Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / ScienceHero

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
andreadrussel Aspirante Since: Aug, 2019
Aspirante
Aug 26th 2019 at 5:14:10 AM •••

In a world where magic exists, can those who study it be considered scientists? For example, the Elric brothers in Fullmetal Alchemist.

Edited by andreadrussel
VulgarBee I AM KING OF THE BEACH!! Since: Jun, 2016
I AM KING OF THE BEACH!!
YoungGun2 Young and restless. Since: Jan, 2011
Young and restless.
Apr 6th 2011 at 8:22:22 PM •••

We need an image... My pick is Tony Stark. Who was able to BUILD THIS IN A CAVE!! WITH A BOX OF SCRAPS!

Hide / Show Replies
mrnoc Since: Apr, 2010
Jun 9th 2011 at 8:53:54 AM •••

My pick is Dr. Chemistry, Walt's surrogate from the Breaking Bad minisode "Team Science". While Walt might be a science anti-hero, Dr. Chemistry is a full on hero.

Stoogebie Since: Apr, 2011
Dec 31st 2011 at 9:21:08 PM •••

Do mathematicians count as Science Heroes? Math is a science after all...

173.75.137.168 Since: Dec, 1969
May 30th 2010 at 6:31:18 PM •••

it's never really explained how post modernism did in this trope...

Hide / Show Replies
76.11.81.191 Since: Dec, 1969
Sep 12th 2010 at 5:08:52 PM •••

Exactly! Just how does being self-referential prevent a Science Hero from appearing?

76.11.81.191 Since: Dec, 1969
Sep 12th 2010 at 5:08:52 PM •••

Exactly! Just how does being self-referential prevent a Science Hero from appearing?

AnonymousMcCartneyfan Since: Jan, 2001
Sep 12th 2010 at 6:10:13 PM •••

It's not being self-referential. It's demanding a personal motivation, and it's rejecting progress for progress's sake.

If you reject progress for progress's sake, then you cannot have a pure Science Hero. If progress for progress's sake is rejected, then For Science! is the mark of a Mad Scientist — and while there may be good and heroic Mad Scientists, they tend to be more fallible than the classic examples of this trope.

The same mentality that rejects progress for progress's sake tends to reject abstract altruism as a sane personal reason for doing something — wanting the good of mankind/the Earth/the universe/etc. is not considered a good reason, and modern scientists who have that reason are likely to be Well Intentioned Extremists instead of heroes. Personal reasons that are considered good either have endpoints, making them The Quest — since the character will often stop pursuing the science once the reason he pursued it is met — or are better achieved by non-scientific means....

I put some of this in the article. Feel free to reword if I wasn't clear there.

There is a fine line between recklessness and courage — Paul McCartney
TheKingsRaven Since: Jun, 2009
Nov 16th 2010 at 8:35:50 AM •••

1) That's a great explanation. Thank you. :)

2) I disagree with the postmodernists entirely.

nrjxll Since: Nov, 2010
Mar 16th 2011 at 8:27:41 PM •••

Interesting explanation. Just when I thought I couldn't dislike postmodernists any more than I already did...

66.179.208.61 Since: Dec, 1969
Mar 30th 2011 at 1:10:40 PM •••

Ummmm ... a science hero isn't a cambellian hero ... at least not according to the five minutes of reseaarch that I put into it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hero_with_a_Thousand_Faces

Top