Follow TV Tropes

Following

History UsefulNotes / KievanRus

Go To

OR

Changed: 25

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
per edit requests thread


* ''Literature/TheThirteenthWarrior'' is partially based on Ibn Fadlans account of a Rus funeral, but is otherwise pure SpeculativeFiction.

to:

* ''Literature/TheThirteenthWarrior'' ''Literature/EatersOfTheDead'' is partially based on Ibn Fadlans account of a Rus funeral, but is otherwise pure SpeculativeFiction.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Per edit requests thread


* ''Literature/EatersOfTheDead'' is partially based on Ibn Fadlans account of a Rus funeral, but is otherwise pure SpeculativeFiction.

to:

* ''Literature/EatersOfTheDead'' ''Literature/TheThirteenthWarrior'' is partially based on Ibn Fadlans account of a Rus funeral, but is otherwise pure SpeculativeFiction.

Added: 260

Changed: 221

Removed: 260

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Per edit requests thread


* ''Animation/ThreeBogatyrs'', a series of Russian animated features based on the Myth/RussianMythologyAndTales (of the titular three bogatyrs in particular) with a bits of [[AnachronismStew modern elements]] and Creator/AlexanderPushkin's narrative thrown in.



* Kyiv is a "rebel" settlement instead of a proper faction in ''VideoGame/MedievalIITotalWar'', but the ''Stainless Steel'' GameMod makes the Kievan Rus properly playable. The Grand Duchy of Kyiv starts with a decent capital and has some quality heavy cavalry and horse archers, but not much in the way of professional infantry, and true to history, the Mongols will be heading their way at some point...

to:

* Kyiv is a "rebel" settlement instead of a proper faction in ''VideoGame/MedievalIITotalWar'', ''VideoGame/MedievalIITotalWar'' with Novgorod (called anachronistically Russia) instead being the playable Rus' state, but the ''Stainless Steel'' GameMod makes the Kievan Rus properly playable. adds The Grand Duchy of Kyiv starts with a decent capital and has into the game (as well as renaming Russia into Novgorod). In both versions, the Rus' have some quality heavy cavalry and horse archers, but not much in the way of professional infantry, and true to history, the Mongols will be heading their way at some point... point...



* ''Animation/ThreeBogatyrs'', a series of Russian animated features based on the Myth/RussianMythologyAndTales (of the titular three bogatyrs in particular) with a bits of [[AnachronismStew modern elements]] and Creator/AlexanderPushkin's narrative thrown in.

Changed: 225

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
per edit requests thread


* A series of Russian animated features based on the lives of [[Myth/RussianMythologyAndTales the three bogatyrs]] by studio Melnitsa mix folklore characters with real life historical characters like Prince Vladimir the Bright Sun.

to:

* A ''Animation/ThreeBogatyrs'', a series of Russian animated features based on the lives of [[Myth/RussianMythologyAndTales Myth/RussianMythologyAndTales (of the titular three bogatyrs]] by studio Melnitsa mix folklore characters bogatyrs in particular) with real life historical characters like Prince Vladimir the Bright Sun.a bits of [[AnachronismStew modern elements]] and Creator/AlexanderPushkin's narrative thrown in.

Added: 358

Changed: 305

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
per edit requests thread


* Season 6 of ''Series/{{Vikings}}'' features Oleg the prophet and the Rus as the season's primary antagonists.
* A series of Russian animated features based on the lives of [[Myth/RussianMythologyAndTales the three bogatyrs]] by studio Melnitsa mix folklore characters with real life historical characters like Prince Vladimir the Bright Sun.

to:

* ''Series/{{Vikings}}'':
**
Season 6 of ''Series/{{Vikings}}'' features Oleg the prophet and the Rus as the season's primary antagonists.
** Novgorod reappears in the second season of the DistantSequel ''Series/VikingsValhalla'', now ruled by Yaroslav the Wise.
* A series of Russian animated features based on the lives of [[Myth/RussianMythologyAndTales the three bogatyrs]] by studio Melnitsa mix folklore characters with real life historical characters like Prince Vladimir the Bright Sun.Sun.
----
Tabs MOD

Added: 277

Removed: 277

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''VideoGame/TheNewOrderLastDaysOfEurope'' is set in an AlternateHistoryNaziVictory world in which USSR collapsed into warlordism. One of Russia's potential unifiers is Major General Nikolai Ivanovich Krylov, who went mad and crowned himself Rurik II (reincarnation of Rurik).



