Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / WithUsOrAgainstUs

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
m


* A {{Kayfabe}} example would be the {{Catchphrase}} of TheNexus. You're either Nexus, or your against us!

to:

* A {{Kayfabe}} example would be the {{Catchphrase}} of TheNexus. You're either Nexus, or your you're against us!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


->'''Anakin Skywalker''': If you're not with me, then you're my enemy.\\

to:

->'''Anakin Skywalker''': If you're not with me, then you're my enemy.\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
or, y\'know, because they were aiding the other side in a battle


** This comes to the forefront ''hard'' in ''[[SoBadItsHorrible Naked Empire]]'', where Richard mows down an entire army of unarmed protestors who are keeping him from the BigBad. He claims that he is fully justified in doing so, due to the protesters' "hatred of moral clarity."

Changed: 122

Removed: 534

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Natter.


'''Obi-Wan Kenobi:''' [[FridgeLogic Only a Sith deals in absolutes]].



* The page quote from ''RevengeOfTheSith''. Leads to a bit of FridgeLogic -- isn't saying that "Only a Sith deals in absolutes" [[{{Hypocrite}} itself an absolute]]?
** If you think about it, it might just be a poorly written line instead of hypocritical. If Obi-wan had just said "Only a Sith deals in ''such'' absolutes", it would have changed the entire meaning and given him more credibility. People don't usually consider potential FridgeLogic before saying something so it could also be considered an example of RealisticDictionIsUnrealistic. Or a delicious NotSoDifferent moral concerning the Jedi Order. YourMileageMayVary.

to:

* The page quote from ''RevengeOfTheSith''. Leads to a bit of FridgeLogic -- isn't saying that "Only a Sith deals in absolutes" [[{{Hypocrite}} itself an absolute]]?\n** If you think about it, it might just be a poorly written line instead of hypocritical. If Obi-wan had just said "Only a Sith deals in ''such'' absolutes", it would have changed the entire meaning and given him more credibility. People don't usually consider potential FridgeLogic before saying something so it could also be considered an example of RealisticDictionIsUnrealistic. Or a delicious NotSoDifferent moral concerning the Jedi Order. YourMileageMayVary.

Changed: 243

Removed: 80

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The page quote in ''RevengeOfTheSith''. Leads to a bit of FridgeLogic--isn't saying that "Only a Sith deals in absolutes" [[{{Hypocrite}} itself an absolute]]?
** If you think about it, it might just be a poorly written line instead of hypocritical. If Obi-wan had just said "Only a Sith deals in ''such'' absolutes", it would have changed the entire meaning and given him more credibility.
*** But it does have a delicious NotSoDifferent moral concerning the Jedi Order.

to:

* The page quote in from ''RevengeOfTheSith''. Leads to a bit of FridgeLogic--isn't FridgeLogic -- isn't saying that "Only a Sith deals in absolutes" [[{{Hypocrite}} itself an absolute]]?
** If you think about it, it might just be a poorly written line instead of hypocritical. If Obi-wan had just said "Only a Sith deals in ''such'' absolutes", it would have changed the entire meaning and given him more credibility.
*** But
credibility. People don't usually consider potential FridgeLogic before saying something so it does have could also be considered an example of RealisticDictionIsUnrealistic. Or a delicious NotSoDifferent moral concerning the Jedi Order.Order. YourMileageMayVary.

Changed: 47

Removed: 52

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Repair, don\'t respond.


** ''MallardFillmore'' stopped a [[StrawmanPolitical Straw Liberal Professor]] from pulling a [[GodwinsLaw Godwin]] on Bush's remark by reminding him that his generation was the one that made "You're either part of the solution or you're part of the problem" a famous rallying cry.
*** A real person is, by definition, not a strawman.

to:

** ''MallardFillmore'' stopped remarked on a [[StrawmanPolitical Straw Liberal Professor]] from Professor pulling a [[GodwinsLaw Godwin]] on Bush's remark by reminding him that his generation was the one that made "You're either part of the solution or you're part of the problem" a famous rallying cry.
*** A real person is, by definition, not a strawman.
cry.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


See also BlackAndWhiteInsanity and ActivistFundamentalistAntics.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** A real person is, by definition, not a strawman.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* As mentioned earlier, Message Boards. This mostly applies to religious and political boards, but can (and usually will) extend to everything else. Anyone who has spent enough time on boards will know that there's often topics where you either agree with a completely insane statement or you're branded as whatever is the opposite of the poster's ideology/beliefs/whatever (examples of popular insults: [[DirtyCommunists communist]], {{Satan}}ist, [[DepravedHomosexual homosexual]] [this one usually appears just for opposing ANY opinion]). It's important to note that {{troll}}s are often to blame for this.

