Linking to a past Trope Repair Shop thread that dealt with this page: looking to knock some of the meta out, started by Deboss on Jan 19th 2011 at 7:57:15 AM
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanThis page really rambles for a long time before getting to the point, doesn't it?
Hide / Show RepliesI've been wanting to split it for some time into "spaceships are metaphorically female" and "this spaceship is actually a girl." I have not been successful in garnering popular support.
I've been wanting to split it for some time into "spaceships are metaphorically female" and "this spaceship is actually a girl." I have not been successful in garnering popular support.
This really needs fixing.
"You want to see how a human dies? At ramming speed." - Emily Wong.Ask and ye shall receive, Falco. I've cut this section out of the intro:
The disguised, contradictory discussion here has been ongoing for a long time. Originally, the trope also included accusations that personifying ships is inherently sexist—parts of which remained for years until I removed them just now. I figure Silent Hunter's knowledge on the topic (as he is the one responsible for these claims) only goes as far as Titanic, where Margaret Brown claims it's sexism and that "it's just another case of men settin' things their way." I've seen claims of this elsewhere on the web, often quoting Titanic directly as evidence—such as in old Manuals of Style discussions on Wikipedia.
As other Tropers have already pointed out both in the disguised Main Page discussion and here in the discussion page, the cultures of the world do not universally consider ships female. Some gender ships by their type, others consider them all male. Others don't personify them at all. And sometimes, a specific ship is given a gender that's different compared to how a culture normally treats its ships.
As I've come to understand the more I read about this topic myself, ships were practically considered a member of the crew by English-speaking captains and seamen during the Age of Sail. Ian W. Toll noted accounts in his book, Six Frigates, where captains would actually talk to their ships, asking (for example) how much sail they'd like to carry that day. They were treating them as people rather than an object to be controlled. "A ship can do everything but talk, and sometimes she can do even that," as one captain put it. One Piece fans might recall the final moments between the Straw Hat Pirates and their first ship, the Going Merry—it's not far off the mark as to how real sailors viewed their ships.
Modern answers to the question "why are ships considered female" can vary from endearing ("a ship carries its passengers inside her like a mother carries an unborn child") to sexist ("because it costs a lot of money to keep her in paint and (gun)powder"), but historically sailors and captains were elevating ships to personhood, treating them as much of a human as they were—not reducing women to objects.
Also, Silent Hunter's claim that figureheads were typically of "scantily clad women" is, frankly, nonsense. This Flickr gallery by Mike Fitzpatrick of the figurehead gallery at the Naval Academy Museum in Anapolis shows that scantily clad women were not the norm. Many of the figureheads were in the likeness of the ship's namesake (John Hancock was the figurehead of the Hancock, a Macedonian soldier adorned the Macedonian, etc.). Others that were named for a concept didn't default to scantily clad women, either—Constitution had a scantily clad Hercules holding up the Constitution, followed by several figureheads of Andrew Jackson in later years.
Since I've gone and removed what remains of Silent Hunter's rant that personification is sexist (as well as other tropers' counterarguments), I'm also going to clean up any examples in the main page that perpetuate Silent Hunter's claims as well. I'll also add some of what I've noted here in the Real Life section.
Edited by 164.58.112.12"The Germans avert it and refer to their ships as a 'he'." This is nonsense. The words for 'ship', 'submarine', 'airplane' etc. are all neuter, but it's a bit more complicated than that ( surprise, surprise ). If referring to a ship by name only it's always female even if the name is not. If referring to a ship by class, type etc. it picks up whatever gender the class, type etc. has. For example "the ice breaker 'Polar Star'" would be male because ice breakers are male. "the polar star" would be male because stars are male too. "the 'Polar Star'" would be female because now you're referring to a ship by name only. Likewise, "the battleship 'Bismarck'" would be neuter because battleships are neuter. "the 'Bismarck'" would be female.
Edited by Macallan Hide / Show RepliesAlso, Portuguese (and I think Spanish too) is a romance language that refers to ships as a "he". Be it an ocean vessel, a small boat, an airplane. The exception is, oddly enough, space ships (because the Sci Fi translators/authors chose to use an ancient form for "ship" which was female).
Spanish and French (that lack the neuter gender) use the masculine gender for ships (UN barco/UN bateau), so it's definitively not something that is common in romance languages.
References: http://www.wordreference.com/definicion/barco http://www.wordreference.com/enfr/ship
Exactly. I can't remember any other linguistic tradition other than English where ships are personified as women. This article is woefully ethnocentric.
Any chance we can change that Picture to one of Rommie from Andromeda? I think she's a better example since she's got all 3 forms (A computerized AI, a robotic body, and a hologram.)
Hide / Show Replies
Is this technically a subtrope of Genius Loci? I know it's one of Artificial Intelligence.