Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / MetaTwist

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the ''{{Spider-Man}}'' mythos, the Green Goblin is always revealed to be Norman Osborn, father of Peter's best friend Harry. However, ''TheSpectacularSpiderMan'' hints that Harry himself is the Goblin, patterning itself after some later comic book storylines (where he succeeded his father as the Goblin, among others). It came as a shock to fans when Harry really ''was'' the Goblin. Subverted the next season, with another twist that Norman was the Goblin all along and Harry was just a RedHerring. (So two Meta Twists, the first within the context of the show and the second within the mythos as a whole.)

to:

* In the ''{{Spider-Man}}'' mythos, the Green Goblin ''TheSpectacularSpiderMan,'' it is always revealed to be Norman Osborn, father of Peter's best friend Harry. However, ''TheSpectacularSpiderMan'' hints hinted, and eventually confirmed, that Harry himself [[spoiler:Harry Osborn]] is the original Green Goblin, patterning itself after some later comic book storylines (where he succeeded his father rather than NormanOsborn as in other continuities. And then, in the Goblin, among others). It came as a shock to fans when Harry really second season finale, we find out that [[spoiler:it ''was'' the Goblin. Subverted the next season, with another twist that Norman was the Goblin all along and along, framing Harry was just a RedHerring. (So two Meta Twists, for the first within the context of the show and the second within the mythos as a whole.)crime]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In PhoenixWrightAceAttorney - Justice for All's final case, [[spoiler: Phoenix's client really is guilty.]] Many consider it [[BestLevelEver one of the best cases in the series.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ScoobyDoo is well known for its ScoobyDooHoax. So this is an example whenever the monster they are chasing is, in fact, a monster, and not a guy in a costume. Mostly occurs in the OVAs.

to:

* ScoobyDoo is well known for its ScoobyDooHoax. So this is an example whenever the monster they are chasing is, in fact, a monster, and not a guy in a costume. Mostly occurs in the OVAs.{{OVA}}s.

Added: 332

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''SouthPark'' fans know that Cartman is always, ''always'' doing good deeds for his own twisted reasons, which may range from PokeThePoodle to all-out MoralEventHorizon in scope. No matter how good he ''seems,'' fans and [[GenreSavvy the characters]] can bet that he's really being manipulative. This makes his subplot in "Major Boobage" something of a surprise, when he really ''does'' take in all the town's cats (which had been recently outlawed) simply out of the kindness of his heart.

to:

* ''SouthPark'' fans know that Cartman is always, ''always'' doing good deeds for his own twisted reasons, which may range from PokeThePoodle to all-out MoralEventHorizon in scope. No matter how good he ''seems,'' fans and [[GenreSavvy the characters]] can bet that he's really being manipulative. This makes his subplot in "Major Boobage" something of a surprise, when he really ''does'' take in all the town's cats (which had been recently outlawed) simply out of the kindness of his heart. heart.
** That doesn't stop him from being an asshole, though. When Cartman delivers an {{Aesop}} about not persecuting a particular group because they're different, he completely ignores Kyle's attempts to point out how this applies to [[WorldWarTwo another period of history where the same thing happened and yet he was totally for it.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ScoobyDoo is well known for its ScoobyDooHoax. So this is an example whenever the monster they are chasing is, in fact, a monster, and not a guy in a costume. Mostly occurs in the OVAs.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder:VideoGames]]
* The first two ''Uncharted'' games had the twist of there being supernatural monsters ([[OurZombiesAreDifferent zombies]] and [[BigfootSasquatchAndYeti Yeti]], respectively) involved in the events. The third game, ''Drake's Deception'', has its supernatural enemy, the Djinn (Arab fire demons), turn out to be just [[MushroomSamba a hallucination]].
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In his debut movie ''HouseOfGames'', David Mamet played the aforementioned trope that the events in a con man movie are revealed to be part of a [[MassiveMultiplayerScam massive con]] straight. But when he directed his second con man movie, ''The Spanish Prisoner'', he must have realized that viewers were now expecting this kind of a PlotTwist. To counter that, the movie keeps constantly introducing new plot elements that may be innocent, or may (to a viewer expecting the twist) be part of a con. The result is that by the end of the movie, a sufficiently paranoid viewer will not know how large the actual con was, or who exactly was involved in it.

to:

* In his debut movie ''HouseOfGames'', David Mamet played the aforementioned trope that the events in a con man movie are revealed to be part of a [[MassiveMultiplayerScam massive con]] straight. But when he directed his second con man movie, ''The Spanish Prisoner'', he must have realized that viewers were now expecting this kind of a PlotTwist. To counter that, the movie keeps constantly introducing new plot elements that may be innocent, or may (to a viewer expecting the twist) be part of a con. The result is that by the end of the movie, a sufficiently paranoid viewer will not know can't be sure how large the actual con was, or who exactly was involved in it.

