I question the applicability of Darkness-Induced Audience Apathy to the game. It was cut before reasoning that the players actions made a decisive, positive difference and the villain gets defeated and all the damage undone, thus you Earn Your Happy Ending. Should we cut it? Or add how hard it is for some player to stay interested in the face of such bleakness?
Hide / Show Replies
It seems like a trope misuse to me, anyway.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
I noticed that majora's mask's complete monster section was cut out and I understand that it was some spam in that section but I still believe majora's mask is still to be considered to be a complete monster due to the many atrocious things it did like turnning link into a deku, turning Kafei into a child mere days before his wedding, and above all else tried to send the moon crashing down to the world, thus would have destroyed the land, all of which was done for the evulz. When was done possessing the skull kid, the latter which thought of the mask at a friend the mask tried to kill him and thought of him as little more than a puppet. It's because of these things and many other reasons that I haven't listed that we should we should consider bringing back Majora's complete monster section if any object or agree please reply
Edited by G-Editor Hide / Show Replies
Em, please use proper grammar and spelling.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
yeah I just notice that now but I w to ask do you think majora's mask is a complete monster
Yes. The forum thread
excluded Majora though.
Why? The villains wiki still considered Majora to be a complete monster even after the forum excluded it. I'm not complaining or anything, I just want to know why so I could have a better understanding. After all Majora has done some pretty messed up things simply for fun. Is there something that I missed?
Edited by G-Editor
Ah, but you see, the Villains Wiki's definition doesn't have to match ours. Nor do we have to agree with them.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
I went to check on the forum, I seem to have a better understanding of the original definition, complete monster, and I could see why the forum excluded Majora as a complete monster. It's just that Majora's Mask is consider by all to be one of the darkest Legend of Zelda titles ever made and Majora is consider by TV tropes to be a Knight of Cerebrus who does thing for the Evulz, so it made me wonder why his label as a CM got removed. So I checked the forum to see the discussions about whether or not Majora was to be considered as such and found out the reason why the forum made that decision to remove the label. Thank you for clearing my understanding
I just have one more question. Do you believe Majora to be a Complete monster?
King Ikana's entry under That One Boss is super overblown and exaggerated. I'd like to just move his breath attack to That One Attack and nix the rest of that entry, if no one else objects.
Hide / Show Replies
No objections here
Souleye - PPPPPP - Potential for Anything 3DS FC: 2621-3105-8671
I swear, someone will put the 3DS remake in Porting Disaster nowadays because of the things they don't like about it and because of that one You Tube video made by a guy who uses bias and out-of-context quotes to make himself look credible.