Still seems like Ridiculously Similar Trope to me. Especially when most guys can't even tell the difference.
Edited by NNinja@Akida Umichi Not necessarily. Supergirl's outfit is a shirt and a skirt, as opposed to a one-piece dress. Though, that varies depending on the artist.
Would this be a subversion if she wears Modesty Shorts underneath?
Hide / Show RepliesShouldn't the article be "Dangerously High Hemline' since the trope doesn't refer to just skirts and the fact that some dresses and skirts aren't tight but indeed are pleated, loose-fitting, and short - like Emilie "Lili" de Rochefort's Victorian-style dress in her primary outfit?
Edited by 165.29.145.1 Hide / Show Repliesprobably, want to take it to repair shop?
That's why he wants you to have the money. Not so you can buy 14 Cadillacs but so you can help build up the wastesShouldn't we add Jun the Swan from Science Ninja Team Gatchaman, due to her Minidress of Power?
Edited by 165.29.145.1 Hide / Show RepliesFirst, is it really necessary to have an underage girl as the picture for a sexualized trope?
Second, are examples necessary for this trope at all?
Hide / Show RepliesUh, that's how this website works, they need to have examples, genius! But yeah, the underaged girl is questionable.
Edited by MrStranger616Is there a reason this is locked? I was going to add a line relating this to Panty Fighter
Hide / Show RepliesProbably because of overly sexual examples. You can post the edit here and a mod will take care of it.
That was the amazing part. Things just keep going.
Disambiguated per TRS:
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/posts.php?discussion=1647292734089897500&page=1#comment-24
Patiently awaiting the release of Paper Luigi and the Marvelous Compass.