* A series of Russian animated features based on the lives of [[Myth/RussianMythologyAndTales the three bogatyrs]] by studio Melnitsa mix folklore characters with real life historical characters like Prince Vladimir the Bright Sun.
* ''VideoGame/TheNewOrderLastDaysOfEurope'' is set in an AlternateHistoryNaziVictory world in which USSR collapsed into warlordism. One of Russia's potential unifiers is Major General Nikolai Ivanovich Krylov, who went mad and crowned himself Rurik II (reincarnation of Rurik).

to:

* A series of Russian animated features based on the lives of [[Myth/RussianMythologyAndTales the three bogatyrs]] by studio Melnitsa mix folklore characters with real life historical characters like Prince Vladimir the Bright Sun.
* ''VideoGame/TheNewOrderLastDaysOfEurope'' is set in an AlternateHistoryNaziVictory world in which USSR collapsed into warlordism. One of Russia's potential unifiers is Major General Nikolai Ivanovich Krylov, who went mad and crowned himself Rurik II (reincarnation of Rurik).
Sun.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Per edit requests thread


Kievan Rus, or Ruthenia. Its early history is ShroudedInMyth; the first reliable historical records are from the ninth century.

The ancestor state of UsefulNotes/{{Russia}}. UsefulNotes/{{Ukraine}} and UsefulNotes/{{Belarus}} Its early history is ShroudedInMyth; the first reliable historical records are from the ninth century.

to:


Kievan Rus, or Ruthenia. Its early history is ShroudedInMyth; the first reliable historical records are from the ninth century.

The ancestor state of UsefulNotes/{{Russia}}. UsefulNotes/{{Russia}}, UsefulNotes/{{Ukraine}} and UsefulNotes/{{Belarus}} UsefulNotes/{{Belarus}}. Its early history is ShroudedInMyth; the first reliable historical records are from the ninth century.

Added: 674

Changed: 503

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Per edit requests thread


The term "Kievan Rus'" was coined in the 19th century in Russian historiography to refer to its period of history when the centre was in Kyiv and ruling Rurik dynasty sat there. During its actual existence in IX-XIII centuries the state was known simply as "Rus'" or "land of Rus'". From translation of Rusian historiography the term entered the international historiography.

to:

The ancestor state of UsefulNotes/{{Russia}}. UsefulNotes/{{Ukraine}} and UsefulNotes/{{Belarus}} Its early history is ShroudedInMyth; the first reliable historical records are from the ninth century.

The term "Kievan Rus'" (or "Kyivan Rus'" going by Ukrainian ortography) was coined in the 19th century in Russian historiography to refer to its period of history when the centre was in Kyiv and ruling Rurik dynasty sat there. During its actual existence in IX-XIII centuries the state was known simply as "Rus'" or "land of Rus'". From translation of Rusian historiography the term entered the international historiography.
historiography. During its actual existence in IX-XIII centuries the state was called by its people simply as "Rus'" or "land of Rus'", while in the rest of Europe it was known as "Russia" or "Ruthenia". Eventually, "Russia" stuck to indicate the north-eastern half (modern Russia), while "Ruthenia" stuck to indicate the south-western half (modern Ukraine and Belarus).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In ''Film/TheNorthman'' the land of the Rus is briefly seen in the first act being raided by a group of berserkers that prince Amleth ended up with. His LoveInterest Olga is a Slav who is captured by the group and sold as a slave to Fjolnir.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Early Kievan Rus was a united monarchy, though with big family feuds, exacerbated by the Slavic succession laws, where the brother held precedence over the son. This quickly led to a bloody free-for-all, and in the 12th century a feudal patchwork kicked in. That made the blanket term "Kievan Rus" obsolete: There were also the Vladimir Rus, the Novgorod Rus, later the Moscow Rus and many smaller principalities, although initially the Kievan throne was notionally their suzerain, and the ruler of Kiev held the title of Grand Prince. This made Rus very vulnerable to outside threats, and in the mid-13th century it was overrun and ruled briefly by the Mongol Horde. For some reason, this period of history is referred to as 'the Tatar Yoke', probably because the western part of the Mongol Horde, the most represented in its new vassal lands, was mostly Tatar.

to:

Early Kievan Rus was a united monarchy, though with big family feuds, exacerbated by the Slavic succession laws, where the brother held precedence over the son. This quickly led to a bloody free-for-all, and in the 12th century a feudal patchwork kicked in. That made the blanket term "Kievan Rus" obsolete: There were also the Vladimir Rus, the Novgorod Rus, later the Moscow Rus and many smaller principalities, although initially the Kievan throne was notionally their suzerain, and the ruler of Kiev Kyiv held the title of Grand Prince. This made Rus very vulnerable to outside threats, and in the mid-13th century it was overrun and ruled briefly by the Mongol Horde. For some reason, this period of history is referred to as 'the Tatar Yoke', probably because the western part of the Mongol Horde, the most represented in its new vassal lands, was mostly Tatar.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removed ROCEJ sinkhole as per discussion.


