Just a sec, is the Gamergate thing so divisive that not even the Rule of Cautious Editing Judgement covers it? If so, I'll abide, but I still want to know so as to delete it if so.
Oh, the thread? Don't worry, it's just dead. Hide / Show RepliesIt's covered by a "do not mention it. We don't care and we don't want the bickering" rule.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanDoes this mean delete the current entry or does it mean don't edit the entry to make your side look better?
The latter, in this case. I don't think a mere citation here is wrong.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanDoes something that fits the Scandalgate formula in name but isn't an actual scandal fit this trope?
Anyone who assigns themselves loads of character tropes is someone to be worried about. Hide / Show RepliesIt needs to be some kind of controversy or somesuch to count.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanSo not necessarily a scandal, just something controversial?
Anyone who assigns themselves loads of character tropes is someone to be worried about.Can we all agree that if any trope subverts Tropes Are Not Bad, it's this one?
Hide / Show RepliesNo, why?
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanThis page should be split between the real world ones and the in-universe ones.
Previous Trope Repair Shop thread: Needs Help, started by MorningStar1337 on Nov 14th 2014 at 12:12:50 AM
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman