Why does this article not mention the Golden Age Of Porn at all? Or how the rise of personal videocassette players led to the end of it?
This page was obviously written by somebody who claims to be "neutral" towards porn, but is actually biased against it.
Pittsburghmuggle
"We're not going to define porn here. The Supreme Court gave up trying, so who are we to try? Best we can say is that it generally involves naked people."
Um.... er.... hmm.... yep, that works. Even fits with the page quote better than what I wrote. Well played, sir.
Edited by 24.131.245.140 "Freedom is not a license for chaos" -Norton Juster's The Dot and the Line: A Romance in Lower Mathematics
Pittsburghmuggle
Cut listed? Large amounts of this article were not "plagiarized". I wrote it myself, using Wikipedia (not simply cut and pasted) and my own knowledge as a resource. I was as concise and simple as I could be - you can only boil down information so far before the sentences start looking the same. If you think it was plagiarized, then how about rewriting it?
If you put it under "needs more work" it would be more appropriate for the reason stated.
Edited by 24.131.245.140 "Freedom is not a license for chaos" -Norton Juster's The Dot and the Line: A Romance in Lower Mathematics
I kinda wanna be silly and put a big NO as the image for this, with the caption "Go find it yourself!" below.
Any takers?
Memes are a halfway decent way to mask the pain.