Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 76 (click to see context) from:
* ''TheSecretOfKells''
to:
* ''TheSecretOfKells''''WesternAnimation/TheSecretOfKells''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Additionally, the western Roman Empire wasn't quite dead during the dark ages, and the feudal states hadn't actually developed their own war-craft to a competitive degree yet. So swords were a characteristic weapon of the only people who were fully trained in the craft of the professional soldier, with formal training in tactics etc. If a band of mercenaries showed up and they were mostly equipped with swords, chances were that it was a legion remnant and you were about to have your own untrained peasant levies shoved up our arse sideways.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
In Hollywood Land, however, this was a time of muck and more muck. The cleanest—and most well-known—figure of this period generally ends up being [[Myth/KingArthur Arthur]], King (...ish) of the Britons, who had a round table, around which sat his band of noble and chivalrous [[strike:knights]] blokes with big swords (many of whom proved ''not'' so noble and chivalrous once left to their own devices). Since most accounts of Arthur were written centuries after he supposedly lived, and featured fashion and architecture from the time they were written, many Hollywood 'historians' lump him in with TheHighMiddleAges (but hey, since when have ''they'' been [[AnachronismStew sticklers for accuracy]]?).
to:
In Hollywood Land, however, this was a time of muck and more muck. The cleanest—and most well-known—figure of this period generally ends up being [[Myth/KingArthur Arthur]], King (...ish) of the Britons, who had a round table, around which sat his band of noble and chivalrous [[strike:knights]] blokes with big swords (many of whom proved ''not'' so noble and chivalrous once left to their own devices).devices) [[note]] many medieval knights were teenagers that worked for their lord as hired muscle, behaving more like modern gang members than the romances would have you believe [[/note]]. Since most accounts of Arthur were written centuries after he supposedly lived, and featured fashion and architecture from the time they were written, many Hollywood 'historians' lump him in with TheHighMiddleAges (but hey, since when have ''they'' been [[AnachronismStew sticklers for accuracy]]?).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
A time of anarchy and chaos (roughly 500 - 900 CE), when people were [[TheDungAges disease-ridden and covered with filth]], unless one [[Film/MontyPythonAndTheHolyGrail happened to be king]]... at least, if you believe what ''Hollywood'' says about them -- according to real modern historians this is a load of cobblers based purely on the fact that we don't have many documents from that time.
to:
A time of anarchy and chaos (roughly 500 - 900 CE), AD), when people were [[TheDungAges disease-ridden and covered with filth]], unless one [[Film/MontyPythonAndTheHolyGrail happened to be king]]... at least, if you believe what ''Hollywood'' says about them -- according to real modern historians this is a load of cobblers based purely on the fact that we don't have many documents from that time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 74 (click to see context) from:
* ''Film/HowToTrainYourDragon'', both [[Literature/HowToTrainYourDragon the book series]] and the 2010 movie.
to:
* ''Film/HowToTrainYourDragon'', ''WesternAnimation/HowToTrainYourDragon'', both [[Literature/HowToTrainYourDragon the book series]] and the 2010 movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7,8 (click to see context) from:
The term “Dark Ages” only makes sense if you understand the technical definition of the word “history”, which is: “The study of stuff people wrote about themselves back in the day.” The Dark Ages were dark not because they were DarkerAndEdgier, or because there was a shortage of candles, but because very few of their writings have survived to the present day, leaving History in the dark about what things were like. We cannot tell for certain whether the Dark Ages were darker and edgier than the eras that came before and after. In fact, there is absolutely no evidence at all that there was any kind of 'technological Dark Age' at all, rather the evidence favors continued gradual development. According to several historians the reason we have writings from Pliny and other earlier writers at all is because they were dutifully copied by monks. The reason we tend to look down on this period is because in the Renaissance there was a massive upsurge in interest in ancient Greek, Roman, and Egyptian culture and a great deal of belittlement and scorn for the previous millennium. The fact that we have so few historical documents from the 'Dark Ages' could well be explained by the distaste for this time and the outright systematic destruction of many great Gothic buildings from the Middle Ages (aside from ones that were ''still under construction'', like the Cologne Cathedral). From a historical view point it would be more accurate to pinpoint this age from 661 (when the Europeans lost contact with Syria and Egypt due to Muslim invasions) to about 1100 (when the Crusades recovered lost information from the Classical Era). We know what happened during those times though and it is for [[TheCrusades whatever reason]] a rather touchy subject so fiction writers do not touch it.
