Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* EvilRedhead: While there are specific negative traits associated with red hair in media, in practice the page is another case of "attribute + another attribute = trope," with examples having little correlation with the actual superstitions and stereotypes associated with red hair. [[Sandbox/EvilRedheadWickCheck Wick check here]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 344 (click to see context) from:
* SpinOffCookbook: A tie-in book to a work with recipes to the food the appeared in it is usually a form of ContinuityPorn, which is objective. The description also mentions that the cookbook is often in-universe; even examples of books that aren't are usually written by work's food stylist, who would be a TechnicalAdvisor. Mere spin-off cookbooks' existence a la LiveOnStage isn't exactly noteworthy for these reasons, so it's likely worth redefining. *
to:
* SpinOffCookbook: A tie-in book to a work with recipes to the food the that appeared in it is usually a form of ContinuityPorn, which is objective. The description also mentions that the cookbook is often in-universe; even examples of books that aren't are usually written by work's food stylist, who would be a TechnicalAdvisor. Mere spin-off cookbooks' existence a la LiveOnStage isn't exactly noteworthy for these reasons, so it's likely worth redefining. *
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 344 (click to see context) from:
* SpinOffCookbook: A tie-in book to a work with recipes to the food the appeared in it is usually a form of ContinuityPorn, which is objective. The description also mentions that the cookbook is often in-universe; even examples of books that aren't are usually written by work's food stylist, who would be a TechnicalAdvisor. Mere spin-off cookbooks' existence a la LiveOnStage isn't exactly noteworthy for these reasons, so it's likely worth redefining.
to:
* SpinOffCookbook: A tie-in book to a work with recipes to the food the appeared in it is usually a form of ContinuityPorn, which is objective. The description also mentions that the cookbook is often in-universe; even examples of books that aren't are usually written by work's food stylist, who would be a TechnicalAdvisor. Mere spin-off cookbooks' existence a la LiveOnStage isn't exactly noteworthy for these reasons, so it's likely worth redefining. *
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moving this to misc, since looking back the core concept seems very much Trivia
Deleted line(s) 342 (click to see context) :
* PropRecycling: Unlike RecycledSet (involving behind-the-scenes budget restraints), the concept of an initially work-specific single prop becoming more widely used is often a {{homage}} to the previous work, and many on-page examples call this out in-universe anyway. Even when budget restraints necessitate redecorating of the prop, it's in an ''interactive'' sense with the audience/characters: cameos and WholeCostumeReference respectively. Toys and Advertising are obvious exceptions, which likely ''is'' a genuine Trivia concept, but it would need to be split.
Added DiffLines:
* SpinOffCookbook: A tie-in book to a work with recipes to the food the appeared in it is usually a form of ContinuityPorn, which is objective. The description also mentions that the cookbook is often in-universe; even examples of books that aren't are usually written by work's food stylist, who would be a TechnicalAdvisor. Mere spin-off cookbooks' existence a la LiveOnStage isn't exactly noteworthy for these reasons, so it's likely worth redefining.
Added DiffLines:
* PropRecycling: Unlike RecycledSet (involving behind-the-scenes budget restraints), the concept of an initially work-specific single prop becoming more widely used is often a {{homage}} to the previous work, and many on-page examples call this out in-universe anyway. Even when budget restraints necessitate redecorating of the prop, it's in an ''interactive'' sense with the audience/characters: cameos and WholeCostumeReference respectively. Toys and Advertising are obvious exceptions, which likely ''is'' a genuine Trivia concept, but it would need to be split. *
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Open TRS thread
Deleted line(s) 28 (click to see context) :
* BeneathTheEarth: It's supposed to be about cities or societies underneath the earth. Predictably, it gets mistaken for just about anything living underneath the earth, such as big monsters (which is not helped by the image). Has a wick check [[Sandbox/BeneathTheEarthWickCheck here]].