to:

* As mentioned earlier, Message Boards. This mostly applies to religious and political boards, but can (and usually will) extend to everything else. Anyone who has spent enough time on boards will know that there's often topics where you either agree with a completely insane statement or you're branded as whatever is the opposite of the poster's ideology/beliefs/whatever (examples of popular insults: [[DirtyCommunists communist]], {{Satan}}ist, communist]]/[[CorruptCorporateExecutive selfish capitalist]], {{Satan}}ist/[[OutgrownSuchSillySuperstitions superstitious nutjob]], [[DepravedHomosexual homosexual]] homosexual]]/[[HeteronormativeCrusader homophobe]] [this one usually appears just for opposing ANY opinion]). It's important to note that {{troll}}s are often to blame for this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** G.W.'s message was really intended to states who were known to harbor terrorists in the past. But he spat it out so broadly, to allies who were more than willing to cooperate as much as to the 'axis of evildoerses' that it came across as arrogantly hitching his nuts up on the world stage. But those countries who would've been willing to shelter Bin Laden just carried on.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The page quote in ''RevengeOfTheSith''.

to:

* The page quote in ''RevengeOfTheSith''. Leads to a bit of FridgeLogic--isn't saying that "Only a Sith deals in absolutes" [[{{Hypocrite}} itself an absolute]]?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''Obi-Wan Kenobi:''' Only a Sith deals in absolutes.

to:

'''Obi-Wan Kenobi:''' [[FridgeLogic Only a Sith deals in absolutes.absolutes]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* [[{{DeepSpaceNine}} ''Commander'' Kira]], tells this lesson to the Cardassians when they've started a rebellion. She's reminded in the same episode that Odo (her lover) used to be against the Bajorans while the Cardassians were occupying her planet.

Added: 422

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* When SteveDitko took a heavy turn into Objectivism, his heroes started to preach his viewpoint. That "Mr. A" AlanMoore sings about? That was one of Ditko's, who claimed that man can either be good or evil with no in-between.

to:

* When SteveDitko took a heavy turn into Objectivism, his heroes started to preach his viewpoint. That "Mr. A" AlanMoore sings about? That was one of Ditko's, who claimed that man can either be good or evil with no in-between. in-between.
* [[SpiderMan Spider-Man]] BrandNewDay has [[ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin The Extermist]]. For him you either was with heroes or with villains, and everybody who dare to criticize superheroes or even laugh at them is evil and schemes to blur the line between good and evil and have to be eliminated. He even tried to kill guy who made website dedicated to laughing at Spider-Man [[spoiler: Who happened to be Peter Parker]].

Added: 963

Changed: 17

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Or the first is applied exclusively in "gathereth" vs. "scattereth" context.



* ''ForgottenRealms'' has a [[ChurchMilitant paladin Order of Samular]]. Once they hunted a demon and an elven community that happened to be between them -- surprise! -- didn't allow a little army of human heavy cavalry to crash through their territory just so... "thus allying themselves with the evil tanar'ri". More than a generation (human) later elves were still upset about the resulting bloodbath and paladins "wary of elves and their unknowable, inhuman ways".



** It's a non-sequitur: claiming that "There are ''no'' blacks and whites" is wrong is [[FalseDichotomy not]] the same as claiming "There are ''only'' blacks and whites" is true. And the quote, strictly speaking, ''does not'' claim that "There are ''no'' blacks and whites" is wrong -- it [[InternetColdReader dives into]] [[AdHominem motivations]]. That is, [[SelfDemonstratingArticle self-demonstrating example]].



*** Sweden and other neutrals often could be said to have aided both sides during WorldWarTwo. The German war machine heavily depended on Swedish iron ore, on the other hand they provided a safe haven for refugees from Germany and Nazi-occupied Europe and a base for Allied secret services. Spain provided volunteer troops that served on the Eastern front against the Soviet Union, yet Franco's adamant neutrality also protected Gibraltar from German plans to take Gibraltar from the land side more effectively than Spain joining the Allies would have.
* As mentioned earlier, Message Boards. This mostly applies to religious and political boards, but can (and usually will) extend to everything else. Anyone who has spent enough time on boards will know that there's often topics where you either agree with a completely insane statement or you're branded as whatever is the opposite of the poster's ideology/beliefs/whatever (examples of popular insults: [[DirtyCommunists communist]], {{Satan}}ist, [[DepravedHomosexual homosexual]] [this one usually appears just for opposing ANY opinion]). It's important to note that [[{{Troller}} trolls]] are often to blame for this.

