Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / ExploitedTrope

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
Stoogebie Since: Apr, 2011
Jul 26th 2013 at 1:58:35 PM •••

Okay, it seems like whatever examples there are of Exploited Trope tend to demonstrate the exploiter as being a Manipulative Bastard to the exploitee, in one way or another. It may have to do with the negative connotations of 'exploiting', but keep in mind the character exploiting a trope need not be a Manipulative Bastard, but merely Genre Savvy. In fact, a character could both exploit a trope that they themselves might have. A Cloud Cuckoolanders Minder could exploit their best friend's weirdness in a way similar to Genius Ditz or Enforced Method Acting, but without taking advantage of them outright.

Hide / Show Replies
VVK Since: Jun, 2009
Jan 6th 2017 at 8:14:59 AM •••

As the name implies, with "Exploited Trope", the exploitee is a trope, not a person.

rimpala it\'s... HIM Since: Jan, 2001
it\'s... HIM
Jul 16th 2013 at 10:02:49 PM •••

I noticed that under Playing Withs this is the most "???'d" line. Is this one still new?

Oh look I mispeled somethink. Hide / Show Replies
Stoogebie Since: Apr, 2011
SonicLover Since: Sep, 2009
Jun 3rd 2011 at 5:37:37 AM •••

Is this seriously getting dumped on the cutlist again?

Note that it has a whopping forty wicks. It's a Trope Trope, so it doesn't need a lot of examples. Also, it's not "Genre Savvy with a different name"; it's more accurately a subtrope thereof.

Edited by SonicLover That's me.
SonicLover Since: Sep, 2009
Dec 5th 2010 at 5:42:37 AM •••

Hylarn was the one who cutlisted this trope, right? Well, I don't think he had a good reason for it. It's a Trope Trope, so the number of examples doesn't really matter that much.

That's me. Hide / Show Replies
Twentington Since: Apr, 2009
Dec 5th 2010 at 11:52:15 AM •••

The nebulous description does matter, and the super low number of wicks suggests it's not done often.

SonicLover Since: Sep, 2009
Dec 5th 2010 at 12:24:22 PM •••

The low number of wicks is just because it's relatively new, and I don't see how the description is nebulous.

That's me.
SonicLover Since: Sep, 2009
Dec 5th 2010 at 12:31:32 PM •••

Also, I quote from the cutlist page:

By the way, folks, this is the cutlist, not the "Needs More Work" list. Listing an article here should mean "We give up. This one can't be saved."
A less-than-ideal description and a low number of wicks are both fixable things. If it can be fixed, fix it, don't scrap it.

That's me.
DragonQuestZ The Other Troper Since: Jan, 2001
The Other Troper
Oct 10th 2010 at 4:49:10 PM •••

I fixed the description, but um... you didn't get actual show examples before launching? That's a prime way to get this on the Cut List.

I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid. Hide / Show Replies
fljared Since: Sep, 2010
Nov 27th 2010 at 7:36:22 PM •••

It got examples

Additional Unknown
SomeGuy Since: Jan, 2001
Nov 28th 2010 at 3:08:38 PM •••

This isn't that kind of trope. It's not supposed to have examples, it's just meant to be played with.

See you in the discussion pages.
SonicLover Since: Sep, 2009
Oct 9th 2010 at 5:36:23 PM •••

Okay, there are a lot of Playing With Wiki entries and it'll take quite a while to add the Exploited line to all of them. I've already added it to the template page. Back on the YKTTW I suggested using a script to add a blank Exploited line to each and every one, then edit in the exceptions manually. The line goes right between Parodied and Deconstructed (that's where I put it).

That's me.
Top