I'm going to add my voices to the people saying we need to make the page a bit more neutral and update it to reflect the fact that she, unfortunately, lost to Donald Trump.
Hide / Show Replies
She won the popular vote by a margin bigger than most other currently governing heads of government in the world when measured by number of votes.
But unfortunately that counts for nothing,
A basic update of facts, i.e. that she won the popular vote by a margin of 3 million votes but lost via electoral college should be neutral enough.
As far as neutrality and keeping up with current events goes, they're still sticking with "one still undecided" in regards to her second run at being President. I kinda remember it stopped being "undecided" sometime before midnight on November 8th...
Well it will remain undecided until say, 2018-2019, when candidates officially declare their candidate run. If that happens update it then...
Do you think Hillary will run again in 2020?
I mean Trump has converted his campaign into a 2020 campaign basically on the eve of the election, but...
This is probably not the place to speculate on that front...what matters is the debate on the information and the page, and we are not going to get any confirmation until 2019 certainly.
To add onto this, this article is written in a heavily biased tone, almost as if she wrote it herself. I understand that we're not trying to be Wikipedia here, but it would be more objective if some of her negative controversies were also highlighted to counteract the currently glowing praise that makes up the article.
Totally agree with Atticus Omundson. This page is so biased that it almost reads like a press release from the DNC.
If you think Hillary's Emails are relevant prior to the media circus made around them, you have skewed priorities.
Hillary's Emails are a very good example of how cable news and partisan opinion making can make nothing into a "scandal" and real scandals into "nothing".
What Hillary did with her Emails was EXACTLY THE SAME THING that Donald Rumsfeld did with his.
Both of you: Knock it off. This isn't the place for this.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
Well Larkmarn, until they unlock the page to allow edits/corrections/deletions, where else?
For your worthless arguing? Some other site.
For proposing edits to a locked page? The same place as literally every locked page
.
If you're willing to actually do work to get the page changed, maybe it will be. If you're looking to just complain about her, there are thousands of sites you can go to.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
Wow, your ability to string prose together that sounds reasonable and nuanced just has me quivering like a bowl full of jelly in an earthquake.
No, they're right. Knock it off. Discussion pages are not a soapbox for you to rant about things you don't like.
"Yup. That tasted purple."
When is this page going to be unlocked? Sorry, but it reads like it was written by one of her most fawning staffers and locked immediately thereafter.
Hide / Show Replies
When she stops being a contentious/polarizing figure. And you're clearly demonstrating that it is not going to be any time soon.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
Wow, you really take your job as guardian of this discussion page seriously, don't you? Glad it gives you something to hang your little hat on.
She wrote a book
When should that be covered here?