Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
*** Okay, but what about the atrocities he committed as the Hydra Supreme?
to:
*** Okay, but what about the atrocities he committed as the Hydra Supreme?Supreme?
*** "Las Vegas is back! What crime!"
*** "Las Vegas is back! What crime!"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
** An immediate assumption is that the legal defence focused more on casting reasonable doubt on the situation, particularly when him going into action as "Captain Krakoa" means that certain people could argue that there's no way to know who was actually in the suit. They may have been able to create the impression that Flag-Smasher was basically infiltrating the MLF to try and stop them, particularly when so many people were receptive to his original "message" during his initial takeover.
to:
** An immediate assumption is that the legal defence focused more on casting reasonable doubt on the situation, particularly when him going into action as "Captain Krakoa" means that certain people could argue that there's no way to know who was actually in the suit. They may have been able to create the impression that Flag-Smasher was basically infiltrating the MLF to try and stop them, particularly when so many people were receptive to his original "message" during his initial takeover.takeover.
*** Okay, but what about the atrocities he committed as the Hydra Supreme?
*** Okay, but what about the atrocities he committed as the Hydra Supreme?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* How is Flag-Smasher's acquittal legally possible given the gravity of his crimes? I'm pretty sure most of Las Vegas would still want to see him hang.
to:
* How is Flag-Smasher's acquittal legally possible given the gravity of his crimes? I'm pretty sure most of Las Vegas would still want to see him hang.hang.
** An immediate assumption is that the legal defence focused more on casting reasonable doubt on the situation, particularly when him going into action as "Captain Krakoa" means that certain people could argue that there's no way to know who was actually in the suit. They may have been able to create the impression that Flag-Smasher was basically infiltrating the MLF to try and stop them, particularly when so many people were receptive to his original "message" during his initial takeover.
** An immediate assumption is that the legal defence focused more on casting reasonable doubt on the situation, particularly when him going into action as "Captain Krakoa" means that certain people could argue that there's no way to know who was actually in the suit. They may have been able to create the impression that Flag-Smasher was basically infiltrating the MLF to try and stop them, particularly when so many people were receptive to his original "message" during his initial takeover.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
* How is Flag-Smasher's acquittal legally possible given the gravity of his crimes?
to:
* How is Flag-Smasher's acquittal legally possible given the gravity of his crimes?crimes? I'm pretty sure most of Las Vegas would still want to see him hang.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
** Captain America being fine with killing goes back to Ed Brubaker where Sharon Carter pointed out that Captain America was killing an unusually number of enemy combatants during the Winter Soldier arc.
to:
** Captain America being fine with killing goes back to Ed Brubaker where Sharon Carter pointed out that Captain America was killing an unusually number of enemy combatants during the Winter Soldier arc.arc.
* How is Flag-Smasher's acquittal legally possible given the gravity of his crimes?
* How is Flag-Smasher's acquittal legally possible given the gravity of his crimes?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
** Counterpoint: The man was a soldier in World War II. Of course he’s fine with killing some fascists; he did it before.
to:
** Counterpoint: The man was a soldier in World War II. Of course he’s fine with killing some fascists; he did it before.before.
** Captain America being fine with killing goes back to Ed Brubaker where Sharon Carter pointed out that Captain America was killing an unusually number of enemy combatants during the Winter Soldier arc.
** Captain America being fine with killing goes back to Ed Brubaker where Sharon Carter pointed out that Captain America was killing an unusually number of enemy combatants during the Winter Soldier arc.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* Is Captain America's [[GainingTheWillToKill newfound willingness to kill]] really acceptable for his character? It's true that Orchis are Neo-Nazi scum and don't deserve mercy of any kind, but Cap's supposed to be Marvel's Superman. Shouldn't he at least try to inspire his allies to be better?
to:
* Is Captain America's [[GainingTheWillToKill newfound willingness to kill]] really acceptable for his character? It's true that Orchis are Neo-Nazi scum and don't deserve mercy of any kind, but Cap's supposed to be Marvel's Superman. Shouldn't he at least try to inspire his allies to be better?better?
** Counterpoint: The man was a soldier in World War II. Of course he’s fine with killing some fascists; he did it before.
** Counterpoint: The man was a soldier in World War II. Of course he’s fine with killing some fascists; he did it before.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
First person writing is not allowed anymore, not even on Headscratchers pages.
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* Is Captain America's [[GainingTheWillToKill newfound willingness to kill]] really acceptable for his character? I get that Orchis are Neo-Nazi scum and don't deserve mercy of any kind, but Cap's supposed to be Marvel's Superman. Shouldn't he at least try to inspire his allies to be better?
to:
* Is Captain America's [[GainingTheWillToKill newfound willingness to kill]] really acceptable for his character? I get It's true that Orchis are Neo-Nazi scum and don't deserve mercy of any kind, but Cap's supposed to be Marvel's Superman. Shouldn't he at least try to inspire his allies to be better?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* Is Captain America's [[GainingTheWillToKill newfound willingness to kill]] really acceptable for his character? I get that Orchis are Neo-Nazi scum and don't deserve mercy of any kind, but Cap's supposed to be Marvel's Superman. Shouldn't he inspire people to be better?
to:
* Is Captain America's [[GainingTheWillToKill newfound willingness to kill]] really acceptable for his character? I get that Orchis are Neo-Nazi scum and don't deserve mercy of any kind, but Cap's supposed to be Marvel's Superman. Shouldn't he at least try to inspire people his allies to be better?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
* Is Captain America's willingness to kill really acceptable for his character? I get that Orchis are Neo-Nazi scum and don't deserve mercy of any kind, but Cap's supposed to be Marvel's Superman. Shouldn't he inspire people to be better?
to:
* Is Captain America's [[GainingTheWillToKill newfound willingness to kill kill]] really acceptable for his character? I get that Orchis are Neo-Nazi scum and don't deserve mercy of any kind, but Cap's supposed to be Marvel's Superman. Shouldn't he inspire people to be better?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* Is Captain America's willingness to kill really acceptable for his character? I get that Orchis are Neo-Nazi scum and don't deserve mercy of any kind, but Cap's supposed to be Marvel's Superman. Shouldn't he inspire people to be better?
