarusian principalities mostly stayed autonomously of Rus and, being united with Aukštaitija, formed the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, which will later unite most of Ruthenian territories, except for Novgorod and North-Eastern colonies that will become a basis for future Russia. But since Russians pack the greatest punch of the three most of the time, the Russian-Ruthenian connection is the most well known. This question is even more complicated by the fact that a people called Ruthenians (or Rusyns, or Ruthens) do exist now; they are relatives of Ukrainians living in Transcarpathia.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The question of who are the "true heirs" of the Kievan Rus is often a matter of disagreement between Eastern Slavs, with Russians saying that Moscow's reunification of the northern principalities and Kiev's depopulation by the Tatars and later subjugation by Lithuania make it clear which city inherited the title of the capital of the Rus, while Ukrainians see the Galicia-Lodomeria as the heir to original Rus, and are saying that Kiev and the southern principalities stayed as the core of Ruthenian culture, unlike the colonial northern principalities, the people of which were intermingled with Ugro-Finns and Tatars. Belarusian principalities mostly stayed autonomously of Rus and, being united with Aukštaitija, formed the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, which will later unite most of Ruthenian territories, except for Novgorod and North-Eastern colonies that will become a basis for future Russia. But since Russians pack the greatest punch of the three most of the time, the Russian-Ruthenian connection is the most well known. This question is even more complicated by the fact that a people called Ruthenians (or Rusyns, or Ruthens) do exist now; they are relatives of Ukrainians living in Transcarpathia.

to:

The question of who are the "true heirs" of the Kievan Rus is often a matter of disagreement between Eastern Slavs, with Russians saying that Moscow's reunification of the northern principalities and Kiev's depopulation by the Tatars and later subjugation by Lithuania make it clear which city inherited the title of the capital of the Rus, Rus (and Novgorod, a distinctly Russian city, being the first capital of Rurik's princedom), while Ukrainians see the Galicia-Lodomeria as the heir to original Rus, and are saying that Kiev and the southern principalities stayed as the core of Ruthenian culture, unlike the colonial northern principalities, the people of which were intermingled with Ugro-Finns and Tatars. Belarusian principalities mostly stayed autonomously of Rus and, being united with Aukštaitija, formed the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, which will later unite most of Ruthenian territories, except for Novgorod and North-Eastern colonies that will become a basis for future Russia. But since Russians pack the greatest punch of the three most of the time, the Russian-Ruthenian connection is the most well known. This question is even more complicated by the fact that a people called Ruthenians (or Rusyns, or Ruthens) do exist now; they are relatives of Ukrainians living in Transcarpathia.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The most common, or, better to say, best known by the lay people, theory (usually called "Normanist") says that Kievan Rus was founded by the Scandinavian prince Rurik and his Viking followers, who migrated south and conquered the backward, almost-tribal Eastern Slavs (ancestors of Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians). The fact is really unknown, and is actually the ground for the very [[MisplacedNationalism hot and politicized debate]]. ''Scientific'' consensus is generally that the Vikings were basically just as tribal (or developed, take whatever you wish) as Slavs, and that their cultures were sufficiently similar for people and nobility to freely mix together.

to:

The most common, or, better to say, best known by the lay people, theory (usually called "Normanist") says that Kievan Rus was founded by the Scandinavian prince Rurik and his Viking followers, who migrated south and conquered the backward, almost-tribal Eastern Slavs (ancestors of Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians). The fact is really unknown, and is actually the ground for the very [[MisplacedNationalism hot and politicized debate]]. ''Scientific'' consensus is generally that the Vikings were basically just as tribal (or developed, take whatever you wish) as Slavs, and that their cultures were sufficiently similar for people and nobility to freely mix together. \n Also, one of the Old Norse words for Ruthenia was "Gardariki" (Realm of [many] towns), which means pre-Kievan Rus was already an urbanizing culture.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The question of who are the "true heirs" of the Kievan Rus is often a matter of disagreement between Eastern Slavs, with Russians saying that Moscow's reunification of the northern principalities and Kiev's depopulation by the Tatars and later subjugation by Lithuania make it clear which city inherited the title of the capital of the Rus, while Ukrainians see the Galicia-Lodomeria as the heir to original Rus, and are saying that Kiev and the southern principalities stayed as the core of Ruthenian culture, unlike the colonial northern principalities, the people of which were intermingled with Ugro-Finns and Tatars. Belarusian principalities mostly stayed autonomously of Rus and, being united with Aukštaitija, formed the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, which will later unite most of Ruthenian territories, except for Novgorod and North-Eastern colonies that will become a basis for future Russia. But since Russians pack the greatest punch of the three most of the time, the Russian-Ruthenian connection is the most well known. This question is even more complicated by the fact that a people called Ruthenians do exist now; they are relatives of Ukrainians living in Transcarpathia.

