Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Trivia / Terrifier2

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DawsonCasting: Sienna is presumably in high school, while her actress Lauren [=LaVera=] was 25 at the time production started in late 2019. Creator/ElliottFullam (Jonathan) averts this, being middle school aged just like his character (he was 14 during filming while Jonathan is 12, though this is justified in the film itself as he's stated to be tall for his age).

to:

* DawsonCasting: Sienna is presumably in high school, while her actress Lauren [=LaVera=] was 25 at the time production started in late 2019. Creator/ElliottFullam Elliott Fullam (Jonathan) averts this, being middle school aged just like his character (he was 14 during filming while Jonathan is 12, though this is justified in the film itself as he's stated to be tall for his age).

Added: 454

Changed: 295

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I don't have a whole lot of proof, aside from that I met Lauren LaVera a few months ago and she told me.


* WhatCouldHaveBeen: TheStinger originally would have Art growing out of the back of Victoria's head. And then ''Film/{{Malignant}}'' turned out to have just about the exact same thing regarding its villain, and Damien Leone decided to scrap said post-credit and create another one where Victoria gives birth to Art.

to:

* WhatCouldHaveBeen: WhatCouldHaveBeen:
**
TheStinger originally would have Art growing out of the back of Victoria's head. And then ''Film/{{Malignant}}'' turned out to have just about the exact same thing regarding its villain, and Damien Leone decided to scrap said post-credit and create another one where Victoria gives birth to Art.Art.
** Creator/HeatherLangenkamp of ''Franchise/ANightmareOnElmStreet'' fame was originally in talks to play Barbara, but couldn't, due to scheduling conflicts.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DawsonCasting: Sienna is presumably in high school, while her actress Creator/LaurenLaVera is in her 20s (her exact age is unknown, but she states she was born in the 90s, meaning she was at least 21 during production in 2020). Creator/ElliottFullam (Jonathan) averts this, being middle school aged just like his character (he was 14 during filming while Jonathan is 12, though this is justified in the film itself as he's stated to be tall for his age).

to:

* DawsonCasting: Sienna is presumably in high school, while her actress Creator/LaurenLaVera is in her 20s (her exact age is unknown, but she states she Lauren [=LaVera=] was born in 25 at the 90s, meaning she was at least 21 during time production started in 2020).late 2019. Creator/ElliottFullam (Jonathan) averts this, being middle school aged just like his character (he was 14 during filming while Jonathan is 12, though this is justified in the film itself as he's stated to be tall for his age).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CastTheRunnerUp: Leah Voysey first auditioned for Sienna when the character would have cosplayer elements, then read for Ally and Brooke, and months later producer Jason Leavy, who knew she could sing and play, invited Voysey to be the Clown Cafe host (which would also extend to a brief appearance as a nurse in TheStinger).



* SleeperHit: As noted by [[https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/25/movies/terrifier-2-box-office.html The New York Times]], the film only cost $250,000 and didn't have any well-known actors, but earned back over 40x its budget. Its predecessor wasn't very well known, received mixed reviews and never received a wide release. ''Terrifier 2'', however, earned much stronger reviews and opened in the top ten, and managed to increase its box office over three weekends despite not expanding into many new theaters. Its strongest weekend was its fourth, after it doubled its theatre count. It had earned nearly $10 million by early November.

to:

* SleeperHit: As noted by [[https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/25/movies/terrifier-2-box-office.html The New York Times]], the film only cost $250,000 and didn't have any well-known actors, but earned back over 40x its budget. Its predecessor wasn't very well known, received mixed reviews and never received a wide release. ''Terrifier 2'', however, earned much stronger reviews and opened in the top ten, and managed to increase its box office over three weekends despite not expanding into many new theaters. Its strongest weekend was its fourth, after it doubled its theatre count. It had earned nearly $10 million by early November.November.
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: TheStinger originally would have Art growing out of the back of Victoria's head. And then ''Film/{{Malignant}}'' turned out to have just about the exact same thing regarding its villain, and Damien Leone decided to scrap said post-credit and create another one where Victoria gives birth to Art.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* DirectToVideo: Due to being deemed "too extreme" for UK cinemas, the film got a straight-to-video release in that market instead.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SleeperHit: As noted by [[https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/25/movies/terrifier-2-box-office.html The New York Times]], the film only cost $250,000 and didn't have any well-known actors, but earned back over 40x its budget. Its predecessor wasn't very well known, received mixed reviews and never received a wide release. ''Terrifier 2'', however, earned much stronger reviews and opened in the top ten, and managed to increase its box office over three weekends despite not expanding into many new theaters. Its strongest weekend was it's fourth, after it doubled its theatre count. It had earned nearly $10 million by early November.