to:

*** Sweden and other neutrals often could be said to have aided both sides during WorldWarTwo. The German war machine heavily depended on Swedish iron ore, on the other hand they provided a safe haven for refugees from Germany and Nazi-occupied Europe and a base for Allied secret services. Spain provided volunteer troops that served on the Eastern front against the Soviet Union, yet Franco's adamant neutrality also protected Gibraltar from German plans to take Gibraltar from the land side more effectively than Spain joining the Allies would have.
have.
* As mentioned earlier, Message Boards. This mostly applies to religious and political boards, but can (and usually will) extend to everything else. Anyone who has spent enough time on boards will know that there's often topics where you either agree with a completely insane statement or you're branded as whatever is the opposite of the poster's ideology/beliefs/whatever (examples of popular insults: [[DirtyCommunists communist]], {{Satan}}ist, [[DepravedHomosexual homosexual]] [this one usually appears just for opposing ANY opinion]). It's important to note that [[{{Troller}} trolls]] {{troll}}s are often to blame for this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[folder:Myth And Legend]]

to:

[[folder:Myth And Legend]][[folder:Religion]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Sweden and other neutrals often could be said to have aided both sides during WorldWarTwo. The German war machine heavily depended on Swedish iron ore, on the other hand they provided a safe haven for refugees from Germany and Nazi-occupied Europe and a base for allied secret services. Spain provided volunteer troops that served on the Eastern front against the Soviet Union, yet Franco's adamant neutrality also protected Gibraltar from German plans to take Gibraltar from the land side.

to:

*** Sweden and other neutrals often could be said to have aided both sides during WorldWarTwo. The German war machine heavily depended on Swedish iron ore, on the other hand they provided a safe haven for refugees from Germany and Nazi-occupied Europe and a base for allied Allied secret services. Spain provided volunteer troops that served on the Eastern front against the Soviet Union, yet Franco's adamant neutrality also protected Gibraltar from German plans to take Gibraltar from the land side.side more effectively than Spain joining the Allies would have.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Sweden and other neutrals often could be said to have aided both sides during WorldWarTwo. The German war machine heavily depended on Swedish iron ore, on the other hand they provided a safe haven for refugees from Germany and Nazi-occupied Europe and a base for allied secret services. Spain provided volunteer troops that served on the Eastern front against the Soviet Union, yet Franco's adamant neutrality also protected Gibraltar from German plans to take Gibraltar from the land side.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Thought this emphasized the point.


* GeorgeWBush famously said, "You are with us, or you are with the terrorists."

to:

* GeorgeWBush famously said, "You are "Either you're with us, or you are you're with the terrorists.enemy; either you're with those who love freedom, or you're with those who hate innocent life."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* A {{Kayfabe}} example would be the {{Catchphrase}} of TheNexus. You're either Nexus, or your against us!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** But it does have a delicious NotSoDifferent moral concerning the Jedi Order.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
It's not a spoiler when Anakin has known to be a Sith for 30 years now.


->[[spoiler:'''Anakin Skywalker''']]: If you're not with me, then you're my enemy.\\

to:

->[[spoiler:'''Anakin Skywalker''']]: ->'''Anakin Skywalker''': If you're not with me, then you're my enemy.\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


->[[spoiler:'''Anakin Skywalker:''']] If you're not with me, then you're my enemy.\\

to:

->[[spoiler:'''Anakin Skywalker:''']] Skywalker''']]: If you're not with me, then you're my enemy.\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spoilered away for the benefit of those who might not have seen the 3rd film. All 5 of them.


->'''Anakin Skywalker:''' If you're not with me, then you're my enemy.\\

to:

->'''Anakin Skywalker:''' ->[[spoiler:'''Anakin Skywalker:''']] If you're not with me, then you're my enemy.\\

Added: 792

Changed: 6

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A very slight extension of this extends to states who harbor elements like Al Qaeda. President George Bush Jr. used the Trope name in a speech speaking to other nations, stating that if they willingly harbored the enemy, they would be considered the enemy. Of course, he hardly ''invented'' that line of reasoning: its ''always'' been an act of war to willingly give one of the belligerents in an ongoing armed conflict safe harbor in your nation. That's why neutral powers during wars are required to intern combatants of either side that stray into their territory.

to:

** A very slight extension of this extends to states who harbor elements like Al Qaeda. President George Bush Jr. GeorgeWBush used the Trope name in a speech speaking to other nations, stating that if they willingly harbored the enemy, they would be considered the enemy. Of course, he hardly ''invented'' that line of reasoning: its ''always'' been an act of war to willingly give one of the belligerents in an ongoing armed conflict safe harbor in your nation. That's why neutral powers during wars are required to intern combatants of either side that stray into their territory.


