Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / EverybodysDeadDave

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 24th 2021 at 2:01:32 AM •••

Old archived discussion

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
SeptimusHeap MOD (Edited uphill both ways)
Mar 23rd 2021 at 2:15:18 AM •••

Linking to a past Trope Repair Shop thread that dealt with this page: Split? (Everybody's Dead Dave), started by DragonQuestZ on Apr 18th 2011 at 8:09:00 AM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
UncleSumer Uncle Sumer Sez Since: Sep, 2010
Uncle Sumer Sez
Oct 1st 2010 at 9:39:50 PM •••

RED DWARF ain't the trope namer, is it, kidz? — seems to me Hal-9000 first said it, to Dave Bowman, in 2001 A Space Odyssey, hmmm . . . ? — -Unc Sumer-

Hide / Show Replies
84.45.134.188 Since: Dec, 1969
Jan 22nd 2011 at 5:39:00 PM •••

Just because it's the first known example, doesn't make it the namer. Red Dwarf was likely chosen over 2001 because it was the show's entire premise, and the trope itself was uttered several times in the first episode.

UncleSumer Since: Sep, 2010
Nov 28th 2013 at 3:35:15 PM •••

ahhh, True Nuff, thanx ... glad to savour the distinction, again - (must've been my millenial zeitgeist bias, from being in the timeline since 1963, on — a fan of both, but assimilated A.C.Clarke's & Kubrik's tropery during "formative years", heh...)

btw - i'd always kinda figured the Red Dwarf usage was a call-out to 2001, myself ...

U Su'

Edited by 70.67.10.185
Taeraresh Since: Jan, 2001
Dec 20th 2010 at 12:22:16 PM •••

I just added an example from Neuromancer. I didn't go into detail about how and why Corto was shot down (EMP weapons, his side knew about them but sent them in anyway, etc.) Anyone think that should be there? I think it's fairly clear as-is.

OldManHoOh It's super effective. Since: Jul, 2010
It's super effective.
Sep 27th 2010 at 3:39:30 AM •••

In Doctor Who, knowing what we do now, millions of Dalek survivors as of series 2 and at least thousands of Time Lord survivors in The End of Time, though the latter get put back into the Time War, so that's wibbly wobbly timey wimey, should we remove the Time War bit?

Top