Suggesting that we remove Waif-Fu. From reading the trope it's more about fighting tactics for smaller women rather than the more fanservice-y She-Fu (as in, it doesn't sound like it's made for sex appeal specifically), and the description ("Svelte women cannot hit that hard") is inaccurate to the "impossible" requirement for this—the trope is specifically about how they can't hit hard and use martial arts techniques instead.
Hide / Show Replies
I think it's fine. The point of the entry is that because it's sexier for the fighter to be a petite woman, the fact that logically she shouldn't be able to be as effective is overlooked.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
That's a good point, but I still feel the description ignores the way that the trope works. ...But maybe I'm being a bit pedantic.
Edited by 216.99.32.44
Anyone know what the trope is for when a girl bends further forward than in real life is physically possible?
the Prodigal
Does anyone know what the game is from teh video from the quote?
Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity.
The Cosmopolitan Fictioneer
Why does the article have "Compare Fetish Fuel" when Fetish Fuel is listed in its Sub-Trope index?
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus. Hide / Show Replies
I'm going to attempt to merge in my attempt at Rule of Sexy to see what people think. I'm putting the original version here in case it doesn't work out in part or whole.
The limit of the Willing Suspension of Disbelief for a given element is directly proportional to its degree of sexyness.
Whether it's fashion design, mild Fanservice or hardcore porn, there is large degree of Artistic License for anything sexy enough. It doesn't matter if something is impractical, impossible, or even safe (as in physically safe) as long as it turns on the viewers.
This can especially apply to particular forms of Playing to the Fetishes. Many amateur stories about certain fetishes rely on this.
It might be obvious, but it should be noted many instances are also Not Safe for Work (and why this page picture is only a mild example).
Compare Fetish, Fetish Fuel, Turn On Tropes (both have instances which are more how the viewers feel than relying on this trope).
Contrast Squick, Fetish Retardant.
Tropes Where Most Examples Are This:
- Absolute Cleavage
- Bare Your Midriff
- Black Bra and Panties
- Brainless Beauty
- Breast Expansion
- Breast Plate
- Buxom Is Better
- Cargo Envy
- Catfight
- Cat Girl
- Clothing Damage
- Custom Uniform of Sexy
- Exposed to the Elements
- Fanservice
- French Maid
- Fur Bikini
- Gag Boobs
- Gainaxing
- Getting Hot in Here
- Girl on Girl Is Hot
- Going Fur a Swim
- Happy Holidays Dress: The skimpy kind
- Hello Nurse
- Hood Ornament Hottie
- Hospital Hottie
- Hot Chick with a Sword
- Hot Librarian
- Hot Men at Work
- Hot Scientist
- Hot Teacher
- Impossibly-Low Neckline
- I See London
- Lady in Red
- Lipstick Lesbian
- Marshmallow Hell
- Most Common Superpower
- Naked Apron
- Naked in Mink
- Naughty Nuns
- Naughty Tentacles
- Nerds Are Sexy
- Night Nurse
- Of Corsets Sexy
- Orgasmic Combat
- O Ring Orifice
- Painted-On Pants
- Panty Shot
- Playboy Bunny
- Seashell Bra
- Sensual Spandex
- Sex Is Violence
- Sexy Priest
- Shirtless Scene
- Showgirl Skirt
- Spy Catsuit
- Stocking Filler
- Stripperific
- Sweater Girl
- Theiss Titillation Theory
- Twin Threesome Fantasy
- Underboobs
- Vapor Wear
- Wardrobe Malfunction
- Wet Sari Scene
- You Can Leave Your Hat On
- You Sexy Beast
- Zettai Ryouiki
Edited by Camacan Hide / Show Replies
We already put that text on Custom Uniform of Sexy. So no need to mix them since you still have that trope.
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
Did you read the whole text? Almost all of it is more general than just the application to Custom Uniform of Sexy and doesn't belong there.
Edited by Camacan
Actually, a lot of that applies more to the Rule of Glamorous
trope I have (switching to another picture for that in a moment). Mind if I crib some of the text for that?
I think this has a lot more business existing than the Glamourous or Custom Uniform ones, actually.
But the picture needs to change; it just isn't all that hot. It's an exceedingly thin woman with an obviously fake, almost disturbing smile (Fetish Retardant if it's anything) in an outfit that isn't all that provocative or revealing.
Edited by 69.154.186.33
First of all, that's your opinion. Second of all, the description states going for something really showing the trope would border on not safe for work. Such things tend to get some sponsors weary, and some pages even have pictures locked out because of that.
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.
Linking to a past Trope Repair Shop thread that dealt with this page: Non-RuleOfSexy tropes
, started by Routerie on Feb 4th 2012 at 7:20:32 AM
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman