Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5,6 (click to see context) from:
The movie presents a fictionalized version of the "Judges' Trial" at of the Franco-Anglo-American-Soviet International Military Tribunal (IMT) trials that took place at Nuremberg in 1947. In this trial the IMT tried the fourteen defendants with:
to:
The movie presents a fictionalized version of the "Judges' Trial" at of from the Franco-Anglo-American-Soviet Anglo-American-Franco-Soviet International Military Tribunal (IMT) trials that took place at Nuremberg in 1947. In this trial the IMT tried the fourteen defendants with:
Changed line(s) 9,11 (click to see context) from:
* Crimes against humanity on the same grounds, including slave labour charges.
* Membership of a Criminal Organization, whether the NSDA Party or SS.
* Membership of a Criminal Organization, whether the NSDA Party or SS.
to:
* Crimes against humanity on the same grounds, including slave labour labor charges.
* Membershipof in a Criminal Organization, whether the NSDA Nazi Party or SS.
* Membership
Changed line(s) 22 (click to see context) from:
* MalignedMixedMarriage: brought up in the film is the (genuine) fact that relations between Germans and Africans, and Germans and Jews, were criminalised as the act of ''Miscegenation'' in the 1935 ''Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor'' (Nuremberg Laws). The term, and laws, were derived from contemporary US State Laws which were still in effect when Film/JudgementatNuremberg was released.
to:
* MalignedMixedMarriage: brought Brought up in the film is the (genuine) fact that relations between Germans and Africans, and Germans and Jews, were criminalised criminalized as the act of ''Miscegenation'' in the 1935 ''Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor'' (Nuremberg Laws). The term, and laws, were derived from contemporary US State Laws which were still in effect when Film/JudgementatNuremberg the film was released.
Changed line(s) 25,26 (click to see context) from:
* NotSoDifferent: A standard argument employed by German nationalists and sympathisers throughout the Trials process. This is part of Rolfe's argument when trying to defend his clients on the charges of their authorizing eugenic sterilization, asking one of the accused if he can identify a judicial opinion upholding a law allowing this before he reveals it was handed down by the ''US Supreme Court'' (this was TruthInTelevision, unfortunately).
** There is a point about the "My Country, Right or Wrong" doctrine which is proclaimed by nationalists, German and American.
** There is a point about the "My Country, Right or Wrong" doctrine which is proclaimed by nationalists, German and American.
to:
* NotSoDifferent: A standard argument employed by German nationalists and sympathisers sympathizers throughout the Trials process.trials. This is part of Rolfe's argument when trying to defend his clients on the charges of their authorizing eugenic sterilization, asking one of the accused if he can identify a judicial opinion upholding a law allowing this before he reveals it was handed down by the ''US Supreme Court'' (this was TruthInTelevision, unfortunately).
** There is a point about the "MyCountry, Right country, right or Wrong" wrong" doctrine which is proclaimed by nationalists, German and American.
** There is a point about the "My
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14,15 (click to see context) from:
In the fictional version presented in the film a panel of three U.S. judges, led by Chief Judge Dan Haywood (Tracy), must decide the fate of three German judges - among them Ernst Janning (Lancaster) - who are merely accused of "collaborating with the Nazis". Robert G. Moeller has recently (2013) argued that the details of the trials process were altered to draw the greatest possible attention to the racially-divided, oppressive 'Jim Crow' policies of the USA itself at the time of its release (1961) by comparing and contrasting Nazi-German and American society and their values.
to:
In the fictional version presented in the film a panel of three U.S. judges, led by Chief Judge Dan Haywood (Tracy), must decide the fate of three German judges - among them Ernst Janning (Lancaster) - who are merely accused of "collaborating with the Nazis". Robert G. Moeller has recently (2013) argued that the details of the trials process characters and story were altered crafted to draw the greatest possible attention to the racially-divided, oppressive 'Jim Crow' policies of the USA itself at the time of its release (1961) by comparing and contrasting Nazi-German and American society policies and their values.values. The message is of course that the USA's value-differences are being betrayed by similar policies.
Changed line(s) 22 (click to see context) from:
* MalignedMixedMarriage: brought up in the film is the (genuine) fact that relations between Germans and Africans, and Germans and Jews, were criminalised as the act of ''Miscegenation'' in the 1935 ''Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor'' (Nuremberg Laws). The term, and laws, were derived from contemporary US State Laws which were still in effect when Film/JudgementAtNuremberg was released.
to:
* MalignedMixedMarriage: brought up in the film is the (genuine) fact that relations between Germans and Africans, and Germans and Jews, were criminalised as the act of ''Miscegenation'' in the 1935 ''Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor'' (Nuremberg Laws). The term, and laws, were derived from contemporary US State Laws which were still in effect when Film/JudgementAtNuremberg Film/JudgementatNuremberg was released.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14,15 (click to see context) from:
In the fictional version presented in the film a panel of three U.S. judges, led by Chief Judge Dan Haywood (Tracy), must decide the fate of three German judges - among them Ernst Janning (Lancaster) - who are merely accused of "collaborating with the Nazis". Robert G. Moeller has recently (2013) argued that the film was created to draw attention to the racially-divided, oppressive 'Jim Crow' policies of the USA itself at the time of its release (1961).
to:
In the fictional version presented in the film a panel of three U.S. judges, led by Chief Judge Dan Haywood (Tracy), must decide the fate of three German judges - among them Ernst Janning (Lancaster) - who are merely accused of "collaborating with the Nazis". Robert G. Moeller has recently (2013) argued that the film was created details of the trials process were altered to draw the greatest possible attention to the racially-divided, oppressive 'Jim Crow' policies of the USA itself at the time of its release (1961).(1961) by comparing and contrasting Nazi-German and American society and their values.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 22 (click to see context) from:
* MalignedMixedMarriage: relations between Germans and Africans, and Germans and Jews, were criminalised as the act of ''Miscegenation'' by the 1935 ''Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor'' (Nuremberg Laws). The term, and laws, were derived from contemporary US State Laws which were still in effect when the film was released.
to:
* MalignedMixedMarriage: brought up in the film is the (genuine) fact that relations between Germans and Africans, and Germans and Jews, were criminalised as the act of ''Miscegenation'' by in the 1935 ''Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor'' (Nuremberg Laws). The term, and laws, were derived from contemporary US State Laws which were still in effect when the film Film/JudgementAtNuremberg was released.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14,15 (click to see context) from:
In the fictional version presented in the film a panel of three U.S. judges, led by Chief Judge Dan Haywood (Tracy), must decide the fate of three German judges - among them Ernst Janning (Lancaster) - who are merely accused of "collaborating with the Nazis".
to:
In the fictional version presented in the film a panel of three U.S. judges, led by Chief Judge Dan Haywood (Tracy), must decide the fate of three German judges - among them Ernst Janning (Lancaster) - who are merely accused of "collaborating with the Nazis". \n Robert G. Moeller has recently (2013) argued that the film was created to draw attention to the racially-divided, oppressive 'Jim Crow' policies of the USA itself at the time of its release (1961).
Added DiffLines:
* MalignedMixedMarriage: relations between Germans and Africans, and Germans and Jews, were criminalised as the act of ''Miscegenation'' by the 1935 ''Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor'' (Nuremberg Laws). The term, and laws, were derived from contemporary US State Laws which were still in effect when the film was released.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,5 (click to see context) from:
''Judgment at Nuremberg'' is a 1961 CourtroomDrama that's BasedOnATrueStory, directed by Creator/StanleyKramer, and with an AllStarCast featuring Creator/SpencerTracy, Creator/BurtLancaster, Richard Widmark, Creator/MarleneDietrich, Maximilian Schell, Montgomery Clift, and Creator/JudyGarland.
The movie focuses on the Nuremberg trials that took place after UsefulNotes/WorldWarII, specifically on when a panel of three U.S. judges, led by Chief Judge Dan Haywood (Tracy), must decide the fate of three German judges - among them Ernst Janning (Lancaster) - who are accused of collaborating with the Nazis.
The movie focuses on the Nuremberg trials that took place after UsefulNotes/WorldWarII, specifically on when a panel of three U.S. judges, led by Chief Judge Dan Haywood (Tracy), must decide the fate of three German judges - among them Ernst Janning (Lancaster) - who are accused of collaborating with the Nazis.
to:
''Judgment at Nuremberg'' is a 1961 CourtroomDrama that's which claims to be BasedOnATrueStory, directed by Creator/StanleyKramer, and with an AllStarCast featuring Creator/SpencerTracy, Creator/BurtLancaster, Richard Widmark, Creator/MarleneDietrich, Maximilian Schell, Montgomery Clift, and Creator/JudyGarland.
The moviefocuses on presents a fictionalized version of the Nuremberg "Judges' Trial" at of the Franco-Anglo-American-Soviet International Military Tribunal (IMT) trials that took place at Nuremberg in 1947. In this trial the IMT tried the fourteen defendants with:
* Participating in a common plan or conspiracy to commit war crimes and [[UsefulNotes/TheHolocaust crimes against humanity]].
* War crimes through the abuse of the judicial and penal process, resulting in mass murder, torture, and plunder of private property.
* Crimes against humanity on the same grounds, including slave labour charges.
* Membership of a Criminal Organization, whether the NSDA Party or SS.
All were acquitted or released from prison by 1956, and afterUsefulNotes/WorldWarII, specifically 1958 they and their colleagues tried themselves for various petty crimes (lying, theft) committed under the Nazi regime. They acquitted themselves on when all counts.
In the fictional version presented in the film a panel of three U.S. judges, led by Chief Judge Dan Haywood (Tracy), must decide the fate of three German judges - among them Ernst Janning (Lancaster) - who are merely accused ofcollaborating "collaborating with the Nazis.Nazis".
The movie
* Participating in a common plan or conspiracy to commit war crimes and [[UsefulNotes/TheHolocaust crimes against humanity]].
* War crimes through the abuse of the judicial and penal process, resulting in mass murder, torture, and plunder of private property.
* Crimes against humanity on the same grounds, including slave labour charges.
* Membership of a Criminal Organization, whether the NSDA Party or SS.
All were acquitted or released from prison by 1956, and after
In the fictional version presented in the film a panel of three U.S. judges, led by Chief Judge Dan Haywood (Tracy), must decide the fate of three German judges - among them Ernst Janning (Lancaster) - who are merely accused of
Changed line(s) 14,15 (click to see context) from:
* NotSoDifferent: This is part of Rolfe's argument when trying to defend his clients on the charges of their authorizing eugenic sterilization, asking one of the accused if he can identify a judicial opinion upholding a law allowing this before he reveals it was handed down by the ''US Supreme Court'' (this was TruthInTelevision, unfortunately).
** There is a point about the "My Country, Right or Wrong" philosophy which is believed by staunch Patriots, both German and American.
** There is a point about the "My Country, Right or Wrong" philosophy which is believed by staunch Patriots, both German and American.
to:
* NotSoDifferent: A standard argument employed by German nationalists and sympathisers throughout the Trials process. This is part of Rolfe's argument when trying to defend his clients on the charges of their authorizing eugenic sterilization, asking one of the accused if he can identify a judicial opinion upholding a law allowing this before he reveals it was handed down by the ''US Supreme Court'' (this was TruthInTelevision, unfortunately).
** There is a point about the "My Country, Right or Wrong"philosophy doctrine which is believed proclaimed by staunch Patriots, both nationalists, German and American.American.
** There is a point about the "My Country, Right or Wrong"
Changed line(s) 18 (click to see context) from:
* VeryLooselyBasedOnATrueStory: Well, there ''were'' war crimes trials at Nuremberg, including one for judges, but every character and all the stories in this film are fictional. Ernst Janning is a composite of three different judges who were tried. Also, the real Judges' Trial took place in 1947, but the film moves it to 1948 so that it can happen against the backdrop of [[UsefulNotes/HistoryOfTheColdWar the communist coup in Czechoslovakia and the Berlin Blockade]].
to:
* VeryLooselyBasedOnATrueStory: Well, there ''were'' war crimes trials at Nuremberg, including one for judges, ''was'' a judges' trial, but every character and all every detail of the stories in this film are trial process is fictional. Ernst Janning is a composite of three different judges who were tried. Also, the real Judges' Trial took place in 1947, but the film moves it to 1948 so that it can happen against the backdrop of [[UsefulNotes/HistoryOfTheColdWar the communist coup in Czechoslovakia and the Berlin Blockade]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 18 (click to see context) :
* UnintentionalPeriodPiece: The movie's parting words -- "The Nuremberg trials held in the American Zone ended July 14, 1949. There were 99 defendants sentenced to prison terms. Not one is still serving his sentence." -- meant something to the audiences of 1961. A modern audience has to put themselves in that time frame or else their reaction will be, "Duh, they're all dead by now."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* UnintentionalPeriodPiece: The movie's parting words -- "The Nuremberg trials held in the American Zone ended July 14, 1949. There were 99 defendants sentenced to prison terms. Not one is still serving his sentence." -- meant something to the audiences of 1961. A modern audience has to put themselves in that time frame or else their reaction will be, "Duh, they're all dead by now."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 18 (click to see context) from:
* VeryLooselyBasedOnATrueStory: Well, there ''were'' war crimes trials at Nuremberg, including one for judges, but every character and all the stories in this film are fictional. Ernst Janning is a composite of three different judges who were tried. Also, the real trial took place in 1947, but the film moves it to 1948 so that it can happen against the backdrop of [[UsefulNotes/HistoryOfTheColdWar the communist coup in Czechoslovakia and the Berlin Blockade]].
to:
* VeryLooselyBasedOnATrueStory: Well, there ''were'' war crimes trials at Nuremberg, including one for judges, but every character and all the stories in this film are fictional. Ernst Janning is a composite of three different judges who were tried. Also, the real trial Judges' Trial took place in 1947, but the film moves it to 1948 so that it can happen against the backdrop of [[UsefulNotes/HistoryOfTheColdWar the communist coup in Czechoslovakia and the Berlin Blockade]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 18 (click to see context) from:
* VeryLooselyBasedOnATrueStory: Well, there ''were'' war crimes trials at Nuremberg, including one for judges, but every character and all the stories in this film are fictional. Ernst Janning is a composite of three different judges who were tried. Also, the real trial took place in 1947, but the film moves it to 1948 so that it can happen against the backdrop of the communist coup in Czechoslovakia and the Berlin Blockade.
to:
* VeryLooselyBasedOnATrueStory: Well, there ''were'' war crimes trials at Nuremberg, including one for judges, but every character and all the stories in this film are fictional. Ernst Janning is a composite of three different judges who were tried. Also, the real trial took place in 1947, but the film moves it to 1948 so that it can happen against the backdrop of [[UsefulNotes/HistoryOfTheColdWar the communist coup in Czechoslovakia and the Berlin Blockade.Blockade]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 18 (click to see context) from:
* VeryLooselyBasedOnATrueStory: Well, there ''were'' war crimes trials at Nuremberg, including one for judges, but every character and all the stories in this film are fictional. Ernst Janning is a composite of three different judges who were tried.
to:
* VeryLooselyBasedOnATrueStory: Well, there ''were'' war crimes trials at Nuremberg, including one for judges, but every character and all the stories in this film are fictional. Ernst Janning is a composite of three different judges who were tried. Also, the real trial took place in 1947, but the film moves it to 1948 so that it can happen against the backdrop of the communist coup in Czechoslovakia and the Berlin Blockade.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Useful Notes pages are not to be listed as tropes.
Deleted line(s) 9 (click to see context) :
* UsefulNotes/AcademyAward: Schell won the Best Actor Oscar, and the script also won. The film was nominated for 11 awards total.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
'''''Judgment at Nuremberg''''' is a 1961 CourtroomDrama that's BasedOnATrueStory, directed by Creator/StanleyKramer, and with an AllStarCast featuring Creator/SpencerTracy, Creator/BurtLancaster, Richard Widmark, Creator/MarleneDietrich, Maximilian Schell, Montgomery Clift, and Creator/JudyGarland.
to:
''Judgment at
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
* AcademyAward: Schell won the Best Actor Oscar, and the script also won. The film was nominated for 11 awards total.
to:
* AcademyAward: UsefulNotes/AcademyAward: Schell won the Best Actor Oscar, and the script also won. The film was nominated for 11 awards total.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
* MyCountryRightOrWrong: Leads to a NotSoDifferent argument, and Janning's HeelRealization.
Deleted line(s) 12 (click to see context) :
* MyCountryRightOrWrong: Leads to a NotSoDifferent argument, and Janning's HeelRealization.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* HangingJudge: Janning plays with this.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* MyCountryRightOrWrong: Leads to a NotSoDifferent argument, and Janning's HeelRealization.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* VeryLooselyBasedOnATrueStory: Well, there ''were'' war crimes trials at Nuremberg, including one for judges, but every character and all the stories in this film are fictional.
to:
* VeryLooselyBasedOnATrueStory: Well, there ''were'' war crimes trials at Nuremberg, including one for judges, but every character and all the stories in this film are fictional. Ernst Janning is a composite of three different judges who were tried.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
''Judgment At Nuremberg'' is a 1961 CourtroomDrama that's BasedOnATrueStory, directed by Creator/StanleyKramer, and with an AllStarCast featuring Creator/SpencerTracy, Creator/BurtLancaster, Richard Widmark, Creator/MarleneDietrich, Maximilian Schell, Montgomery Clift, and Creator/JudyGarland.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** There is a point about the "My Country, Right or Wrong" philosophy which is believed by staunch Patriots, both German and American.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
* NotSoDifferent: This is part of Rolfe's argument when trying to defend his clients on the charges of their authorizing eugenic sterilization, asking one of the accused if he can identify a judicial opinion upholding a law allowing this before he reveals it was handed down by the ''US Supreme Court'' (TruthInTelevision).
to:
* NotSoDifferent: This is part of Rolfe's argument when trying to defend his clients on the charges of their authorizing eugenic sterilization, asking one of the accused if he can identify a judicial opinion upholding a law allowing this before he reveals it was handed down by the ''US Supreme Court'' (TruthInTelevision).(this was TruthInTelevision, unfortunately).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
* NotSoDifferent: This is part of Rolfe's argument when trying to plead his case specifically on the charge relating to eugenic sterilization, asking one of the accused if he can identify a judicial opinion upholding a law allowing this before he reveals it was handed down by the ''US Supreme Court'' in the case of ''Buck vs. Bell'' (TruthInTelevision).
to:
* NotSoDifferent: This is part of Rolfe's argument when trying to plead defend his case specifically clients on the charge relating to charges of their authorizing eugenic sterilization, asking one of the accused if he can identify a judicial opinion upholding a law allowing this before he reveals it was handed down by the ''US Supreme Court'' in the case of ''Buck vs. Bell'' (TruthInTelevision).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
* NotSoDifferent: This is part of Rolfe's argument when trying to plead Janning's case, that some of his decisions (especially involving Judy Garland's character, who allegedly had sexual relations with a Jewish man, and Montgomery Clift's character, whose mother was thrown into a concentration camp for being feeble-minded) were no different than prominent U.S. judges such as Oliver Wendell Holmes.
to:
* NotSoDifferent: This is part of Rolfe's argument when trying to plead Janning's case, that some of his decisions (especially involving Judy Garland's character, who allegedly had sexual relations with case specifically on the charge relating to eugenic sterilization, asking one of the accused if he can identify a Jewish man, and Montgomery Clift's character, whose mother judicial opinion upholding a law allowing this before he reveals it was thrown into a concentration camp for being feeble-minded) were no different than prominent U.S. judges such as Oliver Wendell Holmes.handed down by the ''US Supreme Court'' in the case of ''Buck vs. Bell'' (TruthInTelevision).
Deleted line(s) 13 (click to see context) :
* StarMakingRole: For Maximilian Schell, who'd only done a few German films and a bit part in ''The Young Lions'' previously.
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* VeryLooselyBasedOnATrueStory: Well, there ''were'' war crimes trials at Nuremberg, but every character and all the stories in this film are fictional.
to:
* VeryLooselyBasedOnATrueStory: Well, there ''were'' war crimes trials at Nuremberg, including one for judges, but every character and all the stories in this film are fictional.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* StarMakingRole: For Maximilian Schell, who'd only done a few German films and a bit part in ''The Young Lions'' previously.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* VeryLooselyBasedOnATrueStory: Well, there ''were'' war crimes trials at Nuremberg, but every character and all the stories in this film are fictional.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Deleted line(s) 9,11 (click to see context) :
* DoingItForTheArt: Most of the actors involved did the movie for a fraction of their salary because they believed in the importance of the subject matter.
* EnforcedMethodActing: Clift had a hard time remembering his lines, so Kramer allowed him to ad lib, which ends up adding to the frailty of the character.
* FakeNationality: Judy Garland and Montgomery Clift play Germans.