to:

* SleeperHit: As noted by [[https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/25/movies/terrifier-2-box-office.html The New York Times]], the film only cost $250,000 and didn't have any well-known actors, but earned back over 40x its budget. Its predecessor wasn't very well known, received mixed reviews and never received a wide release. ''Terrifier 2'', however, earned much stronger reviews and opened in the top ten, and managed to increase its box office over three weekends despite not expanding into many new theaters. Its strongest weekend was it's its fourth, after it doubled its theatre count. It had earned nearly $10 million by early November.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DawsonCasting: Sienna is presumably in high school, while her actress Lauren LaVera is in her 20s (her exact age is unknown, but she states she was born in the 90s, meaning she was at least 21 during production in 2020). Elliott Fullam (Jonathan) averts this, being middle school aged just like his character (he was 14 during filming while Jonathan is 12, though this is justified in the film itself as he's stated to be tall for his age).
* SleeperHit: As noted by [[https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/25/movies/terrifier-2-box-office.html The New York Times]], the film only cost $250,000 and didn't have any well known actors, but earned back over 40x its budget. Its predecessor wasn't very well known, received mixed reviews and never received a wide release. ''Terrifier 2'', however, earned much stronger reviews and opened in the top ten, and managed to increase its box office over three weekends despite not expanding into many new theaters. Its strongest weekend was its fourth, after it doubled its theatre count. It had earned nearly $10 million by early November.

to:

* DawsonCasting: Sienna is presumably in high school, while her actress Lauren LaVera Creator/LaurenLaVera is in her 20s (her exact age is unknown, but she states she was born in the 90s, meaning she was at least 21 during production in 2020). Elliott Fullam Creator/ElliottFullam (Jonathan) averts this, being middle school aged just like his character (he was 14 during filming while Jonathan is 12, though this is justified in the film itself as he's stated to be tall for his age).
* SleeperHit: As noted by [[https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/25/movies/terrifier-2-box-office.html The New York Times]], the film only cost $250,000 and didn't have any well known well-known actors, but earned back over 40x its budget. Its predecessor wasn't very well known, received mixed reviews and never received a wide release. ''Terrifier 2'', however, earned much stronger reviews and opened in the top ten, and managed to increase its box office over three weekends despite not expanding into many new theaters. Its strongest weekend was its it's fourth, after it doubled its theatre count. It had earned nearly $10 million by early November.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* DawsonCasting: Sienna is presumably in high school, while her actress Lauren LaVera is in her 20s (her exact age is unknown, but she states she was born in the 90s, meaning she was at least 21 during production in 2020). Elliott Fullam (Jonathan) averts this, being middle school aged just like his character (he was 14 during filming while Jonathan is 12, though this is justified in the film itself as he's stated to be tall for his age).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SleeperHit: As noted by [[https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/25/movies/terrifier-2-box-office.html The New York Times]], the film only cost $250,000 and didn't have any well known actors, but earned back over 40x its budget. Its predecessor wasn't very well known, received mixed reviews and never received a wide release. ''Terrifier 2'', however, earned much stronger reviews and opened in the top ten, and and managed to increase its box office over three weekends despite not expanding into many new theaters. Its strongest weekend was its fourth, after it doubled its theatre count. It had earned nearly $10 million by early November.

to:

* SleeperHit: As noted by [[https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/25/movies/terrifier-2-box-office.html The New York Times]], the film only cost $250,000 and didn't have any well known actors, but earned back over 40x its budget. Its predecessor wasn't very well known, received mixed reviews and never received a wide release. ''Terrifier 2'', however, earned much stronger reviews and opened in the top ten, and and managed to increase its box office over three weekends despite not expanding into many new theaters. Its strongest weekend was its fourth, after it doubled its theatre count. It had earned nearly $10 million by early November.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*SleeperHit: As noted by [[https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/25/movies/terrifier-2-box-office.html The New York Times]], the film only cost $250,000 and didn't have any well known actors, but earned back over 40x its budget. Its predecessor wasn't very well known, received mixed reviews and never received a wide release. ''Terrifier 2'', however, earned much stronger reviews and opened in the top ten, and and managed to increase its box office over three weekends despite not expanding into many new theaters. Its strongest weekend was its fourth, after it doubled its theatre count. It had earned nearly $10 million by early November.

Top