Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Spelling/grammar fix(es)
Changed line(s) 21 (click to see context) from:
The novel sold well and recieved good reviews. It was followed by ''Literature/{{Cauldron}}'', Bond's third novel with Larkin.
to:
The novel sold well and recieved received good reviews. It was followed by ''Literature/{{Cauldron}}'', Bond's third novel with Larkin.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moved edit to YMMV Section
Deleted line(s) 42 (click to see context) :
* ConfirmationBias: The author seems to portray the Cuban's and the socialist bloc as evil war mongering people who saw nothing but to spread their ideals and the lives of civilians were a mere after thought, in real life however it was Cuba that came to the Angolan socialist government's aid when South Africa began its military campaign against Angola which was supported by the U.S (who are seen as the "good guys" in the book).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 42 (click to see context) from:
* ConformationBias: The author seems to portray the Cuban's and the socialist bloc as evil war mongering people who saw nothing but to spread their ideals and the lives of civilians were a mere after thought, in real life however it was Cuba that came to the Angolan socialist government's aid when South Africa began its military campaign against Angola which was supported by the U.S (who are seen as the "good guys" in the book).
to:
* ConformationBias: ConfirmationBias: The author seems to portray the Cuban's and the socialist bloc as evil war mongering people who saw nothing but to spread their ideals and the lives of civilians were a mere after thought, in real life however it was Cuba that came to the Angolan socialist government's aid when South Africa began its military campaign against Angola which was supported by the U.S (who are seen as the "good guys" in the book).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
* ConformationBias: The author seems to portray the Cuban's and the socialist bloc as evil war mongering people who saw nothing but to spread their ideals and the lives of civilians were a mere after thought, in real life however it was Cuba that came to the Angolan socialist government's aid when South Africa began its military campaign against Angola which was supported by the U.S (who are seen as the "good guys" in the book).
Deleted line(s) 71 (click to see context) :
* Irony: The author seems to portray the Cuban's and the socialist bloc as evil war mongering people who saw nothing but to spread their ideals and the lives of civilians were a mere after thought, in real life however it was Cuba that came to the Angolan socialist government's aid when South Africa began its military campaign against Angola which was supported by the U.S (who are seen as the "good guys" in the book).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
undid a part of a pro-western edit
Added DiffLines:
* Irony: The author seems to portray the Cuban's and the socialist bloc as evil war mongering people who saw nothing but to spread their ideals and the lives of civilians were a mere after thought, in real life however it was Cuba that came to the Angolan socialist government's aid when South Africa began its military campaign against Angola which was supported by the U.S (who are seen as the "good guys" in the book).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 48 (click to see context) from:
* DirtyCommunists: Bond portrays Vega and the rest of the Cubans this way, though they are also portrayed as {{MagnificentBastard Magnificent Bastards}}
to:
* DirtyCommunists: Bond portrays Vega and the rest of the Cubans this way, though they are also portrayed as {{MagnificentBastard [[MagnificentBastard Magnificent Bastards}}Bastards]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Toned down some pro-Communist bias
Changed line(s) 35 (click to see context) from:
* TheChessmaster: Antonio Vega whose perfectly timed and multipronged invasion of South Africa brings Vorster's government to the brink of collapse.
to:
* TheChessmaster: Antonio Vega whose perfectly timed and multipronged multi-pronged invasion of South Africa brings Vorster's government to the brink of collapse.
** The Cubans attitude towards the South African civilians (white or black) who are killed when they unleash nerve gas upon enemy positions. Naturally their ANC allies do not see it that way and later exact vengeance.
Deleted line(s) 41 (click to see context) :
* ConfirmationBias: The author seems to portray the Cuban's and socialists as evil war mongering people who saw nothing but spreading their ideals and never cared for the lives of civilians, probably due to him being sore about the fact that Cuba came to the Angolan socialists aid when no one else really did. In reality, Fidel Castro himself oversaw the war without the Soviets being directly involved, and wished to see the black South African's free from Afrikaner rule and Angola an independent country. When Mandela and Castro met each other in 1998, the crowd reflected their views on him in cheers and chants.
