Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / JackassGenie

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
VVK Since: Jun, 2009
Jul 1st 2021 at 4:31:18 PM •••

Removed the following examples from the description, because they're basically all "Jackass Genie and a worse Jackass Genie" rather than the first being literal. Or possibly "Brainlessly Stupid Genie" and Jackass Genie. Anyway, it's not that the first ones are more logical than the second ones. Both are contrived to be bad, the second ones are just worse.

Wish for a hot girlfriend? The Literal Genie will give her a fever (or maybe hook you up with a fire demon). The Jackass Genie will set her on fire. Try to head it off and wish for an attractive girlfriend? The Literal Genie will make her magnetic. The Jackass Genie will make her attract tigers. Wish for a beautiful girlfriend? The Literal Genie will give you a Brainless Beauty. The Jackass Genie will give you a beautiful Ax-Crazy girlfriend who has killed all her previous lovers horribly. Wish for some long overdue social reform? The Literal Genie will create a stagnant society that lacks the conflict necessary for growth, while the Jackass will always opt for an oppressive dystopia where the fanatics who make your side look bad have won out. Wish for a million dollars? The Literal Genie will give you a million dollars from Zimbabwe's pre-2009 failing economy Note  or a million Monopoly dollars, because you never specified what kind of dollar. The Jackass Genie will just give you a million copies of the same dollar, and call the police on you for counterfeiting.

Edited by VVK
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 23rd 2021 at 3:27:16 AM •••

Linking to a past Trope Repair Shop thread that dealt with this page: too many duplicated examples, started by Frank75 on Jan 18th 2011 at 4:28:08 PM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 20th 2021 at 9:04:21 AM •••

Previous Trope Repair Shop thread: Ambiguous Name, started by ShorinBJ on Aug 22nd 2018 at 3:03:56 PM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
LavaringX Since: Jan, 2014
Mar 28th 2019 at 2:22:52 AM •••

An earlier edit seemingly tried to correct an outdated piece of information (about Zimbabwe's dollar being worth less than one U.S. cent, when in fact Zimbabwe had abandoned its old currency and simply switched to the U.S. Dollar), but the edit they changed it to made little to no sense. I changed it back, but updated it to keep the information contemporaneous.

DanaO Since: Jul, 2009
Jul 30th 2017 at 1:02:57 PM •••

One (sub)version of the trope I'm not eager to add to the main page because I've so far seen only one instance of it (in an Interactive Fiction game): the case where the wish-granter is benevolent but is actually unable to make wishes come out exactly as the wishers would expect, and doesn't have the option of refusing the wish or fully explaining the problem. The idea is that the mechanics of making the wish happen aren't simple reality warping but are complex and full of things the uninformed would see as side effects and unintended consequences - to the point where apparent jackassery is actually the good outcome.

MightyG 89 years old!? Since: Mar, 2016
89 years old!?
Apr 9th 2017 at 8:51:23 PM •••

Could I suggest an alternate name of "Djerk" (a play on djinn and jerk)?

Umm... so, personally... this is the first time this has happened, so I'm a bit surprised. Only a centimetre away...
Johnny1993 Since: Sep, 2012
Aug 18th 2013 at 4:10:24 AM •••

I have the ultimate solution to Jackass Genie problems: "I wish that any wish I will ever make shal go exactly as I intended them to, including this one."

MikeRosoft Since: Jan, 2001
Sep 9th 2010 at 2:10:09 PM •••

Removed natter:

  • Tomb Of Horrors features a cursed gem that purports to grant wishes; when the wish is made, it will do an exact opposite or otherwise turn the wish against you (given example: when asked to bring somebody back from the dead, it'll instead destroy his remains, or even kill somebody else), AND then it explodes, burning everybody in the vicinity to death.

Long live Marxism-Lennonism! Hide / Show Replies
MikeRosoft Since: Jan, 2001
Sep 9th 2010 at 2:49:55 PM •••

For the record, the simplest answer would be: "You're making it really easy for me. Wish granted! [Boom!]"

And for the record: the real question this item begs is: what's the point of a mis-fulfilled wish if the gem's going to blow you up anyway? (A gem that explodes when touched is a nice trap. A malicious genie that purports to grant wishes only to turn them against you as badly as possible is a fine plot device, too. But why combine the two?)

And the genie should follow the rules, too: first, he should actually [technically] grant the wish, and not arbitrarily decide to do the opposite (as in the given example - why not just raise him as a powerful undead?); second, killing the wisher [unless he is asking for it] is just cheap (if asked for a magical sword, don't just stab him with it - give him a magical sword with a NASTY side effect).

Long live Marxism-Lennonism!
Nezumi Perky Goth Since: Jan, 2001
Perky Goth
May 17th 2010 at 6:09:09 PM •••

Butterscotch: I will refrain from re-adding my deleted post, as I don't have good reason to, but I'm the one who started that Natter exchange, so I can damn well "ruin" it if I want.

"That's ridiculous. What would a walrus do with a magic bag?" Pokeamida
Top