If we can return to the debate about the origin of the Rus, the clear majority of western historians believe in the Normanist theory. And truthfully, primary sources such as the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annales_Bertiniani#The_Rus.27 annals of St.Bertin]][[note]]Literally spells it out that the Rus were Swedes. Seriously. It says ''"eos gentis esse Sueonum"'' which means ''"These men are Swedes" or "among them are the Swedes"''[[/note]] and [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmad_ibn_Rustah Ahmad ibn Rustah]][[note]]clearly states that the Rus and the Slavs are two completely different peoples, the latter being subservient to the former.[[/note]] seems to support this theory. Since we at TV Tropes are not at liberty to discuss these things too vividly thanks to the Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment, the best thing you can do is go to the library, read up and decide for yourself. [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omeljan_Pritsak Omeljan Pritsak]] and [[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/961611.W_adys_aw_Duczko Wadyszlaw Duczko]] have written at length about the theory, the former against it and the latter in favor of it.

to:

If we can return to the debate about the origin of the Rus, the clear majority of western historians believe in the Normanist theory. And truthfully, primary sources such as the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annales_Bertiniani#The_Rus.27 annals of St.Bertin]][[note]]Literally spells it out that the Rus were Swedes. Seriously. It says ''"eos gentis esse Sueonum"'' which means ''"These men are Swedes" or "among them are the Swedes"''[[/note]] and [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmad_ibn_Rustah Ahmad ibn Rustah]][[note]]clearly states that the Rus and the Slavs are two completely different peoples, the latter being subservient to the former.[[/note]] seems to support this theory. Since we at TV Tropes are not at liberty to discuss these things too vividly thanks to the Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment, vividly, the best thing you can do is go to the library, read up and decide for yourself. [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omeljan_Pritsak Omeljan Pritsak]] and [[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/961611.W_adys_aw_Duczko Wadyszlaw Duczko]] have written at length about the theory, the former against it and the latter in favor of it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The theory best known by lay people (usually called "Normanist") says that Kievan Rus was founded by the Scandinavian prince [[note]](At that time, Rusans used one title 'Князь' or 'Knyaz`', and 'Великий' (The great) 'князь' meant the first among the equals. Initially this meant the seniormost of the Rurikid princes, but eventually began to be ascribed to the ruler of Kyiv, until Kyiv lost its importance (which actually happened even ''before'' the Mongol invasion). The titles were in active use to the end of Russian nobility in early 20th century[[/note]] Rurik and [[UsefulNotes/TheVikingAge his Viking followers]], who migrated south and conquered the backward, almost-tribal Eastern Slavs (ancestors of Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians). The truth is really unknown, and is the grounds for very [[UsefulNotes/MisplacedNationalism hot and politicized debate]].[[note]]Whereas in UsefulNotes/{{Britain}}, the Viking heritage was appropriated and celebrated, thanks to UsefulNotes/{{Norway}} and UsefulNotes/{{Denmark}} being quaint little remote countries in the north, that posed no threat to the British after the Viking age, UsefulNotes/{{Sweden}} and UsefulNotes/{{Russia}} have been deadly enemies ever since the early middle ages to the early 19th century. Even today the relationship between the two countries is mostly formal and cool. He who can lay claim to the Rus, would win a massive propaganda victory.[[/note]][[note]]Although, ironically, the most probable historical candidate for the role of legendary Rurik was actually a Dane.[[/note]] Scientific consensus is generally that the Vikings were at a similar level of development to the Slavs, and that their cultures were sufficiently similar for people and nobility to freely mix together. One of the Old Norse words for Ruthenia was "Gardariki" (Realm of [many] towns), which suggests pre-Kievan Rus was already an urbanizing culture. [[note]]Although there's nothing stopping the possibility that these towns were built by Vikings too.[[/note]]

Another Norse term for Kievan Rus is ''Svitjod the Great'' or ''Svitjod the Cold.'' ''Svitjod'' is an old Norse name for UsefulNotes/{{Sweden}}. [[note]]Meaning literally "the Swedish people" as this was before the existence of kingdoms and national identities in the modern sense. Compare with when the Angles and Saxons began to be referred to as the [[UsefulNotes/{{Britain}} "Angelcynn"]][[/note]]

to:

