Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Literature / AtlasShrugged

Go To

OR

Added: 703

Removed: 703

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* PeaceAndLoveIncorporated:
** All of the villainous businessmen claim to be working only for "the public good", while in fact they are [[CorruptCorporateExecutive anything]] [[ScrewTheRulesIHaveConnections but]]. The heroic businessmen make no secret of the fact they are only out to make money: or so it seems. Most seem to actually be motivated more by [[DoingItForTheArt the love of running a business well]] than anything.
** Twentieth Century Motors under the leadership of the Starnes children is a notable example. The two brothers were pretty much hypocrites, but Ivy Starnes was quite sincere and had no interest in money. The workers found her to be the most loathsome of the three siblings.



* PeaceAndLoveIncorporated:
** All of the villainous businessmen claim to be working only for "the public good", while in fact they are [[CorruptCorporateExecutive anything]] [[ScrewTheRulesIHaveConnections but]]. The heroic businessmen make no secret of the fact they are only out to make money: or so it seems. Most seem to actually be motivated more by [[DoingItForTheArt the love of running a business well]] than anything.
** Twentieth Century Motors under the leadership of the Starnes children is a notable example. The two brothers were pretty much hypocrites, but Ivy Starnes was quite sincere and had no interest in money. The workers found her to be the most loathsome of the three siblings.

Added: 507

Removed: 507

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* PyrrhicVictory: A facet of its CentralTheme; though the looters always get whatever physical wealth they lay claim to, they never get the true source of that wealth. Whenever the looters are going to seize one of the properties of the actual or future strikers, they end up with either a worthless property, or one with no one competent to operate it. D'Anconia blows up his ore mines and docks, Dannager abandons his coal mines, Wyatt blows up his oil fields, Rearden walks away from his steel mill, etc.


Added DiffLines:

* PyrrhicVictory: A facet of its CentralTheme; though the looters always get whatever physical wealth they lay claim to, they never get the true source of that wealth. Whenever the looters are going to seize one of the properties of the actual or future strikers, they end up with either a worthless property, or one with no one competent to operate it. D'Anconia blows up his ore mines and docks, Dannager abandons his coal mines, Wyatt blows up his oil fields, Rearden walks away from his steel mill, etc.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* OppressiveStatesOfAmerica: About halfway through the book, the United States has become a Communist dictatorship in all but name. Private ownership remains on paper, but business is so heavily regulated that is has become a legal fiction. The planners in Washington make all the decisions: who a company should (not "may") hire, what they should pay him, what orders they should accept and what raw materials they will be allocated... the regime is also a tyranny for the worker, of course, who must work where and as assigned or starve (and increasingly, [[FailureIsTheOnlyOption he will starve anyway]]). Blatantly obvious corruption, police state methods and [[PropagandaMachine "Fake News" media]] ruthlessly crush anyone who dissents.

to:

* OppressiveStatesOfAmerica: About halfway through the book, the United States has become a Communist dictatorship in all but name. Private ownership remains on paper, but business is so heavily regulated that is has become a legal fiction. The planners in Washington make all the decisions: who a company should (not "may") hire, what they should pay him, what orders they should accept and what raw materials they will be allocated... the regime is also a tyranny for the worker, of course, who must work where and as assigned or starve (and increasingly, [[FailureIsTheOnlyOption he will starve anyway]]). Blatantly obvious corruption, {{Corrupt Politician}}s, police state methods and [[PropagandaMachine the "Fake News" media]] ruthlessly crush anyone who dissents.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* OppressiveStatesOfAmerica: About halfway through the book, the United States has become a Communist dictatorship in all but name. Private ownership remains on paper, but business is so heavily regulated that is has become a legal fiction. The planners in Washington make all the decisions: who a company should (not "may") hire, what they should pay him, what orders they should accept and what raw materials they will be allocated... the regime is also a tyranny for the worker, of course, who must work where and as assigned or starve (and increasingly, [[FailureIsTheOnlyOption he will starve anyway]]). Blatantly obvious corruption, police state methods and [[PropagandaMachine "Fake News" media]] ruthlessly crush anyone who dissents.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* PresidentEvil: Mr. Thompson, though the book uses the title "Head of State" rather than "President" (possibly reflecting constitutional changes in its dystopian future USA). He is a bit of a subversion, however: the book builds him up as a sinister ShadowDictator, but [[spoiler:when he finally appears in person, he's just another bewildered Looter who is completely out of his depth when confronted with Jon Galt]].

to:

* PresidentEvil: Mr. Thompson, though the book uses the title "Head of State" rather than "President" (possibly reflecting constitutional changes in its dystopian future USA). He is a bit of a subversion, however: the book builds him up as a sinister ShadowDictator, but [[spoiler:when he finally appears in person, he's just another bewildered Looter who is completely out of his depth when confronted with Jon John Galt]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* PresidentEvil: Mr. Thompson, though the book uses the title "Head of State" rather than "President" (possibly reflecting constitutional changes in its dystopian future USA). He is a bit of a subversion, however: the book builds him up as a sinister ShadowDictator, but [[spoiler:when he finally appears in person, he's just another bewildered Looter who is completely out of his depth when confronted with Jon Galt]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BigGood: John Galt.

to:

* BigGood: John Galt.Galt is the undisputed leader of the disparate alliance of creative geniuses who have decided to make a stand against the corrupt socialism of the Looters: beloved, fearless and [[PrinciplesZealot utterly devoted to Objectivism]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BrokenPedestal: Dr. Robert Stadler, brilliant and idealistic scientist who becomes just another part of the looters' machine.

to:

* BrokenPedestal: Dr. Robert Stadler, brilliant and idealistic scientist who compromises with the system to save what he can of science. His motives are honest at first, but in the end he becomes just another part of the looters' machine.corrupt machine -- leaving Dagny deeply disappointed with someone she thought to be admirable, and can still see that he indeed used to be, once upon a time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AuthorTract: Arguably the TropeCodifier.

to:

* AuthorTract: Arguably One of the eminent examples in Western fiction, and possibly the modern TropeCodifier. The entire, immense {{doorstopper}} novel has as its purpose to explain and propagate the writer's ideology, and the means it uses to do so include some of the longest {{Character Filibuster}}s ever written.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


"[[DrivingQuestion Who is John Galt?]]"

to:

"[[DrivingQuestion Who [[DrivingQuestion "Who is John Galt?]]"
Galt?"]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It's TwentyMinutesIntoTheFuture. The USA is a mixed-market, but heavily regulated and increasingly crypto-communist dystopia wherein the federal government is [[FascistButInefficient as oppressive as it is incompetent]]. The average Joe is being pushed further into poverty by each measure nominally intended to relieve it, and can see no way out. The upper classes are LesCollaborateurs [[CorruptCorporateExecutive gaming]] the system for every drop before it crashes, or [[UtopiaJustifiesTheMeans self-deluded]] fools certain they can fix the socio-economic problems [[WhenAllYouHaveIsAHammer created by failed government initiatives]] with ''more'' [[WhenAllYouHaveIsAHammer government initiatives]]. With the press under [[PropagandaMachine rigid control]], there is little [[LaResistance public dissent with the status quo]].

to:

It's TwentyMinutesIntoTheFuture. The USA is a mixed-market, but heavily regulated and increasingly crypto-communist dystopia wherein the federal government is [[FascistButInefficient as oppressive as it is incompetent]]. The average Joe is being pushed further into poverty by each measure nominally intended to relieve it, and can see no way out. The upper classes are LesCollaborateurs [[CorruptCorporateExecutive gaming]] the system for every drop before it crashes, or [[UtopiaJustifiesTheMeans self-deluded]] fools certain they can fix the socio-economic problems [[WhenAllYouHaveIsAHammer created by failed government initiatives]] with ''more'' [[WhenAllYouHaveIsAHammer government initiatives]]. With the press under [[PropagandaMachine rigid control]], there is little [[LaResistance public dissent with against the status quo]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It's TwentyMinutesIntoTheFuture. The USA is a mixed-market, but heavily regulated and increasingly crypto-communist dystopia wherein the federal government is [[FascistButInefficient as oppressive as it is incompetent]]. The average Joe is being pushed further into poverty by each measure intended to relieve it, and can see no way out. The upper classes are LesCollaborateurs [[CorruptCorporateExecutive gaming]] the system for every drop before it crashes, or [[UtopiaJustifiesTheMeans self-deluded]] fools certain they can fix the socio-economic problems [[WhenAllYouHaveIsAHammer created by failed government initiatives]] with ''more'' [[WhenAllYouHaveIsAHammer government initiatives]]. With the press under [[PropagandaMachine rigid control]], there is little [[LaResistance public dissent with the status quo]].

to:

It's TwentyMinutesIntoTheFuture. The USA is a mixed-market, but heavily regulated and increasingly crypto-communist dystopia wherein the federal government is [[FascistButInefficient as oppressive as it is incompetent]]. The average Joe is being pushed further into poverty by each measure nominally intended to relieve it, and can see no way out. The upper classes are LesCollaborateurs [[CorruptCorporateExecutive gaming]] the system for every drop before it crashes, or [[UtopiaJustifiesTheMeans self-deluded]] fools certain they can fix the socio-economic problems [[WhenAllYouHaveIsAHammer created by failed government initiatives]] with ''more'' [[WhenAllYouHaveIsAHammer government initiatives]]. With the press under [[PropagandaMachine rigid control]], there is little [[LaResistance public dissent with the status quo]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Renamed trope


* HonorBeforeReason: Eddie Willers' last-ditch expedition to re-establish transcontinental rail service. Dagny tries but fails to talk him out of it. This results in what is almost certainly a [[DownerEnding downer ending]] for Eddie on the penultimate page of the novel, which can be considered a [[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop Family Unfriendly Aesop]].

to:

* HonorBeforeReason: Eddie Willers' last-ditch expedition to re-establish transcontinental rail service. Dagny tries but fails to talk him out of it. This results in what is almost certainly a [[DownerEnding downer ending]] for Eddie on the penultimate page of the novel, which can be considered a [[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop Family Unfriendly Aesop]].HardTruthAesop.



* InYourNatureToDestroyYourselves: Averted. John Galt claims that humanity has been acting to destroy itself for most of its history: however, this is not insinuated to be part of basic human nature, but a choice made based on the attempt to follow [[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop bad philosophies such as altruism]] and mysticism. He also claims that those whose nature is to destroy themselves, such as James Taggart, would have long ago if the productive hadn't kept enabling them.

to:

* InYourNatureToDestroyYourselves: Averted. John Galt claims that humanity has been acting to destroy itself for most of its history: however, this is not insinuated to be part of basic human nature, but a choice made based on the attempt to follow [[FamilyUnfriendlyAesop [[HardTruthAesop bad philosophies such as altruism]] and mysticism. He also claims that those whose nature is to destroy themselves, such as James Taggart, would have long ago if the productive hadn't kept enabling them.



** As in the FamilyUnfriendlyAesop example above, [[GoodPeopleHaveGoodSex sex between Dagny and Hank as a moral triumph]] is a trope of adventure novels. TheHero gets the girl. [[InvertedTrope Or a heroine gets a great guy.]] Or both [[TheHero heroes]] [[RunningGag get together]], like [[HerculesTheLegendaryJourneys Hercules]] and [[XenaWarriorPrincess Xena]].

to:

** As in the FamilyUnfriendlyAesop HardTruthAesop example above, [[GoodPeopleHaveGoodSex sex between Dagny and Hank as a moral triumph]] is a trope of adventure novels. TheHero gets the girl. [[InvertedTrope Or a heroine gets a great guy.]] Or both [[TheHero heroes]] [[RunningGag get together]], like [[HerculesTheLegendaryJourneys Hercules]] and [[XenaWarriorPrincess Xena]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Renamed trope


* FamilyUnfriendlyAesop: Deliberately invoked, in-universe, as the book sought to argue against traditional definitions of morality. Specifically, it promotes selfishness as a virtue. It also argues for atheism and justifies sex as a moral triumph. MoralGuardians from all over the political spectrum flew into utter outrage these messages. Creator/GoreVidal (Socialist) said Rand's philosophy was "perfect in its immorality," and the National Review's Whittaker Chambers (ex-Communist who became a Christian conservative) said that from every page in this book he could hear a voice calling "to a [[GodwinsLaw gas chamber]], go!" Thus, regardless of whether or not one agrees or disagrees with the aesops presented in Atlas Shrugged, they clearly fall under the category of "family unfriendly." Ayn Rand was no ally of traditional moral beliefs, after all. Furthermore the book clearly promotes the position that if you are a 'productive' member of society and your spouse and children are not, then regardless of how much they love and support you in non-financial ways you should be disgusted by their fiscal parasitism. Finally the book asserts that if you are digusted by their looting of value from you and do dismiss their love for you, then allowing them to suffer (and likely die) is a morally good decision because your actions (hurtful/murderous) would match your inner feelings (hatred/indifference).

to:

* FamilyUnfriendlyAesop: Deliberately invoked, in-universe, as the HardTruthAesop: The book sought to argue against traditional definitions of morality. Specifically, it promotes selfishness as a virtue. It also argues for atheism and justifies sex as a moral triumph. MoralGuardians from all over the political spectrum flew into utter outrage these messages. Creator/GoreVidal (Socialist) said Rand's philosophy was "perfect in its immorality," and the National Review's Whittaker Chambers (ex-Communist who became a Christian conservative) said that from every page in this book he could hear a voice calling "to a [[GodwinsLaw gas chamber]], go!" Thus, regardless of whether or not one agrees or disagrees with the aesops presented in Atlas Shrugged, they clearly fall under the category of "family unfriendly." Ayn Rand was no ally of traditional moral beliefs, after all. Furthermore the book clearly promotes the position that if you are a 'productive' member of society and your spouse and children are not, then regardless of how much they love and support you in non-financial ways you should be disgusted by their fiscal parasitism. Finally the book asserts that if you are digusted by their looting of value from you and do dismiss their love for you, then allowing them to suffer (and likely die) is a morally good decision because your actions (hurtful/murderous) would match your inner feelings (hatred/indifference).

Added: 883

Changed: 33

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[ImNotHereToMakeFriends I'm Not Here To Make Friends]]: "I don't give a damn about 'the public good'. I'm running a business."

to:

* [[ImNotHereToMakeFriends I'm Not Here To Make Friends]]: ImNotHereToMakeFriends: "I don't give a damn about 'the public good'. I'm running a business."


Added DiffLines:

* JustEatGilligan: the whole plot point of the static motor, a source of virtually free energy (though to be clear, not exactly a perpetual motion machine, it does require some fuel) being left to decay in a factory abandoned by workers and management after an experiment in collective ownership... what doesn't make sense (except outside the context of Objectivism, in which anyone opposed to the Objectivist heroes is secretly a power-hungry DirtyCoward who is as stupid and incompetent as they are lazy and conceited) is why a socialist movement would ignore a technological device that would help them achieve most of their aims. The static motor could revolutionize automation, allow more leisure, and significantly reduce the cost of transportation and energy, which are all things that actually could have helped the Looters' maintain control and sustain the peoples' loyalty.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
No potholing trope names.


* [[FallenHero Fallen Mentor]]: Dr. Stadler was one of Galt, Danneskjöld, and d'Anconia's mentors in college, and a confidant for Dagny.

to:

* [[FallenHero Fallen Mentor]]: FallenHero: Dr. Stadler was one of Galt, Danneskjöld, and d'Anconia's mentors in college, and a confidant for Dagny.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* VillainWithGoodPublicity: The looters in general.

to:

* VillainWithGoodPublicity: The leaders of the looters in general.pretend to care about the poor and oppressed, with the controlled media going along with this and presenting them as good and compassionate people. Actually, however, they are simply power-mad {{Straw Hypocrite}}s to a man.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AmbitionIsEvil: The book's villains think this, and the protagonists believe that a ''lack'' of ambition is evil.

to:

* AmbitionIsEvil: The Inverted. While the book's villains think this, and the protagonists (and the author) believe that a ''lack'' of ambition is evil.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* FamilyUnfriendlyAesop: Deliberately invoked, in-universe, as the book sought to argue against traditional definitions of morality. Specifically, it promotes selfishness as a virtue. It also argues for atheism and justifies sex as a moral triumph. MoralGuardians from all over the political spectrum flew into utter outrage these messages. Creator/GoreVidal (Socialist) said Rand's philosophy was "perfect in its immorality," and the National Review's Whittaker Chambers (ex-Communist who became a Christian conservative) said that from every page in this book he could hear a voice calling "to a [[GodwinsLaw gas chamber]], go!" Thus, regardless of whether or not one agrees or disagrees with the aesops presented in Atlas Shrugged, they clearly fall under the category of "family unfriendly." Ayn Rand was no ally of traditional moral beliefs, after all. Furthermore the book clearly promotes the position that if you are a 'productive' member of society and your spouse and children are not, then regardless of how much they love and support you in non-financial ways you should be disgusted by their fiscal parasitism. Finally the book asserts that if you are digusted by their looting of value from you and do dismiss their love for you, then allowing them to sufffer (and likely die) is a morally good decision because your actions (hurtful/murderous) would match your inner feelings (hatred/indifference).

to:

* FamilyUnfriendlyAesop: Deliberately invoked, in-universe, as the book sought to argue against traditional definitions of morality. Specifically, it promotes selfishness as a virtue. It also argues for atheism and justifies sex as a moral triumph. MoralGuardians from all over the political spectrum flew into utter outrage these messages. Creator/GoreVidal (Socialist) said Rand's philosophy was "perfect in its immorality," and the National Review's Whittaker Chambers (ex-Communist who became a Christian conservative) said that from every page in this book he could hear a voice calling "to a [[GodwinsLaw gas chamber]], go!" Thus, regardless of whether or not one agrees or disagrees with the aesops presented in Atlas Shrugged, they clearly fall under the category of "family unfriendly." Ayn Rand was no ally of traditional moral beliefs, after all. Furthermore the book clearly promotes the position that if you are a 'productive' member of society and your spouse and children are not, then regardless of how much they love and support you in non-financial ways you should be disgusted by their fiscal parasitism. Finally the book asserts that if you are digusted by their looting of value from you and do dismiss their love for you, then allowing them to sufffer suffer (and likely die) is a morally good decision because your actions (hurtful/murderous) would match your inner feelings (hatred/indifference).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** In one of the extensive flashbacks to their adolescent romance, Francisco slaps Dagny during an argument out of frustration. Dagny decides not to tell her mother, and treats the slap like an exciting secret adventure she shares with Francisco, that others simply would not understand.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It's not that ambiguous though, because late in the book there is a reference to nuclear technology in the form of an atom-smashing machine, but in almost 1200 pages, no one refers to World War II, Nagasaki, Hiroshima, or the Soviet Union's nuclear arsenal, which would all have been very recent or contemporary in memory TwentyMinutesIntoTheFuture of 1957. Ragnar's warship also uses battleship-grade cannons (long after battleships were technologically obsolete) instead of something like a ballistic missile to destroy Boyle's factor.See YMMV for speculation on this novel's timeline and technology.

Changed: 44

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* LowerClassLout: Socialism is depicted as having turned the working class into this, as they became more interested in collecting paychecks to spend on ConspicuousConsumption while the quality of their work went into freefall, secure in the knowledge that they'd never be fired because the union had their backs. John Galt's origin story is that he got fed up with his co-workers and their employers, the Starnes family, enabling them through their embrace of socialism, and told them to TakeThisJobAndShoveIt once they socialized the 20th Century Motor Company (which they proceeded to run into the ground).

to:

* LowerClassLout: Socialism is "Altruistic," New Deal type policies are depicted as having turned the working class into this, as they became more interested in collecting paychecks to spend on ConspicuousConsumption while the quality of their work went into freefall, secure in the knowledge that they'd never be fired because the union had their backs. John Galt's origin story is that he got fed up with his co-workers and their employers, the Starnes family, enabling them through their embrace of socialism, and told them to TakeThisJobAndShoveIt once they socialized the 20th Century Motor Company (which they proceeded to run into the ground).

Changed: 73

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternateHistory: A fandom explanation for the importance of radios, trains, and the lack of post-WWII technology is that the timeline splits around the '30s when FDR is elected, resulting in decades of stagnation, and major events such as World War II never happened in this universe. Critics of the book, on the other hand, point out that setting the story in an alternative universe would not be in Rand's character, and would undermine her intended message of "realistic" conflict in contemporary society. Rand spent many years working on the book, and it's telling that television and nuclear power ("atom-smashing machines") are actually mentioned but not until the later chapters. It has the effect, [[YMMV for some readers]], of an Unintentional Period Piece.

to:

* AlternateHistory: A fandom explanation for the importance of radios, trains, and the lack of post-WWII technology is that the timeline splits around the '30s when FDR is elected, resulting in decades of stagnation, and major events such as World War II never happened in this universe. Critics of the book, on the other hand, point out that setting the story in an alternative universe would not be in Rand's character, and would undermine her intended message of "realistic" conflict in contemporary society. Rand spent many years working on the book, and it's telling that television and nuclear power ("atom-smashing machines") are actually mentioned but not until the later chapters. It has the effect, [[YMMV YMMV, but for some readers]], readers the first half of the book has the effect of an Unintentional Period Piece.UnintentionalPeriodPiece.

