Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Literature / AtlasShrugged

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Several of the looters say "in the long run we're all dead," which is a verbatim quote from economist John Maynard Keynes.

to:

** Several of the looters say "in the long run we're all dead," which is a verbatim quote from economist John Maynard Keynes. (Though this is actually a misunderstanding of the quote: in its original context, the point was to illustrate how insufficient "the long run" is as a basis to judge policies.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Francisco d'Anconia, in his spare time during college, works at a copper mine and rises to own it, just so he can prove he could.

to:

** Francisco d'Anconia, in his spare time during college, works d'Anconia starts working at a copper mine foundry at the age of 16. Four years later, he buys it on the day he graduates from college, having used his wages and rises the allowance money sent by his father to own it, just so he can prove he could.make a killing in the stock market.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Worse, the [[ApatheticCitizens handful of scientists, entrepreneurs, and managers]] sustaining the system [[OptOut are disappearing one by one]]. No one ever hears from them again, and their friends and relatives are left with nothing but a question:

to:

Worse, the [[ApatheticCitizens handful of scientists, entrepreneurs, and managers]] sustaining the system [[OptOut are disappearing one by one]]. No one ever hears from them again, and their friends and relatives are left with nothing but a one question:
Tabs MOD

Changed: 239

Removed: 258

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
dewicking disambiguation page


*** Later in the book, Kip Chalmers, a politician, also demands that ''his'' train be got moving again because he doesn't want to be late to his destination; because he is a looter and a villain, the result is that ''absolutely everyone on the train dies'' and infrastructure that is critical to the ''entire nation'' is destroyed.
*** [[JustForPun Objectively speaking]], these two characters make the same decision, with the same motivation, with the same lack of knowledge of what is going on elsewhere on the railroad; the only difference is in the author's respective opinions on them.

to:

*** Later in the book, Kip Chalmers, a politician, also demands that ''his'' train be got moving again because he doesn't want to be late to his destination; because he is a looter and a villain, the result is that ''absolutely everyone on the train dies'' and infrastructure that is critical to the ''entire nation'' is destroyed. \n*** [[JustForPun Objectively speaking]], speaking, these two characters make the same decision, with the same motivation, with the same lack of knowledge of what is going on elsewhere on the railroad; the only difference is in the author's respective opinions on them.

Added: 557

Changed: 73

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AnAesop: In Rand's eyes the book has several:

to:

* AnAesop: In Rand's eyes the book has several:several, and while a lot of them overlap with HardTruthAesop, not all of them do:


Added DiffLines:

** The vast majority of the human race have nothing to offer the tiny handful of genuinely exceptional people that create everything that makes human life worth living except their labor, and rather rather than accept this and be content with their lot, or to try to themselves become great creative minds producing something of value, modern society encourages this majority to become bloodsucking parasites leeching off these exceptional individuals' ideas and success; in this way these great individuals are the ''real'' victims of social exploitation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Three Amigos is a disambiguation


* ThreeAmigos: Francisco formed one with Dagny and Eddie when they were children and with Ragnar and John Galt while in college.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Worse, the [[ApatheticCitizens handful of scientists, entrepreneurs, and managers]] sustaining the system [[OptOut are disappearing one by one.]] No one ever hears from them again, and their friends and relatives are left with nothing but a question:

to:

Worse, the [[ApatheticCitizens handful of scientists, entrepreneurs, and managers]] sustaining the system [[OptOut are disappearing one by one.]] one]]. No one ever hears from them again, and their friends and relatives are left with nothing but a question:



The title is based on a popular misconception that in Greek mythology Atlas carried the world on his back (he actually carried the sky); as Hank and Francisco [[TitleDrop discuss during the book]], if he ever tired of carrying that weight on his shoulders, all he needed to do was shrug, and it would fall off. The working title for the novel, before its publication, was ''The Strike''--but Rand changed it because she feared it would be a SpoilerTitle.[[note]]However, it remained the title of the most popular German translation, "Der Streik".[[/note]]

to:

The title is based on a popular misconception that in Greek mythology mythology, Atlas carried the world on his back (he actually carried the sky); as Hank and Francisco [[TitleDrop discuss during the book]], if he ever tired of carrying that weight on his shoulders, all he needed to do was shrug, and it would fall off. The working title for the novel, before its publication, was ''The Strike''--but Rand changed it because she feared it would be a SpoilerTitle.[[note]]However, it remained the title of the most popular German translation, "Der Streik".[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** When Francisco d'Anconia delivers his speech about just how awesome money is, he complains about the phrase "Money is the root of all evil." The actual phrase in question is "''The Love of'' money is the root of all evil" (1 Timothy 6:10), which puts the blame for evil not on money itself but on ''avarice'' - which all of Rand's heroes regard as being a virtue.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AllForNothing: "Kip's Ma" Chalmers diverts thousands of railcars from transporting the nation's wheat harvest in order to haul a crop of soybeans she's grown in a personal agriculture project. Not only does most of the wheat end up rotting in storage, touching off widespread food shortages, but the soybeans turn out to be unfit for consumption because they were harvested too early.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BoomHeadshot: In the aftermath of the riot at his steel mill, Rearden learns that a newly hired furnace foreman saved his life by shooting two attackers in the face and blowing their heads off. [[spoiler:Said forman turns out to be Francisco d'Anconia.]]

