Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Fridge / TheWaterHorseLegendOfTheDeep

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Additionally, we are never told if the water horse species always worked like this or not. If they are a purely biological animal, with no supernatural aspects at all, there would have been more of them at one point. Numerous species are able to asexually reproduce when deprived of a mate. Perhaps by the relatively modern times, the species had been so drastically reduced at what was once a population is now reduced to a single individual.

to:

** Additionally, we are never told if the water horse species always worked like this or not. If they are a purely biological animal, with no supernatural aspects at all, there would have been more of them at one point. Numerous species are able to asexually reproduce when deprived of a mate. Perhaps by the relatively modern times, the species had been so drastically reduced at as what was once a population is now reduced to a single individual.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Additionally, we are never told if the water horse species always worked like this or not. If they are a purely biological animal, with no supernatural aspects at all, there would have been more of them at one point. Numerous species are able to asexually reproduce when deprived of a mate. Perhaps by the relatively modern times, the species had been so drastically reduced at what was once a population is now reduced to a single individual.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* For that matter, why is there still only one? shouldn't a set of identical twins have occurred at some point?

to:

* For that matter, why is there still only one? shouldn't Shouldn't a set of identical twins have occurred at some point?

Added: 120

Changed: 120

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



* For that matter, why is there still only one? shouldn't a set of identical twins have occurred at some point?

to:

\n** Magic.

* For that matter, why is there still only one? shouldn't a set of identical twins have occurred at some point?point?
** Magic.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
oops


* Darwin would have a FlatWhat moment if you told him about a species where each specimen produces only a single child and then immediately dies, considering that it'd take them millions of years to evolve this trait (and that's not even getting into the difficulty of imagining an environmental situation where this would be anything but detrimental), and there are a ''lot'' of things that can either kill an organism before it reaches reproductive age or just prevent it from being able to reproduce in the first place: disease, injury, predation, toxins, birth defect, infertility, etc. So how has this species managed to survive for so long without encountering any of these factors

to:

* Darwin would have a FlatWhat moment if you told him about a species where each specimen produces only a single child and then immediately dies, considering that it'd take them millions of years to evolve this trait (and that's not even getting into the difficulty of imagining an environmental situation where this would be anything but detrimental), and there are a ''lot'' of things that can either kill an organism before it reaches reproductive age or just prevent it from being able to reproduce in the first place: disease, injury, predation, toxins, birth defect, infertility, etc. So how has this species managed to survive for so long without encountering any of these factors
factors?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Darwin would have a FlatWhat moment if you told him about a species where each specimen produces only a single child and then immediately dies, considering that it'd take them millions of years to evolve this trait (and that's not even getting into the difficulty of imagining an environmental situation where this would be anything but detrimental), and there are a ''lot'' of things that can either kill an organism before it reaches reproductive age or just prevent it from being able to reproduce in the first place: disease, injury, toxins, birth defect, infertility, etc. So how has this species managed to not go extinct?

to:

* Darwin would have a FlatWhat moment if you told him about a species where each specimen produces only a single child and then immediately dies, considering that it'd take them millions of years to evolve this trait (and that's not even getting into the difficulty of imagining an environmental situation where this would be anything but detrimental), and there are a ''lot'' of things that can either kill an organism before it reaches reproductive age or just prevent it from being able to reproduce in the first place: disease, injury, predation, toxins, birth defect, infertility, etc. So how has this species managed to not go extinct?
survive for so long without encountering any of these factors
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Darwin would have a FlatWhat moment if you told him about a species where each specimen produces only a single child and then immediately dies, considering that it'd take them millions of years to evolve this trait (and that's not even getting into the difficulty of imagining an environmental situation where this would be anything but detrimental), and there are a ''lot'' of things that can kill an organism before it reaches reproductive age or prevent it from being able to reproduce: disease, injury, toxins, birth defect, infertility, etc. So how has this species managed to not go extinct?

to:

* Darwin would have a FlatWhat moment if you told him about a species where each specimen produces only a single child and then immediately dies, considering that it'd take them millions of years to evolve this trait (and that's not even getting into the difficulty of imagining an environmental situation where this would be anything but detrimental), and there are a ''lot'' of things that can either kill an organism before it reaches reproductive age or just prevent it from being able to reproduce: reproduce in the first place: disease, injury, toxins, birth defect, infertility, etc. So how has this species managed to not go extinct?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Darwin would have a FlatWhat moment if you told him about a species where each specimen produces only a single child and then immediately dies, considering that it'd take them millions of years to evolve this trait (and that's not even getting into the difficulty of imagining an environmental situation where this would be anything but detrimental), and there are a ''lot'' of things that can kill an organism before it reaches reproductive age or prevent it from being able to reproduce: disease, injury, toxins, birth defect, infertility, etc. So how has this species managed to not go extinct?

* For that matter, why is there still only one? shouldn't a set of identical twins have occurred at some point?

Top