to:
The term “Dark Ages” only makes sense if you understand the technical definition of the word “history”, which is: “The study of stuff people wrote about themselves back in the day.” The Dark Ages were dark not because they were DarkerAndEdgier, or because there was a shortage of candles, but because very few of their writings have survived to the present day, leaving History in the dark about what things were like. We cannot tell for certain whether the Dark Ages were darker and edgier than the eras that came before and after. In fact, there is absolutely no evidence at all that there was any kind of 'technological Dark Age' at all, Age', rather the evidence favors continued gradual development. According to several historians the reason we have writings from Pliny and other earlier writers at all is because they were dutifully copied by monks. The reason we tend to look down on this period is because in the Renaissance there was a massive upsurge in interest in ancient Greek, Roman, and Egyptian culture and a great deal of belittlement and scorn for the previous millennium. The fact that we have so few historical documents from the 'Dark Ages' could well be explained by the distaste for this time and the outright systematic destruction of many great Gothic buildings from the Middle Ages (aside from ones that were ''still under construction'', like the Cologne Cathedral). From a historical view point it would be more accurate to pinpoint this age from 661 (when the Europeans lost contact with Syria and Egypt due to Muslim invasions) to about 1100 (when the Crusades recovered lost information from the Classical Era). We know what happened during those times though though, and it is for [[TheCrusades whatever reason]] a rather touchy subject subject, so fiction writers do not touch it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
This period heralded the [[AfterTheEnd fall]] and [[BalkanizeMe division]] of the Western Roman Empire (the Eastern half was able to survive), and the rise of monasticism in Europe. Hollywood monks are pious men, clad in long brown robes, with rosaries and tonsure haircuts. They spend their days dipping feathered quills into inkwells and scribbling strange script into large books by candlelight. That is, when they're not out chasing lusty, busty tavern wenches. Hollywood monks don't take that whole “celibacy” thing all that seriously. Neither, in fact, did the regular clergy; celibacy did not become a requirement of the priesthood until ''very'' late in the Middle Ages. It ''was'', however, mandated in nearly every set of monastic rules, including those of Benedict. It was also a time of interesting contrasts: during this period, Christian and Pagan folklore and traditions were syncretized in the minds of the public, which gave rise to some of the most famous mythologies and legends of the Middle Ages, such as Beowulf, Siegfried, and the aforementioned King Arthur.
to:
This period heralded the [[AfterTheEnd fall]] and [[BalkanizeMe division]] of the Western Roman Empire (the Eastern half was able to survive), survive as the Byzantine Empire), and the rise of monasticism in Europe. Hollywood monks are pious men, clad in long brown robes, with rosaries and tonsure haircuts. They spend their days dipping feathered quills into inkwells and scribbling strange script into large books by candlelight. That is, when they're not out chasing lusty, busty tavern wenches. Hollywood monks don't take that whole “celibacy” thing all that seriously. Neither, in fact, did the regular clergy; celibacy did not become a requirement of the priesthood until ''very'' late in the Middle Ages. It ''was'', however, mandated in nearly every set of monastic rules, including those of Benedict. It was also a time of interesting contrasts: during this period, Christian and Pagan folklore and traditions were syncretized in the minds of the public, which gave rise to some of the most famous mythologies and legends of the Middle Ages, such as Beowulf, Siegfried, and the aforementioned King Arthur.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 41 (click to see context) from:
* NorseMythology
to:
* NorseMythologyMyth/NorseMythology
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
In Hollywood Land, however, this was a time of muck and more muck. The cleanest—and most well-known—figure of this period generally ends up being [[KingArthur Arthur]], King (...ish) of the Britons, who had a round table, around which sat his band of noble and chivalrous [[strike:knights]] blokes with big swords (many of whom proved ''not'' so noble and chivalrous once left to their own devices). Since most accounts of Arthur were written centuries after he supposedly lived, and featured fashion and architecture from the time they were written, many Hollywood 'historians' lump him in with TheHighMiddleAges (but hey, since when have ''they'' been [[AnachronismStew sticklers for accuracy]]?).
to:
In Hollywood Land, however, this was a time of muck and more muck. The cleanest—and most well-known—figure of this period generally ends up being [[KingArthur [[Myth/KingArthur Arthur]], King (...ish) of the Britons, who had a round table, around which sat his band of noble and chivalrous [[strike:knights]] blokes with big swords (many of whom proved ''not'' so noble and chivalrous once left to their own devices). Since most accounts of Arthur were written centuries after he supposedly lived, and featured fashion and architecture from the time they were written, many Hollywood 'historians' lump him in with TheHighMiddleAges (but hey, since when have ''they'' been [[AnachronismStew sticklers for accuracy]]?).
Changed line(s) 33 (click to see context) from:
* Literature/KingArthur
to:
* Literature/KingArthurMyth/KingArthur
Changed line(s) 48 (click to see context) from:
* All movie and literary versions of ''Literature/KingArthur''.
to:
* All movie and literary versions of ''Literature/KingArthur''.''Myth/KingArthur''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 68 (click to see context) from:
to:
* ''Series/{{Vikings}}''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 33 (click to see context) from:
* KingArthur
to:
* KingArthurLiterature/KingArthur
Changed line(s) 48 (click to see context) from:
* All movie and literary versions of ''KingArthur''.
to:
* All movie and literary versions of ''KingArthur''.''Literature/KingArthur''.
Changed line(s) 53,54 (click to see context) from:
* ''{{Outlander}}'' (2008), i.e., Beowulf, [[RecycledInSpace the Sci-Fi Remix]].
to:
* ''{{Outlander}}'' ''Series/{{Outlander}}'' (2008), i.e., Beowulf, [[RecycledInSpace the Sci-Fi Remix]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
fixed wick
Changed line(s) 42 (click to see context) from:
* SlavicMythology
to:
* SlavicMythologyMyth/SlavicMythology
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* HeroesPreferSwords: The history behind this is: after the fall of Rome (which had made swords standard for its soldiers), later swords would be expensive, prestigious weapons in many parts of Europe at least and legendary heroes would usually those rich enough to own swords, or alternatively those honored to be given them by their chief or liege.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 62 (click to see context) from:
to:
* ''Literature/LestDarknessFall''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
In Hollywood Land, however, this was a time of muck and more muck. The cleanest—and most well-known—figure of this period generally ends up being [[KingArthur Arthur]], King(…ish) of the Britons, who had a round table, around which sat his band of noble and chivalrous [[strike:knights]] blokes with big swords (many of whom proved ''not'' so noble and chivalrous once left to their own devices). Since most accounts of Arthur were written centuries after he supposedly lived, and featured fashion and architecture from the time they were written, many Hollywood 'historians' lump him in with TheHighMiddleAges (but hey, since when have ''they'' been [[AnachronismStew sticklers for accuracy]]?).
to:
In Hollywood Land, however, this was a time of muck and more muck. The cleanest—and most well-known—figure of this period generally ends up being [[KingArthur Arthur]], King(…ish) King (...ish) of the Britons, who had a round table, around which sat his band of noble and chivalrous [[strike:knights]] blokes with big swords (many of whom proved ''not'' so noble and chivalrous once left to their own devices). Since most accounts of Arthur were written centuries after he supposedly lived, and featured fashion and architecture from the time they were written, many Hollywood 'historians' lump him in with TheHighMiddleAges (but hey, since when have ''they'' been [[AnachronismStew sticklers for accuracy]]?).
Changed line(s) 7,8 (click to see context) from:
The term “Dark Ages” only makes sense if you understand the technical definition of the word “history”, which is: “The study of stuff people wrote about themselves back in the day.” The Dark Ages were dark not because they were DarkerAndEdgier, or because there was a shortage of candles, but because very few of their writings have survived to the present day, leaving History in the dark about what things were like. We cannot tell for certain whether the Dark Ages were darker and edgier than the eras that came before and after. In fact, there is absolutely no evidence at all that there was any kind of 'technological Dark Age' at all, rather the evidence favours continued gradual development. According to several historians the reason we have writings from Pliny and other earlier writers at all is because they were dutifully copied by monks. The reason we tend to look down on this period is because in the Renaissance there was a massive upsurge in interest in ancient Greek, Roman, and Egyptian culture and a great deal of belittlement and scorn for the previous millennium. The fact that we have so few historical documents from the 'Dark Ages' could well be explained by the distaste for this time and the outright systematic destruction of many great Gothic buildings from the Middle Ages (aside from ones that were ''still under construction'', like the Cologne Cathedral). From a historical view point it would be more accurate to pinpoint this age from 661 (when the Europeans lost contact with Syria and Egypt due to Muslim invasions) to about 1100 (when the Crusades recovered lost information from the Classical Era). We know what happened during those times though and it is for [[TheCrusades whatever reason]] a rather touchy subject so fiction writers do not touch it.
to:
The term “Dark Ages” only makes sense if you understand the technical definition of the word “history”, which is: “The study of stuff people wrote about themselves back in the day.” The Dark Ages were dark not because they were DarkerAndEdgier, or because there was a shortage of candles, but because very few of their writings have survived to the present day, leaving History in the dark about what things were like. We cannot tell for certain whether the Dark Ages were darker and edgier than the eras that came before and after. In fact, there is absolutely no evidence at all that there was any kind of 'technological Dark Age' at all, rather the evidence favours favors continued gradual development. According to several historians the reason we have writings from Pliny and other earlier writers at all is because they were dutifully copied by monks. The reason we tend to look down on this period is because in the Renaissance there was a massive upsurge in interest in ancient Greek, Roman, and Egyptian culture and a great deal of belittlement and scorn for the previous millennium. The fact that we have so few historical documents from the 'Dark Ages' could well be explained by the distaste for this time and the outright systematic destruction of many great Gothic buildings from the Middle Ages (aside from ones that were ''still under construction'', like the Cologne Cathedral). From a historical view point it would be more accurate to pinpoint this age from 661 (when the Europeans lost contact with Syria and Egypt due to Muslim invasions) to about 1100 (when the Crusades recovered lost information from the Classical Era). We know what happened during those times though and it is for [[TheCrusades whatever reason]] a rather touchy subject so fiction writers do not touch it.
Changed line(s) 22 (click to see context) from:
* GoldenAge: A localised one in Ireland which saw a huge cultural, religious and artistic flowering thanks to the arrival of monasticism (this where the 'Saints' from an 'Island of Saints and Scholars' comes in.)
to:
* GoldenAge: A localised localized one in Ireland which saw a huge cultural, religious and artistic flowering thanks to the arrival of monasticism (this is where the 'Saints' from an 'Island of Saints and Scholars' comes in.)in).
Changed line(s) 28,29 (click to see context) from:
* VestigialEmpire: TheRomanEmpire collapsed in the fifth century, leaving crumbling roads and aquaducts to lace Europe--but only the Western half. [[ByzantineEmpire The Eastern Roman Empire]] continued on until the fifteenth century: advanced infrastructure, a literate culture, and a higher standard of living, but in an increasingly smaller territory.
to:
* VestigialEmpire: TheRomanEmpire collapsed in the fifth century, leaving crumbling roads and aquaducts aqueducts to lace Europe--but Europe-but only the Western half. [[ByzantineEmpire The Eastern Roman Empire]] continued on until the fifteenth century: advanced infrastructure, a literate culture, and a higher standard of living, but in an increasingly smaller territory.
Changed line(s) 33 (click to see context) from:
** {{Excalibur}}, his sword
to:
** {{Excalibur}}, his swordsword.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 36,38 (click to see context) from:
!!! Related UsefulNotes pages:
* UsefulNotes/CelticMythology
* UsefulNotes/CelticMythology
to:
!!! Related UsefulNotes pages:
*UsefulNotes/CelticMythologyMyth/CelticMythology
*
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
A time of anarchy and chaos (roughly 500 - 900 CE), when people were [[TheDungAges disease-ridden and covered with filth]], unless one [[Film/MontyPythonAndTheHolyGrail happened to be king]].....at least, if you believe what ''Hollywood'' says about them - according to real modern historians this is a load of cobblers based purely on the fact that we don't have many documents from that time.
to:
A time of anarchy and chaos (roughly 500 - 900 CE), when people were [[TheDungAges disease-ridden and covered with filth]], unless one [[Film/MontyPythonAndTheHolyGrail happened to be king]].....king]]... at least, if you believe what ''Hollywood'' says about them - -- according to real modern historians this is a load of cobblers based purely on the fact that we don't have many documents from that time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 28,29 (click to see context) from:
* VestigialEmpire: TheRomanEmpire collapsed in the fifth century, leaving crumbling roads and aquaducts to lace Europe--but only the Western part. The Eastern Roman Empire continued to claim the title of Roman Empire and limped on until the fifteenth century: advanced infrastructure, literate culture, and a higher standard of living, but in an increasingly smaller territory.
to:
* VestigialEmpire: TheRomanEmpire collapsed in the fifth century, leaving crumbling roads and aquaducts to lace Europe--but only the Western part. half. [[ByzantineEmpire The Eastern Roman Empire Empire]] continued to claim the title of Roman Empire and limped on until the fifteenth century: advanced infrastructure, a literate culture, and a higher standard of living, but in an increasingly smaller territory.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
This period heralded the [[AfterTheEnd fall]] and [[BalkanizeMe division]] of the Roman Empire, and the rise of monasticism in Europe. Hollywood monks are pious men, clad in long brown robes, with rosaries and tonsure haircuts. They spend their days dipping feathered quills into inkwells and scribbling strange script into large books by candlelight. That is, when they're not out chasing lusty, busty tavern wenches. Hollywood monks don't take that whole “celibacy” thing all that seriously. Neither, in fact, did the regular clergy; celibacy did not become a requirement of the priesthood until ''very'' late in the Middle Ages. It ''was'', however, mandated in nearly every set of monastic rules, including those of Benedict. It was also a time of interesting contrasts: during this period, Christian and Pagan folklore and traditions were syncretized in the minds of the public, which gave rise to some of the most famous mythologies and legends of the Middle Ages, such as Beowulf, Siegfried, and the aforementioned King Arthur.
to:
This period heralded the [[AfterTheEnd fall]] and [[BalkanizeMe division]] of the Western Roman Empire, Empire (the Eastern half was able to survive), and the rise of monasticism in Europe. Hollywood monks are pious men, clad in long brown robes, with rosaries and tonsure haircuts. They spend their days dipping feathered quills into inkwells and scribbling strange script into large books by candlelight. That is, when they're not out chasing lusty, busty tavern wenches. Hollywood monks don't take that whole “celibacy” thing all that seriously. Neither, in fact, did the regular clergy; celibacy did not become a requirement of the priesthood until ''very'' late in the Middle Ages. It ''was'', however, mandated in nearly every set of monastic rules, including those of Benedict. It was also a time of interesting contrasts: during this period, Christian and Pagan folklore and traditions were syncretized in the minds of the public, which gave rise to some of the most famous mythologies and legends of the Middle Ages, such as Beowulf, Siegfried, and the aforementioned King Arthur.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** The Carolignian dynasty of [[ManBehindTheMan Mayors of the Palace]], Kings, and finally Emperors helped another one explode on the mainland towards the end of this period, capping off with [[TheEmperor Charlemagne]] reconstructing the largest empire since Rome.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 27,28 (click to see context) from:
* VestigialEmpire: TheRomanEmpire collapsed in the fifth century, leaving crumbling roads and aquaducts to lace Europe--but only the Western part. The Eastern Roman Empire rebranded itself the Byzantine Empire and limped on until the fifteenth century: advanced infrastructure, literate culture, and a higher standard of living, but in an increasingly smaller territory.
to:
* VestigialEmpire: TheRomanEmpire collapsed in the fifth century, leaving crumbling roads and aquaducts to lace Europe--but only the Western part. The Eastern Roman Empire rebranded itself continued to claim the Byzantine title of Roman Empire and limped on until the fifteenth century: advanced infrastructure, literate culture, and a higher standard of living, but in an increasingly smaller territory.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
* UsefulNotes/CelticMythology
Deleted line(s) 37 (click to see context) :
* CelticMythology
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7,8 (click to see context) from:
The term “Dark Ages” only makes sense if you understand the technical definition of the word “history”, which is: “The study of stuff people wrote about themselves back in the day.” The Dark Ages were dark not because they were DarkerAndEdgier, or because there was a shortage of candles, but because very few of their writings have survived to the present day, leaving History in the dark about what things were like. We cannot tell for certain whether the Dark Ages were darker and edgier than the eras that came before and after. In fact, there is absolutely no evidence at all that there was any kind of 'technological Dark Age' at all, rather the evidence favours continued gradual development. According to several historians the reason we have writings from Pliny and other earlier writers at all is because they were dutifully copied by monks. The reason we tend to look down on this period is because in the Renaissance there was a massive upsurge in interest in ancient Greek, Roman, and Egyptian culture and a great deal of belittlement and scorn for the previous millennium. The fact that we have so few historical documents from the 'Dark Ages' could well be explained by the distaste for this time and the outright systematic destruction of many great Gothic buildings from the Middle Ages (aside from ones that were ''still under construction'', like the Cologne Cathedral). Also, depending on your perspective, the lack of Roman overlords breathing down your neck was probably an improvement. From a historical view point it would be more accurate to pinpoint this age from 661 (when the Europeans lost contact with Syria and Egypt due to Muslim invasions) to about 1100 (when the Crusades recovered lost information from the Classical Era). We know what happened during those times though and it is for [[TheCrusades whatever reason]] a rather touchy subject so fiction writers do not touch it.
to:
The term “Dark Ages” only makes sense if you understand the technical definition of the word “history”, which is: “The study of stuff people wrote about themselves back in the day.” The Dark Ages were dark not because they were DarkerAndEdgier, or because there was a shortage of candles, but because very few of their writings have survived to the present day, leaving History in the dark about what things were like. We cannot tell for certain whether the Dark Ages were darker and edgier than the eras that came before and after. In fact, there is absolutely no evidence at all that there was any kind of 'technological Dark Age' at all, rather the evidence favours continued gradual development. According to several historians the reason we have writings from Pliny and other earlier writers at all is because they were dutifully copied by monks. The reason we tend to look down on this period is because in the Renaissance there was a massive upsurge in interest in ancient Greek, Roman, and Egyptian culture and a great deal of belittlement and scorn for the previous millennium. The fact that we have so few historical documents from the 'Dark Ages' could well be explained by the distaste for this time and the outright systematic destruction of many great Gothic buildings from the Middle Ages (aside from ones that were ''still under construction'', like the Cologne Cathedral). Also, depending on your perspective, the lack of Roman overlords breathing down your neck was probably an improvement. From a historical view point it would be more accurate to pinpoint this age from 661 (when the Europeans lost contact with Syria and Egypt due to Muslim invasions) to about 1100 (when the Crusades recovered lost information from the Classical Era). We know what happened during those times though and it is for [[TheCrusades whatever reason]] a rather touchy subject so fiction writers do not touch it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Careful. We wouldn\'t want our readers laugh themselves to death.
Deleted line(s) 1,3 (click to see context) :
[[quoteright:350:http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/werrwerqw_9881.png]]
[[caption-width-right:350:The traditional view of the DarkAges]]
[[caption-width-right:350:The traditional view of the DarkAges]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
A time of anarchy and chaos (roughly 500 - 900 CE), when people were [[TheDungAges disease-ridden and covered with filth]], unless one [[Film/MontyPythonAndTheHolyGrail happened to be king]]. At least, if you believe what Hollywood says about them - according to real modern historians this is a load of cobblers based purely on the fact that we don't have many documents from that time.
to:
[[quoteright:350:http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/werrwerqw_9881.png]]
[[caption-width-right:350:The traditional view of the DarkAges]]
A time of anarchy and chaos (roughly 500 - 900 CE), when people were [[TheDungAges disease-ridden and covered with filth]], unless one [[Film/MontyPythonAndTheHolyGrail happened to beking]]. At king]].....at least, if you believe what Hollywood ''Hollywood'' says about them - according to real modern historians this is a load of cobblers based purely on the fact that we don't have many documents from that time.