Changed line(s) 48 (click to see context) from:
* DirtyCommunists: Bond tries to portray Vega and the rest of the Cubans this way. Unfortunately, he's far too reliant on their simply being Communists to make them seem evil, and the end result is a group of antivillains who rarely KickTheDog.
to:
* DirtyCommunists: Bond tries to portray portrays Vega and the rest of the Cubans this way. Unfortunately, he's far too reliant on their simply being Communists to make them seem evil, and the end result is a group of antivillains who rarely KickTheDog.way, though they are also portrayed as {{MagnificentBastard Magnificent Bastards}}
Changed line(s) 51 (click to see context) from:
* EvenEvilHasStandards: Vega is a ruthless commander with only a limited regard for civilian casualties (and a Communist, which in Bond's mind makes him absolute scum). The South African regime absolutely disgusts him, however, and he finds their racism not only vile, but baffling. He honestly can't understand where they're coming from.
to:
* EvenEvilHasStandards: Vega is a ruthless commander with only a limited regard for civilian casualties (and a Communist, which in Bond's mind makes him absolute scum).casualties. The South African regime absolutely disgusts him, however, and he finds their racism not only vile, but baffling. He honestly can't understand where they're coming from.
Changed line(s) 74 (click to see context) from:
* KickTheDog: Vega's use of gas is meant to remind us that the Cubans are not the good guys. In context it doesn't necessarily come off that way.
to:
* KickTheDog: Vega's use of gas and lack of concern for the civilian casualties is meant to remind us that the Cubans are not the good guys. In context it doesn't necessarily come off that way.guys.
Changed line(s) 105 (click to see context) from:
* TheStrategist: Vega, who's probably the smartest character in the book when it comes to conventional warfare. He's only defeated by the Americans because he lacks their superior firepower.
to:
* TheStrategist: Vega, who's probably one of the smartest character characters in the book when it comes to conventional warfare. He's only defeated by Unfortunately for him the Americans because he lacks their superior firepower. come in fresher and bring a lot more firepower.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Loads And Loads Of Characters is no longer a trope
Changed line(s) 4,5 (click to see context) from:
The novel has LoadsAndLoadsOfCharacters. Some of the more important ones include:
to:
The novel has LoadsAndLoadsOfCharacters.a large cast. Some of the more important ones include:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 57 (click to see context) from:
* FailedFutureForecast: The Soviet Union is shown as still existing in the book's future 1990s (circa 1993/1994), when it collapsed in 1991, though it is shown as weak and crumbling apart.The Soviet Union is still shown as being Communist, when the Communist Party was actually banned shortly after the book came out.
to:
* FailedFutureForecast: The Soviet Union is shown as still existing in the book's future 1990s (circa 1993/1994), when it collapsed in 1991, though it is shown as weak and crumbling apart. The Soviet Union is still shown as being Communist, when the Communist Party was actually banned shortly after the book came out.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
* FailedFutureForecast: The Soviet Union is shown as still existing in the book's future 1990s (circa 1993/1994), when it collapsed in 1991, though it is shown as weak and crumbling apart.The Soviet Union is still shown as being Communist, when the Communist Party was actually banned shortly after the book came out.
Deleted line(s) 65,66 (click to see context) :
* TheGreatPoliticsMessUp: The Soviet Union is shown as still existing in the book's future 1990s (circa 1993/1994), when it collapsed in 1991, though it is shown as weak and crumbling apart.
** The Soviet Union is still shown as being Communist, when the Communist Party was actually banned shortly after the book came out.
** The Soviet Union is still shown as being Communist, when the Communist Party was actually banned shortly after the book came out.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 33 (click to see context) :
Changed line(s) 37,39 (click to see context) from:
* CollateralDamage: When the U.S. Army Rangers airdrop into the nuclear plant to take it from the SADF, many of the paratroopers are killed by hard landings and other accidental mishaps before they can even fight the enemy proper.
** When a U.S. Navy battleship faces off against SADF artillery hidden in a mountainside, the cannon-fire weakens the mountain enough that it crumbles down onto the artillerymen, killing them.
* ColonelBadass: Henrik Kruger and Robert O'Connell
** When a U.S. Navy battleship faces off against SADF artillery hidden in a mountainside, the cannon-fire weakens the mountain enough that it crumbles down onto the artillerymen, killing them.
* ColonelBadass: Henrik Kruger and Robert O'Connell
to:
* CollateralDamage: CollateralDamage:
** When the U.S. Army Rangers airdrop into the nuclear plant to take it from the SADF, many of the paratroopers are killed by hard landings and other accidental mishaps before they can even fight the enemy proper.
** When aU.S. Navy battleship Cactus Surface-to-Air Missile launcher strikes a C-141 Starlifter, callsign Sierra One Four, the aircraft crashes into Pretoria's southern suburbs, causing ''enormous'' property damage and more than one hundred South African civilians either dead or dying. Not only that, but burning jet fuel from the crashed plane causes a fire to a "quarter-mile stretch of Pretoria".
** When the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Wisconsin_(BB-64) USS Wisconsin]] faces off against SADF artillery hidden in a mountainside, thecannon-fire impacts of 16-inch shellfire weakens the mountain enough that it crumbles down onto the artillerymen, killing them.
* ColonelBadass: Henrik Kruger and RobertO'ConnellO'Connell.
** When the U.S. Army Rangers airdrop into the nuclear plant to take it from the SADF, many of the paratroopers are killed by hard landings and other accidental mishaps before they can even fight the enemy proper.
** When a
** When the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Wisconsin_(BB-64) USS Wisconsin]] faces off against SADF artillery hidden in a mountainside, the
* ColonelBadass: Henrik Kruger and Robert
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 40 (click to see context) from:
* ConfirmationBias: The author seems to portray the Cuban's and socialists as evil war mongering people who saw nothing but spreading their ideals and never cared for the lives of civilians, probably due to him being sore about the fact that Cuba came to the Angolan socialists aid when no one else really did, in reality Fidel Castro himself oversaw the war without the soviet's being directly involved, and wished to see the black South African's free from Afrikaner rule and Angola an independent country. When Mandela and Castro met each other in 1998 the crowd reflected their views on him in cheers and chants.
to:
* ConfirmationBias: The author seems to portray the Cuban's and socialists as evil war mongering people who saw nothing but spreading their ideals and never cared for the lives of civilians, probably due to him being sore about the fact that Cuba came to the Angolan socialists aid when no one else really did, in reality did. In reality, Fidel Castro himself oversaw the war without the soviet's Soviets being directly involved, and wished to see the black South African's free from Afrikaner rule and Angola an independent country. When Mandela and Castro met each other in 1998 1998, the crowd reflected their views on him in cheers and chants.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
* CollateralDamage: When the U.S. Army Rangers airdrop into the nuclear plant to take it from the SADF, many of the paratroopers are killed by hard landings and other accidental mishaps before they can even fight the enemy proper.
** When a U.S. Navy battleship faces off against SADF artillery hidden in a mountainside, the cannon-fire weakens the mountain enough that it crumbles down onto the artillerymen, killing them.
** When a U.S. Navy battleship faces off against SADF artillery hidden in a mountainside, the cannon-fire weakens the mountain enough that it crumbles down onto the artillerymen, killing them.
Deleted line(s) 95,96 (click to see context) :
* RealityEnsues: When the U.S. Army Rangers airdrop into the nuclear plant to take it from the SADF, many of the paratroopers are killed by hard landings and other accidental mishaps before they can even fight the enemy proper.
** When a U.S. Navy battleship faces off against SADF artillery hidden in a mountainside, the cannon-fire weakens the mountain enough that it crumbles down onto the artillerymen, killing them.
** When a U.S. Navy battleship faces off against SADF artillery hidden in a mountainside, the cannon-fire weakens the mountain enough that it crumbles down onto the artillerymen, killing them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 38 (click to see context) from:
* ConfirmationBias: The author seems to portray the Cuban's and socialists as evil war mongering people who see nothing but spreading their ideals and never cared for the lives of civilians, probably due to him being sore about the fact that Cuba came to the Angolan socialists aid when no one else really did, in reality Fidel Castro himself oversaw the war without the soviet's being directly involved, and wished to see the black South African's free from Afrikaner rule and Angola an independent country. When Mandela and Castro met each other in 1998 the crowd reflected their views on him in cheers and chants.
to:
* ConfirmationBias: The author seems to portray the Cuban's and socialists as evil war mongering people who see saw nothing but spreading their ideals and never cared for the lives of civilians, probably due to him being sore about the fact that Cuba came to the Angolan socialists aid when no one else really did, in reality Fidel Castro himself oversaw the war without the soviet's being directly involved, and wished to see the black South African's free from Afrikaner rule and Angola an independent country. When Mandela and Castro met each other in 1998 the crowd reflected their views on him in cheers and chants.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 33 (click to see context) from:
* Bias: The author seems to portray the Cuban's and socialists as evil war mongering people who see nothing but spreading their ideals and never cared for the lives of civilians, probably due to him being sore about the fact that Cuba came to the Angolan socialists aid when no one else really did, in reality Fidel Castro himself oversaw the war without the soviet's being directly involved, and wished to see the black South African's free from Afrikaner rule and Angola an independent country. When Mandela and Castro met each other in 1998 the crowd reflected their views on him in cheers and chants.
to:
Added DiffLines:
* ConfirmationBias: The author seems to portray the Cuban's and socialists as evil war mongering people who see nothing but spreading their ideals and never cared for the lives of civilians, probably due to him being sore about the fact that Cuba came to the Angolan socialists aid when no one else really did, in reality Fidel Castro himself oversaw the war without the soviet's being directly involved, and wished to see the black South African's free from Afrikaner rule and Angola an independent country. When Mandela and Castro met each other in 1998 the crowd reflected their views on him in cheers and chants.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 33 (click to see context) from:
* UnreliableNarrator: The author seems to portray the Cuban's and socialists as evil war mongering people who see nothing but spreading their ideals and never cared for the lives of civilians, probably due to him being sore about the fact that Cuba came to the Angolan socialists aid when no one else really did, in reality Fidel Castro himself oversaw the war without the soviet's being directly involved, and wished to see the black South African's free from Afrikaner rule and Angola an independent country. When Mandela and Castro met each other in 1998 the crowd reflected their views on him in cheers and chants.
to:
* UnreliableNarrator: Bias: The author seems to portray the Cuban's and socialists as evil war mongering people who see nothing but spreading their ideals and never cared for the lives of civilians, probably due to him being sore about the fact that Cuba came to the Angolan socialists aid when no one else really did, in reality Fidel Castro himself oversaw the war without the soviet's being directly involved, and wished to see the black South African's free from Afrikaner rule and Angola an independent country. When Mandela and Castro met each other in 1998 the crowd reflected their views on him in cheers and chants.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 33 (click to see context) from:
* Unreliable Narrator: The author seems to portray the Cuban's and socialists as evil war mongering people who see nothing but spreading their ideals and never cared for the lives of civilians, probably due to him being sore about the fact that Cuba came to the Angolan socialists aid when no one else really did, in reality Fidel Castro himself oversaw the war without the soviet's being directly involved, and wished to see the black South African's free from Afrikaner rule and Angola an independent country. When Mandela and Castro met each other in 1998 the crowd reflected their views on him in cheers and chants.
to:
* Unreliable Narrator: UnreliableNarrator: The author seems to portray the Cuban's and socialists as evil war mongering people who see nothing but spreading their ideals and never cared for the lives of civilians, probably due to him being sore about the fact that Cuba came to the Angolan socialists aid when no one else really did, in reality Fidel Castro himself oversaw the war without the soviet's being directly involved, and wished to see the black South African's free from Afrikaner rule and Angola an independent country. When Mandela and Castro met each other in 1998 the crowd reflected their views on him in cheers and chants.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 33 (click to see context) from:
* Biased Author: The author seems to portray the Cuban's and socialists as evil war mongering people who see nothing but spreading their ideals and never cared for the lives of civilians, probably due to him being sore about the fact that Cuba came to the Angolan socialists aid when no one else really did, in reality Fidel Castro himself oversaw the war without the soviet's being directly involved, and wished to see the black South African's free from Afrikaner rule and Angola an independent country. When Mandela and Castro met each other in 1998 the crowd reflected their views on him in cheers and chants.