to:

The question of who are the "true heirs" of the Kievan Rus is often a matter of disagreement between Eastern Slavs, with Russians saying that Moscow's reunification of the northern principalities and Kiev's depopulation by the Tatars and later subjugation by Lithuania make it clear which city inherited the title of the capital of the Rus, while Ukrainians see the Galicia-Lodomeria as the heir to original Rus, and are saying that Kiev and the southern principalities stayed as the core of Ruthenian culture, unlike the colonial northern principalities, the people of which were intermingled with Ugro-Finns and Tatars. Belarusian principalities mostly stayed autonomously of Rus and, being united with Aukštaitija, formed the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, which will later unite most of Ruthenian territories, except for Novgorod and North-Eastern colonies that will become a basis for future Russia. But since Russians pack the greatest punch of the three most of the time, the Russian-Ruthenian connection is the most well known. This question is even more complicated by the fact that a people called Ruthenians (or Rusyns, or Ruthens) do exist now; they are relatives of Ukrainians living in Transcarpathia.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The question of who are the "true heirs" of the Kievan Rus is often a matter of disagreement between Eastern Slavs, with Russians saying that Moscow's reunification of the northern principalities and Kiev's depopulation by the Tatars and later subjugation by Lithuania make it clear which city inherited the title of the capital of the Rus, while Ukrainians see the Galicia-Lodomeria as the heir to original Rus, and are saying that Kiev and the southern principalities stayed as the core of Ruthenian culture, unlike the colonial northern principalities, the people of which were intermingled with Ugro-Finns and Tatars. Belarusian principalities mostly stayed autonomously of Rus and, being united with Aukštaitija, formed the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, which will later unite most of Ruthenian territories, except for Novgorod and North-Eastern colonies that will become a basis for future Russia.

to:

The question of who are the "true heirs" of the Kievan Rus is often a matter of disagreement between Eastern Slavs, with Russians saying that Moscow's reunification of the northern principalities and Kiev's depopulation by the Tatars and later subjugation by Lithuania make it clear which city inherited the title of the capital of the Rus, while Ukrainians see the Galicia-Lodomeria as the heir to original Rus, and are saying that Kiev and the southern principalities stayed as the core of Ruthenian culture, unlike the colonial northern principalities, the people of which were intermingled with Ugro-Finns and Tatars. Belarusian principalities mostly stayed autonomously of Rus and, being united with Aukštaitija, formed the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, which will later unite most of Ruthenian territories, except for Novgorod and North-Eastern colonies that will become a basis for future Russia. \n But since Russians pack the greatest punch of the three most of the time, the Russian-Ruthenian connection is the most well known. This question is even more complicated by the fact that a people called Ruthenians do exist now; they are relatives of Ukrainians living in Transcarpathia.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Vladimir I (Vladimir the Saint). The guy who made Rus Christian. He was an illegitimate child, and captured the throne by force. He had several wives, then he received the baptism and forced it on all Rus. A saint of the [[OrthodoxChristianity Orthodox Church]].

to:

* Vladimir I (Vladimir the Saint).Saint, Vladimir the Red Sun). The guy who made Rus Christian. He was an illegitimate child, and captured the throne by force. He had several wives, then he received the baptism and forced it on all Rus. A saint of the [[OrthodoxChristianity Orthodox Church]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


An official myth dating back to the Imperial era says the Slavs themselves invited the Norse to rule them. Needless to say, it is subject to the very same debate, which is generally more about politics than history. Some say that knowing the attitudes and customs of TheDungAges, this is highly unlikely, other insist that it was actually pretty routine. Just don't try to [[FlameBait bring it up]] in a non-scientific circles. The first capital of Rurik's principality was the ancient Northern city of Ladoga (now called ''Old'' Ladoga), but soon moved to Novgorod (another Northern city, founded by the settlers from Ladoga; now called ''Veliky'' ("Great") ''Novgorod''). His sons, however, took it over south, to Kiev.

to:

An official myth dating back to the Imperial era says the Slavs themselves invited the Norse to rule them. Needless to say, it is subject to the very same debate, which is generally more about politics than history. Some say that knowing the attitudes and customs of TheDungAges, this is highly unlikely, other insist that it was actually pretty routine. Just don't try to [[FlameBait bring it up]] in a non-scientific circles. The first capital of Rurik's principality was the ancient Northern city of Ladoga (now called ''Old'' Ladoga), but soon moved to Novgorod (another Northern city, founded by the settlers from Ladoga; now called ''Veliky'' ("Great") ''Novgorod'').''Novgorod'' despite it's smaller than [[OtherRussianTownsAndCities the other Novgorod]]). His sons, however, took it over south, to Kiev.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


An official myth dating back to the Imperial era says the Slavs themselves invited the Norse to rule them. Needless to say, it is subject to the very same debate, which is generally more about politics than history. Some say that knowing the attitudes and customs of TheDungAges, this is highly unlikely, other insist that it was actually pretty routine. Just don't try to [[FlameBait bring it up]] in a non-scientific circles. The first capital of Rurik's principality was the ancient Northern city of Ladoga (now called ''Old'' Ladoga), but soon moved to Novgorod (another Northern city, founded by the settlers from Ladoga). His sons, however, took it over south, to Kiev.

to:

An official myth dating back to the Imperial era says the Slavs themselves invited the Norse to rule them. Needless to say, it is subject to the very same debate, which is generally more about politics than history. Some say that knowing the attitudes and customs of TheDungAges, this is highly unlikely, other insist that it was actually pretty routine. Just don't try to [[FlameBait bring it up]] in a non-scientific circles. The first capital of Rurik's principality was the ancient Northern city of Ladoga (now called ''Old'' Ladoga), but soon moved to Novgorod (another Northern city, founded by the settlers from Ladoga).Ladoga; now called ''Veliky'' ("Great") ''Novgorod''). His sons, however, took it over south, to Kiev.

Added: 1938

Changed: 4567

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The most common theory says that Kievan Rus was founded by the Scandinavian prince Rurik and his Viking followers, who migrated south and conquered the backward, almost-tribal Eastern Slavs (ancestors of Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians). An official myth dating back to the Imperial era says the Slavs themselves invited the Norse to rule them. Knowing the attitudes and customs of TheDungAges, everyone can say this is highly unlikely. The first capital of Rurik's principality was Novgorod, but it was soon moved to Kiev.

The original Kievan Rus was pagan, with the Viking-descended nobility worshipping the Norse gods and the common Slavs their own pantheon. But in 988, Prince Vladimir I converted Rus into OrthodoxChristianity. Allegedly, he organised a "casting": Catholics failed because of the fasting and general dourness, of [[TheTeetotaler the Muslims]] Vladimir declared that "[[VodkaDrunkenski Drinking is the joy of the Russes. We cannot exist without that pleasure]]", of the Jews Vladimir concluded their own {{God}} must dislike them if they're dispersed like that, while the Orthodox Byzantines were careful to approach Vladimir with all kinds of bling and little of the rules. Many pagan remnants persisted even into the Tsarist era.

Early Kievan Rus was a single monarchy, though with big family feuds, but in the 12th century the feudal patchwork kicked in. That made the blanket term "Kievan Rus" obsolete: There were also the Vladimir Rus, the Novgorod Rus, later the Moscow Rus and many smaller principalities. This made Rus very vulnerable to outside threats, and in the mid-13th century it was overrun by the Mongol Horde.

The Mongols left most of the political system intact, but now the Grand Prince had to be formally recognized as such by his Mongol lieges, who chose the most obedient ones. The Novgorod Rus was spared of the Mongol invasion by being too far north, but had to deal with other enemies, such as Swedes and TheTeutonicKnights.

Eventually, Grand Duchy of Vladimir-Suzdal, later known as "of Moscow", ended up as the most important principality. The Muscovite princes cast off the Mongol-Tatar yoke, annexed the Novgorod Republic and united the northern principalities. The principalities under the Grand Duchy of Moscow later formed the [[TsaristRussia Muscovite Tsardom]]. Kiev, the original capital of Ruthenia, and the southern principalities were united by the Galician-Volhynian Principality (later renamed the Kingdom of Rus) for a time, until its lands were divided between Kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, another pretender to be the "true heir" of Ruthenia.

to:

The most common common, or, better to say, best known by the lay people, theory (usually called "Normanist") says that Kievan Rus was founded by the Scandinavian prince Rurik and his Viking followers, who migrated south and conquered the backward, almost-tribal Eastern Slavs (ancestors of Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians). The fact is really unknown, and is actually the ground for the very [[MisplacedNationalism hot and politicized debate]]. ''Scientific'' consensus is generally that the Vikings were basically just as tribal (or developed, take whatever you wish) as Slavs, and that their cultures were sufficiently similar for people and nobility to freely mix together.

An official myth dating back to the Imperial era says the Slavs themselves invited the Norse to rule them. Knowing Needless to say, it is subject to the very same debate, which is generally more about politics than history. Some say that knowing the attitudes and customs of TheDungAges, everyone can say this is highly unlikely. unlikely, other insist that it was actually pretty routine. Just don't try to [[FlameBait bring it up]] in a non-scientific circles. The first capital of Rurik's principality was Novgorod, the ancient Northern city of Ladoga (now called ''Old'' Ladoga), but it was soon moved to Novgorod (another Northern city, founded by the settlers from Ladoga). His sons, however, took it over south, to Kiev.

The original Kievan Rus was pagan, with the Viking-descended nobility worshipping worshiping the Norse gods and the common Slavs their own pantheon. But in pantheon, which was somewhat similar, but distinct. There were also significant and influential Christian minority, as well as Jewish and Muslim ones. Christians, however, were much better placed, as they generally were Christianized Vikings who served at Byzantine court as mercenaries, and were often relatives of Russian nobility. In 988, Prince Vladimir I I, who was dissatisfied with paganism, and wished to establish a state religion, converted Rus into OrthodoxChristianity. OrthodoxChristianity.

Allegedly, he organised a "casting": Catholics failed because of the fasting and general dourness, of [[TheTeetotaler the Muslims]] Vladimir declared that "[[VodkaDrunkenski Drinking is the joy of the Russes. We cannot exist without that pleasure]]", of the Jews Vladimir concluded their own {{God}} must dislike them if they're dispersed like that, while the Orthodox Byzantines were careful to approach Vladimir with all kinds of bling and little of the rules. This was a myth, however. In fact, Vladimir was heavily influenced by Christianity from the start, and his grandmother, [[TheHighQueen Princess Olga]], was a Christian, baptized at the Byzantine court. Many pagan remnants customs, though, persisted even into the Tsarist era.

era and even to this day, after being coopted into the Christian ritual.

Early Kievan Rus was a single united monarchy, though with big family feuds, but exacerbated by the Slavic succession laws, where the brother held precedence over the son. This had quickly led to the bloody free-for-all, and in the 12th century the feudal patchwork kicked in. That made the blanket term "Kievan Rus" obsolete: There were also the Vladimir Rus, the Novgorod Rus, later the Moscow Rus and many smaller principalities.principalities, although initially the Kievan throne was notionally their suzerain, and the ruler of Kiev held the title of Grand Prince. This made Rus very vulnerable to outside threats, and in the mid-13th century it was overrun by the Mongol Horde.

The Mongols left most of the political system intact, but now the Grand Prince had to be formally recognized as such by his Mongol lieges, who chose the most obedient ones. The Novgorod Rus was spared of the Mongol invasion by being too far north, and its princes and council being too much of {{Magnificent Bastard}}s (Novgorod was a republic, its prince being only the hired military leader, who could be deposed by the parliament and the city council), but had to deal with other enemies, such as Swedes and TheTeutonicKnights.

TheTeutonicKnights.

Eventually, Grand Duchy of Vladimir-Suzdal, later known as "of Moscow", ended up as the most important principality. The Muscovite princes cast off the Mongol-Tatar yoke, annexed the Novgorod Republic and united the northern principalities. The principalities under the Grand Duchy of Moscow later formed the [[TsaristRussia Muscovite Tsardom]]. Kiev, the original capital of Ruthenia, and the southern principalities were united by the Galician-Volhynian Principality (later renamed the Kingdom of Rus) for a time, until its lands were divided between Kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, Lithuania (which had little connection to the ''modern'' Lithuania, and corresponding mostly to the modern Belorussia[[hottip:*:Current Lithuania was more of an AxCrazy cousin kept out of sight, but cared because its pagan population were {{Proud Warrior Race Guy}}s and its princes made fantastic commanders. It was vassal to the then Lithuania and was called Zhemaitia.]]), another pretender to be the "true heir" of Ruthenia.



* Saint Olga (Helga). Mother of Sviatoslav and grandmother of Vladimir, she was a shrewd, efficient, [[GodSaveUsFromTheQueen often ruthless]], but just ruler, who steered the land while [[WarriorPrince her son]] was raiding the neighbors, and who first introduced Christianity to the land, for which she was later canonized. The best candidate for TheHighQueen among the whole dynasty.



* Yaroslav the Wise. In his time, feudal disintegration of the Rus began. He made the first Russian code of laws, the Russkaya Pravda.

to:

* Yaroslav the Wise.Wise, son of Vladimir. Initially known as [[NonIndicativeName The Lame]], he was such a MagnificentBastard that he remains remembered even now. In his time, feudal disintegration of the Rus began. He made the first Russian code of laws, the Russkaya Pravda.



