Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / CourtroomAntics

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* John Gotti's Lawyer Bruce Cutler was infamous for this. Some of his antics included referring to prosecutor Diane Giacacolne as the "Lady in Red" when she showed up in court in a red dress, throwing an indictment in the garbage, verbally berating witnesses, questioning their character, name-calling and even turning prosecution witnesses into his witnesses (which became known as "Brucyfying")

to:

* [[UsefulNotes/TheMafia Mafia boss]] John Gotti's Lawyer lawyer Bruce Cutler was infamous for this. Some of his antics included referring to prosecutor Diane Giacacolne as the "Lady in Red" when she showed up in court in a red dress, throwing an indictment in the garbage, verbally berating witnesses, questioning their character, name-calling and even turning prosecution witnesses into his witnesses (which became known as "Brucyfying")



** During the testimony of his ex girlfriend, Brooks tried to put forth the idea that she is an unfit parent and this damages her credibility. The jury was removed from the room while Judge Dorow tried to explain why he couldn't do this without merit, and that it was irrelevant to the situation. Assistant District Attorney Zachary Witchow began to argue that if Brooks wanted to bring up her credibility as a parent, then the Prosecution would bring up the fact that she was impregnated, as a minor, by Brooks himself, and that had earned him a statutory rape charge (which placed him on the sex offender registry). Brooks became outraged, shouting over Witchow and Dorow, yelling about how they don't know the truth. As he was removed once again, he shouted "So let's open the door on all of it then so we can get all of it on the record since you think you know so much. DID YOU KNOW SHE SAID SHE WAS EIGHTEEN WHEN I MET HER?! DID YOU KNOW THAT?!" This came following an attempt by Brooks to put a series of texts between himself and his ex on the record as evidence (which was denied due to the discovery rule). Brooks had engaged in a long drawn-out argument with Dorow that he knew the texts were from his ex because they were from his ex, completely missing the repeated attempts by Dorow to establish factual proof that they were real, verified, and in evidence.

to:

** During the testimony of his ex girlfriend, ex-girlfriend, Brooks tried to put forth the idea that she is an unfit parent and this damages her credibility. The jury was removed from the room while Judge Dorow tried to explain why he couldn't do this without merit, and that it was irrelevant to the situation. Assistant District Attorney Zachary Witchow began to argue that if Brooks wanted to bring up her credibility as a parent, then the Prosecution would bring up the fact that she was impregnated, as a minor, by Brooks himself, and that had earned him a statutory rape charge (which placed him on the sex offender registry). Brooks became outraged, shouting over Witchow and Dorow, yelling about how they don't know the truth. As he was removed once again, he shouted "So let's open the door on all of it then so we can get all of it on the record since you think you know so much. DID YOU KNOW SHE SAID SHE WAS EIGHTEEN WHEN I MET HER?! DID YOU KNOW THAT?!" This came following an attempt by Brooks to put a series of texts between himself and his ex on the record as evidence (which was denied due to the discovery rule). Brooks had engaged in a long drawn-out argument with Dorow that he knew the texts were from his ex because they were from his ex, completely missing the repeated attempts by Dorow to establish factual proof that they were real, verified, and in evidence.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Series/ALaw'': "His Suit Is Hirsute" brings us the character of Frank Pastorini, whose egregious antics (such as singing his objections and tap-dancing his way to a sidebar) would, in RealLife, result in a jail sentence. Michael Kuzak turns the tables on him by doing his closing argument in the gorilla suit with which he interrupted Grace's wedding.

to:

* ''Series/ALaw'': ''Series/LALaw'': "His Suit Is Hirsute" brings us the character of Frank Pastorini, whose egregious antics (such as singing his objections and tap-dancing his way to a sidebar) would, in RealLife, result in a jail sentence. Michael Kuzak turns the tables on him by doing his closing argument in the gorilla suit with which he interrupted Grace's wedding.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[caption-width-right:350:"This whole trial is a circus. And I mean that literally!"]]

to:

[[caption-width-right:350:"This ->[[caption-width-right:350:"Your Honor, the defense attests that this whole trial is a circus. And I mean that literally!"]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''TabletopGame/{{Battletech}}'', Nicolai Malthus, during his imprisonment after the Clan Invasion, happened to catch an episode of a cartoon series in which a fictionalized version of himself was the villain (the in-universe equivalent of the [[WesternAnimation/{{Battletech}} real-life cartoon]]). His outrage led someone to inform him that he couldn't declare a TrialByCombat in the Inner Sphere, and that his only recourse would be to hire a lawyer and sue for slander. Which he promptly did. The case was thrown out after Malthus attempted to challenge the ''judge'' to a fight.

to:

* In ''TabletopGame/{{Battletech}}'', ''TabletopGame/BattleTech'', Nicolai Malthus, during his imprisonment after the Clan Invasion, happened to catch an episode of a cartoon series in which a fictionalized version of himself was the villain (the in-universe equivalent of the [[WesternAnimation/{{Battletech}} [[WesternAnimation/BattleTech1994 real-life cartoon]]). His outrage led someone to inform him that he couldn't declare a TrialByCombat in the Inner Sphere, and that his only recourse would be to hire a lawyer and sue for slander. Which he promptly did. The case was thrown out after Malthus attempted to challenge the ''judge'' to a fight.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[caption-width-right:350:A tiger, its tamer, a magician, a mascot costume, a little boy, an amateur photographer, two birds, and a dog. Oh, and another child behind the defense's bench. All here in time for the trial.]]

to:

[[caption-width-right:350:A tiger, its tamer, [[caption-width-right:350:"This whole trial is a magician, a mascot costume, a little boy, an amateur photographer, two birds, and a dog. Oh, and another child behind the defense's bench. All here in time for the trial.]]
circus. And I mean that literally!"]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[caption-width-right:350:A lion, its tamer, a magician, a mascot costume, a little boy, an amateur photographer, two birds, and a dog. Oh, and another child behind the defense's bench. All here in time for the trial.]]

to:

[[caption-width-right:350:A lion, tiger, its tamer, a magician, a mascot costume, a little boy, an amateur photographer, two birds, and a dog. Oh, and another child behind the defense's bench. All here in time for the trial.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Series/DoctorWho'':
** The Fourth Doctor's appeal in the final episode of [[Recap/DoctorWhoS16E3TheStonesOfBlood "The Stones of Blood"]] features the Doctor calling a witness who wasn't actually present, followed by his counsel. This being the Doctor, it's hard to tell how much was stalling for time to delay his execution and how much was just normal chaos.
** The Trial of a Time Lord series has the Valeyard pulling out all the stops to get the Sixth Doctor sentenced, most notably the introduction of evidence that [[TimeyWimeyBall hadn't happened yet from the Doctor's perspective]] or holding him responsible for the consequences of ''when he was summoned to the trial''. Then there's the Master showing up as a SurpriseWitness...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Franchise/AceAttorney'' is practically the poster boy for this trope. From bringing animals into the courtroom to the defense getting everything but the kitchen sink thrown at them to the prosecution playing air guitar and the witness playing ''literal'' guitar, there's never dull moment in court.

to:

* ''Franchise/AceAttorney'' is practically the poster boy for this trope. From bringing animals into the courtroom to the defense getting everything but the kitchen sink thrown at them to the prosecution playing air guitar and the witness playing ''literal'' guitar, there's never a dull moment in court.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[caption-width-right:350:A lion, it's tamer, a magician, a mascot costume, a little boy, an amateur photographer, two birds, and a dog. Oh, and another child behind the defense's bench. All here in time for the trial.]]

to:

[[caption-width-right:350:A lion, it's its tamer, a magician, a mascot costume, a little boy, an amateur photographer, two birds, and a dog. Oh, and another child behind the defense's bench. All here in time for the trial.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)



to:

