enderheisenberg
Since: Jul, 2011
Oct 28th 2014 at 12:27:17 AM
•••
I'm not pretending to be unbiased - most people who care to edit this page do hate him. The Chinese internet is biased against him pretty much everywhere, both Mainland and Taiwan. If the article on Mussolini can make fun of him, then no way we can't let this one mock the Bald Headmaster. On the other hand, let Mao's article become a battlefield then.
MAI742
Since: Oct, 2009
Nov 13th 2014 at 10:53:20 PM
•••
Those bits are gone now, since tropes don't apply to people in real life. What's left is pretty much just, well, accurate.
We really need more on his personal habits and faith, though. This reads like a short history of his administration, not his place in it...
Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest. — Mark Twain
This article has a major bias against Chiang. It requires serious work; Mao's article places his worst missteps in an, at worst, ambivalent light, while this article contains lines such as 'Chiang's incompetence was well known' and 'Chiang valued only one thing: Loyalty'.
Hide / Show Replies