The theory best known by lay people (usually called "Normanist") says that Kievan Rus was founded by the Scandinavian prince [[note]](At that time, Rusans used one title 'Князь' "Князь" or 'Knyaz`', "Knyaz`", and 'Великий' (The great) 'князь' "Великий" (the Great) "князь" meant the first among the equals. Initially this meant the seniormost of the Rurikid princes, but eventually began to be ascribed to the ruler of Kyiv, until Kyiv lost its importance (which actually happened even ''before'' the Mongol invasion). The titles were in active use to the end of Russian nobility in early 20th century[[/note]] Rurik and [[UsefulNotes/TheVikingAge his Viking followers]], who migrated south and conquered the backward, almost-tribal Eastern Slavs (ancestors of Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians). The truth is really unknown, and is the grounds for very [[UsefulNotes/MisplacedNationalism hot and politicized debate]].[[note]]Whereas in UsefulNotes/{{Britain}}, UsefulNotes/{{Britain}} the Viking heritage was appropriated and celebrated, thanks to UsefulNotes/{{Norway}} and UsefulNotes/{{Denmark}} being quaint little remote countries in the north, north that posed no threat to the British after the Viking age, UsefulNotes/{{Sweden}} and UsefulNotes/{{Russia}} have been deadly enemies ever since the early middle ages to the early 19th century. Even today the relationship between the two countries is mostly formal and cool. He who can lay claim to the Rus, Rus would win a massive propaganda victory.[[/note]][[note]]Although, [[/note]][[note]]However, ironically, the most probable historical candidate for the role of legendary Rurik was actually a Dane.[[/note]] Scientific consensus is generally that the Vikings were at a similar level of development to the Slavs, and that their cultures were sufficiently similar for people and nobility to freely mix together. One of the Old Norse words for Ruthenia was "Gardariki" (Realm ("realm of [many] towns), towns"), which suggests pre-Kievan Rus was already an urbanizing culture. [[note]]Although there's nothing stopping the possibility that these towns were built by Vikings too.[[/note]]

Another Norse term for Kievan Rus is ''Svitjod the Great'' or ''Svitjod the Cold.'' Cold''. ''Svitjod'' is an old Norse name for UsefulNotes/{{Sweden}}. [[note]]Meaning literally "the Swedish people" as this was before the existence of kingdoms and national identities in the modern sense. Compare with when the Angles and Saxons began to be referred to as the [[UsefulNotes/{{Britain}} "Angelcynn"]][[/note]]
"Angelcynn"]].[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The theory best known by lay people (usually called "Normanist") says that Kievan Rus was founded by the Scandinavian prince [[note]](At that time, Rusans used one title 'Князь' or 'Knyaz`', and 'Великий' (The great) 'князь' meant the first among the equals. Initially this meant the seniormost of the Rurikid princes, but eventually began to be ascribed to the ruler of Kiev, until Kiev lost its importance (which actually happened even ''before'' the Mongol invasion). The titles were in active use to the end of Russian nobility in early 20th century[[/note]] Rurik and [[UsefulNotes/TheVikingAge his Viking followers]], who migrated south and conquered the backward, almost-tribal Eastern Slavs (ancestors of Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians). The truth is really unknown, and is the grounds for very [[UsefulNotes/MisplacedNationalism hot and politicized debate]].[[note]]Whereas in UsefulNotes/{{Britain}}, the Viking heritage was appropriated and celebrated, thanks to UsefulNotes/{{Norway}} and UsefulNotes/{{Denmark}} being quaint little remote countries in the north, that posed no threat to the British after the Viking age, UsefulNotes/{{Sweden}} and UsefulNotes/{{Russia}} have been deadly enemies ever since the early middle ages to the early 19th century. Even today the relationship between the two countries is mostly formal and cool. He who can lay claim to the Rus, would win a massive propaganda victory.[[/note]][[note]]Although, ironically, the most probable historical candidate for the role of legendary Rurik was actually a Dane.[[/note]] Scientific consensus is generally that the Vikings were at a similar level of development to the Slavs, and that their cultures were sufficiently similar for people and nobility to freely mix together. One of the Old Norse words for Ruthenia was "Gardariki" (Realm of [many] towns), which suggests pre-Kievan Rus was already an urbanizing culture. [[note]]Although there's nothing stopping the possibility that these towns were built by Vikings too.[[/note]]

to:

The theory best known by lay people (usually called "Normanist") says that Kievan Rus was founded by the Scandinavian prince [[note]](At that time, Rusans used one title 'Князь' or 'Knyaz`', and 'Великий' (The great) 'князь' meant the first among the equals. Initially this meant the seniormost of the Rurikid princes, but eventually began to be ascribed to the ruler of Kiev, Kyiv, until Kiev Kyiv lost its importance (which actually happened even ''before'' the Mongol invasion). The titles were in active use to the end of Russian nobility in early 20th century[[/note]] Rurik and [[UsefulNotes/TheVikingAge his Viking followers]], who migrated south and conquered the backward, almost-tribal Eastern Slavs (ancestors of Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians). The truth is really unknown, and is the grounds for very [[UsefulNotes/MisplacedNationalism hot and politicized debate]].[[note]]Whereas in UsefulNotes/{{Britain}}, the Viking heritage was appropriated and celebrated, thanks to UsefulNotes/{{Norway}} and UsefulNotes/{{Denmark}} being quaint little remote countries in the north, that posed no threat to the British after the Viking age, UsefulNotes/{{Sweden}} and UsefulNotes/{{Russia}} have been deadly enemies ever since the early middle ages to the early 19th century. Even today the relationship between the two countries is mostly formal and cool. He who can lay claim to the Rus, would win a massive propaganda victory.[[/note]][[note]]Although, ironically, the most probable historical candidate for the role of legendary Rurik was actually a Dane.[[/note]] Scientific consensus is generally that the Vikings were at a similar level of development to the Slavs, and that their cultures were sufficiently similar for people and nobility to freely mix together. One of the Old Norse words for Ruthenia was "Gardariki" (Realm of [many] towns), which suggests pre-Kievan Rus was already an urbanizing culture. [[note]]Although there's nothing stopping the possibility that these towns were built by Vikings too.[[/note]]