Added DiffLines:

* Both the GeorgeWBush examples and the ''MallardFillmore'' one need to understand the difference between harboring criminals, not helping solve a problem, and being neutral.
** Being neutral generally requires that the neutral party refuse to help either side. That includes not harboring combatants, as stated above.
** The "You're either part of the solution or you're part of the problem" is not claiming someone is an enemy, but that their neutrality is part of the problem. An example would be Sweden during WorldWarII. They were neutral, which was part of the problem in getting the world to unite against the Nazis. However, they were not the enemy of the Allies. It would be wrong to say they were "with the Nazis" because they were neutral. While Bush was saying exactly that.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''GundamSEED'' Atlantic Federation did this in spades. In the first season, they left their Eurasian allies to hang at JOSH-A as the ZAFT forces deliver a CurbstompBattle against their forces before activating the Cyclops System to finish both sides off. Then when it happened all over again in GundamSEEDDestiny, they unleashed the Destroy Gundam on the Eurasian forces.

to:

* ''GundamSEED'' Atlantic Federation did this in spades. In the first season, they left their Eurasian allies to hang at JOSH-A as the ZAFT forces deliver a CurbstompBattle against their forces before activating the Cyclops System to finish both sides off. Then when it happened all over again in GundamSEEDDestiny, they but it was done by Blue Cosmos/LOGOS who unleashed the Destroy Gundam on the Eurasian forces.forces for not siding with them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Unnecessary Take That at Objectivists are way too common on this wiki.


* This is one of the central ideas of the Objectivism philosophy (upon which ''The Sword of Truth'', see above, draws heavily). "A is A" and all that--see the quote above. Ayn Rand, the [[strike:cult's]] philosophy's founder, was a lot like this in real life--if you disagreed with her even slightly, you were ''out'' of her little collective. As she stated: 'When a man declares: "There are no blacks and whites [in morality]" he is making a psychological confession, and what he means is: "I am unwilling to be wholly good--and please don't regard me as wholly evil!"'

to:

* This is one of the central ideas of the Objectivism philosophy (upon which ''The Sword of Truth'', see above, draws heavily). "A is A" and all that--see the quote above. Ayn Rand, the [[strike:cult's]] philosophy's founder, was a lot like this in real life--if you disagreed with her even slightly, you were ''out'' of her little collective. As she stated: 'When a man declares: "There are no blacks and whites [in morality]" he is making a psychological confession, and what he means is: "I am unwilling to be wholly good--and please don't regard me as wholly evil!"'
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''Obi-Wan Kenobi:''' [[HypocriticalHumor Only a Sith]] [[InsaneTrollLogic deals in absolutes.]]

to:

'''Obi-Wan Kenobi:''' [[HypocriticalHumor Kenobi:''' Only a Sith]] [[InsaneTrollLogic Sith deals in absolutes.]]

Changed: 4

Removed: 366

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Natter


** If you think about it, it might just be a poorly written line instead of hypocritical. If Obi-wan had just said "Only a Sith deals in ''such'' absolutes", it would have changed the entire meaning and given him far more credibility.
*** Not completely. The Jedi already have a certain reputation of being quite hypocritical of others, and Obi-wan himself is the TropeNamer for FromACertainPointOfView. It does overall fit into the Jedi's Flaws, since they're really NotSoDifferent from the Sith when it comes to certain things.

to:

** If you think about it, it might just be a poorly written line instead of hypocritical. If Obi-wan had just said "Only a Sith deals in ''such'' absolutes", it would have changed the entire meaning and given him far more credibility.
*** Not completely. The Jedi already have a certain reputation of being quite hypocritical of others, and Obi-wan himself is the TropeNamer for FromACertainPointOfView. It does overall fit into the Jedi's Flaws, since they're really NotSoDifferent from the Sith when it comes to certain things.
credibility.



