Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Administrivia / BluenoseBowdlerizer

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Locked page
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
You need to do this to show more than three asterisks.


'''insomniacdude007:''' *** censorship

to:

'''insomniacdude007:''' *** [=***=][=*=] censorship
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
New namespace


Not every troper who removes a few curse words is one of these, though. Sometimes vulgar words are [[ObligatorySwearing gratuitously inserted]] into articles, making them come off as immature. Removing such words when used inappropriately is encouraged on this wiki, especially since Administrivia/TheGoogleIncident.

to:

Not every troper who removes a few curse words is one of these, though. Sometimes vulgar words are [[ObligatorySwearing gratuitously inserted]] into articles, making them come off as immature. Removing such words when used inappropriately is encouraged on this wiki, especially since Administrivia/TheGoogleIncident.Archive/TheGoogleIncident.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''insomniacdude007:''' *** censorship

to:

'''insomniacdude007:''' *** **** censorship
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


On the other hand, replacing them with asterisks or other symbols [[Administrivia/NoLewdnessNoPrudishness is discouraged]] and a bannable offense if done repeatedly. This includes the use of a so-called Net Nanny or Nannybot, automated programs that do the censoring while editing and are just as undesirable as "symbol-substituting" Bowdlerising. Especially because of the ScunthorpeProblem; said filters would break links like, well, ScunthorpeProblem.

to:

On the other hand, replacing them with asterisks or other symbols [[Administrivia/NoLewdnessNoPrudishness is discouraged]] and a bannable offense if done repeatedly. This includes the use of a so-called Net Nanny or Nannybot, automated programs that do the censoring while editing and are just as undesirable as "symbol-substituting" Bowdlerising. Especially because of the ScunthorpeProblem; ScunthorpeProblem, said filters would break links like, well, ScunthorpeProblem.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''insomniacdude007:''' *** censorship

to:

'''insomniacdude007:''' *** **** censorship
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


->'''steve:''' whats your opinion on censorship
->'''insomniacdude007:''' [[HypocriticalHumor *** censorship]]

to:

->'''steve:''' whats your opinion on censorship
->'''insomniacdude007:''' [[HypocriticalHumor
censorship\\
'''insomniacdude007:'''
*** censorship]]censorship
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


->'''insomniacdude007:''' [[BoomerangBigot *** censorship]]

to:

->'''insomniacdude007:''' [[BoomerangBigot [[HypocriticalHumor *** censorship]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moved to Administrivia/ per TRS


!!Tropes listed in the WikiTropes index are being discussed at the Administrivia/TropeRepairShop. Click the link [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1618086045064904400&page=1#1 here]] to join the discussion.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

!!Tropes listed in the WikiTropes index are being discussed at the Administrivia/TropeRepairShop. Click the link [[https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1618086045064904400&page=1#1 here]] to join the discussion.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


->'''insomniacdude007:''' *** censorship

to:

->'''insomniacdude007:''' [[BoomerangBigot *** censorshipcensorship]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



Not to be confused with that sailboat that's on the {{Canad|aEh}}ian dime, the Stan Rogers song about said sailboat, or the denizens of Nova Scotia, UsefulNotes/{{Canad|ianHistory}}a (known as 'Bluenoses' since the late 18th century). Nor to be confused with sailors who have [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line-crossing_ceremony crossed into the arctic circle]] for the first time or ardent supporters of Rangers F.C. Also not to be confused with [[Manga/OnePiece a certain]] [[WesternAnimation/RudolphTheRedNosedReindeer Rudolph]] {{expy}}, or a character from ''WesternAnimation/{{TUGS}}'' or ''WesternAnimation/TheodoreTugboat''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


See {{Bowdlerise}}, MoralGuardians, CulturePolice and ScunthorpeProblem. Compare CensoredForComedy. Part of the "No Prudishness" rule in Administrivia/NoLewdnessNoPrudishness.

to:

See {{Bowdlerise}}, ProfanityPolice, MoralGuardians, CulturePolice and ScunthorpeProblem. Compare CensoredForComedy. Part of the "No Prudishness" rule in Administrivia/NoLewdnessNoPrudishness.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


A wiki [[WikiVandal "contributor"]] who does nothing but [[TWordEuphemism censor words]] they find offensive.[[Administrivia/RightingGreatWrongs Neither the circumstances nor the standards of the rest of the wiki matter]] to the Bluenose -- if they think a word is the least bit "naughty", it gets excised. Reasonably intelligent censors will actually go through the effort of rewriting the passage so that the offending terms are no longer needed, but the far more common simpleminded variety will merely replace all but the first letter of the "bad word" with asterisks, use spoiler font, or "safe" [[GoshDangItToHeck anti-swearwords]]. They may also simply delete the offending words and go their merry way without checking that the resulting text makes sense without what was removed. In short, they are rather [[SelfDemonstratingArticle #$¢%ing]] stupid.

to:

A wiki [[WikiVandal "contributor"]] who does nothing but [[TWordEuphemism censor words]] they find offensive. [[Administrivia/RightingGreatWrongs Neither the circumstances nor the standards of the rest of the wiki matter]] to the Bluenose -- if they think a word is the least bit "naughty", it gets excised. Reasonably intelligent censors will actually go through the effort of rewriting the passage so that the offending terms are no longer needed, but the far more common simpleminded variety will merely replace all but the first letter of the "bad word" with asterisks, use spoiler font, or "safe" [[GoshDangItToHeck anti-swearwords]]. They may also simply delete the offending words and go their merry way without checking that the resulting text makes sense without what was removed. In short, they are rather [[SelfDemonstratingArticle #$¢%ing]] stupid.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moral Guardians is already on page.


A wiki [[WikiVandal "contributor"]] who does nothing but [[TWordEuphemism censor words]] they find offensive. The “contributor” could be one of the MoralGuardians, due to probably the kids coming on the page. [[Administrivia/RightingGreatWrongs Neither the circumstances nor the standards of the rest of the wiki matter]] to the Bluenose -- if they think a word is the least bit "naughty", it gets excised. Reasonably intelligent censors will actually go through the effort of rewriting the passage so that the offending terms are no longer needed, but the far more common simpleminded variety will merely replace all but the first letter of the "bad word" with asterisks, use spoiler font, or "safe" [[GoshDangItToHeck anti-swearwords]]. They may also simply delete the offending words and go their merry way without checking that the resulting text makes sense without what was removed. In short, they are rather [[SelfDemonstratingArticle #$¢%ing]] stupid.

to:

A wiki [[WikiVandal "contributor"]] who does nothing but [[TWordEuphemism censor words]] they find offensive. The “contributor” could be one of the MoralGuardians, due to probably the kids coming on the page. [[Administrivia/RightingGreatWrongs Neither the circumstances nor the standards of the rest of the wiki matter]] to the Bluenose -- if they think a word is the least bit "naughty", it gets excised. Reasonably intelligent censors will actually go through the effort of rewriting the passage so that the offending terms are no longer needed, but the far more common simpleminded variety will merely replace all but the first letter of the "bad word" with asterisks, use spoiler font, or "safe" [[GoshDangItToHeck anti-swearwords]]. They may also simply delete the offending words and go their merry way without checking that the resulting text makes sense without what was removed. In short, they are rather [[SelfDemonstratingArticle #$¢%ing]] stupid.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moral Guardians are an example, but the trope’s already on that page. I’m adding it because some bluenose bowlderizer might be a moral guardian.


A wiki [[WikiVandal "contributor"]] who does nothing but [[TWordEuphemism censor words]] they find offensive. [[Administrivia/RightingGreatWrongs Neither the circumstances nor the standards of the rest of the wiki matter]] to the Bluenose -- if they think a word is the least bit "naughty", it gets excised. Reasonably intelligent censors will actually go through the effort of rewriting the passage so that the offending terms are no longer needed, but the far more common simpleminded variety will merely replace all but the first letter of the "bad word" with asterisks, use spoiler font, or "safe" [[GoshDangItToHeck anti-swearwords]]. They may also simply delete the offending words and go their merry way without checking that the resulting text makes sense without what was removed. In short, they are rather [[SelfDemonstratingArticle #$¢%ing]] stupid.

to:

A wiki [[WikiVandal "contributor"]] who does nothing but [[TWordEuphemism censor words]] they find offensive. The “contributor” could be one of the MoralGuardians, due to probably the kids coming on the page. [[Administrivia/RightingGreatWrongs Neither the circumstances nor the standards of the rest of the wiki matter]] to the Bluenose -- if they think a word is the least bit "naughty", it gets excised. Reasonably intelligent censors will actually go through the effort of rewriting the passage so that the offending terms are no longer needed, but the far more common simpleminded variety will merely replace all but the first letter of the "bad word" with asterisks, use spoiler font, or "safe" [[GoshDangItToHeck anti-swearwords]]. They may also simply delete the offending words and go their merry way without checking that the resulting text makes sense without what was removed. In short, they are rather [[SelfDemonstratingArticle #$¢%ing]] stupid.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


A wiki [[WikiVandal "contributor"]] who does nothing but [[TWordEuphemism censor words]] they find offensive. [[Administrivia/RightingGreatWrongs Neither the circumstances nor the standards of the rest of the wiki matter]] to the Bluenose -- if they think a word is the least bit "naughty", it gets excised. Reasonably intelligent censors will actually go through the effort of rewriting the passage so that the offending terms are no longer needed, but the far more common simpleminded variety will merely replace all but the first letter of the "bad word" with asterisks, use spoiler font, or [[NonIndicativeName "safe"]] [[GoshdangItToHeck anti-swearwords]]. They may also simply delete the offending words and go their merry way without checking that the resulting text makes sense without what was removed. In short, they are rather [[SelfDemonstratingArticle #$¢%ing]] stupid.

to:

A wiki [[WikiVandal "contributor"]] who does nothing but [[TWordEuphemism censor words]] they find offensive. [[Administrivia/RightingGreatWrongs Neither the circumstances nor the standards of the rest of the wiki matter]] to the Bluenose -- if they think a word is the least bit "naughty", it gets excised. Reasonably intelligent censors will actually go through the effort of rewriting the passage so that the offending terms are no longer needed, but the far more common simpleminded variety will merely replace all but the first letter of the "bad word" with asterisks, use spoiler font, or [[NonIndicativeName "safe"]] [[GoshdangItToHeck "safe" [[GoshDangItToHeck anti-swearwords]]. They may also simply delete the offending words and go their merry way without checking that the resulting text makes sense without what was removed. In short, they are rather [[SelfDemonstratingArticle #$¢%ing]] stupid.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The quote was wrong


->'''insomniacdude007:''' *** censorship

to:

->'''insomniacdude007:''' *** **** censorship
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


On the other hand, replacing them with asterisks or other symbols [[Administrivia/NoLewdnessNoPrudishness is discouraged]] and a bannable offense if done repeatedly. This includes the use of a so-called Net Nanny or Nannybot, automated programs that do the censoring while editing and are just as undesirable as "symbol-substituting" Bowdlerising.

to:

On the other hand, replacing them with asterisks or other symbols [[Administrivia/NoLewdnessNoPrudishness is discouraged]] and a bannable offense if done repeatedly. This includes the use of a so-called Net Nanny or Nannybot, automated programs that do the censoring while editing and are just as undesirable as "symbol-substituting" Bowdlerising.
Bowdlerising. Especially because of the ScunthorpeProblem; said filters would break links like, well, ScunthorpeProblem.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


->'''insomniacdude007:''' ***

to:

->'''insomniacdude007:''' ******* censorship
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Page quotes should not have potholes


->'''insomniacdude007:''' [[HypocriticalHumor *** censorship]]

to:

->'''insomniacdude007:''' [[HypocriticalHumor *** censorship]]****
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


->'''insomniacdude007:''' *** censorship

to:

->'''insomniacdude007:''' [[HypocriticalHumor *** censorshipcensorship]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


->'''insomniacdude007:''' *** censorship

to:

->'''insomniacdude007:''' *** **** censorship

Top