Changed: 481

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AlternateHistory: A fandom explanation for the importance of radios, trains, and the lack of post-WWII technology is that the timeline splits around the '30s when FDR is elected, resulting in decades of stagnation, and major events such as World War II never happened in this universe.

to:

* AlternateHistory: A fandom explanation for the importance of radios, trains, and the lack of post-WWII technology is that the timeline splits around the '30s when FDR is elected, resulting in decades of stagnation, and major events such as World War II never happened in this universe. Critics of the book, on the other hand, point out that setting the story in an alternative universe would not be in Rand's character, and would undermine her intended message of "realistic" conflict in contemporary society. Rand spent many years working on the book, and it's telling that television and nuclear power ("atom-smashing machines") are actually mentioned but not until the later chapters. It has the effect, [[YMMV for some readers]], of an Unintentional Period Piece.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheElitesJumpShip: This is the core plot of novel and is played sympathetically, as elite businessmen and industrialists "go Galt" and disappear from the world stage in protest of growing socialist policies, forming their own community called Galt's Gulch, while the rest of the country collapses.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SpitefulSuicide: Eric Starnes, one of the three siblings who ran the 20th Century Motor Company into the ground. As described by a character in-universe:
-->"... He needed love, was his line. He was being kept by older women, when he could find them.\\ Then he started running after a girl of sixteen, a nice girl who wouldn't have anything to do with him. She married a boy she was engaged to. Eric Starnes got into their house on the wedding day, and when they came back from church after the ceremony, they found him in their bedroom, dead, messy dead, his wrists slashed.... Now I say there might be forgiveness for a man who kills himself quietly. Who can pass judgment on another man's suffering and on the limit of what he can bear? But the man who kills himself, making a show of his death in order to hurt somebody, the man who gives his life for malice--there's no forgiveness for him, no excuse, he's rotten clear through, and what he deserves is that people spit at his memory, instead of feeling sorry for him and hurt, as he wanted them to be.... Well, that was Eric Starnes. ..."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* LowerClassLout: Socialism is depicted as having turned the working class into this, as they became more interested in collecting paychecks to spend on ConspicuousConsumption while the quality of their work went into freefall, secure in the knowledge that they'd never be fired because the union had their backs. John Galt's origin story is that he got fed up with his co-workers and told them to TakeThisJobAndShoveIt once they socialized the 20th Century Motor Company (which they proceeded to run into the ground).

to:

* LowerClassLout: Socialism is depicted as having turned the working class into this, as they became more interested in collecting paychecks to spend on ConspicuousConsumption while the quality of their work went into freefall, secure in the knowledge that they'd never be fired because the union had their backs. John Galt's origin story is that he got fed up with his co-workers and their employers, the Starnes family, enabling them through their embrace of socialism, and told them to TakeThisJobAndShoveIt once they socialized the 20th Century Motor Company (which they proceeded to run into the ground).

Added: 518

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* LovingAShadow: Cherryl towards James

to:

* LovingAShadow: Cherryl towards JamesJames.
* LowerClassLout: Socialism is depicted as having turned the working class into this, as they became more interested in collecting paychecks to spend on ConspicuousConsumption while the quality of their work went into freefall, secure in the knowledge that they'd never be fired because the union had their backs. John Galt's origin story is that he got fed up with his co-workers and told them to TakeThisJobAndShoveIt once they socialized the 20th Century Motor Company (which they proceeded to run into the ground).

Added: 553

Removed: 559

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Boring Invincible Hero redirect is being cut


* BoringInvincibleHero: The villains never stand the ''slightest'' chance against Galt & Co. Every confrontation in the book between the two, whether it's physical, economic or intellectual, is handily and easily won by the heroes. Dagny and Hank do suffer several defeats in their overall goals for most of the novel, but this is only because they try to fight the looters on their terms - terms which the looters and their predecessors have refined for generations to be in their favor. Once they cross over to the strikers, their foes are utterly helpless.


Added DiffLines:

* InvincibleHero: The villains never stand the ''slightest'' chance against Galt & Co. Every confrontation in the book between the two, whether it's physical, economic or intellectual, is handily and easily won by the heroes. Dagny and Hank do suffer several defeats in their overall goals for most of the novel, but this is only because they try to fight the looters on their terms - terms which the looters and their predecessors have refined for generations to be in their favor. Once they cross over to the strikers, their foes are utterly helpless.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Top