Ferot_Dreadnaught
Since: Mar, 2015
May 20th 2018 at 9:16:55 AM
•••
I removed it because his well intentions were rendered impossible and he underwent a Villainous Breakdown. He lost good intentions, yes, but he never tried to claim his subsequent lashing out was well intentioned. If his breakdown revealed Zod actually had a nefarious/self-serving reason for his original actions, then he'd count.
ArthurEld
Since: May, 2014
Mar 25th 2016 at 1:23:53 PM
•••
This doesnt seem like an actual trope, given how few examples there are and how closely related it is to another. It would probably be best to just call it Playing with WIED in some way as the examples differ-sometimes averted, sometimes subverted, etc.
Hide / Show Replies
Larkmarn
Since: Nov, 2010
Mar 25th 2016 at 2:01:06 PM
•••
It's a subversion of Well-Intentioned Extremist. Whether or not that's a legitimate other trope is... debatable.
Found a Youtube Channel with political stances you want to share? Hop on over to this page and add them.
This example was recently removed with the reason: "Spending most of the movie genuinely well-intentioned and only losing it during a villainous breakdown seems like a disqualifier."
First, "seems like a disqualifier" is Weasel Words. Second, there's nothing in the description to discount it, given that it specifically mentions Motive Decay and Jumping Off the Slippery Slope, so the reasoning itself is arbitrary.
You've got roaming bands of armed, aggressive, tyrannical plumbers coming to your door, saying "Use our service, or else!" Hide / Show Replies