to:

* BoomHeadshot: In the aftermath of the riot at his steel mill, Rearden learns that a newly hired furnace foreman saved his life by shooting two attackers in the face and blowing their heads off. [[spoiler:Said forman foreman turns out to be Francisco d'Anconia.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BoomHeadshot: In the aftermath of the riot at his steel mill, Rearden learns that a newly hired furnace foreman saved his life by shooting two attackers in the face and blowing their heads off. [[spoiler:Said forman turns out to be Francisco d'Anconia.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AuthorFilibuster: As the quote on the AuthorFilibuster page says, "Eventually the question you ask stops being 'Who is John Galt?' and becomes 'When will John Galt shut up?'" ''Atlas Shrugged'' has one of the longest examples in print, with 60 to 70 pages (depending on printing) and four hours of in-universe time of John Galt lecturing the entire world. There are other, shorter filibusters as well scattered through the book. It must be noted that Ayn Rand was inspired by Creator/VictorHugo, whose novels did include numerous examples.

to:

* AuthorFilibuster: As the quote on the AuthorFilibuster page says, "Eventually the question you ask stops being 'Who is John Galt?' and becomes 'When will John Galt shut up?'" ''Atlas Shrugged'' has one of the longest examples in print, with 60 to 70 pages (depending on printing) and four hours of in-universe time of John Galt lecturing the entire world.world (though real-life readings of the speech tend to take upwards of ''six''). There are other, shorter filibusters as well scattered through the book. It must be noted that Ayn Rand was inspired by Creator/VictorHugo, whose novels did include numerous examples.

Changed: 52

Removed: 90

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
rich idiot with no day job was disambiguated by TRS. As is typical with wick cleaning projects, zero-context examples are deleted as it's impossible to tell if they're actually examples of anything. https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=16723903170.78923100&


* ConspicuousConsumption: Francisco d'Anconia became famous for this after adopting his [[RichIdiotWithNoDayJob playboy persona]]. James Taggart also goes on a spree of this later on. Notably averted with most of the heroic characters, even very rich ones: they may purchase extremely expensive objects, but do this for their quality rather than showing off how rich they are.

to:

* ConspicuousConsumption: Francisco d'Anconia became famous for this after adopting his [[RichIdiotWithNoDayJob playboy persona]].persona. James Taggart also goes on a spree of this later on. Notably averted with most of the heroic characters, even very rich ones: they may purchase extremely expensive objects, but do this for their quality rather than showing off how rich they are.



* NonIdleRich: Most of the heroic businesspeople, such as Dagny Taggart, Midas Mulligan and Hank Rearden will be this, having already made millions of dollars but staying in business pretty much because they love doing it. The entire D'Anconia family also counts, although Francisco pretends to be a [[RichIdiotWithNoDayJob worthless playboy]] for a while as part of his cover when striking.

to:

* NonIdleRich: Most of the heroic businesspeople, such as Dagny Taggart, Midas Mulligan and Hank Rearden will be this, having already made millions of dollars but staying in business pretty much because they love doing it. The entire D'Anconia family also counts, although Francisco pretends to be a [[RichIdiotWithNoDayJob worthless playboy]] playboy for a while as part of his cover when striking.



%%* RichIdiotWithNoDayJob: This is all part of Francisco d'Anconia's ObfuscatingStupidity.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** When the government enacts a law that one individual can only own one company, none of the heroes respond by incorporating a new company that immediately acquires all of their previous holdings as wholly-owned subsidiaries. Apparently there are no conglomerates in the world of Atlas Shrugged.
** When Dagny creates the John Galt Line as a separate company from Taggart Transcontinental, so that she can run it exactly as she wants, she promises that all the Line's profits will come back to Taggart when it is re-acquired. When Rearden provides financial backing, he expects a return on his investment. The two positions are completely irreconcilable, and might even constitute fraud if Dagny did not make the conditions of her deal with Taggart known to her investors.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Also, Gold is ''absurdly heavy'', making it impractical for - for instance - Ragnar to haul around stolen gold bullion to "repay" people he thinks were taxed too much. A "Good Delivery" standard gold bar is supposed to weigh ''12.4 Kilograms'', i.e. it is very much not something you could comfortably carry around in a pocket, even if the pocket was reinforced enough to not just rip under the strain.