* Danylo (Daniel) I of Galicia. The prince of Galicia-Volhynia, he created a wide alliance against the Mongol-Tatars in Eastern Europe, as well as reasoned with the Pope to start the Crusade against the Mongol-Tatars, but ultimately failed and had to stay as the vassal of the Khan. He is known as the founder of Lviv and the first ruler to be crownd as "the King of Rus".

to:

* Danylo (Daniel) I of Galicia. The prince of Galicia-Volhynia, he created a wide alliance against the Mongol-Tatars in Eastern Europe, as well as reasoned with the Pope to start the Crusade against the Mongol-Tatars, but ultimately failed and had to stay as the vassal of the Khan. He is known as the founder of Lviv and the first ruler to be crownd crowned as "the King of Rus".



* Semyon Olelkovych. The last prince (not the grand prince) of Kiev, a vassal of the Grand Duke of Lithuania. He was one of the leaders in defence of the Grand Duchy's borders against Tatars and was thinked by many to be the new Grand Duke of Lithuania, Ruthenia and Samogitia. After his death in 1470 the Kievan Principality lost its autonomy and was officially subjugated into the Grand Duchy as Kievan Voievodship.

to:

* Semyon Olelkovych. The last prince (not the grand prince) of Kiev, a vassal of the Grand Duke of Lithuania. He was one of the leaders in defence of the Grand Duchy's borders against Tatars and was thinked thought by many to be the new Grand Duke of Lithuania, Ruthenia and Samogitia. After his death in 1470 the Kievan Principality lost its autonomy and was officially subjugated into the Grand Duchy as Kievan Voievodship.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The question of who are the "true heirs" of the Kievan Rus is often a matter of disagreement between Eastern Slavs, with Russians saying that Moscow's reunification of the northern principalities and Kiev's subjugation by Lithuania make it clear which city inherited the title of the capital of the Rus, while Ukrainians see the Galicia-Lodomeria as the heir to original Rus, and are saying that Kiev and the southern principalities stayed as the core of Ruthenian culture, unlike the colonial northern principalities, the people of which were intermingled with Ugro-Finns and Tatars. Belarusian principalities mostly stayed autonomously of Rus and, being united with Aukštaitija, formed the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, which will later unite most of Ruthenian territories, except for Novgorod and North-Eastern colonies that will become a basis for future Russia.

to:

The question of who are the "true heirs" of the Kievan Rus is often a matter of disagreement between Eastern Slavs, with Russians saying that Moscow's reunification of the northern principalities and Kiev's depopulation by the Tatars and later subjugation by Lithuania make it clear which city inherited the title of the capital of the Rus, while Ukrainians see the Galicia-Lodomeria as the heir to original Rus, and are saying that Kiev and the southern principalities stayed as the core of Ruthenian culture, unlike the colonial northern principalities, the people of which were intermingled with Ugro-Finns and Tatars. Belarusian principalities mostly stayed autonomously of Rus and, being united with Aukštaitija, formed the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, which will later unite most of Ruthenian territories, except for Novgorod and North-Eastern colonies that will become a basis for future Russia.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Trope misuse cleanup


* Vseslav the Sorcerer. A prince of Polotsk (modern-day Belarus). The last pagan prince of the Rus. He was known as, well, a [[FunctionalMagic sorcerer]]. Several supernatural powers were [[OrWasIt attributed]] to him.

to:

* Vseslav the Sorcerer. A prince of Polotsk (modern-day Belarus). The last pagan prince of the Rus. He was known as, well, a [[FunctionalMagic sorcerer]]. Several supernatural powers were [[OrWasIt attributed]] attributed to him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Ivan III. With him, the era ended. He threw off the Mongol yoke, united the northern Ruthenian principalities and created the Muscovite Tsardom, which eventually became TsaristRussia.

to:

* Ivan III. With him, the era ended. He threw off the Mongol yoke, united the northern Ruthenian (now distinctly Russian) principalities and created the Muscovite Tsardom, which eventually became TsaristRussia.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Semen Olelkovych. The last prince (not the grand prince) of Kiev, a vassal of the Grand Duke of Lithuania. He was one of the leaders in defence of the Grand Duchy's borders against Tatars and was thinked by many to be the new Grand Duke of Lithuania, Ruthenia and Samogitia. After his death in 1470 the Kievan Principality lost its autonomy and was officially subjugated into the Grand Duchy as Kievan Voievodship.

to:

* Semen Semyon Olelkovych. The last prince (not the grand prince) of Kiev, a vassal of the Grand Duke of Lithuania. He was one of the leaders in defence of the Grand Duchy's borders against Tatars and was thinked by many to be the new Grand Duke of Lithuania, Ruthenia and Samogitia. After his death in 1470 the Kievan Principality lost its autonomy and was officially subjugated into the Grand Duchy as Kievan Voievodship.

Added: 23

Changed: -2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The question of who are the "true heirs" of the Kievan Rus is often a matter of disagreement between Eastern Slavs, with Russians saying that Moscow's reunification of the northern principalities and Kiev's subjugation by Lithuania make it clear which city inherited the title of the capital of the Rus, while Ukrainians see the Galicia-Lodomeria as the heir to original Rus, and are saying that Kiev and the southern principalities stayed as the core of Ruthenian culture, unlike the colonial northern principalities, the people of which were intermingled with Ugro-Finns and Tatars. Belarusian principalities mostly stayed autonomously of Rus and, being united with Aukštaitija, formed the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, which will later unite most of Ruthenian territories, except for Novgorod and North-Eastern colonies that will become a basis for future Russia.

to:

The question of who are the "true heirs" of the Kievan Rus is often a matter of disagreement between Eastern Slavs, with Russians saying that Moscow's reunification of the northern principalities and Kiev's subjugation by Lithuania make it clear which city inherited the title of the capital of the Rus, while Ukrainians see the Galicia-Lodomeria as the heir to original Rus, and are saying that Kiev and the southern principalities stayed as the core of Ruthenian culture, unlike the colonial northern principalities, the people of which were intermingled with Ugro-Finns and Tatars. Belarusian principalities mostly stayed autonomously of Rus and, being united with Aukštaitija, formed the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, which will later unite most of Ruthenian territories, except for Novgorod and North-Eastern colonies that will become a basis for future Russia.



----

to:

--------
!!Depictions in fiction

Added: 557

Changed: 1593

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Kievan Rus was a feudal state that was the precursor to Tsarist Russia. Its early history is ShroudedInMyth; the first reliable historical records are from the ninth century.

to:

Kievan Rus Rus, or Ruthenia, was a feudal state that was the precursor to Tsarist Russia. Its early history is ShroudedInMyth; the first reliable historical records are from the ninth century.



Eventually, Moscow ended up as the most important city-state. The Muscovite princes cast off the Mongol-Tatar yoke, they reunited the country, and the [[TsaristRussia Muscovite Tsardom]] began.

The question of who are the "true heirs" of the Kievan Rus is often a matter of disagreement between Russians and Ukrainians, with Russians saying that Moscow's reunification of the principalities and Kiev's subjugation by Poland make it clear which city inherited the title of the capital of the Rus, and with Ukrainians saying that Kiev is their city and that Muscovite Russia is not the successor of the Rus, but of the Horde.

to:

Eventually, Moscow Grand Duchy of Vladimir-Suzdal, later known as "of Moscow", ended up as the most important city-state. principality. The Muscovite princes cast off the Mongol-Tatar yoke, they reunited annexed the country, Novgorod Republic and united the northern principalities. The principalities under the Grand Duchy of Moscow later formed the [[TsaristRussia Muscovite Tsardom]] began.

Tsardom]]. Kiev, the original capital of Ruthenia, and the southern principalities were united by the Galician-Volhynian Principality (later renamed the Kingdom of Rus) for a time, until its lands were divided between Kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, another pretender to be the "true heir" of Ruthenia.

The question of who are the "true heirs" of the Kievan Rus is often a matter of disagreement between Russians and Ukrainians, Eastern Slavs, with Russians saying that Moscow's reunification of the northern principalities and Kiev's subjugation by Poland Lithuania make it clear which city inherited the title of the capital of the Rus, and with while Ukrainians see the Galicia-Lodomeria as the heir to original Rus, and are saying that Kiev is their city and the southern principalities stayed as the core of Ruthenian culture, unlike the colonial northern principalities, the people of which were intermingled with Ugro-Finns and Tatars. Belarusian principalities mostly stayed autonomously of Rus and, being united with Aukštaitija, formed the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, which will later unite most of Ruthenian territories, except for Novgorod and North-Eastern colonies that Muscovite Russia is not the successor of the Rus, but of the Horde.
will become a basis for future Russia.



* Svyatoslav. He was a {{Badass}} WarriorPrince who paid more attention to his campaigns than to running the realm. He died in battle, and the Pecheneg nomads made a cup out of his skull. He was the first prince to be named in Old Russian, not in Old Norse.

to:

* Svyatoslav. He was a {{Badass}} WarriorPrince who paid more attention to his campaigns than to running the realm. He died in battle, and the Pecheneg nomads made a cup out of his skull. He was the first prince to be named in Old Russian, Ruthenian, not in Old Norse.



