A section has been cut per TRS
https://wgntv.com/2018/05/31/husky-goes-on-killing-spree-that-leaves-nearly-30-animals-dead-owner-facing-charges/?utm_source=dose&utm_medium=dose_6&utm_campaign=husky_killing_spree
Dogs will kill to kill. I had to remove the line that said they normally don't.
This trope is irritating and its existence encourages people to "take action" against a species that is largely dependent on humans to survive. Mind you, I also love dogs.
Ooooh, but Walt Disney hated them? Let's just remember who good ol' Walt did like.
¿Que pasó que pasó vamos 'ay?
Some of the examples are very subjective. For example in the part of the Aristocats is mentioned that the gang of ally cats are kind of/sort of mean because they are trying to eat a mouse... well what did you expected? If cats are mean for eating their natural prey then are all non-vegetarian humans mean too?
Tolkien may (or may not - "The Fat Cat on the Mat" is so conventional that it's hardly proof of anything) have liked cats, but he certainly did not understand them. His notes on Queen Beruthiel and her cats are clear evidence of that.
Can we clear up the Real Life section? It's pretty much devolved into a Cats vs Dogs war.
Linking to a past Trope Repair Shop thread that dealt with this page: Soft split
, started by neoYTPism on Apr 1st 2011 at 3:43:46 PM
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman