The whole concept of mail-order brides has a negative connotation abroad, as well. Go to a foreign country like the Philippines and say you're getting a "mail-order bride." Go ahead. I double dog dare you. You'll be nailed for human trafficking, because most governments view it in the same light as one of the interviewees in the Bloomberg article does.
The "Real Life" section seems to consist of propaganda advocating this practice. Given that every man I've ever heard of who married a woman from abroad whom he met on one of these services gave misogynistic reasons why (i.e. Western women are too independent and disobedient; Asian or Eastern European women are supposedly submissive), I find this disturbing.
Hide / Show RepliesEvidence: http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/11_03/b4211069050983.htm#p2 (particularly the bit about the website offering brides "unspoiled by feminism"); a mail-order bride company trying to weaken the Violence Against Women Act's immigrant protections (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/08/violence-against-women-act_n_1500693.html); an old law journal article about the problem (http://www.nostatusquo.com/ACLU/anderson/brides/pg1.html).
But there are Real Life examples under Live Action TV? In adding tv documentary show examples, isn't this a grey area?
Male, early sixties, Cranky old fart, at least two decades behind. So you have been warned. Functionally illiterate in several languages.