Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / IAmNotLeonardNimoy

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
Icestar1186(2) Since: Jan, 2014
Jul 19th 2022 at 9:36:25 AM •••

Is there a reason this page is divided by gender?

SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 22nd 2021 at 9:17:57 AM •••

Linking to a past Trope Repair Shop thread that dealt with this page: Rename, started by Nyktos on Jan 24th 2011 at 12:53:55 AM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 20th 2021 at 10:48:39 AM •••

Previous Trope Repair Shop thread: Ambiguous Name, started by grapesandmilk on Feb 17th 2014 at 2:52:18 AM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
movie007 Since: Jan, 2001
Dec 1st 2013 at 6:04:46 AM •••

Would the Olsen twins qualify? In just about every work (aside from Full House), they pretty much always played a pair of twins named "Ashley and Mary-Kate" and had similar personalities.

Edited by 75.129.134.209 Hide / Show Replies
fearlessnikki Since: Feb, 2015
Oct 13th 2016 at 5:26:29 PM •••

They would indeed. Their double act was always the same. Mary Kate was the edgy rebellious tomboy and Ashley the level-headed, somewhat neurotic girly girl.

silver06 Since: Mar, 2012
Apr 2nd 2014 at 12:31:22 PM •••

Why is this called I am not Leonard Nimoy if Leonard Nimoy isn't even in the examples?

Hide / Show Replies
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Apr 2nd 2014 at 1:35:54 PM •••

Page example sections are never complete. Ergo, the lack of an example doesn't mean anything.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Tomwithnonumbers Since: Dec, 2010
May 29th 2011 at 10:12:02 AM •••

I haven't pulled it yet, but do people think Brad Pitt should be here?

It's an interesting case, there are definitely a lot of movies where Brad Pitt played Brad Pitt (Troy and most of the early rom coms. Mr and Mrs Smith etc..)

But he's definitely broke out and there are now also a lot of movies where people remember the character. It's Tyler Durden and not Brad Pitt and so on...

So what's the consensus?

74.101.160.211 Since: Dec, 1969
Sep 12th 2010 at 8:18:49 AM •••

George Lindsey. Can you think of a role he played that wasn't Goober (Beasley) Pyle?

Hide / Show Replies
Tomwithnonumbers Since: Dec, 2010
May 29th 2011 at 10:07:36 AM •••

It's not just about being typecast, it's do you think 'oh look what George Lindsey's doing now?' instead of whoever his character is supposed to be?

Tomwithnonumbers Since: Dec, 2010
May 29th 2011 at 10:08:25 AM •••

Oops double post

Edited by Tomwithnonumbers
livettora Since: Jun, 2009
Feb 22nd 2011 at 10:35:39 PM •••

I'm seeing a lot of examples that belong in Typecasting and I Am Not Spock. Could someone with a bit more time on their hands maybe move those there?

SomeGuy Since: Jan, 2001
Aug 13th 2010 at 9:55:16 AM •••

Most of these examples are relatively old, and until recently women didn't really get parts that landed them in the thick of Memetic Mutation- at least unless it was about their general sexiness, like Marilyn Monroe. Eh, guess I'll add her to the list.

See you in the discussion pages.
Top