There's certainly overlap. The sender of a Public Secret Message might intend the message for a specific group rather than an individual. A Public Secret Message could also be Hidden in Plain Sight. If the press isn't looking very closely, they might miss a minor change that a specific group was looking for, allowing the general public to go uninformed.
However, it needs to be an actual secret, and the message needs to be clearly, deliberately sent to a very specific audience. For example, if a politician might cut a program to send a message to a racist group, but it's also possible the politician had other reasons to cut the program, it's probably best to leave the example off the page.
Would this also include what is known as "dog-whistle politics"?
Hide / Show Replies