[[caption-width-right:350:A lion, it's tamer, a magician, a mascot costume, a little boy, an amateur photographer, two birds, and a dog. Oh, and another child behind the defense's bench. All here in time for the trial.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''State of Georgia v. Denver Fenton Allen'' (seen in this [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vN_PEmeKb0 animated reenactment]] by the creators and voice actors of ''WesternAnimation/RickAndMorty'') started off as relatively mundane (a defendant in a murder trial started out by expressing dissatisfaction with his court-appointed attorney) but quickly took a turn for the bizarre after he started accusing his attorney of trying to force him into allowing him (the attorney) to perform fellatio upon him (the defendant) in exchange for requested documents; from there, the defendant eventually began showering the judge with verbal abuse before then asking the judge to fellate him, followed by a declaration that he "[doesn't] fuck girls" and instead preferred "white boys" with "big butts," which eventually turned into a shouting match between the judge and the defendant before the defendant eventually graphically threatened to murder the judge's entire family (to which the judge responded that he doesn't even ''have'' a family), followed by threatening to masturbate and ejaculate upon the judge ''and the judge daring him to do just that''. The judge gave as good as he got, however, telling the defendant looks "like a queer" and that he has "the constitutional right to be a dumbass." Note that ''none'' [[RealityIsUnrealistic of this is exaggerated or embellished in any way;]] the transcript indicates that this is a ''verbatim'' retelling of what actually happened that day.

to:

* ''State of Georgia v. Denver Fenton Allen'' (seen in this [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vN_PEmeKb0 animated reenactment]] by the creators and voice actors of ''WesternAnimation/RickAndMorty'') started off as relatively mundane (a defendant in a murder trial started out by expressing dissatisfaction with his court-appointed attorney) but quickly took a turn for the bizarre after he started accusing his attorney of trying to force him into allowing him (the attorney) to perform fellatio upon him (the defendant) in exchange for requested documents; from there, the defendant eventually began showering the judge with verbal abuse before then asking the judge to fellate him, followed by a declaration that he "[doesn't] fuck girls" and instead preferred "white boys" with "big butts," which eventually turned into a shouting match between the judge and the defendant before the defendant eventually graphically threatened to murder the judge's entire family (to which the judge responded that he doesn't even ''have'' a family), followed by threatening to masturbate and ejaculate upon the judge ''and the judge daring him to do just that''. The judge gave as good as he got, however, telling the defendant looks he looked "like a queer" and that he has had "the constitutional right to be a dumbass." Note that ''none'' [[RealityIsUnrealistic of this is exaggerated or embellished in any way;]] the transcript indicates that this is a ''verbatim'' retelling of what actually happened that day.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The trial of UsefulNotes/CharlesManson and his accomplices for seven counts of murder and one count of conspiracy is one of the most notorious examples. To begin with, Family members not named as defendants loitered outside the courthouse with plainly visible hunting knives in sheaths, simply to intimidate passersby. On one day of the proceedings, Manson himself was able to smuggle in a copy of ''The Los Angeles Times'' with the front page headline "Manson Guilty, Nixon Declares," and flash it in front of the jury (requiring Judge Older to issue a ''voir dire'' to the jury before they could proceed). The next day, the female defendants stood up and said in unison that, in light of Nixon's remark, there was no point in going on with the trial. (Older naturally didn't buy it.) Two months later, after Manson's request to question a prosecution witness (who had already been cross-examined by the defense) was denied, he actually tried to attack the judge; he had to be removed after being wrestled to the ground by the bailiffs, as the female defendants rose to their feet and started chanting in Latin. Thereafter, Older kept a loaded revolver under his robe remainder of the trial. Besides the Family themselves, defense attorney Irving Kanarek [[ThatWasObjectionable kept objecting over every little thing]], often racking up a hundred in a single day, and was so notorious for having trials extended beyond belief that another attorney had once quit rather than face him again. He was held in contempt of court numerous times but never quit objecting.

to:

* The trial of UsefulNotes/CharlesManson and his accomplices for seven counts of murder and one count of conspiracy is one of the most notorious examples. To begin with, Family members not named as defendants loitered outside the courthouse with plainly visible hunting knives in sheaths, simply to intimidate passersby. On one day of the proceedings, Manson himself was able to smuggle in a copy of ''The Los Angeles Times'' with the front page headline "Manson Guilty, Nixon Declares," and flash it in front of the jury (requiring Judge Older to issue a ''voir dire'' to the jury before they could proceed). The next day, the female defendants stood up and said in unison that, in light of Nixon's remark, there was no point in going on with the trial. (Older naturally didn't buy it.) Two months later, after Manson's request to question a prosecution witness (who had already been cross-examined by the defense) was denied, he actually tried to attack the judge; he had to be removed after being wrestled to the ground by the bailiffs, as the female defendants rose to their feet and started chanting in Latin. Thereafter, Older kept a loaded revolver under his robe for the remainder of the trial. Besides the Family themselves, defense attorney Irving Kanarek [[ThatWasObjectionable kept objecting over every little thing]], often racking up a hundred in a single day, and was so notorious for having trials extended beyond belief that another attorney had once quit rather than face him again. He was held in contempt of court numerous times but never quit objecting.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)

Added DiffLines:

* in ''ComicBook/GiraffesOnHorsebackSalad'', the trial of the Surrealist Woman quickly descends into zany hijinx thanks to the efforts of [[Creator/MarxBrothers Groucho and Chico Marx]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

%% Image selected via crowner in the Image Suggestion thread: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1452266899092104700
%% https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/crowner.php?crowner_id=weof6oen
%% Please do not change or remove without starting a new thread.

[[quoteright:350:[[Franchise/AceAttorney https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/ace_attorney_crazy_courtroom_0.png]]]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Infamously known as "Quack Quack" in mob circles for being a chatterbox, [[UsefulNotes/TheMafia Gambino family]] mobster Angelo Ruggiero had his bail revoked in 1987 when he [[PenultimateOutburst insulted]] the judge with profanity-laced tirades in an attempt to intimidate the jury during his trial.

to:

* Infamously known as "Quack Quack" in mob circles for being a chatterbox, chatterbox and a gossip mill, [[UsefulNotes/TheMafia Gambino family]] mobster Angelo Ruggiero had his bail revoked in 1987 when he [[PenultimateOutburst insulted]] the judge with profanity-laced tirades profanity in an attempt to intimidate the jury during his trial.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


In RealLife, being in court is a stressful and serious situation. You have to take it seriously in order to avoid being held in contempt of court and win your case. In fiction, though, it's not entertaining to see a long, dry, drawn-out court session, especially in a comedy show. That's why these proceedings are often PlayedForLaughs, instead, as the characters partake in antics that would ''never'' fly in a real life courtroom.

to:

In RealLife, being in court is a stressful and serious situation. You have to take it seriously in order to avoid being held in contempt of court and win your case. In fiction, though, it's not entertaining to see a long, dry, drawn-out court session, especially in a comedy show. That's why these proceedings are often PlayedForLaughs, instead, as the characters (the attorneys, the witnesses, the judge, etc.) partake in antics that would ''never'' fly in a real life courtroom.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* WebAnimation/DarkMatter2525 has a series of videos set in a courtroom with a down-to-earth prosecuting attorney and an InsaneTrollLogic following defense attorney.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Infamously known as "Quack Quack" in mob circles for being a chatterbox, [[UsefulNotes/TheMafia Gambino family]] mobster Angelo Ruggiero had his bail revoked in 1987 when he [[PenultimateOutburst insulted]] the judge with profanity-laced tirades in an attempt to intimidate the jury during his trial.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In November of 2021, [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waukesha_Christmas_parade_attack Darrell Edward Brooks jr. rammed through a parade held in Waukesha Wisconsin following a domestic dispute with his ex-girlfriend (whom he had one child with and was staying at a Women's Shelter due to physical violence)]]. Brooks elected, in a pre-trial hearing in 2022, to represent himself as a [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_citizen_movement Sovereign Citizen]], and the trial officially started on October 3rd of 2022. Brooks had ''numerous'' bizarre outbursts that were highly innapropriate (sometimes outright threatening), and his behavior only devolved as the trial continued. Judge Jennifer R. Dorow would later state that she was lenient on these behaviors due to Brooks self representation, and she didn't want to give Brooks an opening for a valid appeal.

to:

* In November of 2021, [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waukesha_Christmas_parade_attack Darrell Edward Brooks jr. rammed through a parade held in Waukesha Wisconsin following a domestic dispute with his ex-girlfriend (whom he had one child with and was staying at a Women's Shelter due to physical violence)]]. Brooks elected, in a pre-trial hearing in 2022, to [[AFoolForAClient represent himself himself]] as a [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_citizen_movement Sovereign Citizen]], and the trial officially started on October 3rd of 2022. Brooks had ''numerous'' bizarre outbursts that were highly innapropriate (sometimes outright threatening), and his behavior only devolved as the trial continued. Judge Jennifer R. Dorow would later state that she was lenient on these behaviors due to Brooks self representation, and she didn't want to give Brooks an opening for a valid appeal.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* During the trial for [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkland_high_school_shooting Nikolas Kruz]], one of the defense lawyers wiped her eye with her middle finger in an obvious mockery against the opposing side. This elicited a laugher from Kruz himself, who was the defendant in a school shooting. Needless to say, this was [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ailncs5c6nU caught on camera]] and [[https://nypost.com/2022/11/04/lawyer-tamara-curtis-being-investigated-over-middle-finger/ heavily discussed in news reports]]. Needless to say, [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjvKif3D29E the parents]] [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wk89U-oXNQ of the]] [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhKHz8dP1-M shooting victims]] did not take it well, and neither did the judge. During the victim impact statements, the families not only shamed Kruz, but also shamed the defense team for their actions and took part of their impact statements to simply tear into them as well.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In November of 2021, [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waukesha_Christmas_parade_attack Darrell Edward Brooks jr. rammed through a parade held in Waukesha Wisconsin following a domestic dispute with his ex-girlfriend (whom he had one child with and was staying at a Women's Shelter due to physical violence)]]. Brooks elected, in a pre-trial hearing in 2022, to represent himself as a [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_citizen_movement Sovereign Citizen]], and the trial officially started on October 3rd of 2022. Brooks had ''numerous'' bizarre outbursts that were highly innapropriate (sometimes outright threatening), and his behavior only devolved as the trial continued. Judge Jennifer R. Dorow would later state that she was lenient on these behaviors due to Brooks self representation, and she didn't want to give Brooks an opening for a valid appeal.
** Brooks, at one point, was so disruptive that he was removed from the courtroom and continued part of the day in an adjoining courtroom. This happened many times, however during the beginning of the case, Brooks removed his shirt and turned his back on the camera. This appeared to be due to a fit of rage, and he refused to put his shirt back on for some time.
** Brooks claimed to potentially be [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19 Covid positive]], and due to the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19 ongoing pandemic]], had suggested the trial be postponed. Judge Dorow stated that this would be dependent on the covid test results. During the earlier part of the trial, the test came back. After reading it, Brooks refused to hand it over to the Judge or bailiffs, resulting in them forcibly removing it from him. When the trial resumed, Dorow almost immediately placed the trial on another recess while Brooks was returned to the courtroom. Brooks was visibly crying, and seemed to be upset that his test results were taken. The results stated he was negative for Covid.
** Brooks became enraged with Judge Dorow following a series of arguments, and repeatedly cut off Prosecutor Susan Opper. When told to be quiet, Brooks slammed his fist on the table and gave Judge Dorow an unblinking glare. Judge Dorow put the case into temporary recess while he was removed from the courtroom stating "He is making me feel scared".
** During the testimony of his ex girlfriend, Brooks tried to put forth the idea that she is an unfit parent and this damages her credibility. The jury was removed from the room while Judge Dorow tried to explain why he couldn't do this without merit, and that it was irrelevant to the situation. Assistant District Attorney Zachary Witchow began to argue that if Brooks wanted to bring up her credibility as a parent, then the Prosecution would bring up the fact that she was impregnated, as a minor, by Brooks himself, and that had earned him a statutory rape charge (which placed him on the sex offender registry). Brooks became outraged, shouting over Witchow and Dorow, yelling about how they don't know the truth. As he was removed once again, he shouted "So let's open the door on all of it then so we can get all of it on the record since you think you know so much. DID YOU KNOW SHE SAID SHE WAS EIGHTEEN WHEN I MET HER?! DID YOU KNOW THAT?!" This came following an attempt by Brooks to put a series of texts between himself and his ex on the record as evidence (which was denied due to the discovery rule). Brooks had engaged in a long drawn-out argument with Dorow that he knew the texts were from his ex because they were from his ex, completely missing the repeated attempts by Dorow to establish factual proof that they were real, verified, and in evidence.
