Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / ValuesDissonance

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
ike755 Since: Dec, 2013
Jul 17th 2015 at 6:12:11 PM •••

OK, so considering how overdosed this trope is, i propose separating this trope into two sub-tropes, with examples going under one or the other. The sub-tropes shall be Values Dissonance-Time, and Values Dissonance-Region/Culture, as I see those as differing in the manner of dissonance. Any thoughts?

Hide / Show Replies
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Jul 18th 2015 at 3:08:26 AM •••

Seems fairly nitpicky/arbitrary to me. I'd recommend against.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
ike755 Since: Dec, 2013
Jul 19th 2015 at 4:33:44 PM •••

Hmm. I thought it would be like how Artistic License and Double Standard have sub-categories such as Artistic License-History or Double Standard: Abuse, Female on Male.

ike755 Since: Dec, 2013
Apr 21st 2016 at 2:22:01 PM •••

I just thought it would look nicer if the examples were better organized.

ExplodingCreeper14 Since: Dec, 2022
Jun 25th 2023 at 4:21:59 PM •••

I'd recommend for the sub-tropes to be made; it'd make it easier for people to see region based dissonance, for example. SeptimusHeap, Why do you find it nitpicky/arbitrary?

Edited by ExplodingCreeper14
Commander_Ysenir Since: Mar, 2015
May 29th 2023 at 7:07:36 PM •••

I will abide by the rule in the interest of general harmony, but I still wish to lodge my frustration with the "20 year rule".

In The Sims 2, which came out in 2004, there is a mechanic where Sims (teens, adults and elders of both genders) can look in a fancy telescope at night and there is a small chance they will be abducted by aliens. They are missing for a few hours and come back at dawn. The details aren't mentioned but it's implied to be horrifying and Sims in general fear it and have a bad memory (with hints that they now see the world as a Cosmic Horror Story), but Sims with the "Knowledge" Aspiration actually like it, sometimes have a wish to be abducted by aliens and have a positive memory of it.

Oh and also male adult Sims (and only males) return pregnant with an alien baby. They have no say in the matter. The pregnancy is otherwise just like the regular female pregnancies, nobody seems to find it weird that there is a pregnant man walking around, this doesn't cause a massive media frenzy or scientific curiosity or anything, the male just gives birth (mercifully offscreen, this is a T-rated game), the alien baby is effectively just a regular baby but with green skin and black eyes, etc...

This is treated as a cutesy and funny thing, like "ha ha wouldn't it be funny if aliens forcibly made a man pregnant with an alien baby" and the male "mother" always ends up loving his little alien baby and raising it alone with no support from the aliens, apparently with no psychological or physiological trauma. The implications are not brought up other than a generic "wow it's crazy that I was abducted amirite?".

Oh and like I mentioned this doesn't happen to female Sims.

I pointed out in the YMMV of the Sims 2 how this was values dissonance back from 2004 when sexual assault on men and boys was much more taboo and not treated as seriously and how this mechanic has aged very poorly and is generally regarded as in very bad taste by the community and my edit got taken down because of the 20 year rule.

I'm so glad to know there's an arbitrary waiting period until 2024 when it's suddenly ok to point out the unfortunate implications behind a male-exclusive alien rape and impregnation mechanic being treated as cute, harmless and funny. Apparently pointing this out is highly controversial right now because it hasn't been 20 years yet.

This shouldn't be controversial. You shouldn't need 20 years of "hindsight" to point out how this mechanic is tasteless and problematic in the light of increased discussion of sexual violence, especially how it relates to male victims.

SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 23rd 2021 at 5:58:28 AM •••

Linking to a past Trope Repair Shop thread that dealt with this page: May WordOfDante be considered along with WordOfGod?, started by Gilgameshkun on Feb 27th 2011 at 1:53:42 PM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
laserviking42 Since: Oct, 2015
Oct 18th 2020 at 4:29:59 PM •••

Over on the Live Action film page someone removed this:

  • Trading Places:
    • Dan Aykroyd appears in Black Face during the New Year's Eve train party. It's Played for Laughs for how ridiculous the disguise is, but they still probably couldn't get away with it today.
    • Billy Ray Valentine's liberal use of the word 'faggot' in the earlier portion of the film couldn't fly today, especially for a character the audience is supposed to like. It doesn't help that he says the word more than once in front of Denholm Elliott, who actually was bisexual in real life and Richard Hunt, the Dukes' agent on the floor, was openly gay.

With the edit reason: You can see that whoever wrote this entry does not know about the poor neighborhoods, saying things like "faggot" is something very common.

Yes, racism and homophobia are still distressingly common, but the point still stands that nowadays, in a major studio picture no less, things like blackface and derogatory language would not be allowed. I'd like to re-add without sparking an edit war

I didn't choose the troping life, the troping life chose me
cricri3007 Since: Jul, 2014
Jun 14th 2015 at 2:39:52 PM •••

Considering it´s present in almost all medium, where do i put the fact that showing death (suicide, décapitation,etc,..) is mostly okay but the second a (female) nipple is shown, everyone scream scandal ?

Edited by cricri3007
flamemario12 Since: Sep, 2010
Feb 2nd 2015 at 10:44:19 PM •••

So, why does Anime and Manga section have general folder while Western Animation don't have one? Obviously, not anyone that browses Tv tropes are from the United States. Myself included.

Hide / Show Replies
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Feb 3rd 2015 at 1:00:07 AM •••

"General" folders ought to be deleted - we only want specific examples.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
ToadSideOfTheRainbow Since: Oct, 2013
Dec 17th 2013 at 6:17:18 PM •••

Why no real life examples allowed all of a sudden? They were perfectly fine! What happened that we could allow IRL examples of values dissonance before but not now?

Hide / Show Replies
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Aug 2nd 2014 at 9:39:48 AM •••

What happened is that discussion and vote here disallowed them. It was a while ago and thus I don't remember the reasons anymore.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Fanra Fanra Since: Jan, 2001
Fanra
Jun 25th 2010 at 11:04:17 PM •••

Just to mention the paragraph:

"Across all the advanced civilizations of Earth's history, for example, we humans have been able to agree on very few acts that nobody should find justifiable: first-degree murder, rape, sex with prepubescent children, bullying the defenseless, property destruction, robbery (at least if done for completely selfish purposes), fraud, bestiality, and treason (at least in one's own country)."

Is actually incorrect. It's a value judgment. Rather than go into a ton of examples, let's just say that first-degree murder of a 30 year old Adolf Hitler, assuming you had a time machine, would not be something most people would consider wrong. I could make some other examples of these as well.

Yes, I know some people will say I'm nit picking, but the entire idea of TV Tropes is to take a good look at the underpinnings of fiction (and therefore society). Assuming something is set in stone as "all the advanced civilizations of Earth's history" is really a failure to think.

Edited by Fanra Hide / Show Replies
cardamomlace Since: Nov, -0001
Jul 16th 2010 at 12:39:00 AM •••

Yeah, it really, really isn't that universal at all. Look at Roman pederasty or the treatment of rape in medieval Europe (which was more based on class than the actual act itself). Most of what the paragraph mentioned actually has gotten kicked around or treated as normal in many cultures, who reach very different conclusions.

Given that this is Values Dissonance, we're kinda missing the point if we make assumptions here.

Madcapunlimited Since: Feb, 2011
Oct 25th 2011 at 11:29:47 AM •••

I can't remember if it was Robert Anton Wilson or Timothy Leary, but one of them said that the one universal taboo is on having no taboos.

Wardog Since: May, 2010
Aug 26th 2013 at 5:04:43 PM •••

The original quote might be more generally correct, if you added "(except as legally-mandated punishment / justified revenge / self-defence /in war or otherwise against an enemy / against someone not a member of our group/class/tribe/nation / or if really necessary for ... some reason.")

WhiteBear Since: Nov, 2010
Apr 9th 2011 at 10:45:22 PM •••

The one suggestion under Troper Tales about eliminating all monotheistic religions does not strike me as a "meaningful" philosophical question; it just seems like something a troll put up to get people at each other's throats. Should it be deleted?

Top