Why is the trope called "No-Harm Requirement" when it does not actually mean someone is required not to harm something? The trope description clearly states that it means something must not be excessively harmed. That's not what the trope name says.
Two solutions occur:
Edit the description and police the examples so the trope's name becomes indicative again.
Divide the examples into "defeat without excessive harm" and "defeat without ANY harm" categories on the page (much like Evil Has a Bad Sense of Humor).
Why is the trope called "No-Harm Requirement" when it does not actually mean someone is required not to harm something? The trope description clearly states that it means something must not be excessively harmed. That's not what the trope name says.
Two solutions occur:
- Edit the description and police the examples so the trope's name becomes indicative again.
- Divide the examples into "defeat without excessive harm" and "defeat without ANY harm" categories on the page (much like Evil Has a Bad Sense of Humor).
Edited by GoblinCipher