Follow TV Tropes

Following

Discussion Main / EeriePaleSkinnedBrunette

Go To

You will be notified by PM when someone responds to your discussion
Type the word in the image. This goes away if you get known.
If you can't read this one, hit reload for the page.
The next one might be easier to see.
Throneofsouls Since: Apr, 2015
Oct 16th 2021 at 1:04:18 AM •••

Why is there an 'A.K.A Pale Skinned Brunette'for Eerie pale Skinned Brunette? Because not only is it slightly repetitive and looks clunky, but it is also unneeded. If a character is pale and it makes them seem eerie and offputting, then just having 'Eerie Pale Skinned Brunette is more than a direct description.

There's doesn't seem to be a need to make the headline this repetitive. So, with that said is it possible to just have the headline be put back to just Eerie Pale Skinned Brunette ?

stuthehistoryguy Since: May, 2011
Apr 27th 2016 at 8:09:12 AM •••

How does the Fourth Doctor fit this trope? His hair is brown, and, while I'd never characterize Tom Baker as swarthy, he's hardly pale. I'd recommend deletion.

Edited by stuthehistoryguy
Starshock Since: Feb, 2015
May 18th 2015 at 6:21:21 PM •••

Does anybody know the origins of this trope?

Not my circus, not my monkeys.
XFllo There is no Planet B Since: Aug, 2012
There is no Planet B
Nov 15th 2013 at 7:13:28 PM •••

I removed this part of the article. It was added as Natter to the "Snow White" entry.

  • (...) it's newer than they think as the trope comes twentieth century.
    • Actually, it's older than that. Remember Ligeia?
    • Tanith Lee played with this by taking the whole "Skin pale as snow, lips as red as blood, hair black as a raven's wing" description and concluding that this meant Snow White and her mother were vampires. So did Neil Gaiman.
      • Cecelia Eng wrote a Filk almost certainly based on Lee's story:
    Mirror, mirror, on the wall,
    Cannot see my face at all;
    My lips are red as the blood I crave,
    My hair as black as an empty grave.

(Some of the examples might be put back and really fit, but I'm not familiar with them.)

FastEddie MOD Since: Apr, 2004
Apr 10th 2012 at 2:05:11 PM •••

What about the 550+ wicks?

Goal: Clear, Concise and Witty
DoktorvonEurotrash Welcome, traveller, welcome to Omsk Since: Jan, 2001
Welcome, traveller, welcome to Omsk
Apr 5th 2011 at 6:29:44 AM •••

Er... why is there no Literature folder?

It does not matter who I am. What matters is, who will you become? - motto of Omsk Bird Hide / Show Replies
FreeLiveFree Since: Mar, 2011
May 3rd 2011 at 9:58:12 PM •••

The Literature seems be mixed with the film.

MoCellMan Since: Jun, 2010
Dec 8th 2010 at 6:53:13 PM •••

Putting entries that no longer seem to fit the redefined trope, but someone may know that they do:

Anime:

Edited by MoCellMan Searching for plausible mechanisms. Hide / Show Replies
Sackett Since: Jan, 2001
Dec 8th 2010 at 8:25:04 PM •••

Don't know the first one.

Lelouch probably is this. On the Anti-Hero side of things. He's not "eerie" as a personality, but his looks are, and he does fit the duality, evilish bits of the trope. I'd count him.

Japan is not this trope. His complexion and hair is used to emphasize his Japanese-ness (compared to all the other characters). It does not have any of the traits of this trope.

Edited by Sackett
MoCellMan Since: Jun, 2010
Dec 4th 2010 at 4:50:16 PM •••

Contents of previous discussion:

Happy Duck: It seems like a lot of examples are just plain brunettes, as opposed to the intended "hair black as night, skin white as snow" meaning.

76.105.6.113: Seeing as how the trope is supposed to refer specifically to those with 'raven' hair, I'm thinking that the Trope Name is pretty misleading. Brunette really just refers to people with medium dark to dark brown hair, and this particular trope refers to those with black hair. Can't the name be changed to something more indicative of the actual content?

109.184.125.254: I guess it's a linguistic dissonance. Where I live, brunet(te) is a black-haired person, brown-haired would be "chatain" (yes, we shamelessly borrowed a French word). Maybe it's similar for a troper who came up with the title.

76.105.6.113: But the word "brunette" comes from France. And in France, 'brun' means brown. No where does it mean black. And in French, 'chatain' is the name for hair that's between blonde & brown. Only medium to dark brown hair is brunette, chatain is mainly light brown (which is not considered brunette). It seems ridiculous to have the word 'brunette' encompass every single person in the world who has black or brown hair, because that would be a label for about 95% of all people.

95.37.118.113: "No where does it mean black."

Erm, I already said that it does where I live. "Where I live" is not exactly "nowhere". When one language borows words from another, they can change their meaning. And, okay, I know I can be fairly incoherent in my own language, never mind in English, but how, exactly "I guess it's a linguistic dissonance" equals "if we call black-haired people "brunet(te)s", then all the world should do so"? I have no idea what trope creator's native language is, but it's possible that it's neither English nor French, and "brunet(te)" there is any dark-haired person. So the title wouldn't be misleading in their own country, but it turned out to be misleading in English. Is that the only possible explanation? No. Can it be the possible explanation? Yes. Does it mean trope shouldn't be renamed? If title is misleading, of course it should. I'm not trying to defend the name - I'm trying to explain why it could happen.

(Sorry for the overuse of italics.)

Searching for plausible mechanisms.
MoCellMan Since: Jun, 2010
HappyDuck Give me your sooouuul Since: May, 2010
Give me your sooouuul
Jul 16th 2010 at 4:25:31 AM •••

It seems like a lot of examples are just plain brunettes, as opposed to the intended "hair black as night, skin white as snow" meaning.

http://troperville.myminicity.com http://troperville.myminicity.com/ind Hide / Show Replies
76.105.6.113 Since: Dec, 1969
Aug 26th 2010 at 1:18:49 PM •••

Seeing as how the trope is supposed to refer specifically to those with 'raven' hair, I'm thinking that the Trope Name is pretty misleading. Brunette really just refers to people with medium dark to dark brown hair, and this particular trope refers to those with black hair. Can't the name be changed to something more indicative of the actual content?

109.184.125.254 Since: Dec, 1969
Oct 6th 2010 at 8:53:39 AM •••

I guess it's a linguistic dissonance. Where I live, brunet(te) is a black-haired person, brown-haired would be "chatain" (yes, we shamelessly borrowed a French word). Maybe it's similar for a troper who came up with the title.

76.105.6.113 Since: Dec, 1969
Oct 9th 2010 at 11:16:52 PM •••

But the word "brunette" comes from France. And in France, 'brun' means brown. No where does it mean black. And in French, 'chatain' is the name for hair that's between blonde & brown. Only medium to dark brown hair is brunette, chatain is mainly light brown (which is not considered brunette). It seems ridiculous to have the word 'brunette' encompass every single person in the world who has black or brown hair, because that would be a label for about 95% of all people.

95.37.118.113 Since: Dec, 1969
Oct 30th 2010 at 4:41:21 AM •••

"No where does it mean black."

Erm, I already said that it does where I live. "Where I live" is not exactly "nowhere". When one language borows words from another, they can change their meaning. And, okay, I know I can be fairly incoherent in my own language, never mind in English, but how, exactly "I guess it's a linguistic dissonance" equals "if we call black-haired people "brunet(te)s", then all the world should do so"? I have no idea what trope creator's native language is, but it's possible that it's neither English nor French, and "brunet(te)" there is any dark-haired person. So the title wouldn't be misleading in their own country, but it turned out to be misleading in English. Is that the only possible explanation? No. Can it be the possible explanation? Yes. Does it mean trope shouldn't be renamed? If title is misleading, of course it should. I'm not trying to defend the name - I'm trying to explain why it could happen.

(Sorry for the overuse of italics.)

Top