Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / FeudalFuture

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
ShinSheel Since: Jan, 2016
Jul 8th 2016 at 1:06:19 PM •••

Code Geass world isn't feudal

Yes, they have nobility and ruling house but we don't hear a single word about feudal holdings.

Enamex Since: Jan, 2013
Feb 17th 2013 at 10:59:38 AM •••

Would the anime "Nausicäa of The Valley of The Wind" fit here?

madhammerer Since: May, 2011
Oct 25th 2011 at 3:25:04 PM •••

Why is a Feudal Future usually treated better by people than a presidential dictatorship? They are basically the same thing except dictatorships dont need to play as much of a dice game on whether or not the heir is an incompetent.

Hide / Show Replies
JimCambias Since: Jan, 2011
Oct 25th 2011 at 3:58:51 PM •••

People alive today have lived under dictatorships and know there's nothing good about them. There aren't any genuine feudal societies left.

jatay3 Since: Oct, 2010
Jan 31st 2012 at 8:43:40 PM •••

More seriously, feudalism at least can be a serious attempt to make a lawful society whereas "presidential dictatatorship" is Asskicking Equals Authority.

Or you can just say "Better Ermine Cape Effect." Probably more or less true.

jatay3 Since: Oct, 2010
Jan 31st 2012 at 8:52:50 PM •••

And there is the point that dictators actually are going out of the way to be dictators. Nobles are not asked beforehand whether they want to be political livestock or targets for poisoning. They can just be taking the role society gave them. Paul Atreides never wanted to be the Kwaitz Haderech and Miles Vorkosigan paid more then enough for being born a Vor. Making a character who is a noble is in a way, no different then making a character who is from a given ethnicity. Indeed it is easy to make a noble hero while showing a tyrannical aristocratic system whereas it is hard to make a hero who is a tyrant that is seeking to Take Over the World. The first can be a White Sheep, and the second is simply a villain.

Edited by 69.172.221.6
jasontaylor Since: Dec, 1969
Mar 10th 2010 at 11:36:33 PM •••

The assumption that dynastic rule in the future is unlikely may not be justifiable. It is not necessary to assume that human social habits will change their basic themes unrecognizably, powerful people will likely always want to benefit their families and nostalgia is a useful propaganda tool.

Hide / Show Replies
76.27.231.166 Since: Dec, 1969
Jun 27th 2010 at 8:46:37 AM •••

However it might be noted that the original feudalism was effectively a bribe paid to warlords to make themselves semi-useful members of society. A culture with the time and technology to build spacecraft is already civilized. Therefore a Feudal Future might be better justified by saying it originated in a coalition of Family Business s rather then being the same kind of thing as the original feudalism.

Top