* Danylo (Daniel) I of Galicia. The prince of Galicia-Volhynia, he created a wide alliance against the Mongol-Tatars in Eastern Europe, as well as reasoned with the Pope to start the Crusade against the Mongol-Tatars, but ultimately failed and had to stay as the vassal of the Khan. He is known as the founder of Lviv and the first ruler to be crownd as "the King of Rus".



* Ivan III. With him, the era ended. He threw off the Mongol yoke, reunited Russia and created the Muscovite Tsardom, which eventually became TsaristRussia.

to:

* Semen Olelkovych. The last prince (not the grand prince) of Kiev, a vassal of the Grand Duke of Lithuania. He was one of the leaders in defence of the Grand Duchy's borders against Tatars and was thinked by many to be the new Grand Duke of Lithuania, Ruthenia and Samogitia. After his death in 1470 the Kievan Principality lost its autonomy and was officially subjugated into the Grand Duchy as Kievan Voievodship.
* Ivan III. With him, the era ended. He threw off the Mongol yoke, reunited Russia united the northern Ruthenian principalities and created the Muscovite Tsardom, which eventually became TsaristRussia.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Dmitri Donskoi (Dmitri of the Don [River]). Another prince of Moscow. He is famous for the first military victory over the Golden Horde, the battle of Kulikovo.

to:

* Dmitri Donskoi (Dmitri of the Don [River]). Another prince of Moscow. He is famous for the first military victory over the Golden Horde, the battle of Kulikovo. A contemporary and kinda friend of one of the most important saints of the Russian Orthodox Church, St.Sergius of Radonezh.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Vladimir I (Vladimir the Saint). The guy who made Rus Christian. He was an illegitimate child, and captured the throne by force. He had several wives, then he received the baptism and forced it on all Rus. A saint of the OrthodoxChurch.

to:

* Vladimir I (Vladimir the Saint). The guy who made Rus Christian. He was an illegitimate child, and captured the throne by force. He had several wives, then he received the baptism and forced it on all Rus. A saint of the OrthodoxChurch.[[OrthodoxChristianity Orthodox Church]].



* Alexander Nevsky, a prince of the Novgorod Rus. Novgorod was a republic, and its prince was more a general than anything else. Alexander Nevsky is famous as a really good general who won two wars, with the Swedes and with the Teutonic Knights. Also a saint of the OrthodoxChurch.

to:

* Alexander Nevsky, a prince of the Novgorod Rus. Novgorod was a republic, and its prince was more a general than anything else. Alexander Nevsky is famous as a really good general who won two wars, with the Swedes and with the Teutonic Knights. Also a saint of the OrthodoxChurch.[[OrthodoxChristianity Orthodox Church]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Vladimir I (Vladimir the Saint). The guy who made Rus Christian. He was an illegitimate child, and captured the throne by force. He had several wives, then he received the baptism and forced it on all Rus.

to:

* Vladimir I (Vladimir the Saint). The guy who made Rus Christian. He was an illegitimate child, and captured the throne by force. He had several wives, then he received the baptism and forced it on all Rus. A saint of the OrthodoxChurch.



* Alexander Nevsky, a prince of the Novgorod Rus. Novgorod was a republic, and its prince was more a general than anything else. Alexander Nevsky is famous as a really good general who won two wars, with the Swedes and with the Teutonic Knights.

to:

* Alexander Nevsky, a prince of the Novgorod Rus. Novgorod was a republic, and its prince was more a general than anything else. Alexander Nevsky is famous as a really good general who won two wars, with the Swedes and with the Teutonic Knights. Also a saint of the OrthodoxChurch.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Vseslav the Sorcerer. A prince of Polotsk (modern-day Belarus). The last pagan prince of the Rus. He was known as, well, a sorcerer. Several supernatural powers were attributed to him.

to:

* Vseslav the Sorcerer. A prince of Polotsk (modern-day Belarus). The last pagan prince of the Rus. He was known as, well, a sorcerer. [[FunctionalMagic sorcerer]]. Several supernatural powers were attributed [[OrWasIt attributed]] to him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Vseslav the Sorcerer. A prince of Polotsk (modern-day Belarus). The last pagan prince of the Rus. He was known as, well, a sorcerer. Several supernatural powers were attributed to him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Notable princes of the period include:

to:

