Strongly questioning whether this makes sense. In some worlds, being an atheist might make a vampire immune to holy symbols; in other worlds, an atheist might be able to use a Darwin Fish to repel a vampire, as it symbolizes their faith in science. I'm not seeing why wearing a Darwin Fish would be of any use to a vampire.
There is the specific example that some high-level evil clerics can turn paladins in certain editions of Dungeons & Dragons, which might also apply to undead clerics, but if so that would be a work-specific trope, not something to put in the description. And even then, "you have something that works on me, I have something that works on you" isn't a Kryptonite-Proof Suit because it doesn't provide protection, it merely grants parity.
From the description:
Holy objects repel? Wear a Darwin-fish necklace!note
Strongly questioning whether this makes sense. In some worlds, being an atheist might make a vampire immune to holy symbols; in other worlds, an atheist might be able to use a Darwin Fish to repel a vampire, as it symbolizes their faith in science. I'm not seeing why wearing a Darwin Fish would be of any use to a vampire.
There is the specific example that some high-level evil clerics can turn paladins in certain editions of Dungeons & Dragons, which might also apply to undead clerics, but if so that would be a work-specific trope, not something to put in the description. And even then, "you have something that works on me, I have something that works on you" isn't a Kryptonite-Proof Suit because it doesn't provide protection, it merely grants parity.
Edited by GoblinCipher