Raxis
How do you tell the difference between this trope and La Résistance?
Perhaps we should organize examples on whether or not they are: 1. Organized efforts by (at least some of) the leaders of the defeated group to revive the group, or, 2. Independent efforts by folks on the frontlines who hadn't learned that their group had been defeated. Thoughts?
Hide / Show Replies
"Type" splits are discouraged and soft-splits are usually a trouble source, so I am thinking "no".
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
You Give Me Fever
The Undefeated was a better name for this page.
That's why he wants you to have the money. Not so you can buy 14 Cadillacs but so you can help build up the wastes Hide / Show Replies
That kinda sounds like the exact opposite... The Undefeated sounds like the winner of the war.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
The Undefeated sounds like a trope for people who are never defeated. Very much not what this trope is about.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
But it also sounds like what a group like this would refer to themselves as, especially those that don't know the war is supposedly "over". And if the "winners" can't get rid of a "remnant", is it really right to call it a remnant?
That's why he wants you to have the money. Not so you can buy 14 Cadillacs but so you can help build up the wastes
... yes? That's what makes it a remnant... the fact it remains.
And the thing is, maybe they'd refer to themselves as "undefeated" but you know who else would (and has a much better claim to it)? The guys who won the war.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
So... was Free France during WW 2 The Undefeated? Think not. That's why they are called The Remnant. It's a much more suitable name.
Edited by 46.12.152.223 It is sometimes an appropriate response to reality to go insane.
What in the world is going on with this example?
It's nominally from one work, has a quote from a second, and then some bullet points that frankly don't seem like they belong to either. It seems to me like the result of clumsy copy-pasting, but looking through the page history I'm not actually certain I know what actually happened.