Added: 657

Changed: 4

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheBrothersBloom is about con-men, and it has become something of a cliche that any story about con-men is usually a con itself--the viewer waits for the twist to be revealed. The twist at the end of TheBrothersBloom is... there is no twist. The movie has played fair with the audience all along, and what you saw is what really happened. The feeling of the viewer's plot-twist-sense tingling was just paranoia.

to:

* TheBrothersBloom ''TheBrothersBloom'' is about con-men, and it has become something of a cliche that any story about con-men is usually a con itself--the viewer waits for the twist to be revealed. The twist at the end of TheBrothersBloom is... there is no twist. The movie has played fair with the audience all along, and what you saw is what really happened. The feeling of the viewer's plot-twist-sense tingling was just paranoia.paranoia.
* In his debut movie ''HouseOfGames'', David Mamet played the aforementioned trope that the events in a con man movie are revealed to be part of a [[MassiveMultiplayerScam massive con]] straight. But when he directed his second con man movie, ''The Spanish Prisoner'', he must have realized that viewers were now expecting this kind of a PlotTwist. To counter that, the movie keeps constantly introducing new plot elements that may be innocent, or may (to a viewer expecting the twist) be part of a con. The result is that by the end of the movie, a sufficiently paranoid viewer will not know how large the actual con was, or who exactly was involved in it.

Changed: 236

Removed: 114

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
\'\'The Straight Story\'\' is Directing Against Type, not this.


* After making a whole lot of surrealist films, DavidLynch directed ''The Straight Story''. The twist: There are ''no'' monster fetuses, talking women in radiators or violent porn scenes. It's just an ordinary G-rated Disney film.
** ''BlueVelvet'' is a lesser example; its storyline is far more straightforward than most of Lynch's other films.

to:

* After making a whole lot of surrealist films, DavidLynch directed ''The Straight Story''. The twist: There are ''no'' monster fetuses, talking women in radiators or violent porn scenes. It's just an ordinary G-rated Disney film.
**
storyline of DavidLynch's ''BlueVelvet'' is a lesser example; its storyline is far more straightforward than most of Lynch's his other films.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** ''BlueVelvet'' is a lesser example; its storyline is far more straightforward than most of Lynch's other films.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In the pilot episode of ''{{Firefly}}'', Kaylee is shot and treated by Simon, with Mal threatening to pitch Simon off the ship if she doesn't recover. And JossWhedon is well known for being willing and eager to kill off characters, levity, and anything resembling cuteness with ''extreme'' prejudice. So, of course, Mal walks in on Simon and declares simply that she didn't make it -- and is ''lying through his teeth'' because he thinks it's funny (as does the rest of the crew).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''{{Goosebumps}}'' is notorious for having a MandatoryTwistEnding in practically every book. In the few episodes where there effectively is no twist ending, we get this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Namespace


* HBO helped pull this off in GameOfThrones. Who's the marketing of? Who's the obvious main character? SeanBean, who's the biggest name and most recognizable actor. Fans of the book loved it because they fell for the DecoyProtagonist when reading it and from the sheer amount of reviews and youtube videos so did most of television fans.

to:

* HBO helped pull this off in GameOfThrones.''Series/GameOfThrones''. Who's the marketing of? Who's the obvious main character? SeanBean, who's the biggest name and most recognizable actor. Fans of the book loved it because they fell for the DecoyProtagonist when reading it and from the sheer amount of reviews and youtube videos so did most of television fans.

Changed: 60

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* At Wrestlemania 27, Edge and Christian headed into Edge's title match vs Alberto Del Rio with a series of tense promo's that caused most to assume that Christian's ChronicBackstabbingDisorder would rear it's head again and cause him to screw over Edge during the match. The match itself, never even teased the possibility, leading to a clean win for Edge, with the two of them heading back the ramp together. In a way, it was quite fortunate, as due to a medical condition Edge retired legitimately, and instead of going out being screwed by the the other half of the Edge and Christian ThoseTwoGuys vibe, he retired as a champion with his best friend still in his corner.

to:

* At Wrestlemania 27, Edge and Christian headed into Edge's title match vs Alberto Del Rio with a series of tense promo's that caused most to assume that Christian's ChronicBackstabbingDisorder would rear it's head again and cause him to screw over Edge during the match. The match itself, never even teased the possibility, leading to a clean win for Edge, with the two of them heading back leaving the ramp stage together. In a way, it was quite fortunate, as due to a medical condition Edge retired legitimately, and instead legitimately before he could wrestle another match. Instead of going out being screwed by the the other half of the Edge and Christian ThoseTwoGuys vibe, he retired as a the champion with his best friend still in his corner.

Changed: 11

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder:ProfessionalWrestling]]
* At Wrestlemania 27, Edge and Christian headed into Edge's title match vs Alberto Del Rio with a series of tense promo's that caused most to assume that Christian's ChronicBackstabbingDisorder would rear it's head again and cause him to screw over Edge during the match. The match itself, never even teased the possibility, leading to a clean win for Edge, with the two of them heading back the ramp together. In a way, it was quite fortunate, as due to a medical condition Edge retired legitimately, and instead of going out being screwed by the the other half of the Edge and Christian ThoseTwoGuys vibe, he retired as a champion with his best friend still in his corner.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HBO helped pull this off in GameOfThrones. Whose the marketing of? Whose the obvious main character? SeanBean, whose the biggest name and most recognizable actor. Fans of the book loved it because they fell for the DecoyProtagonist when reading it and from the sheer amount of reviews and youtube videos so did most of television fans.

to:

* HBO helped pull this off in GameOfThrones. Whose Who's the marketing of? Whose Who's the obvious main character? SeanBean, whose who's the biggest name and most recognizable actor. Fans of the book loved it because they fell for the DecoyProtagonist when reading it and from the sheer amount of reviews and youtube videos so did most of television fans.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*HBO helped pull this off in GameOfThrones. Whose the marketing of? Whose the obvious main character? SeanBean, whose the biggest name and most recognizable actor. Fans of the book loved it because they fell for the DecoyProtagonist when reading it and from the sheer amount of reviews and youtube videos so did most of television fans.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* A suspect in ''TheCloser'' was a junkie arrested while he was high, showed violent tenancies when he chucked a chair through a window, had blood on his clothes, and possessed the keys to a stolen car with a murdered girl in the trunk. Rarely is the guilty party quite so obvious. The episode was largely dedicated to convincing [[DaChief Brenda]] that it was probably exactly what it looked like.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
\"he realized that her using\"?


Maybe he realized that her using the trope was becoming predictable or worse, a crutch, and ditched it. Or perhaps he [[TheyPlottedAPerfectlyGoodWaste plotted a perfectly good waste]] from before even writing the first book just to give fans a huge surprise. And of course, maybe he just wanted (horror of horrors) to surprise readers in order to entertain them. It doesn't matter which it is, the net effect is the same: The plot twist for that story becomes the absence of an established twist. So, a Meta Twist.

to:

Maybe he realized that her using the trope was becoming predictable or worse, a crutch, and ditched it. Or perhaps he [[TheyPlottedAPerfectlyGoodWaste plotted a perfectly good waste]] from before even writing the first book just to give fans a huge surprise. And of course, maybe he just wanted (horror of horrors) to surprise readers in order to entertain them. It doesn't matter which it is, the net effect is the same: The plot twist for that story becomes the absence of an established twist. So, a Meta Twist.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** This habit was so well known that this troper, who did not watch the show, stumbled over the third season finale's final minutes and actually waited to see what the cliffhanger twist would be. Needless to say, I was confused.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MNightShyamalan is so famous for adding [[ShockingSwerve completely unexpected]] ([[TropesAreNotBad but in a good way!]]) twists to his works that when ''TheHappening'' lacked one, people were disappointed.

to:

* MNightShyamalan is so famous for adding [[ShockingSwerve completely unexpected]] ([[TropesAreNotBad ([[SarcasmMode but in a good way!]]) twists to his works that when ''TheHappening'' lacked one, people were disappointed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''SouthPark'' fans know that Cartman is always, ''always'' doing good deeds for his own twisted reasons, which may range from PokeThePoodle to all-out MoralEventHorizon in scope. No matter how good he ''seems,'' fans and [[GenreSavvy the characters]] can bet that he's really being manipulative. This makes his subplot in "Major Boobage" something of a surprise, when he really ''does'' take in all the town's cats (which had been recently outlawed) simply out of the kindness of his heart.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[folder:film]]

to:

[[folder:film]][[folder:Film]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Say you're into a particular writer who [[MandatoryTwistEnding likes giving each of her stories a special kind]] of TwistEnding. She likes using it so much it's practically a signature element for her works. [[YourMilageMayVary For some readers]], it's [[DeadHorseTrope predictable and groanworthy]], others might like it. Imagine the surprise when, after you've put down the book, [[AvertedTrope the twist isn't there]]. Much like an EmptyRoomPsych, the author willingly removes that twist from her latest work to throw avid fans (and the GenreSavvy who expected ItWasHisSled) for a loop.

Maybe she realized that her using the trope was becoming predictable or worse, a crutch, and ditched it. Or perhaps she [[TheyPlottedAPerfectlyGoodWaste plotted a perfectly good waste]] from before even writing the first book just to give fans a huge surprise. And of course, maybe she just wanted (horror of horrors) to surprise readers in order to entertain them. It doesn't matter which it is, the net effect is the same: The plot twist for that story becomes the absence of an established twist. So, a Meta Twist.

to:

Say you're into a particular writer who [[MandatoryTwistEnding likes giving each of her his stories a special kind]] of TwistEnding. She He likes using it so much it's practically a signature element for her his works. [[YourMilageMayVary For some readers]], it's [[DeadHorseTrope predictable and groanworthy]], others might like it. Imagine the surprise when, after you've put down the book, [[AvertedTrope the twist isn't there]]. Much like an EmptyRoomPsych, the author willingly removes that twist from her his latest work to throw avid fans (and the GenreSavvy who expected ItWasHisSled) for a loop.

Maybe she he realized that her using the trope was becoming predictable or worse, a crutch, and ditched it. Or perhaps she he [[TheyPlottedAPerfectlyGoodWaste plotted a perfectly good waste]] from before even writing the first book just to give fans a huge surprise. And of course, maybe she he just wanted (horror of horrors) to surprise readers in order to entertain them. It doesn't matter which it is, the net effect is the same: The plot twist for that story becomes the absence of an established twist. So, a Meta Twist.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In the opening chapters of Sarah Waters' ''The Night Watch'', a main character thinks about her secret lover and why nobody can ever know about their relationship. As Waters' previous books centred on lesbians, it seems obvious where this is going - but the lover is actually a man (the forbidden love aspect is because he's married.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MNightShyamalan is so famous for adding [[ShockingSwerve completely unexpected]] ([[TropesAreNotBad but in a good way!]]) twists to his works that when ''TheHappening'' lacked one, people were disappointed. It didn't help that the apparent situation was so fricking ''[[GaiasVengeance dumb]]'' people were hoping for any other explanation.

to:

* MNightShyamalan is so famous for adding [[ShockingSwerve completely unexpected]] ([[TropesAreNotBad but in a good way!]]) twists to his works that when ''TheHappening'' lacked one, people were disappointed. It didn't help that the apparent situation was so fricking ''[[GaiasVengeance dumb]]'' people were hoping for any other explanation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MNightShyamalan is so famous for adding [[ShockingSwerve completely unexpected]] ([[TropesAreNotBad but in a good way!]]) twists to his works that when ''TheHappening'' lacked one, people were disappointed.

to:

* MNightShyamalan is so famous for adding [[ShockingSwerve completely unexpected]] ([[TropesAreNotBad but in a good way!]]) twists to his works that when ''TheHappening'' lacked one, people were disappointed. It didn't help that the apparent situation was so fricking ''[[GaiasVengeance dumb]]'' people were hoping for any other explanation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''HalfBloodPrince'' also has another one: Up until then, the DA-teacher always had been a character newly introduced in the respective book. (Except in the first book of course, where ''everyone'' was "newly introduced".) Even the characters were surprised when this turned out ''not'' to be the case in ''HBP''.

to:

** ''HalfBloodPrince'' also has another one: Up until then, the DA-teacher always had been a character newly introduced in the respective book. (Except in the first book of course, where ''everyone'' was "newly introduced".) Even the characters were surprised when this This turned out ''not'' to be the case in ''HBP''.''HBP''. Even Harry & friends were surprised by this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** ''HalfBloodPrince'' also has another one: Up until then, the DA-teacher always had been a character newly introduced in the respective book. (Except in the first book of course, where ''everyone'' was "newly introduced".) Even the characters were surprised when this turned out to not be the case in ''HBP''.

to:

** ''HalfBloodPrince'' also has another one: Up until then, the DA-teacher always had been a character newly introduced in the respective book. (Except in the first book of course, where ''everyone'' was "newly introduced".) Even the characters were surprised when this turned out ''not'' to not be the case in ''HBP''.

Top