** At one point Judge Dorow asked Brooks to sit down. Brooks took it as a demand (despite the fact the judge can demand him to sit down) and angrily responded to her with "I'm a grown man with grown kids. I have no problem with what you ''ask'' me to do, but ain't nobody gonna tell me ''what'' to do."
** Brooks's defense witnesses were less-than-helpful for his case, and his questions repeatedly failed to get the answers he desired. The prosecution, on the other hand, asked much more broad questions when able and more specific questions when obvious. Brooks took this as a sign that they were colluding with the witnesses to prejudice his defense. From hereon, he began actively arguing that Sue Opper, Judge Dorow, and all of the witnesses were in cahoots, and that this was just an obvious fact. He also tried to argue this at a witness, which got his questioning shut down and the witness excused. Brooks began a petty series of attacks against the prosecution, such as claiming they were mocking him when they laughed (Opper would later state that she was laughing because of a misspelled exhhibit), and he mocked Opper's tone of voice while shouting an imitation "DA DAHFENDANT". He claimed this was her mocking him in a way a child would mock another child (despite her not doing this at all). Needless to say, Judge Dorow found it all baseless.
** Brooks ended up in a long drawn-out shouting match which got him sent to the other courtroom when he claimed Judge Dorow told him to send all of his court filings to her and she would make them exhibits. Judge Dorow would state she never told him this, and that she never intended to make his filings exhibits as they're all hearsay. Brooks made a deal of this for a long period of the day, and used it as an excuse to explode on Judge Dorow multiple times while claiming prejudice.
** Following the final day of the defense witnesses, Judge Dorow tried to get Brooks to follow questioning regarding who was being brought in and whether he wanted to testify. In standard fashion, Brooks became enraged and argued with her constantly, sending him, once more, back to the other courtroom. Judge Dorow tried to continue the colloquy to determine if he wanted to testify. Brooks refused to engage, or just continued to bring up "Subject Matter Jurisdiction". Ultimately, as a result, Judge Dorow, by default, shut his defense down and ended the evidentiary phase of the trial. What followed was nothing but rage for several hours. While Dorow and the Prosecution team engaged in discussion regarding the Jury Instructions, Brooks repeatedly yelled at Dorow whenever asked questions, stated she was "prejudicing his defense". He demanded repeatedly to be sent back to his cell which Judge Dorow refused. In a last ditch effort of pettiness, he stacked his legal boxes in the way of the camera so he couldn't be seen. Judge Dorow eventually demanded the bailiffs remove the boxes, and he became irate, slammed his hand on the table repeatedly, and shouted at Judge Dorow. He would then put the boxes ''back'' and make his box fort again, this time getting them taken away completely.
** Brooks told Judge Dorow he was going to tell the jury "The Truth" and that they could use [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification Jury Nullification]] to find him not guilty. Judge Dorow angrily informed him he had no right to bring up Jury Nullification, and Brooks continued to say he was going to ignore ''everything'' she said and do it anyways. Ultimately he did do so. Unsurprising, the Jury didn't go for it and found him guilty of all 76 counts.
** Brooks mocked the victim impact statements before sentencing. He either rolled his eyes, read the bible, closed his eyes and prayed, or slow clapped. The only true show of emotion; Brooks broke down and cried when his mom argued on his behalf and blamed the entirety of his behavior on mental illness and for leniency. When Judge Dorow got to her final statements before sentencing, she argued Brooks was morally bankrupt and his mental illness was a scapegoat. When she claimed he did not love his ex (given the fact that he would physically assault her), he became irate yet again and said "That's a lie" before engaging in yet another drawn-out argument. He was removed to the adjoining courtroom, and spent the entire time waving an "objection" sign in front of the camera. He was sentenced to six life sentences plus over seven-hundred years, and didn't react in any way except to wave the sign and get in the last word. He did not get that chance.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The premise of ''Series/JuryDuty''. A chaotic and unpredictable court case is decided by twelve equally chaotic jurors, except one isn't an actor--and he's forced to put up with the antics and ineptitude of everyone else involved in the case.

Top