to:
* Biased Author: Unreliable Narrator: The author seems to portray the Cuban's and socialists as evil war mongering people who see nothing but spreading their ideals and never cared for the lives of civilians, probably due to him being sore about the fact that Cuba came to the Angolan socialists aid when no one else really did, in reality Fidel Castro himself oversaw the war without the soviet's being directly involved, and wished to see the black South African's free from Afrikaner rule and Angola an independent country. When Mandela and Castro met each other in 1998 the crowd reflected their views on him in cheers and chants.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 33 (click to see context) from:
* Biased Literature: The author seems to protray the Cuban's and socialists as evil people who see nothing but spreading their ideals and never cared for the civillians, probably due to him being sore about the fact that Cuba came to the Angolan socialists aid when no one else really did, in reality Fidel Castro himself oversaw the war without the soviet's being directly involved, and wished to see the black south african's free from afrikaner rule and Angola a independent country, when Mandela and castro met each other in 1998 the crowd reflected their views on him in cheers and chants.
to:
* Biased Literature: Author: The author seems to protray portray the Cuban's and socialists as evil war mongering people who see nothing but spreading their ideals and never cared for the civillians, lives of civilians, probably due to him being sore about the fact that Cuba came to the Angolan socialists aid when no one else really did, in reality Fidel Castro himself oversaw the war without the soviet's being directly involved, and wished to see the black south african's South African's free from afrikaner Afrikaner rule and Angola a an independent country, when country. When Mandela and castro Castro met each other in 1998 the crowd reflected their views on him in cheers and chants.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added a extra troupe
Added DiffLines:
*Biased Literature: The author seems to protray the Cuban's and socialists as evil people who see nothing but spreading their ideals and never cared for the civillians, probably due to him being sore about the fact that Cuba came to the Angolan socialists aid when no one else really did, in reality Fidel Castro himself oversaw the war without the soviet's being directly involved, and wished to see the black south african's free from afrikaner rule and Angola a independent country, when Mandela and castro met each other in 1998 the crowd reflected their views on him in cheers and chants.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 85 (click to see context) from:
* NukeEm: The South Africans nuke Cuba's Third Brigade Tactical Group when they realise conventional forces will not be enough. The American invasion is concerned chiefly with shutting down the South African nuclear weapons. Later, Vortster threatens to contaminate South Africa's mines with radioactive dust.
to:
* NukeEm: The South Africans nuke Cuba's Third Brigade Tactical Group when they realise conventional forces will not be enough. The American invasion is concerned chiefly with shutting down the South African nuclear weapons. Later, Vortster Vorster threatens to contaminate South Africa's mines with radioactive dust.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not a trope.
Deleted line(s) 36 (click to see context) :
* TheColdWar: The novel is set near the end of it, as the Soviet Union crumbles from internal pressure, the American defence budget drops for the first time in decades, and Cuba withdraws from Angola.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* RealityEnsues: When the U.S. Army Rangers airdrop into the nuclear plant to take it from the SADF, many of the paratroopers are killed by hard landings and other accidental mishaps before they can even fight the enemy proper.
**When a U.S. Navy battleship faces off against SADF artillery hidden in a mountainside, the cannon-fire weakens the mountain enough that it crumbles down onto the artillerymen, killing them.
**When a U.S. Navy battleship faces off against SADF artillery hidden in a mountainside, the cannon-fire weakens the mountain enough that it crumbles down onto the artillerymen, killing them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 53 (click to see context) :
* {{Expy}}: Haymans is either an F. W. de Klerk expy or his successor in a retroactive alternate history.
Added DiffLines:
* NoCelebritiesWereHarmed: Haymans is either an F. W. de Klerk expy or his successor in a retroactive alternate history.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 53 (click to see context) from:
* Expy: Haymans is either an F. W. de Klerk expy or his successor in a retroactive alternate history.
to:
* Expy: {{Expy}}: Haymans is either an F. W. de Klerk expy or his successor in a retroactive alternate history.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 53 (click to see context) from:
* [[Main/Expy]]: Haymans is either an F. W. de Klerk expy or his successor in a retroactive alternate history.
to:
* [[Main/Expy]]: Expy: Haymans is either an F. W. de Klerk expy or his successor in a retroactive alternate history.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 53 (click to see context) from:
* [[Expy]]: Haymans is either an F. W. de Klerk expy or his successor in a retroactive alternate history.
to:
* [[Expy]]: [[Main/Expy]]: Haymans is either an F. W. de Klerk expy or his successor in a retroactive alternate history.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 53 (click to see context) from:
* Expy: Haymans is either an F. W. de Klerk expy or his successor in a retroactive alternate history.
to:
* Expy: [[Expy]]: Haymans is either an F. W. de Klerk expy or his successor in a retroactive alternate history.