Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / Realpolitik

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* From TheOtherWiki: [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realpolitik Realpolitik]] (see also Political realism) From German: real "realistic", "practical" or "actual"; and Politik "politics". Realpolitik refers to politics or diplomacy based primarily on practical considerations, rather than ideological notions or moralistic premises. In this respect, it shares aspects of its philosophical approach with those of realism and pragmatism. The term ''realpolitik'' is often used pejoratively to imply politics that are coercive, amoral or Machiavellian. The term was ''not'' coined by {{Otto von Bismarck}}, although he was one of its most famous and successful followers.

to:

* From TheOtherWiki: [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realpolitik Realpolitik]] (see also Political realism) From German: real "realistic", "practical" or "actual"; and Politik "politics". Realpolitik refers to politics or diplomacy based primarily on practical considerations, rather than ideological notions or moralistic premises. In this respect, it shares aspects of its philosophical approach with those of realism and pragmatism. The term ''realpolitik'' is often used pejoratively to imply politics that are coercive, amoral or Machiavellian. The term was ''not'' coined by {{Otto von Bismarck}}, UsefulNotes/OttoVonBismarck, although he was one of its most famous and successful followers.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Proponents of this way of thinking would say that there are a lot of big, nasty nations out there, and that if you try being nice, your rivals will simply exploit this, so you must always further your interests where you can as no one else will. Besides, if you try to "help", you could be accused of interfering with the business of other nations to further your own influence. Critics would, of course, point out that it is this kind of thinking which perpetuates tensions and wars among nations, and that it is essentially "might makes right" as a political philosophy.

to:

Proponents of this way of thinking would say that there are a lot of big, nasty nations out there, and that if you try being nice, your rivals will simply exploit this, so you must always further your interests where you can as no one else will. Besides, if you try to "help", you could be accused of interfering with the business of other nations to further your own influence. Critics would, of course, point out that it is this kind of thinking which perpetuates tensions and wars among nations, and that it is essentially "might makes right" "MightMakesRight" as a political philosophy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Palmerston said it better in the nineteenth century: "Therefore I say that it is a narrow policy to suppose that this country or that is to be marked out as the eternal ally or the perpetual enemy of England. We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow."

Added: 590

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Of course, in real life, moral considerations and what people will, and will not, go along with are real things, factors in the equation just as much as firepower and economic interests. To attempt to totally disregard such things in one's political calculation is in fact contrary to effective Realpolitick.

to:

** Of course, in real life, moral considerations and what people will, and will not, go along with are real things, factors in the equation just as much as firepower and economic interests. To attempt to totally disregard such things in one's political calculation is in fact contrary to effective Realpolitick.Realpolitik.
** In practice, realpolitik is practiced by governments all over the world. The United States, for example, has many allies that do not share the same inherent belief in human rights (for example, Saudi Arabia). By the same token, there are many situations where the United States condemns the actions of a foreign power, but goes no further, because igniting a war in that region would be detrimental to global stability. If you've ever looked at your government and wondered why it does things or cooperates with organizations or governments that seems shady, the answer is probably this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Alexander III of Russia once said: "Russia has two allies: the Army and the Navy".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* President Urho Kekkonen of Finland defined Finlandization as <i>art of bowing to East without mooning to West</i>, and stated <i>Find your friends near and your enemies far</i>.

to:

* President Urho Kekkonen of Finland defined Finlandization as <i>art ''art of bowing to East without mooning to West</i>, West'', and stated <i>Find ''Find your friends near and your enemies far</i>.far''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* President Urho Kekkonen of Finland defined Finlandization as <i>art of bowing to East without mooning to West</i>, and stated <i>Find your friends near and your enemies far</i>.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[quoteright:300:http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/Nixon_and_Mao_1972_2309.png]]
[[caption-width-right:300:The [[MaoZedong Communist revolutionary]], shaking hands with a [[RichardNixon life-long commie hater?]] Thank this trope.]]

Added: 373

Changed: 3

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CharlesTheGaulle summed this attitude up nicely. "France has no friends, only interest".

to:

* CharlesTheGaulle CharlesdeGaulle summed this attitude up nicely. "France has no friends, only interest".interest".
* The Melian dialogue in Thucydides' account of the Peloponnesian War. The Athenians asserted their dominance over the Melians due to the fact that they had far stronger military force, and could blackmail the Melians into accepting either submitting peacefully or being killed. The idea was that "the strong will do what they will and the weak will accept what they must".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CharlesTheGaulle summed this attitude up nicely. "France has no friends, only interest".

Added: 85

Changed: 469

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* This is what ''Literature/ThePrince'' is ''[[{{Flanderization}} actually]]'' about.



* This is what ''Literature/ThePrince'' is ''[[{{Flanderization}} actually]]'' about.

to:

* This The Andermani Empire in the ''HonorHarrington'' series is what ''Literature/ThePrince'' known for determining all foreign policy by ''realpolitik'', which is ''[[{{Flanderization}} actually]]'' about.
unsurprising, since they model themselves after Prussia. In a subversion of how this trope is usually portrayed, they are just as famous for expanding their empire by rescuing planets in trouble, for entirely pragmatic and selfish reasons -- a tradition that started with Gustav Anderman's rescue of Kuan-Yin, now known as Potsdam.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


This line of philosophy is essentially NiceGuysFinishLast among nations, and has been around since two groups of people got together and decided that there were issues on which could only be resolved by one side not getting what they wanted. If you ask TheEmpire, "Why are you taking over our country?" they will respond, "To make sure the other empire doesn't first."

to:

This line of philosophy is essentially NiceGuysFinishLast among nations, and has been around since two groups of people got together and decided that there were issues on which could only be resolved by one side not getting what they wanted.wanted at the expense of the other. If you ask TheEmpire, "Why are you taking over our country?" they will respond, "To make sure the other empire doesn't first."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


This line of philosophy is essentially NiceGuysFinishLast among nations, and has been around since two groups of people got together and decided that there were issues on which they really didn't agree too well. If you ask TheEmpire, "Why are you taking over our country?" they will respond, "To make sure the other empire doesn't first."

to:

This line of philosophy is essentially NiceGuysFinishLast among nations, and has been around since two groups of people got together and decided that there were issues on which could only be resolved by one side not getting what they really didn't agree too well.wanted. If you ask TheEmpire, "Why are you taking over our country?" they will respond, "To make sure the other empire doesn't first."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* This is what ''Literature/ThePrince'' is ''[[{{Flanderization}} actually]]'' about.


This line of philosophy is essentially NiceGuysFinishLast among nations, and has been around since two groups of people got together and decided that there were issues on which they [[{{Understatement}} really didn't agree too well]]. If you ask TheEmpire, "Why are you taking over our country?" they will respond, "To make sure the other empire doesn't first."

to:

This line of philosophy is essentially NiceGuysFinishLast among nations, and has been around since two groups of people got together and decided that there were issues on which they [[{{Understatement}} really didn't agree too well]].well. If you ask TheEmpire, "Why are you taking over our country?" they will respond, "To make sure the other empire doesn't first."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** To explain the photo: Richard Nixon made his political career being a stalwart anticommunist, yet he and Henry Kissinger (his Secretary of State) were the ones who established formal diplomatic ties with the People's Republic of China - both held mutual distrust and suspicion of the Soviet Union at the time.

to:

** To explain the photo: Richard *Richard Nixon made his political career being a stalwart anticommunist, yet he and Henry Kissinger (his Secretary of State) were the ones who established formal diplomatic ties with the People's Republic of China - both held mutual distrust and suspicion of the Soviet Union at the time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
That\'s Leonid Brezhnev in the image, not Mao Zedong.


http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/Nixon_Zhou_Enlai_6219.jpg
[[caption-width:300:The Communist revolutionary and [[RichardNixon the life-long Commie-hater]] toast their friendship and good will. [[EnemyMine Or at least their mutual dislike of the Soviet Union]].]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[caption-width:300:The Communist revolutionary and [[RichardNixon the life-long Commie-hater]] toast their friendship and good will. Or at least their mutual dislike of the Soviet Union.]]

to:

[[caption-width:300:The Communist revolutionary and [[RichardNixon the life-long Commie-hater]] toast their friendship and good will. [[EnemyMine Or at least their mutual dislike of the Soviet Union.Union]].]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** To explain the photo: Richard Nixon made his political career being a stalwart anticommunist, yet he and Henry Kissinger (his Secretary of State) were the ones who established formal diplomatic ties with the People's Republic of China - both held mutual distrust and suspicion of the Soviet Union at the time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Of course, in real life, moral considerations and what people will, and will not, go along with are real things, factors in the equation just as much as firepower and economic interests. To attempt to totally disregard such things in one's political calculation is in fact contrary to effective Realpolitick.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* From TheOtherWiki: [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realpolitik Realpolitik]] (see also Political realism) From German: real "realistic", "practical" or "actual"; and Politik "politics". Realpolitik refers to politics or diplomacy based primarily on practical considerations, rather than ideological notions or moralistic premises. In this respect, it shares aspects of its philosophical approach with those of realism and pragmatism. The term ''realpolitik'' is often used pejoratively to imply politics that are coercive, amoral or Machiavellian.

to:

* From TheOtherWiki: [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realpolitik Realpolitik]] (see also Political realism) From German: real "realistic", "practical" or "actual"; and Politik "politics". Realpolitik refers to politics or diplomacy based primarily on practical considerations, rather than ideological notions or moralistic premises. In this respect, it shares aspects of its philosophical approach with those of realism and pragmatism. The term ''realpolitik'' is often used pejoratively to imply politics that are coercive, amoral or Machiavellian. The term was ''not'' coined by {{Otto von Bismarck}}, although he was one of its most famous and successful followers.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[AC:VideoGames]]

* You can easily fall into this way of thinking in EuropaUniversalis games, especially if you are a small, relatively insecure nation. Your focus tends to be less on right and wrong and more on grabbing as much for your country as possible without setting the world on you.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[caption-width:300:The Communist revolutionary and the life-long Commie-hater toast their friendship and good will. Or at least their mutual dislike of the Soviet Union.]]

to:

[[caption-width:300:The Communist revolutionary and [[RichardNixon the life-long Commie-hater Commie-hater]] toast their friendship and good will. Or at least their mutual dislike of the Soviet Union.]]



[[AC: {{Literature}}]]

to:

[[AC: {{Literature}}]] [[AC:{{Literature}}]]



[[AC: LiveActionTV]]
* In ''{{Stargate Atlantis}}'' the "[[DesignatedHero heroes]]" are ''put on trial'' for [[WhatTheHellHero their previous actions]]. Shepard basically argues that they aren't fighting for right or wrong, but rather they are fighting for ''themselves''.

to:

[[AC: LiveActionTV]]
[[AC:LiveActionTV]]
* In ''{{Stargate Atlantis}}'' ''StargateAtlantis'' the "[[DesignatedHero heroes]]" are ''put on trial'' for [[WhatTheHellHero their previous actions]]. Shepard basically argues that they aren't fighting for right or wrong, but rather they are fighting for ''themselves''.



[[AC: RealLife]]

to:

[[AC: RealLife]] [[AC:RealLife]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Contrast HobbesWasRight.

to:

Contrast Compare and contrast HobbesWasRight.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* On ''{{Babylon 5}}'', this is the philosophy espoused by most of the Centauri (except for Vir, who is the TokenGoodTeammate, and Emperor Cartagia, who is TheCaligula).

Changed: 641

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


If you ask a diplomat exactly why his country is behaving in a ruthless manner, he will usually, if you can blast your way through all the skillful deflections and rhetoric, respond with this argument.

"We're just protecting our interests. It is what every other nation is doing, and what every nation ''should'' be doing."

This line of philosophy is essentially "NiceGuysFinishLast" among nations, and has been around since two groups of people got together and decided that there were issues on which they [[{{Understatement}} really didn't agree too well]]. If you ask TheEmpire, "Why are you taking over our country?" they will respond, "To make sure the other empire doesn't first."

to:

http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/Nixon_Zhou_Enlai_6219.jpg
[[caption-width:300:The Communist revolutionary and the life-long Commie-hater toast their friendship and good will. Or at least their mutual dislike of the Soviet Union.]]
If you ask a diplomat exactly why his country is behaving in a ruthless manner, he will usually, if you can blast your way through all the skillful deflections and rhetoric, respond with this argument.

argument: "We're just protecting our interests. It is what every other nation is doing, and what every nation ''should'' be doing."

This line of philosophy is essentially "NiceGuysFinishLast" NiceGuysFinishLast among nations, and has been around since two groups of people got together and decided that there were issues on which they [[{{Understatement}} really didn't agree too well]]. If you ask TheEmpire, "Why are you taking over our country?" they will respond, "To make sure the other empire doesn't first."

Changed: 456

Removed: 359

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
If that was a coy Take That at Starship Troopers, it is not at all accurate.


* In a sci-fi story whose title eludes me: Humankind go around wiping out whole alien races on the off chances that they may do the same thing. [[RobertAHeinlein The author]] saw nothing wrong with this.
** In another RobertAHeinlein novel, ''[=~Have Space Suit - Will Travel~=]'', the Three Galaxies organization of many alien races puts HumanityOnTrial. Our hero Kip says this is unjust. The alien moderator responds that the Three Galaxies don't bother trying to understand "justice" but are a defense organization that destroys any race that will be a threat.

to:

* In a sci-fi story whose title eludes me: Humankind go around wiping out whole alien races on the off chances that they may do the same thing. [[RobertAHeinlein The author]] saw nothing wrong with this.
**
In another RobertAHeinlein novel, ''[=~Have Space Suit - Will Travel~=]'', the Three Galaxies organization of many alien races puts HumanityOnTrial. Our hero Kip says this is unjust. The alien moderator responds that the Three Galaxies don't bother trying to understand "justice" but are a defense organization that destroys any race that will be a threat.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


If you ask a diplomat exactly why his country is behaving in a ruthless manner, he will usually, if you can blast your way through all the skilful deflections and rhetoric, respond with this argument.

to:

If you ask a diplomat exactly why his country is behaving in a ruthless manner, he will usually, if you can blast your way through all the skilful skillful deflections and rhetoric, respond with this argument.




to:

* One of the post-[[IsaacAsimov Asimov]] ''{{Foundation}}'' authors claimed that aliens never showed up because robots killed them to [[ThreeLawsCompliant protect humans]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


Contrast HobbesWasRight.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*In a sci-fi story whose title eludes me: Humankind go around wiping out whole alien races on the off chances that they may do the same thing. [[RobertAHeinlein The author]] saw nothing wrong with this.

to:

*In a sci-fi story whose title eludes me: Humankind go around wiping out whole alien races on the off chances that they may do the same thing. [[RobertAHeinlein The author]] saw nothing wrong with this.this.
** In another RobertAHeinlein novel, ''[=~Have Space Suit - Will Travel~=]'', the Three Galaxies organization of many alien races puts HumanityOnTrial. Our hero Kip says this is unjust. The alien moderator responds that the Three Galaxies don't bother trying to understand "justice" but are a defense organization that destroys any race that will be a threat.

Top