----
<<|DescribeTopicHere|>>
<<|IndexOfExactTropeTitles|>>
<<|PoliticsTropes|>>

to:

----
<<|DescribeTopicHere|>>
<<|IndexOfExactTropeTitles|>>
<<|PoliticsTropes|>>
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Not completely. The Jedi already have a certain reputation of being quite hypocritical of others, and Obi-wan himself is the trope namer for FromaCertainPointofView. It does overall fit into the Jedi's Flaws, since their really NotsoDifferent from the Sith when it comes to certain things.

to:

*** Not completely. The Jedi already have a certain reputation of being quite hypocritical of others, and Obi-wan himself is the trope namer TropeNamer for FromaCertainPointofView. FromACertainPointOfView. It does overall fit into the Jedi's Flaws, since their they're really NotsoDifferent NotSoDifferent from the Sith when it comes to certain things.



** This comes to the forefront ''hard'' in ''[[SoBadItsHorrible Naked Empire]]'', where Richard mows down an entire army of unarmed protestors who are keeping him from the BigBad. He claims that he is fully justified in doing so, due to the protestors' "hatred of moral clarity."

to:

** This comes to the forefront ''hard'' in ''[[SoBadItsHorrible Naked Empire]]'', where Richard mows down an entire army of unarmed protestors who are keeping him from the BigBad. He claims that he is fully justified in doing so, due to the protestors' protesters' "hatred of moral clarity."



--> Some people would be asking: Whose side are you on? If you're not with us, you're against us. Huh. If you're not an apple, you're a banana…

to:

--> Some people would be asking: Whose side are you on? If you're not with us, you're against us. Huh. If you're not an apple, you're a banana…banana!



* In AManForAllSeasons, Thomas More does not like King Henry VIII's actions, but rather than complain, he keeps his mouth shut and refuses to say anything one way or the other. Unfortunately, Sir Thomas is widely known as one of the wisest and most honest men in the kingdom, and his silence makes his position on the issue pretty obvious to everybody. King Henry then lays down the gauntlet, and makes everyone in England swear an oath affirming his support of the King's actions, prompting the film's main conflict.

to:

* In AManForAllSeasons, ''{{A Man for All Seasons}}'', Thomas More does not like King Henry VIII's actions, but rather than complain, he keeps his mouth shut and refuses to say anything one way or the other. Unfortunately, Sir Thomas is widely known as one of the wisest and most honest men in the kingdom, and his silence makes his position on the issue pretty obvious to everybody. King Henry then lays down the gauntlet, and makes everyone in England swear an oath affirming his support of the King's actions, prompting the film's main conflict.



* This is one of the central ideas of the Objectivism philosophy (upon which ''The Sword of Truth'', see above, draws heavily). "A is A" and all that--see the quote above. Ayn Rand, the [[strike:cult's]] philosophy's founder, was a lot like this in real life--if you disagreed with her even slightly, you were ''out'' of her little collective. As she stated: 'When a man declares: "There are no blacks and whites [in morality]" he is making a psychological confession, and what he means is: "I am unwilling to be wholly good—and please don't regard me as wholly evil!"'

to:

* This is one of the central ideas of the Objectivism philosophy (upon which ''The Sword of Truth'', see above, draws heavily). "A is A" and all that--see the quote above. Ayn Rand, the [[strike:cult's]] philosophy's founder, was a lot like this in real life--if you disagreed with her even slightly, you were ''out'' of her little collective. As she stated: 'When a man declares: "There are no blacks and whites [in morality]" he is making a psychological confession, and what he means is: "I am unwilling to be wholly good—and good--and please don't regard me as wholly evil!"'



* As mentioned earlier, Message Boards. This mostly applies to religious and political boards, but can (and usually will) extend to everything else. Anyone who has spent enough time on boards will know that there's often topics where you either agree with a completely insane statement or you're branded as whatever is the opposite of the poster's idology/beliefs/whatever (examples of popular insults: [[DirtyCommunists communist]], [[{{Satan}} satanist]], [[DepravedHomosexual homosexual]] [this one usually appears just for opposing ANY opinion]). It's important to note that [[{{Troller}} trolls]] are often to blame for this.

to:

* As mentioned earlier, Message Boards. This mostly applies to religious and political boards, but can (and usually will) extend to everything else. Anyone who has spent enough time on boards will know that there's often topics where you either agree with a completely insane statement or you're branded as whatever is the opposite of the poster's idology/beliefs/whatever ideology/beliefs/whatever (examples of popular insults: [[DirtyCommunists communist]], [[{{Satan}} satanist]], {{Satan}}ist, [[DepravedHomosexual homosexual]] [this one usually appears just for opposing ANY opinion]). It's important to note that [[{{Troller}} trolls]] are often to blame for this.

Top