Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / MagicPants

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
JoeMerl Since: Jan, 2015
Sep 10th 2021 at 10:48:47 AM •••

This is actually my first time using a discussions page, sorry if I'm doing it wrong. Anyway, I feel like there are too many aversions listed. Since that already has its own trope, would anyone mind if I just go and delete most of them?

JustaUsername Since: Jul, 2009
Sep 14th 2018 at 3:03:06 AM •••

I can't help but feel there's two different tropes in here, one where clothes manage to fit a shapeshifter's form no matter what and one where their clothes disappear when transformed and reappear when they revert.

This page might at minimum, need a Soft Split.

Some people say I'm lazy. It's hard to disagree.
TweedlyDee BWAAAH! Since: Apr, 2010
BWAAAH!
Mar 28th 2011 at 4:46:02 PM •••

The current image doesn't illustrate the trope at all. I suggest The Incredible Hulk as the page image provider instead.

I TELL YOU HWAT!
86.219.211.53 Since: Dec, 1969
Aug 13th 2010 at 3:55:14 AM •••

Soupdragon: What!? No real life examples? How can this be?

Hide / Show Replies
173.25.213.117 Since: Dec, 1969
Dec 19th 2010 at 1:47:26 AM •••

There are no real life examples because people generally don't undergo massive transformations that would destroy their clothes.

FeatherWriter Feather Since: Jun, 2010
Feather
Jul 12th 2010 at 1:53:58 PM •••

It almost seems as if there should be two different tropes here. One for Magic Pants (where the clothes survive the transformation, or are strangely changed) and one for the aversion of this trope (where the clothes DO get torn/destroyed). People seem to be listing both here, often without mentioning that the torn clothes are an aversion.

Also, wouldn't the examples listed in the discription box (conjuring new clothes, super-speed dressing, and superclothes) be "justifications" of the trope, not "aversions"?

Edited by FeatherWriter
Top