* EnforcedMethodActing: Clift had a hard time remembering his lines, so Kramer allowed him to ad lib, which ends up adding to the frailty of the character.
* FakeNationality: Judy Garland and Montgomery Clift play Germans.
Deleted line(s) 13,15 (click to see context) :
* HeyItsThatGuy:
** Creator/WilliamShatner is Judge Haywood's aide.
** [[Series/HogansHeroes Colonel Klink]] is one of the German judges on trial.
** Creator/WilliamShatner is Judge Haywood's aide.
** [[Series/HogansHeroes Colonel Klink]] is one of the German judges on trial.
Deleted line(s) 18 (click to see context) :
* PlayingAgainstType: Marlene Dietrich, who in real life was passionately anti-Nazi, playing a character who claims the Germans didn't know the full extent of what they'd done. Dietrich reportedly found scenes where she espoused that viewpoint hard to film.
Deleted line(s) 21,23 (click to see context) :
* WhatCouldHaveBeen:
** Creator/MarlonBrando was very interested in the part of Rolfe, and Kramer was interested in using him, but when he saw Schell's performance in the original TV version, Kramer and writer Abby Mann decided on using Schell instead.
** Creator/LaurenceOlivier was considered for Ernst Janning.
** Creator/MarlonBrando was very interested in the part of Rolfe, and Kramer was interested in using him, but when he saw Schell's performance in the original TV version, Kramer and writer Abby Mann decided on using Schell instead.
** Creator/LaurenceOlivier was considered for Ernst Janning.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Formatting.
Changed line(s) 4,6 (click to see context) from:
This film contains examples of:
to:
!! This film contains examples of:
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
* HeyItsThatGuy: Creator/WilliamShatner is Judge Haywood's aide.
to:
* HeyItsThatGuy: HeyItsThatGuy:
** Creator/WilliamShatner is Judge Haywood's aide.
** Creator/WilliamShatner is Judge Haywood's aide.
Changed line(s) 20,21 (click to see context) from:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Creator/MarlonBrando was very interested in the part of Rolfe, and Kramer was interested in using him, but when he saw Schell's performance in the original TV version, Kramer and writer Abby Mann decided on using Schell instead.
** Creator/LaurenceOlivier was considered for Ernst Janning.
** Creator/LaurenceOlivier was considered for Ernst Janning.
to:
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: WhatCouldHaveBeen:
** Creator/MarlonBrando was very interested in the part of Rolfe, and Kramer was interested in using him, but when he saw Schell's performance in the original TV version, Kramer and writer Abby Mann decided on using Schell instead.
** Creator/LaurenceOlivier was considered for ErnstJanning.Janning.
----
** Creator/MarlonBrando was very interested in the part of Rolfe, and Kramer was interested in using him, but when he saw Schell's performance in the original TV version, Kramer and writer Abby Mann decided on using Schell instead.
** Creator/LaurenceOlivier was considered for Ernst
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
* DoingItForTheArt: Most of the actors involved did the movie for a fraction of their salary because they believed in the importance of the subject matter.
* NotSoDifferent: This is part of Rolfe's argument when trying to plead Janning's case, that some of his decisions (especially involving Judy Garland's character, who allegedly had sexual relations with a Jewish man, and Montgomery Clift's character, whose mother was thrown into a concentration camp for being feeble-minded) were no different than prominent U.S. judges such as Oliver Wendell Holmes.
* PlayingAgainstType: Marlene Dietrich, who in real life was passionately anti-Nazi, playing a character who claims the Germans didn't know the full extent of what they'd done. Dietrich reportedly found scenes where she espoused that viewpoint hard to film.
* PlayingAgainstType: Marlene Dietrich, who in real life was passionately anti-Nazi, playing a character who claims the Germans didn't know the full extent of what they'd done. Dietrich reportedly found scenes where she espoused that viewpoint hard to film.
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
* TranslationConvention: All of the German characters speak German at the beginning of the trial, with translation provided (and the judges and attorneys wearing headsets), until Kramer cuts to a close-up of Rolfe speaking. As he pulls back the camera, Rolfe starts speaking English, and from then on, so do the other German characters.
to:
* TranslationConvention: All of the German characters speak German at the beginning of the trial, with translation provided (and the judges and attorneys wearing headsets), until Kramer cuts to a close-up of Rolfe speaking. As he pulls back the camera, Rolfe starts speaking English, and from then on, so do the other German characters.characters.
