Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / FanSequel

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 20th 2021 at 11:49:17 AM •••

Previous Trope Repair Shop thread: Unclear Description, started by Specialist290 on Jun 25th 2012 at 10:16:15 PM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
MathsAngelicVersion Ambassador of Eurogames and Touhou Music Since: Mar, 2013
Ambassador of Eurogames and Touhou Music
Jan 23rd 2019 at 11:04:29 AM •••

  • Usually, this happens when ill-advised fans get blinded by a false sense of entitlement and try to brute-force an installment at the perception their beloved franchise is stuck adrift and will never get out of its hole, so they rather carelessly go with the delusion that they are Running the Asylum. Sure, it is very noble to try to launch kick-starters, provide fan support, and petition for new developments, but it is just plain twisted to try to seize control for yourself, because to do that is like a stranger handling a parent's baby without consent. It is not your baby and you can't dress it up like it is yours or steal it from its parent.

I think we should get rid of this paragraph. Its only purpose is hating on fans who make fan sequels. It's fine if you don't like fan sequels, but I don't think the trope page should push that opinion (clearly a lot of people enjoy fan sequels and would disagree that the people who make them are "blinded by a false sense of entitlement" and "twisted"). We've already mentioned that fan sequels can get Screwed by the Lawyers, and that should be enough. Alternatively, we could rewrite the article to be more neutral and add a couple of arguments from the other side.

Edited by MathsAngelicVersion Hide / Show Replies
MyFinalEdits (Ten years in the joint)
Jan 23rd 2019 at 8:10:59 PM •••

Agreed. Zap it.

135 - 169 - 273 - 191 - 188 - 230 - 300
MyFinalEdits (Ten years in the joint)
Jan 23rd 2019 at 8:12:11 PM •••

Ah, you already removed it. Why did you start by saying "we should remove it" instead of "I remived it because..."?

135 - 169 - 273 - 191 - 188 - 230 - 300
chasemaddigan Since: Oct, 2011
Jan 23rd 2019 at 8:50:45 PM •••

They also asked permisson on the Removing complaining, bashing, and other negativity thread, and it was agreed to cut there.

MathsAngelicVersion Since: Mar, 2013
Jan 24th 2019 at 2:05:44 AM •••

@MyFinalEdits: I'm sorry. I forgot to update my original post to include the information chasemaddigan posted.

I chose to zap it instead of rewriting it because the page doesn't really need a paragraph rehashing the usual arguments for and against fan works.

Edited by MathsAngelicVersion
PassTheWord The Brony Since: Jul, 2011
BURGINABC Since: Jun, 2012
Apr 6th 2015 at 10:32:46 AM •••

Someone needs to alphabetize the game list. There ought to be an automated tool to do that to example lists, if there isn't already, but if there is I don't know how to use it.

SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Apr 6th 2015 at 11:37:32 AM •••

There isn't such a tool. There may be one in the future, though.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Top