to:

** Also, Gold is ''absurdly heavy'', [[HollywoodDensity making it impractical for - for instance - Ragnar to haul around stolen gold bullion bullion]] to "repay" people he thinks were taxed too much. A "Good Delivery" standard gold bar is supposed to weigh ''12.4 Kilograms'', i.e. it is very much not something you could comfortably carry around in a pocket, even if the pocket was reinforced enough to not just rip under the strain.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* OmnidisciplinaryScientist: John Galt ''for sure'', but Rand treats all her heroes like this to some extent; "Genius" is treated as an elastic quality that can apply itself to any field, with no requirement for specialised knowledge or study to make vast and sudden leaps in science and technology. Meanwhile, things that have actually been significant real-world drivers of scientific progress -- large, government-funded or government-backed projects and organisations, e.g. The Manhattan Project or [=NASA=] -- are specifically denigrated as being worthless, bureaucratic wastes of individual talent. Rearden Metal is subjected to bad press from the State Science Institute ''because'' they're embarrassed that one man came up with something better than all of them working together could.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CapitalismIsBad: The Class-2 ApocalypseHow caused by the intellectual elite's refusal to reform society, and decisions to speed up its disintegration and death instead, have caused altruistic readers to take this message from the book even though Rand believed that unregulated oligarchic/monopolistic free-market capitalism was an absolutely meritocratic political and economic system. This message was likely unintentional, as Objectivism maintains that refusing to act altruistically is perfectly 'moral' as long as you do not feel bad about refusing (like John Galt), and altruistic behaviour is only 'moral' when it makes you feel good (rather than it being inherently or ojbectively good).
* CharacterFilibuster: Quite a few. A ''four hour long'' speech appears verbatim, ''right before the climax''. After that, the rest look like zingers.

to:

* CapitalismIsBad: The Class-2 ApocalypseHow caused by the intellectual elite's refusal to reform society, and decisions to speed up its disintegration and death instead, have caused altruistic readers to take this message from the book even though Rand believed that unregulated oligarchic/monopolistic free-market capitalism was an absolutely meritocratic political and economic system. This message was likely unintentional, as Objectivism maintains that refusing to act altruistically is perfectly 'moral' as long as you do not feel bad about refusing (like John Galt), and altruistic behaviour is only 'moral' when it makes you feel good (rather than it being inherently or ojbectively objectively good).
* CharacterFilibuster: Quite a few. A ''four hour long'' speech appears verbatim, ''right before the climax''. After that, the rest - Francisco D'Anconia's praise of money, Hank Rearden's speech when the government puts him on trial, and plenty more - look like zingers.



* ComicBookTime: A mild example with Galt's speech which is four hours long in the book. In real life, no-one has been able to read the entire thing, clearly and distinctly, in less than six.

to:

* ComicBookTime: A mild example with Galt's speech speech, which is described as being four hours long in the book. book; In real life, no-one has been able to read the entire thing, clearly and distinctly, in anything less than six.''six'' hours.



** James...again, after his sister's dynamo performance on Bertram Scudder's radio program. When Cherryl asks him about Dagny's comments, James responds by attacking Scudder and pointing out that he has been kicked off the radio, and Cherryl disliked Scudder anyway. Cherryl becomes quite exasperated.

to:

** James... again, after his sister's dynamo performance on Bertram Scudder's radio program. When Cherryl asks him about Dagny's comments, James responds by attacking Scudder and pointing out that he has been kicked off the radio, and Cherryl disliked Scudder anyway. Cherryl becomes quite exasperated.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** In real life, when important business leaders quit, are fired or die while on the job, the entire industry doesn't just fail. The plot turns on the idea that charismatic, hypercompetent individuals alone have the power to keep entire industries functioning, and that without them, failure is inevitable. If this were true, then industries would not exist at all.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removing Kill Em All wick, incorrect use (by me).


*** Later in the book, Kip Chalmers, a politician, also demands that ''his'' train be got moving again because he doesn't want to be late to his destination; because he is a looter and a villain, the result is that ''[[KillEmAll absolutely everyone on the train dies]]'' and infrastructure that is critical to the ''entire nation'' is destroyed.

to:

*** Later in the book, Kip Chalmers, a politician, also demands that ''his'' train be got moving again because he doesn't want to be late to his destination; because he is a looter and a villain, the result is that ''[[KillEmAll absolutely ''absolutely everyone on the train dies]]'' dies'' and infrastructure that is critical to the ''entire nation'' is destroyed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** "Wyatt's Torch" is lit when Ellis Wyatt blows up all of his oil fields after the government passes laws that would doom his business, and the John Galt Line, to a slow death. "I am leaving it as I found it. Take over. It's yours."

to:

** "Wyatt's Torch" is lit when Ellis Wyatt blows up all of his oil fields after the government passes laws that would doom his business, and the John Galt Line, to a slow death. "I am leaving it as I found it. Take over. It's yours.""[[note]]As [[Podcast/TheScathingAtheist God Awful Movies]] point out in their reviews of the movies, it definitely wasn't ''on fire'' when he found it![[/note]]

Added: 2451

Changed: 743

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ProtagonistCenteredMorality: This features very prominently in its final chapters, ultimately culminating in Dagny and her allies murdering security guards in cold blood on the way to rescue John Galt, despite - or perhaps even ''because'' - the narrative saying they're too paralyzed with indecision to step aside. There's a bizarre undertone of, "Help us, fight us, or get the hell out of our way, just do ''something'' besides just ''sit there''" during the rampage. One can argue that the questionable behavior up until that point was just washing one's hands clean of a broken system, but at that point the Strikers are just flat-out executing people for what they consider the ultimate sin - [[ApatheticCitizens apathy]].

to:

* ProtagonistCenteredMorality: This features The protagonists commit all sorts of reprehensible acts in pursuit of their personal freedom from taxation, but Ragnar Danneskjöld, a pirate who plunders ''foreign aid ships'', probably takes the cake.
** Another noteworthy instance is illustrated in two train journeys:
*** At the start of the book, Dagny Taggart is on a train that is stuck at a red signal and is at risk of being late for a meeting. She demands that the driver proceed despite the signal, laying out a chain of logic that works ''internally'' but fails to account for all the reasons why a signal might be at red[[note]]- she says the signal must be broken; there is no way for her to know if it is in fact letting them know that the track ahead is broken, flooded out, has a running train on it, has a ''broken-down'' train on it, etc[[/note]]. As she is the heroine of the novel, everything is just fine.
*** Later in the book, Kip Chalmers, a politician, also demands that ''his'' train be got moving again because he doesn't want to be late to his destination; because he is a looter and a villain, the result is that ''[[KillEmAll absolutely everyone on the train dies]]'' and infrastructure that is critical to the ''entire nation'' is destroyed.
*** [[JustForPun Objectively speaking]], these two characters make the same decision, with the same motivation, with the same lack of knowledge of what is going on elsewhere on the railroad; the only difference is in the author's respective opinions on them.
** Features
very prominently in its the final chapters, ultimately culminating in Dagny and her allies murdering security guards in cold blood on the way to rescue John Galt, despite - or perhaps even ''because'' - the narrative saying they're too paralyzed with indecision to step aside. There's a bizarre undertone of, "Help us, fight us, or get the hell out of our way, just do ''something'' besides just ''sit there''" during the rampage. One can argue that the questionable behavior up until that point was just washing one's hands clean of a broken system, but at that point the Strikers are just flat-out executing people for what they consider the ultimate sin - [[ApatheticCitizens apathy]].apathy]].
*** In regards the rescue, there is one final cherry on the top to consider; if you take the Galt oath as being a pithy statement of the man's morals - "I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine" - then ''by attempting to rescue him'' the protagonists are breaking John Galt's own moral precepts. At no point does he complain that these alleged fierce individualists are acting collectively for the good of someone other than themselves.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Dagny (and some other characters) express great admiration for her ancestor, the founder of Taggart Transcontinental, for never taking government handouts - and, indeed, throwing someone who tried to give him one down a flight of stairs. But building railroads ''absolutely requires'' government assistance because ''only'' a government can wield the kind of compulsory purchase power (Eminent Domain, in US Law, but other countries have different names for the same process) necessary to obtain the land on which you want to lay thousands of miles of track - without the Government, just a few stubborn landowners in the right places could have prevented Taggart Transcontinental from ever becoming, well, Transcontinental.


Added DiffLines:

** Hank Rearden designs a new and revolutionary bridge to be used on Dagny's John Galt line in an afternoon. When engine drivers balk at driving trains across this new and untested structure at speed, this is depicted as being due to their weak-willed looter nature, and not, for instance, any memory they might have of [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tay_Bridge_disaster The Tay Bridge Disaster]]. The Tay Bridge was designed and built by an experienced railway engineer - albeit one who failed to account for Wind Loading, with horrific consequences - and not by a self-taught metallurgist with no civil engineering experience at all.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** When Francisco d'Anconia delivers his speech about just how awesome money is, he complains about the phrase "Money is the root of all evil." The actual phrase in question is "''The Love of'' money is the root of all evil" (1 Timothy 6:10), which puts the blame for evil not on money itself but on ''avarice'' - which all of Rand's heroes regard as being a virtue.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Top