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Creator/MarlonBrando was very interested in the part of Rolfe, and Kramer was interested in using him, but when he saw Schell's performance in the original TV version, Kramer and writer Abby Mann decided on using Schell instead.
** Creator/LaurenceOlivier was considered for Ernst Janning.
* WhatCouldHaveBeen: Creator/MarlonBrando was very interested in the part of Rolfe, and Kramer was interested in using him, but when he saw Schell's performance in the original TV version, Kramer and writer Abby Mann decided on using Schell instead.
** Creator/LaurenceOlivier was considered for Ernst Janning.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
* FakeGerman: Judy Garland and Montgomery Clift play Germans.
to:
* FakeGerman: FakeNationality: Judy Garland and Montgomery Clift play Germans.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
''Judgment At Nuremberg'' is a 1961 CourtroomDrama that's BasedOnATrueStory, directed by Creator/StanleyKramer, and with an AllStarCast featuring Creator/SpencerTracy, Creator/BurtLancaster, Richard Widmark, Creator/MarleneDietrich, Maximilian Schell, Montgomery Clift, and Creator/JudyGarland.
The movie focuses on the Nuremberg trials that took place after UsefulNotes/WorldWarII, specifically on when a panel of three U.S. judges, led by Chief Judge Dan Haywood (Tracy), must decide the fate of three German judges - among them Ernst Janning (Lancaster) - who are accused of collaborating with the Nazis.
This film contains examples of:
* AcademyAward: Schell won the Best Actor Oscar, and the script also won. The film was nominated for 11 awards total.
* BigShutUp: Janning does this to Rolfe as he's badgering Irene Hoffman on the stand.
* EnforcedMethodActing: Clift had a hard time remembering his lines, so Kramer allowed him to ad lib, which ends up adding to the frailty of the character.
* FakeGerman: Judy Garland and Montgomery Clift play Germans.
* HeroicBSOD: Col. Lawson, after Rolfe destroys Rudolph Peterson on the stand.
* HeyItsThatGuy: Creator/WilliamShatner is Judge Haywood's aide.
** [[Series/HogansHeroes Colonel Klink]] is one of the German judges on trial.
* NaziNobleman: Mrs. Bertholt describes her late husband as this.
* PunchClockVillain: Rolfe tries to argue the German judges, especially Janning, were this. Naturally, Lawson doesn't agree.
* TranslationConvention: All of the German characters speak German at the beginning of the trial, with translation provided (and the judges and attorneys wearing headsets), until Kramer cuts to a close-up of Rolfe speaking. As he pulls back the camera, Rolfe starts speaking English, and from then on, so do the other German characters.
The movie focuses on the Nuremberg trials that took place after UsefulNotes/WorldWarII, specifically on when a panel of three U.S. judges, led by Chief Judge Dan Haywood (Tracy), must decide the fate of three German judges - among them Ernst Janning (Lancaster) - who are accused of collaborating with the Nazis.
This film contains examples of:
* AcademyAward: Schell won the Best Actor Oscar, and the script also won. The film was nominated for 11 awards total.
* BigShutUp: Janning does this to Rolfe as he's badgering Irene Hoffman on the stand.
* EnforcedMethodActing: Clift had a hard time remembering his lines, so Kramer allowed him to ad lib, which ends up adding to the frailty of the character.
* FakeGerman: Judy Garland and Montgomery Clift play Germans.
* HeroicBSOD: Col. Lawson, after Rolfe destroys Rudolph Peterson on the stand.
* HeyItsThatGuy: Creator/WilliamShatner is Judge Haywood's aide.
** [[Series/HogansHeroes Colonel Klink]] is one of the German judges on trial.
* NaziNobleman: Mrs. Bertholt describes her late husband as this.
* PunchClockVillain: Rolfe tries to argue the German judges, especially Janning, were this. Naturally, Lawson doesn't agree.
* TranslationConvention: All of the German characters speak German at the beginning of the trial, with translation provided (and the judges and attorneys wearing headsets), until Kramer cuts to a close-up of Rolfe speaking. As he pulls back the camera, Rolfe starts speaking English, and from then on, so do the other German characters.