[[caption-width-right:350:The traditional view of the DarkAges]]
A time of anarchy and chaos (roughly 500 - 900 CE), when people were [[TheDungAges disease-ridden and covered with filth]], unless one [[Film/MontyPythonAndTheHolyGrail happened to be
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
This period heralded the [[AfterTheEnd fall]] and [[BalkanizeMe division]] of the Roman Empire, and the rise of monasticism in Europe. Hollywood monks are pious men, clad in long brown robes, with rosaries and tonsure haircuts. They spend their days dipping feathered quills into inkwells and scribbling strange script into large books by candlelight. That is, when they're not out chasing lusty, busty tavern wenches. Hollywood monks don't take that whole “celibacy” thing all that seriously. Neither, in fact, did the regular clergy; celibacy did not become a requirement of the priesthood until ''very'' late in the Middle Ages. It ''was'', however, mandated in nearly every set of monastic rules, including those of Benedict. It was also a time of interesting contrasts: during this period, Christian and Pagan folklore and traditions were syncretized, which gave rise to some of the most famous mythologies and legends of the Middle Ages, such as Beowulf, Siegfried, and the aforementioned King Arthur.
to:
This period heralded the [[AfterTheEnd fall]] and [[BalkanizeMe division]] of the Roman Empire, and the rise of monasticism in Europe. Hollywood monks are pious men, clad in long brown robes, with rosaries and tonsure haircuts. They spend their days dipping feathered quills into inkwells and scribbling strange script into large books by candlelight. That is, when they're not out chasing lusty, busty tavern wenches. Hollywood monks don't take that whole “celibacy” thing all that seriously. Neither, in fact, did the regular clergy; celibacy did not become a requirement of the priesthood until ''very'' late in the Middle Ages. It ''was'', however, mandated in nearly every set of monastic rules, including those of Benedict. It was also a time of interesting contrasts: during this period, Christian and Pagan folklore and traditions were syncretized, syncretized in the minds of the public, which gave rise to some of the most famous mythologies and legends of the Middle Ages, such as Beowulf, Siegfried, and the aforementioned King Arthur.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* GoldenAge: A localised one in Ireland which saw a huge cultural, religious and artistic flowering thanks to the arrival of monasticism (this where the 'Saints' from an 'Island of Saints and Scholars' comes in.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
A time of anarchy and chaos (roughly 400 - 600 CE), when people were [[TheDungAges disease-ridden and covered with filth]], unless one [[Film/MontyPythonAndTheHolyGrail happened to be king]]. At least, if you believe what Hollywood says about them - according to real modern historians this is a load of cobblers based purely on the fact that we don't have many documents from that time.
to:
A time of anarchy and chaos (roughly 400 500 - 600 900 CE), when people were [[TheDungAges disease-ridden and covered with filth]], unless one [[Film/MontyPythonAndTheHolyGrail happened to be king]]. At least, if you believe what Hollywood says about them - according to real modern historians this is a load of cobblers based purely on the fact that we don't have many documents from that time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 26,27 (click to see context) from:
* VestigialEmpire: TheRomanEmpire was alive and (relatively) well in the east. It maintained its infrastructure, literate culture, and a higher standard of living, but its territory was reduced considerably.
to:
* VestigialEmpire: TheRomanEmpire was alive and (relatively) well collapsed in the east. It maintained its fifth century, leaving crumbling roads and aquaducts to lace Europe--but only the Western part. The Eastern Roman Empire rebranded itself the Byzantine Empire and limped on until the fifteenth century: advanced infrastructure, literate culture, and a higher standard of living, but its territory was reduced considerably.
in an increasingly smaller territory.
Changed line(s) 34 (click to see context) from:
* TheLowMiddleAges: Is there really a difference?
to:
* TheLowMiddleAges: Is there really a difference?TheLowMiddleAges
Changed line(s) 37 (click to see context) from:
* SlavicMythology: Provided you can find a piece of media involving it, heh heh.
to:
* SlavicMythology: Provided you can find a piece of media involving it, heh heh.SlavicMythology