Notable !!Notable princes of the period include:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Oleg the Seer. He was known for wars with the Khazar Khaghanate, and for the legend of his death. There was a prophecy that he would die by his horse. His horse died before him, and Oleg put his foot on the horse's skull and started to gloat; then a snake crawled from the skull and bit him fatally.
* Svyatoslav. He was a {{Badass}} WarriorPrince who paid more attention to his campaigns than to running the realm. He died in battle, and the Pecheneg nomads made a cup out of his skull.

to:

* Oleg (Helgi) the Seer. He was known for wars with the Khazar Khaghanate, and for the legend of his death. There was a prophecy that he would die by his horse. His horse died before him, and Oleg put his foot on the horse's skull and started to gloat; then a snake crawled from the skull and bit him fatally.
* Svyatoslav. He was a {{Badass}} WarriorPrince who paid more attention to his campaigns than to running the realm. He died in battle, and the Pecheneg nomads made a cup out of his skull. He was the first prince to be named in Old Russian, not in Old Norse.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The most common theory says that Kievan Rus was founded by the Scandinavian prince Rurik and his Viking followers, who migrated south and conquered the backward, almost-tribal Eastern Slavs (ancestors of Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians). The first capital of Rurik's principality was Novgorod, but it was soon moved to Kiev.

to:

The most common theory says that Kievan Rus was founded by the Scandinavian prince Rurik and his Viking followers, who migrated south and conquered the backward, almost-tribal Eastern Slavs (ancestors of Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians). An official myth dating back to the Imperial era says the Slavs themselves invited the Norse to rule them. Knowing the attitudes and customs of TheDungAges, everyone can say this is highly unlikely. The first capital of Rurik's principality was Novgorod, but it was soon moved to Kiev.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The Mongols left most of the political system intact, but now the Grand Prince had to be formally recognized as such by his Mongol lieges, who chose the most obedient ones. The Novgorod Rus was spared of the Mongol invasion by being too far north, but had to deal with other enemies, such as Swedes and Teutonic Knights.

to:

The Mongols left most of the political system intact, but now the Grand Prince had to be formally recognized as such by his Mongol lieges, who chose the most obedient ones. The Novgorod Rus was spared of the Mongol invasion by being too far north, but had to deal with other enemies, such as Swedes and Teutonic Knights.
TheTeutonicKnights.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The original Kievan Rus was pagan, with the Viking-descended nobility worshipping the Norse gods and the common Slavs their own pantheon. But in 988, Prince Vladimir I converted Rus into OrthodoxChristianity. Many pagan remnants persisted even into the Tsarist era.

to:

The original Kievan Rus was pagan, with the Viking-descended nobility worshipping the Norse gods and the common Slavs their own pantheon. But in 988, Prince Vladimir I converted Rus into OrthodoxChristianity. Allegedly, he organised a "casting": Catholics failed because of the fasting and general dourness, of [[TheTeetotaler the Muslims]] Vladimir declared that "[[VodkaDrunkenski Drinking is the joy of the Russes. We cannot exist without that pleasure]]", of the Jews Vladimir concluded their own {{God}} must dislike them if they're dispersed like that, while the Orthodox Byzantines were careful to approach Vladimir with all kinds of bling and little of the rules. Many pagan remnants persisted even into the Tsarist era.

Added: 429

Changed: 4

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The most common theory says that Kievan Rus was founded by the Scandinavian prince Rurik and his Viking followers, who migrated south and conquered the backward, almost-tribal Eastern Slavs (ancestors of Russians, Ukrainians and Belorussians). The first capital of Rurik's principality was Novgorod, but it was soon moved to Kiev.

to:

The most common theory says that Kievan Rus was founded by the Scandinavian prince Rurik and his Viking followers, who migrated south and conquered the backward, almost-tribal Eastern Slavs (ancestors of Russians, Ukrainians and Belorussians).Belarusians). The first capital of Rurik's principality was Novgorod, but it was soon moved to Kiev.



Eventually, Moscow ended up as the most important city-state. The Muscovite princes cast off the Mongolo-Tatar yoke, they reunited the country, and the [[TsaristRussia Muscovite Tsardom]] began.

to:

Eventually, Moscow ended up as the most important city-state. The Muscovite princes cast off the Mongolo-Tatar Mongol-Tatar yoke, they reunited the country, and the [[TsaristRussia Muscovite Tsardom]] began.
began.

The question of who are the "true heirs" of the Kievan Rus is often a matter of disagreement between Russians and Ukrainians, with Russians saying that Moscow's reunification of the principalities and Kiev's subjugation by Poland make it clear which city inherited the title of the capital of the Rus, and with Ukrainians saying that Kiev is their city and that Muscovite Russia is not the successor of the Rus, but of the Horde.

Top