An official myth dating back to the Imperial era says the Slavs themselves invited the Norse to rule them. Needless to say, it is subject to the same debate, which is generally more about politics than history. Some say that knowing the attitudes and customs of TheDungAges, this is highly unlikely. Others insist that it was actually pretty routine. Just don't try to [[FlameBait bring it up]] in non-scientific circles. The first capital of Rurik's principality was the ancient Northern city of Ladoga (now called ''Old'' Ladoga), but soon moved to Novgorod (another Northern city, founded by the settlers from Ladoga; now called ''Veliky'' ("Great") ''Novgorod'' despite being smaller than [[UsefulNotes/OtherRussianTownsAndCities the other Novgorod]]; the Norse called it Holmgard). His sons, however, took it south to Kiev.

to:

An official myth dating back to the Imperial era says the Slavs themselves invited the Norse to rule them. Needless to say, it is subject to the same debate, which is generally more about politics than history. Some say that knowing the attitudes and customs of TheDungAges, this is highly unlikely. Others insist that it was actually pretty routine. Just don't try to [[FlameBait bring it up]] in non-scientific circles. The first capital of Rurik's principality was the ancient Northern city of Ladoga (now called ''Old'' Ladoga), but soon moved to Novgorod (another Northern city, founded by the settlers from Ladoga; now called ''Veliky'' ("Great") ''Novgorod'' despite being smaller than [[UsefulNotes/OtherRussianTownsAndCities the other Novgorod]]; the Norse called it Holmgard). His sons, however, took it south to Kiev.
Kyiv.



Eventually, the Grand Duchy of Vladimir-Suzdal, later known as "of Moscow", ended up as the most important principality. The Muscovite princes cast off the Mongol-Tatar yoke, annexed the Novgorod Republic and united the northern principalities. The principalities under the Grand Duchy of Moscow later formed the [[UsefulNotes/TsaristRussia Muscovite Tsardom]]. Kiev, the original capital of Ruthenia, and the southern principalities were united by the Galician-Volhynian Principality (later renamed the Kingdom of Rus) for a time, until its lands were divided between the Kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, another pretender to be the "true heir" of Ruthenia.

The question of who are now the "true heirs" of the Kievan Rus is often a matter of disagreement between Eastern Slavs, with Russians saying that Moscow's reunification of the northern principalities and Kyiv's depopulation by the Tatars and later subjugation by Lithuania (and Novgorod, a distinctly Russian city, being the first capital of Rurik's princedom) make it clear which city inherited the title of the capital of the Rus, while Ukrainians see the Galicia-Lodomeria as the heir to original Rus, and claim that Kyiv and the southern principalities stayed as the core of Ruthenian culture, unlike the colonial northern principalities, the people of which were intermingled with Ugro-Finns and Tatars (according to [[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10069400 genetic]] [[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002929707000250 analyses]], Russians, Ukrainians, and Poles are very close, and the Russian genetic pool shows no Turkish or Mongol impact - most likely for the reason that the Tatar-Mongols rarely had direct contact with Russians, and Russians saw them as invaders with inherently alien culture). Belarusian principalities mostly stayed autonomous from Rus and, being united with Aukštaitija, formed the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, which would later unite most of the Ruthenian territories, except for Novgorod and North-Eastern colonies that would become a basis for the future Russia. But since Russians pack the greatest punch of the three most of the time, the Russian-Ruthenian connection is the most well known. This question is complicated even more by the fact that a people called Ruthenians (or Rusyns, or Ruthens) do exist now; they are relatives of Ukrainians living in Transcarpathia (and elsewhere; Creator/AndyWarhol — birth name Andriy Varhola — was Ruthenian American).

to:

Eventually, the Grand Duchy of Vladimir-Suzdal, later known as "of Moscow", ended up as the most important principality. The Muscovite princes cast off the Mongol-Tatar yoke, annexed the Novgorod Republic and united the northern principalities. The principalities under the Grand Duchy of Moscow later formed the [[UsefulNotes/TsaristRussia Muscovite Tsardom]]. Kiev, Kyiv, the original capital of Ruthenia, and the southern principalities were united by the Galician-Volhynian Principality (later renamed the Kingdom of Rus) for a time, until its lands were divided between the Kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, another pretender to be the "true heir" of Ruthenia.

The question of who are now the "true heirs" of the Kievan Rus is often a matter of disagreement between Eastern Slavs, with Russians saying that Moscow's reunification of the northern principalities and Kyiv's depopulation by the Tatars and later subjugation by Lithuania (and Novgorod, a distinctly Russian city, being the first capital of Rurik's princedom) make it clear which city inherited the title of the capital of the Rus, while Ukrainians see the Galicia-Lodomeria Galicia–Volhynia as the heir to original Rus, and claim that Kyiv and the southern principalities stayed as the core of Ruthenian culture, unlike the colonial northern principalities, the people of which were intermingled with Ugro-Finns and Tatars (according to [[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10069400 genetic]] [[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002929707000250 analyses]], Russians, Ukrainians, and Poles are very close, and the Russian genetic pool shows no Turkish or Mongol impact - most likely for the reason that the Tatar-Mongols rarely had direct contact with Russians, and Russians saw them as invaders with inherently alien culture). Belarusian principalities mostly stayed autonomous from Rus and, being united with Aukštaitija, formed the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, which would later unite most of the Ruthenian territories, except for Novgorod and North-Eastern colonies that would become a basis for the future Russia. But since Russians pack the greatest punch of the three most of the time, the Russian-Ruthenian connection is the most well known. This question is complicated even more by the fact that a people called Ruthenians (or Rusyns, or Ruthens) do exist now; they are relatives of Ukrainians living in Transcarpathia (and elsewhere; Creator/AndyWarhol — birth name Andriy Varhola — was Ruthenian American).



* Vladimir I (Vladimir the Saint, Vladimir the Bright Sun). The guy who made Rus Christian. He was an illegitimate child, and captured the throne by force. He had several wives, then he received the baptism and forced it on all Rus. A saint of the [[UsefulNotes/OrthodoxChristianity Orthodox Church]]. He's also a recurring character in [[Myth/RussianMythologyAndTales Slavic epics]], his court in Kiev often served as background for knights' tales, like Camelot in [[Myth/KingArthur Arthurian mythos]].

to:

* Vladimir I (Vladimir the Saint, Vladimir the Bright Sun). The guy who made Rus Christian. He was an illegitimate child, and captured the throne by force. He had several wives, then he received the baptism and forced it on all Rus. A saint of the [[UsefulNotes/OrthodoxChristianity Orthodox Church]]. He's also a recurring character in [[Myth/RussianMythologyAndTales Slavic epics]], his court in Kiev Kyiv often served as background for knights' tales, like Camelot in [[Myth/KingArthur Arthurian mythos]].



* Kiev is a "rebel" settlement instead of a proper faction in ''VideoGame/MedievalIITotalWar'', but the ''Stainless Steel'' GameMod makes the Kievan Rus properly playable. The Grand Duchy of Kyiv starts with a decent capital and has some quality heavy cavalry and horse archers, but not much in the way of professional infantry, and true to history, the Mongols will be heading their way at some point...

to:

* Kiev Kyiv is a "rebel" settlement instead of a proper faction in ''VideoGame/MedievalIITotalWar'', but the ''Stainless Steel'' GameMod makes the Kievan Rus properly playable. The Grand Duchy of Kyiv starts with a decent capital and has some quality heavy cavalry and horse archers, but not much in the way of professional infantry, and true to history, the Mongols will be heading their way at some point...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The Mongols left most of the political system intact, but now the Grand Prince had to be formally recognized as such by his Mongol lieges, who chose the most obedient ones. The Novgorod Rus was spared of the Mongol invasion by being too far north, and its princes and council being such effective rulers (Novgorod was a republic, its prince being only the hired military leader, who could be deposed by the parliament and the city council), but had to deal with other enemies, such as [[UsefulNotes/{{Sweden}} Swedes]] and UsefulNotes/TheTeutonicKnights.

to:

The Mongols left most of the political system intact, but now the Grand Prince had to be formally recognized as such by his Mongol lieges, who chose the most obedient ones. The Novgorod Rus was spared of the Mongol invasion by being too far north, and its princes and council being such effective rulers (Novgorod was a republic, its prince being only the hired military leader, who could be deposed by the parliament and the city council), but had to deal with other enemies, such as [[UsefulNotes/{{Sweden}} Swedes]] and UsefulNotes/TheTeutonicKnights.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Allegedly, he organised a "casting": Catholics failed because of the fasting and general dourness, of [[TheTeetotaler the Muslims]] Vladimir is said to have liked most of the doctrine but declared that "[[VodkaDrunkenski Drinking is the joy of the Russes. We cannot exist without that pleasure]]", of the Jews Vladimir concluded their own {{God}} must dislike them if they're dispersed like that, while the Orthodox Romans were careful to approach Vladimir with all kinds of bling and little of the rules. This was a myth, however. In fact, Vladimir was heavily influenced by Christianity from the start, and his grandmother, [[TheHighQueen Princess Olga]], was a Christian, baptized at the Byzantine Roman court. Many pagan customs, though, persisted into the Tsarist era and even to this day, after being coopted into the Christian ritual.

to:

Allegedly, he organised a "casting": Catholics failed because of the fasting and general dourness, of [[TheTeetotaler the Muslims]] Vladimir is said to have liked most of the doctrine but declared that "[[VodkaDrunkenski Drinking is the joy of the Russes. We cannot exist without that pleasure]]", of the Jews Vladimir concluded their own {{God}} must dislike them if they're dispersed like that, while the Orthodox Romans were careful to approach Vladimir with all kinds of bling and little of the rules. This was is a myth, however. In fact, Vladimir was heavily influenced by Christianity from the start, and his grandmother, [[TheHighQueen Princess Olga]], was a Christian, baptized at the Byzantine Roman court. Many pagan customs, though, persisted into the Tsarist era and even to this day, after being coopted into the Christian ritual.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


A theory that's gaining traction nowadays is that the petty princes of many Slavic and Finnic tribes that populated the territory were dissatisfied with the constant squabbles between them. An then among the Novgorodians (already a somewhat prosperous trade hub) a wish arose for an impartial arbiter from a respected noble house not invested in their struggle, who would settle their difference and observe their court cases, which resulted in the invitation of a notable but currently landless Danish king.

to:

A theory that's gaining traction nowadays is that the petty princes of many Slavic and Finnic tribes that populated the territory were dissatisfied with the constant squabbles between them. An And then among the Novgorodians (already a somewhat prosperous trade hub) a wish arose for an impartial arbiter from a respected noble house not invested in their struggle, who would settle their difference and observe their court cases, which resulted in the invitation of a notable but currently landless Danish king.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The theory best known by lay people (usually called "Normanist") says that Kievan Rus was founded by the Scandinavian prince [[note]](At that time, Rusans used one title 'Князь' or 'Knyaz`', and 'Великий' (The great) 'князь' meant the first among the equals<s>ruler of Kiev</s>. Initially this meant the seniormost of the Rurikid princes, but eventually began to be ascribed to the ruler of Kiev, until Kiev lost its importance (which actually happened even ''before'' the Mongol invasion). The titles were in active use to the end of Russian nobility in early 20th century[[/note]] Rurik and [[UsefulNotes/TheVikingAge his Viking followers]], who migrated south and conquered the backward, almost-tribal Eastern Slavs (ancestors of Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians). The truth is really unknown, and is the grounds for very [[UsefulNotes/MisplacedNationalism hot and politicized debate]].[[note]]Whereas in UsefulNotes/{{Britain}}, the Viking heritage was appropriated and celebrated, thanks to UsefulNotes/{{Norway}} and UsefulNotes/{{Denmark}} being quaint little remote countries in the north, that posed no threat to the British after the Viking age, UsefulNotes/{{Sweden}} and UsefulNotes/{{Russia}} have been deadly enemies ever since the early middle ages to the early 19th century. Even today the relationship between the two countries is mostly formal and cool. He who can lay claim to the Rus, would win a massive propaganda victory.[[/note]][[note]]Although, ironically, the most probable historical candidate for the role of legendary Rurik was actually a Dane.[[/note]] Scientific consensus is generally that the Vikings were at a similar level of development to the Slavs, and that their cultures were sufficiently similar for people and nobility to freely mix together. One of the Old Norse words for Ruthenia was "Gardariki" (Realm of [many] towns), which suggests pre-Kievan Rus was already an urbanizing culture. [[note]]Although there's nothing stopping the possibility that these towns were built by Vikings too.[[/note]]

to:

The theory best known by lay people (usually called "Normanist") says that Kievan Rus was founded by the Scandinavian prince [[note]](At that time, Rusans used one title 'Князь' or 'Knyaz`', and 'Великий' (The great) 'князь' meant the first among the equals<s>ruler of Kiev</s>.equals. Initially this meant the seniormost of the Rurikid princes, but eventually began to be ascribed to the ruler of Kiev, until Kiev lost its importance (which actually happened even ''before'' the Mongol invasion). The titles were in active use to the end of Russian nobility in early 20th century[[/note]] Rurik and [[UsefulNotes/TheVikingAge his Viking followers]], who migrated south and conquered the backward, almost-tribal Eastern Slavs (ancestors of Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians). The truth is really unknown, and is the grounds for very [[UsefulNotes/MisplacedNationalism hot and politicized debate]].[[note]]Whereas in UsefulNotes/{{Britain}}, the Viking heritage was appropriated and celebrated, thanks to UsefulNotes/{{Norway}} and UsefulNotes/{{Denmark}} being quaint little remote countries in the north, that posed no threat to the British after the Viking age, UsefulNotes/{{Sweden}} and UsefulNotes/{{Russia}} have been deadly enemies ever since the early middle ages to the early 19th century. Even today the relationship between the two countries is mostly formal and cool. He who can lay claim to the Rus, would win a massive propaganda victory.[[/note]][[note]]Although, ironically, the most probable historical candidate for the role of legendary Rurik was actually a Dane.[[/note]] Scientific consensus is generally that the Vikings were at a similar level of development to the Slavs, and that their cultures were sufficiently similar for people and nobility to freely mix together. One of the Old Norse words for Ruthenia was "Gardariki" (Realm of [many] towns), which suggests pre-Kievan Rus was already an urbanizing culture. [[note]]Although there's nothing stopping the possibility that these towns were built by Vikings too.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The theory best known by lay people (usually called "Normanist") says that Kievan Rus was founded by the Scandinavian prince [[note]](At that time, Rusans used one title 'Князь' or 'Knyaz`', and 'Великий' (The great) 'князь' meant ruler of Kiev. The titles were in active use to the end of Russian nobility in early 20th century[[/note]] Rurik and [[UsefulNotes/TheVikingAge his Viking followers]], who migrated south and conquered the backward, almost-tribal Eastern Slavs (ancestors of Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians). The truth is really unknown, and is the grounds for very [[UsefulNotes/MisplacedNationalism hot and politicized debate]].[[note]]Whereas in UsefulNotes/{{Britain}}, the Viking heritage was appropriated and celebrated, thanks to UsefulNotes/{{Norway}} and UsefulNotes/{{Denmark}} being quaint little remote countries in the north, that posed no threat to the British after the Viking age, UsefulNotes/{{Sweden}} and UsefulNotes/{{Russia}} have been deadly enemies ever since the early middle ages to the early 19th century. Even today the relationship between the two countries is mostly formal and cool. He who can lay claim to the Rus, would win a massive propaganda victory.[[/note]][[note]]Although, ironically, the most probable historical candidate for the role of legendary Rurik was actually a Dane.[[/note]] Scientific consensus is generally that the Vikings were at a similar level of development to the Slavs, and that their cultures were sufficiently similar for people and nobility to freely mix together. One of the Old Norse words for Ruthenia was "Gardariki" (Realm of [many] towns), which suggests pre-Kievan Rus was already an urbanizing culture. [[note]]Although there's nothing stopping the possibility that these towns were built by Vikings too.[[/note]]

to:

The theory best known by lay people (usually called "Normanist") says that Kievan Rus was founded by the Scandinavian prince [[note]](At that time, Rusans used one title 'Князь' or 'Knyaz`', and 'Великий' (The great) 'князь' meant the first among the equals<s>ruler of Kiev</s>. Initially this meant the seniormost of the Rurikid princes, but eventually began to be ascribed to the ruler of Kiev.Kiev, until Kiev lost its importance (which actually happened even ''before'' the Mongol invasion). The titles were in active use to the end of Russian nobility in early 20th century[[/note]] Rurik and [[UsefulNotes/TheVikingAge his Viking followers]], who migrated south and conquered the backward, almost-tribal Eastern Slavs (ancestors of Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians). The truth is really unknown, and is the grounds for very [[UsefulNotes/MisplacedNationalism hot and politicized debate]].[[note]]Whereas in UsefulNotes/{{Britain}}, the Viking heritage was appropriated and celebrated, thanks to UsefulNotes/{{Norway}} and UsefulNotes/{{Denmark}} being quaint little remote countries in the north, that posed no threat to the British after the Viking age, UsefulNotes/{{Sweden}} and UsefulNotes/{{Russia}} have been deadly enemies ever since the early middle ages to the early 19th century. Even today the relationship between the two countries is mostly formal and cool. He who can lay claim to the Rus, would win a massive propaganda victory.[[/note]][[note]]Although, ironically, the most probable historical candidate for the role of legendary Rurik was actually a Dane.[[/note]] Scientific consensus is generally that the Vikings were at a similar level of development to the Slavs, and that their cultures were sufficiently similar for people and nobility to freely mix together. One of the Old Norse words for Ruthenia was "Gardariki" (Realm of [many] towns), which suggests pre-Kievan Rus was already an urbanizing culture. [[note]]Although there's nothing stopping the possibility that these towns were built by Vikings too.[[/note]]

Top